Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.4.261
Temple and Postauricular Dissection in Face and Neck Lift Surgery
Periauricular paresthesia may afflict patients for a significant amount of time after facelift surgery. When performing face and neck lift surgery, temple and posterior auricular flap dissection is undertaken directly over the auriculotemporal, great auricular, and lesser occipital nerve territory, leading to potential damage to the nerve. The auriculotemporal nerve remains under the thin outer superficial fascia just below the subfollicular level in the prehelical area. To prevent damage to the auriculotemporal nerve and to protect the temporal hair follicle, the dissection plane should be kept just above the thin fascia covering the auriculotemporal nerve. Around the McKinney point, the adipose tissue covering the deep fascia is apt to be elevated from the deep fascia due to its denser fascial relationship with the skin, which leaves the great auricular nerve open to exposure. In order to prevent damage to the posterior branches of the great auricular nerve, the skin flap at the posterior auricular sulcus should be elevated above the auricularis posterior muscle. Fixating the superficial muscular aponeurotic system flap deeper and higher to the tympano-parotid fascia is recommended in order to avoid compromising the lobular branch of the great auricular nerve. The lesser occipital nerve (C2, C3) travels superficially at a proximal and variable level that makes it vulnerable to compromise in the mastoid dissection. Leaving the adipose tissue at the level of the deep fascia puts the branches of the great auricular nerve and lesser occipital nerve at less risk, and has been confirmed not to compromise either tissue perfusion or hair follicles.
This article was presented at the 2017 Congress of the Korean Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery on April 2, 2017 in Seoul, Korea.
Publication History
Received: 17 April 2017
Accepted: 29 June 2017
Article published online:
20 April 2022
© 2017. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
REFERENCES
- 1 Berry M, Bannister HL, Standring MS. Nervous system. In: Gray H, Williams PL, Bannister LH. Gray’s anatomy. 38 ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1995: 1238-64
- 2 McKinney P, Katrana DJ. Prevention of injury to the great auricular nerve during rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 66: 675-9
- 3 McKinney P, Gottlieb J. The relationship of the great auricular nerve to the superficial musculoaponeurotic system. Ann Plast Surg 1985; 14: 310-4
- 4 Pantaloni M, Sullivan P. Relevance of the lesser occipital nerve in facial rejuvenation surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105: 2594-9
- 5 Sharma VS, Stephens RE, Wright BW. et al. What is the lobular branch of the great auricular nerve? Anatomical description and significance in rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139: 371e-378e
- 6 Lefkowitz T, Hazani R, Chowdhry S. et al. Anatomical landmarks to avoid injury to the great auricular nerve during rhytidectomy. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33: 19-23
- 7 Rohrich RJ, Taylor NS, Ahmad J. et al. Great auricular nerve injury, the “subauricular band” phenomenon, and the periauricular adipose compartments. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 835-43
- 8 Hu J, Ye W, Zheng J. et al. The feasibility and significance of preservation of the lobular branch of the great auricular nerve in parotidectomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 39: 684-9