Beckenendlage: äußere Wendung, Sectio oder Steißgeburt?

Veronika Ernst; Michael Krause; Wolfgang Köhler

doi:10.1055/a-0590-6374

Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, Table of Contents

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78(09): 834-838
DOI: 10.1055/a-0590-6374

GebFra Magazin

Aktuell diskutiert

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Beckenendlage: äußere Wendung, Sectio oder Steißgeburt?

Veronika Ernst

,

Michael Krause

,

Wolfgang Köhler

Abstract

Full Text

References

Literatur
1 Scheer K, Nubar J. Variation of fetal presentation with gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 125: 269
2 Hickok DE, Gordon DC, Milberg JA. et al. The Frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 851
3 Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Dalaker K. et al. Reproductive career after breech presentation: subsequent pregnancy rates, interpregnancy interval, and recurrence. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92: 345
4 Tsai FJ, Lin CC, Chang FC. et al. Breech deformation complex in neonates. J Reprod Med 2000; 45: 933-935
5 Waterfall H, Grivell RM, Dodd JM. Techniques for assisting difficult delivery at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; (01) CD004944
6 Sun W, Liu F, Liu S. et al. Comparison of outcomes between induction of labor and spontaneous labor for term breech – A systemic review and meta analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018; 222: 155-160 doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.12.031
7 Macharey G, Gissler M, Ulander VM. et al. Risk factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in planned vaginal breech labors at term: a retrospective population-based case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17: 93 doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1278-8
8 Louwen F, Daviss BA, Johnson KC. et al. Does breech delivery in an upright position instead of on the back improve outcomes and avoid cesareans?. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017; 136: 151-161 doi:10.1002/ijgo.12033
9 Beuckens A, Rijnders M, Verburgt-Doeleman GH. et al. An observational study of the success and complications of 2546 external cephalic versions in low-risk pregnant women performed by trained midwives. BJOG 2016; 123: 415-423 doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13234
10 Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R, West HM. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (04) CD000083
11 Flamm BL, Fried MW, Lonky NM. et al. External cephalic version after previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 370-372
12 Keepanasseril A, Anand K, Soundara Raghavan S. Matched cohort study of external cephalic version in women with previous cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017; 138: 79-83 doi:10.1002/ijgo.12169
13 Eisenmann P, Kästner R, Bergauer F. et al. Sanfte Wendung bei BEL. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2005; 209 - FV_6_1 doi:10.1055/s-2005-923083
14 Cluver C, Gyte GM, Sinclair M. et al. Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (02) CD000184
15 Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA. et al. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2000; 356: 1375-1383
16 Whyte H, Hannah ME, Saigal S. et al. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 864-871
17 Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah M, Lawrie TA. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (07) CD000166
18 Berhan Y, Haileamlak A. The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breechbirth: a meta-analysis including observational studies. BJOG 2016; 123: 49-57 doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13524
19 Macharey G, Väisänen-Tommiska M, Gissler M. et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at the age of 4 years according to the planned mode of delivery in term breech presentation: a nationwide, population-based record linkage study. J Perinat Med 2018; 46: 323-331 doi:10.1515/jpm-2017-0127
20 Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM. et al. PREMODA Study Group. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 1002-1011
21 Hackelöer BJ. DGGG. 2010 Online: https://www.dggg.de/fileadmin/documents/leitlinien/archiviert/federfuehrend/015051_Geburt_bei_Beckenendlage/015051_2010.pdf Stand: 20.03.2018
22 Hutton EK, Hofmeyr GJ, Dowswell T. External cephalic version for breech presentation before term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (07) CD000084
23 Impey LWM, Murphy DJ, Griffiths M. et al. on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of Breech Presentation. BJOG 2017; 124: e151-e177
24 Bergenhenegouwen L, Vlemmix F, Ensing S. et al. Preterm Breech Presentation: A Comparison of Intended Vaginal and Intended Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126: 1223-1230 doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001131
25 Muhuri PK, Macdorman MF, Menacker F. Method of delivery and neonatal mortality among very low birth weight infants in the United States. Matern Child Health J 2006; 10: 47-53
26 Niles KM, Barrett JFR, Ladhani NNN. Comparison of cesarean versus vaginal delivery of extremely preterm gestations in breech presentation: retrospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 20: 1-6 doi:10.1080/14767058.2017.1401997
27 Grabovac M, Karim JN, Isayama T. et al. What is the safest mode of birth for extremely preterm breech singleton infants who are actively resuscitated? A systematic review and meta-analyses. BJOG 2017;
28 Cibils LA, Karrison T, Brown L. Factors influencing neonatal outcomes in the very-low-birth-weight fetus (< 1500 grams) with a breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 35-42
29 Steins Bisschop CN, Vogelvang TE, May AM. et al. Mode of delivery in non-cephalic presenting twins: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 286: 237-247 doi:10.1007/s00404-012-2294-6