Endoscopy 2018; 50(09): E240-E241
DOI: 10.1055/a-0628-6136
E-Videos
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The EndoRotor, a novel tool for the endoscopic management of pancreatic necrosis

Sophia E. van der Wiel
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Jan-Werner Poley
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Marina J. A. L. Grubben
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Marco J. Bruno
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Arjun D. Koch
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Corresponding author

Sophia E. van der Wiel, MD
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam
Postbus 2040
3000 CA Rotterdam
The Netherlands   
Fax: +31-10-7030331   

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 June 2018 (online)

 

Acute pancreatitis may run a severe course when pancreatic necrosis becomes infected, with mortality rates of up to 30 % [1] [2] [3]. Endoscopic drainage and ensuing necrosectomy have been shown to be effective in the management of pancreatic necrosis [4] [5]. One of the main limitations of endoscopic necrosectomy is the lack of dedicated and effective instruments to remove the necrotic tissue.

The EndoRotor (Interscope Medical, Inc., Worcester, Massachusetts, USA) is a novel automated mechanical endoscopic resection system designed for use in the gastrointestinal tract for tissue dissection and resection with a single device; it can be used to suck, cut, and remove small pieces of tissue. The EndoRotor catheter has a fixed outer cannula with a hollow inner cannula ([Fig. 1]). A motorized, rotating cutting tool, driven by an electronically controlled console, performs tissue resection and rotates at either 1000 or 1700 revolutions per minute. The resected tissue is immediately aspirated away from the resection site, cut by the rotating inner cannula, and collected in the tissue collection trap. Both the cutting tool and the suction are controlled by the endoscopist using two separate foot pedals.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 The EndoRotor catheter.

We here present the first two patients with infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis who were endoscopically treated using the EndoRotor. Imaging of the pancreas revealed a mean necrotic collection size of 135 mm in diameter ([Fig. 2]). Both patients had previously been treated unsuccessfully with conventional tools in two and four procedures, respectively. Complete removal of the pancreatic necrosis was achieved with two additional procedures in each patient using the EndoRotor ([Video 1]). No procedure-related adverse events occurred. Both endoscopists were very satisfied about the ease of use and effective removal of necrotic tissue.

Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Pre-intervention computed tomography scans of the abdomen in: a, b patient #1; c patient #2.

Video 1 Video showing endoscopic necrosectomy of walled-off pancreatic necrosis using the EndoRotor, a novel automated mechanical endoscopic resection system.


Quality:

Initial experience with the EndoRotor in two patients suggests that this device can safely, quickly, and effectively remove pancreatic necrosis.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AR_2AI

Endoscopy E-Videos
https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos

Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online.
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos


#

Competing interests

Marco J. Bruno received consultant and lecturer fees for: Boston Scientific group, Cook Medical and 3M. He also received industry and investigator initiated grants for: Boston Scientific group, Cook Medical and 3M.
J. W. Poley received: consultancy, travel and speaker’s fees for: Boston Scientific group, Cook Medical and Pentax.

  • References

  • 1 Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2013; 13: e1-e15
  • 2 van Santvoort HC, Bakker OJ, Bollen TL. et al. A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis improves outcome. Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 1254-1263
  • 3 van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ. et al. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. NEJM 2010; 362: 1491-1502
  • 4 Bugiantella W, Rondelli F, Boni M. et al. Necrotizing pancreatitis: A review of the interventions. Int J Surg 2016; 28 (Suppl. 01) S163-S171
  • 5 Gurusamy KS, Belgaumkar AP, Haswell A. et al. Interventions for necrotising pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 4: CD011383

Corresponding author

Sophia E. van der Wiel, MD
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam
Postbus 2040
3000 CA Rotterdam
The Netherlands   
Fax: +31-10-7030331   

  • References

  • 1 Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2013; 13: e1-e15
  • 2 van Santvoort HC, Bakker OJ, Bollen TL. et al. A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis improves outcome. Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 1254-1263
  • 3 van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ. et al. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. NEJM 2010; 362: 1491-1502
  • 4 Bugiantella W, Rondelli F, Boni M. et al. Necrotizing pancreatitis: A review of the interventions. Int J Surg 2016; 28 (Suppl. 01) S163-S171
  • 5 Gurusamy KS, Belgaumkar AP, Haswell A. et al. Interventions for necrotising pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 4: CD011383

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 The EndoRotor catheter.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Pre-intervention computed tomography scans of the abdomen in: a, b patient #1; c patient #2.