Diese Arbeit widmen wir unserem langjährigen Chef, dem Ordinarius der Radiologischen
Universitätsklinik Bonn, Herrn Professor Dr. Hans Heinz Schild, der seit dem 1.2.1993
die Geschicke der Klinik in jeder Hinsicht verantwortungsvoll und weitsichtig geführt
hat und dem alle Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter in fachlicher, wissenschaftlicher
und persönlicher Weise sehr viel zu verdanken haben. Dies gilt vor allem für uns als
verantwortliche Erst- und Letztautoren. Dafür ein herzliches Dankeschön!
Introduction
Since its introduction in the early 1990 s, contrast-enhanced and particularly time-resolved
magnetic resonance angiography (4D-MRA) has made tremendous progress [1 ]
[2 ]. Advanced techniques have been tested for a broad spectrum of indications and, as
a result, have become part of routine clinical practice [3 ]
[4 ]. However, optimization of 4D-MRA not only requires ideal pulse sequence parameters,
but also dedicated contrast agent (CA) application protocols.
Physico-chemical properties including relaxivity, bolus application and concentration
of gadolinium-based CAs were shown to have an impact on thoracoabdominal 4D-MRA that
also depends on field-strength affecting both quantitative and qualitative aspects
[5 ]
[6 ]. Given its higher gadolinium concentration (1 molar), the gadolinium-based higher
r1 -relaxivity macrocyclic CA gadobutrol has been shown to allow for a more compact bolus
shape and possibly superior overall image quality compared to a standard dose of gadopentetate
dimeglumine (0.5 molar) [7 ]
[8 ].
Another important aspect is the required dose of CA for optimized 4D-MRA. Dose reduction
has taken on an increasingly important role in contrast-enhanced MR imaging in many
centers [9 ]
[10 ]. However, while several studies on 4D-MRA reported high image quality at reduced
doses of CAs, a systematic analysis of the effects of dose reduction on gadolinium
concentration and signal intensity (SI) and image quality in 4D-MRA is missing [11 ]
[12 ]
[13 ]
[14 ].
The purpose of this study therefore was to
first investigate the effects of half-dose (hGb) instead of standard-dose (sGb) gadobutrol
application on 4D-MRA SI using dCT as the quantitative reference
and then investigate these CA applications to an application of standard-dose gadopentetate
dimeglumine regarding quantitative and qualitative parameters of arterial and venous
image quality in thoracoabdominal 4D-MRA.
Materials and Methods
Animals
7 Goettingen minipigs (4 female, age 31.7 ± 6.9 months, 46.1 ± 4.0 kg body weight)
were examined on a clinical dual-source CT and on a 3 T clinical whole-body MRI scanner
(protocol A). 8 other Goettingen minipigs (7 female, age 32.1 ± 6.1 months, 33.4 ± 4.5 kg
body weight) were examined on a 3 T clinical whole-body MRI scanner (protocol B).
The animals were handled in compliance with the German animal welfare legislation
and with the approval of the state animal welfare committee. All animals were investigated
under general anesthesia induced with ketamine, 30 mg/kg body weight i. m. (Pharmacia,
Karlsruhe, Germany), azaperone, 2 mg/kg body weight i. m. (Stresnil, Janssen-Cilag,
Neuss, Germany) and atropine, 0.025 mg/kg body weight (Eifelfango Chem.-Pharm. Werke,
Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler, Germany). Anesthesia was maintained by intravenous injection
with propofol, 0.8 mg/kg (Ratiopharm, Ulm, Germany). Animals were placed in a prone
position and the electrocardiograms and oxygen saturations were monitored. For dCT
and 4D-MRA, end-expiratory breath-holds were used. CAs were administered intravenously
into an ear vein using a 20-gauge access and a power injector (Medrad Spectris Solaris,
Bayer US, Pittsburgh, PA, USA).
Weight, size, cardiac output, ECG and oxygen saturation and anesthesia-related complications
were recorded and analyzed to rule out parameters that may influence CA bolus profiles.
Experimental Setup
This study was carried out to investigate the correlation between dose differences
in vascular gadobutrol concentration and SI in 4D-MRA (protocol A) and to investigate
the influence of different doses of gadobutrol compared to that of gadopentetate dimeglumine
on image quality (protocol B) ([Fig. 1 ]).
Fig. 1 Study design including a total of 52 contrast agent applications in 15 minipigs.
Protocol A: half-dose and standard-dose gadobutrol were injected into 7 minipigs for
both dynamic CT and transverse time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA (4D-MRA) in separate
examinations (7 × 4 = 28 contrast agent injections). Protocol B: half-dose and standard-dose
gadobutrol as well as standard-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine) were injected into
8 minipigs for the acquisition of coronal dynamic 4D-MRA examinations (8 × 3 = 24
contrast agent injections).
Abb. 1 Studiendesign mit insgesamt 52 Kontrastmittel-Applikationen bei 15 Minischweinen.
Protokoll A: Je eine halbe und eine Standarddosis Gadobutrol wurden sieben Minischweinen
sowohl für eine dynamische CT als auch für eine transversale zeitlich hochaufgelöste
Kontrast-verstärkte MRA (4D-MRA) in getrennten Untersuchungen appliziert (7 × 4 = 28
Kontrastmittel-Injektionen). Protokoll B: Je eine halbe und eine Standarddosis Gadobutrol
sowie eine Standarddosis Gadopentetat Dimeglumin wurden in getrennten Untersuchungen
acht Minischweinen für die Akquisition von koronaren dynamischen 4D-MRA Untersuchungen
appliziert (8 × 3 = 24 Kontrastmittel-Injektionen).
Protocol A ([Fig. 1a ]): seven animals received dynamic CT and transverse 4D-MRA with standard-dose (0.1 mmol/kg;
sGb) and half-dose (0.05 mmol/kg; hGb) gadobutrol (Gadovist, Bayer Vital, Leverkusen,
Germany). Therefore, each of these seven animals received 4 CA injections (2 for dCT
and 2 for 4D- MRA). In this part of the study dose-related differences in vascular
gadobutrol concentration vs. SI in 4DMRA were investigated.
Protocol B ([Fig. 1b ]): eight animals (different animals than those in protocol A) received coronal thoracoabdominal
4D-MRA with sGb and hGb (1 ml/s), and standard doses of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight gadopentetate
dimeglumine (GD; Magnevist, Bayer Vital). In this protocol, each of the eight animals
received 3 CA injections (all 4D- MRA). Protocol B was undertaken to compare image
quality parameters of 4D-MRA using sGb to hGb and to GD.
All gadobutrol examinations were carried out at flow rates of 1 ml/s, whereas gadopentetate
dimeglumine injections were performed at 2 ml/s to allow for equimolar gadolinium
applications (chemical properties of the two CAs differ with respect to concentrations
and relaxivities (higher in plasma for both CAs): gadopentetate dimeglumine: linear,
ionic, 0.5 molar, relaxivity in whole blood at 37 °C and 1.5 T of r1 = 4.25 – 4.3 L mmol–1 s–1; ; gadobutrol: macrocyclic, 1.0 molar, r1 = 4.61 – 5.3 L mmol–1 s–1 ) [6 ]
[15 ]
[16 ]. In each protocol CAs were administered in a randomized order. CA administrations
were followed by 20-mL saline flushes at the same flow rates.
Protocol A
Technical parameters of dynamic CT and transverse 4D-MRA
Dynamic CT imaging was performed with a clinical dual-source 64-slice CT scanner (Definition,
Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany), acquiring four transverse slices (slice thickness,
6 mm each) in the thoracoabdominal region covering the descending aorta, portal vein
and the main hepatic arteries and veins. Technical parameters: 80 kV; 485 mAseff ; rotation time: 0.37s; reconstruction interval = 0.3s; no table feed; imaging time:
0 – 40 s post injection; reconstruction kernel: B30. Imaging was started simultaneously
with CA injection. CT attenuations were converted into gadolinium concentrations on
the basis of data from previous phantom experiments [5 ].
Transverse 4D-MRA of the same animals was performed in a randomized order with 45 min.
intervals to allow for elimination of the previous CA ([Fig. 2 ]) in regions corresponding to those of dCT experiments ([Fig. 1a ]). Transverse 4D-MRA slices were acquired to be able to fully cover the body region
that was previously visualized and quantified by dCT with a similar temporal resolution.
Fig. 2 Signal enhancement in the descending aorta in one representative minipig for a period
of 42.78 minutes after administration of gadobutrol determined by repeated acquisition
of the transverse 4D-MRA. The individual blocks of data points represent the single
measurements of the repeated 4D-MRAs. Note the recurrence of the signal intensity
almost to the baseline level (23 a. u.) at the end of the repetitive scan.
Abb. 2 Signalverstärkung in der Aorta descendens am Beispiel eines Minischweins über einen
Zeitraum von 42,78 Minuten nach Administration von Gadobutrol auf der Basis wiederholter
Akquisitionen der transversalen 4D-MRA. Die einzelnen Blöcke von Datenpunkten repräsentieren
einzelne Messungen der wiederholten 4D-MRA. Zum Endzeitpunkt der wiederholten Messungen
wird die Ausgangssignalintensität nahezu erreicht (23 a. u.).
4D-MRA was performed on a 3 T whole-body scanner (Intera, Philips Healthcare, Best/the
Netherlands) using 4D-TRAK [17 ]
[18 ]. The imaging parameters of transverse 4D-MRA were as follows: TR, 7.7 ms; TE, 1.27
ms; FA, 25°; voxel size, [1.6 × 1.6 × 6.0] mm³; 200 dynamics, 16 slices each; 0.3 s
image update time; FOV, 410 × 410mm²; keyhole percentage, 25 %; parallel imaging,
SENSE, P(ap) = 3, S(fh) = 2; acquisition time (AQ), 60 s. Imaging was started 2 s
after starting the injection of the CA.
Data analysis of dynamic CT and transverse 4D-MRA
Quantitative analysis of dCT and transverse 4D-MRA boluses included quantification
of a) peak SIs (4D-MRA) / peak gadolinium concentrations (dCT), b) peak widths (FWHM)
and c) time-to-peak intervals (TTP) (CT, DynEva, Syngo® , Siemens Healthcare; MRI, MeanCurve, Syngo® , Siemens Healthcare). FWHM was defined as the time interval of the bolus from where
SI reached at least 50 % of the peak SI until it declined back to 50 % of the peak
SI. 4D-MRA peak SIs were measured at both the first and second (recirculation) arterial
bolus passage.
Protocol B
Technical parameters of coronal thoracoabdominal 4D-MRA
In the second part of the study, 8 animals received coronal thoracoabdominal 4D-MRA
with sGb, hGb and GD. This approach was chosen in order to obtain images similar to
those in clinical human examinations in order to allow for qualitative image analysis
(protocol B, [Fig. 3 ]). As a consequence of covering large volumes with almost isotropic voxels, the temporal
resolution is somewhat lower in this approach than in protocol A. Protocol B included
three injections in a randomized order with 45 min. intervals for signal renormalization
([Fig. 1b ]). Technical parameters of coronal 4D-MRA: TR, 7.7 ms; TE, 1.27 ms; FA, 25°; voxel
size, [1.5 × 1.5 × 1.5] mm³; 53 slices, 40 dynamics; 1.3 s image update time; FOV,
410 × 410mm²; keyhole percentage, 25 %; parallel imaging, SENSE, P(ap) = 3, S(fh) = 2;
AQ, 52 s. Imaging was started 2 s after starting CA injection.
Fig. 3 Maximum-intensity projections of thoracoabdominal time-resolved contrast-enhanced
MRA (4D-MRA) in minipigs. Quantitative bolus analyses were performed in the descending
aorta (straight solid arrows in B ), the celiac trunk (curved solid arrow in B ), the portal vein (arrowheads in D ) and the inferior vena cava (hollow arrows in C ) measuring the same parameters as in transverse 4 D MRA. Qualitative analyses were
performed at the time points of maximum enhancement in the descending aorta, celiac
trunk, common hepatic and main hepatic arteries (solid arrowheads in B ), superior mesenteric artery (curved hollow arrow in B ), left and right main and first order branches of renal arteries (straight hollow
arrows in B ), segmental pulmonary arteries (arrows in A ), segmental pulmonary veins (hollow arrowheads in B ), superior and inferior vena cava (hollow arrows in C ), main and first order branches of portal vein (arrows in D ), and superior mesenteric vein (arrowheads in D ) as well as the main renal veins (solid arrowheads in C ). Note that in minipigs in contrast to humans the portal veins enhance after the
hepatic veins.
Abb. 3 Maximumintensitätsprojektionen von thorako-abdominalen zeitaufgelösten kontrastmittelverstärkten
MRA (4D-MRA) bei Minischweinen. Quantitative Bolusanalysen wurden in der Aorta descendens
(gerade durchgezogene Pfeile in B ), dem Truncus coeliacus (gekrümmter durchgezogener Pfeil in B ), der Pfortader (Pfeilspitzen in D ) und der Vena cava inferior (hohle Pfeile in C ) durchgeführt um dieselben Parameter zu messen wie in der transversalen 4D-MRA. Qualitative
Analysen wurden zu den Zeitpunkten der maximalen KM-Anreicherung in der Aorta descendens,
dem Truncus coeliacus, der Arteria hepatica und den A. hepatica- Hauptstämmen (ausgefüllte
Pfeilspitzen in B ), der Arteria mesenterica superior (gekrümmter hohler Pfeil in B ), den linken und rechten A. renalis- Haupt- und Segmentarterien erster Ordnung (gerade
hohle Pfeile in B ), den pulmonalen Segmentarterien (Pfeile in A ) und Segmentvenen (hohle Pfeilspitzen in B ), der Vena cava superior et inferior (hohle Pfeile in C ), dem Hauptstamm und Pfortaderabzweigungen (Pfeile in D ) sowie in der V. mesenterica superior (Pfeilspitzen in D ) sowie den linken und rechten V. renalis (Pfeilspitzen in C ) durchgeführt. Zu beachten ist, dass sich die Portalvenen bei Minischweinen im Gegensatz
zu Menschen erst nach den Lebervenen kontrastieren.
Data analysis of coronal thoracoabdominal 4D-MRA
Qualitative analyses of coronal 4D-MRA were performed in regions of interest located
in twelve arterial and six venous targets (rating: 0 to 2; 0: non-visible; 1: visible
but insufficient for diagnosis; 2: diagnostic) in non-subtracted data sets at time
points of visually maximum enhancement: aorta, segmental pulmonary arteries, celiac
trunk, common hepatic artery, main hepatic artery, superior mesenteric artery, left
and right main renal arteries and their first and second order branches, segmental
pulmonary veins, superior and inferior vena cava, portal vein, first order branches
of portal vein, left and right main renal veins, and superior mesenteric vein ([Fig. 3 ]). Vessel visibility was judged independently by two radiologists (4 and 5 years
of experience) blinded to the animal’s identification codes, injection rates, and
the administered CAs.
Overall image quality was rated in dynamic frontal-view whole-volume subtracted maximum
intensity projections. The criteria for overall image quality were defined as follows:
1: poor (no diagnostic information, impossible to detect or exclude vascular abnormalities);
2: moderate (large vessels well depicted, small vessels visible but level of confidence
poor for diagnostics); 3: good (diagnostic visualization of main renal and hepatic
arteries at high level of confidence and smaller arteries at a moderate level of confidence);
4: excellent (visualization of intra-parenchymal arteries and large veins at a high
level of confidence). The reviewers of 4D-MRA were allowed to switch back and forth
between dynamic phases to select the best for vessel visualization.
Statistical Analysis
All results are given as mean ± standard deviation. Significance was stated at p < 0.05.
After a Gaussian distribution was confirmed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov analysis, peak
enhancement, FWHM and TTP (dynamic CT, transversal 4D-MRA) and vascular SI (coronal
4D-MRA) were compared using t-tests for paired samples. Wilcoxon’s matched-pairs signed-rank
tests were used to compare the overall image quality ratings. Cohen’s kappa was measured
to compare the readers’ assessments of visibility of arterial and venous vessels in
coronal 4D-MRA. Excellent agreement was stated at κ > 0.8, substantial agreement
at 0.6 < κ < 0.8, moderate agreement at 0.4 < κ < 0.6 and poor agreement at κ < 0.4
[19 ].
The heart rate of the animals was compared by a one-way analysis of ranks followed
by the Tukey test for group comparison. All statistical analyses were performed with
statistical analysis software (SSIS Statistics version 22.0).
Results
All dCT and 4D-MRA examinations were successfully completed. Procedure-, anesthesia-
or drug-related complications were not observed. No significant differences in heart
rate were observed between the groups ([Table 1 ]). The weight and size of the animals were within normal ranges and ECG and oxygen
saturation were within normal rest levels during all measurements.
Table 1
Heart rate of minipigs in experimental groups (bpm).
Tab. 1 Herzfrequenz von Minischweinen in den Versuchsgruppen (bpm).
gadobutrol
gadopentetate dimeglumine
standard dose
half dose
standard dose
1 ml/s
1 ml/s
2 ml/s
dynamic CT
123.4 ± 7.2
124.3 ± 11.6
4D-MRA transverse
120.1 ± 8.0
116.7 ± 24.9
4D-MRA coronal
110.4 ± 14.2
113.4 ± 17.6
111.8 ± 17.2
Data are provided as mean ± standard deviation. CT indicates computed tomography;
4D-MRA: time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography; bpm: beats
per minute. Die Daten werden als Mittelwert ± Standardabweichung angegeben. CT steht für Computertomographie,
4D-MRA für zeitaufgelöste kontrastmittelverstärkte Magnetresonanzangiographie und
bpm für Herzschläge pro Minute.
Dynamic CT and transverse 4D-MRA
Arterial first pass bolus peak CA concentrations and corresponding 4D-MRA SIs were
compared to each other using dCT and transverse 4D-MRA and revealed marked differences
between the behavior of CA concentrations and 4D-MRA SIs when reducing the CA dose
to a half dose. dCT-derived peak gadolinium concentrations with sGb compared to those
with hGb were significantly decreased by 38.7 % ± 6.0 % (p < 0.001), whereas 4D-MRA
mean arterial peak SIs only dropped by 13.5 % ± 20.2 % at the half dose (p = 0.327)
([Table 2 ]). This discrepancy of CA concentration vs. 4D-MRA SIs on the one hand and the substantial
standard deviation of 4D-MRA SIs on the other hand ([Table 3 ]) resulted from broad plateaus or peak reversals in sGb-enhanced 4D-MRA in 5/7 animals
while well-defined peaks without plateaus and peak reversals were observed using sGb
in dCT ([Fig. 4 ], [5 ]). Neither in peaks of second arterial pass boluses of sGb nor in hGb boluses were
broad plateaus or peak reversals of peak SIs observed. As a consequence, second arterial
bolus pass peaks after sGb were almost as high as first pass peaks (sGb: 9.8 % ± 4.4 %
lower than first pass peaks, hGb: 29.9 % ± 8.5 % lower). Other bolus characteristics
of sGb compared to hGb included: dCT, time to peak interval (TTP) reduced by 10.1 % ± 3.9 %
(p = 0.001), FWHM 19.7 % ± 7.6 shorter (p < 0.001); 4D-MRA: TTP reduced by 10.7 % ± 28.4 %
(p = 0.37), FWHM by 33.0 % ± 11.3 % (p = 0.001).
Table 2
Gadolinium concentrations and transverse time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic
resonance angiography (4D-MRA) signal intensities in the descending aorta in 7 minipigs.
Tab. 2 Gadoliniumkonzentrationen und normierte Signalintensitäten der transversalen zeitaufgelöste
kontrastverstärkten Magnetresonanzangiographie- (4D-MRA) in der Aorta desscendens
von 7 Minischweinen.
gadobutrol
standard dose
half dose
0.1 mmol/kg
0.05 mmol/kg
dynamic CT (attenuation in HU)
97.0 ± 15.8
59.3 ± 14.2
dynamic CT (concentration in mmol/l)
12.2 ± 2.0
7.5 ± 1.8
4D-MRA transverse (signal intensitiy [a. u.])
34.0 ± 17.7
29.4 ± 15.8
Data are provided as mean + standard deviation. CT indicates computed tomography;
4D-MRA: time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography; HU: Hounsfield
units; a. u.: arbitrary units. Die Daten werden als Mittelwert ± Standardabweichung angegeben. CT steht für Computertomographie,
4D-MRA für zeitaufgelöste kontrastmittelverstärkte Magnetresonanzangiographie, HU
für Hounsfield-Einheiten, a. u. für willkürliche Einheiten.
Table 3
Vessel segment visibility in 8 minipigs using three different contrast agent protocols.
Tab. 3 Sichtbarkeit der Gefäßsegmente in 8 Minischweinen unter Verwendung von drei verschiedenen
Kontrastmittelprotokollen.
sGb vs. GD
hGb vs. GD
sGb vs. hGb
All vessels (n = 369)
1.46 ± 0.75 vs. 1.31 ± 0.78[1 ]
1.44 ± 0.75 vs. 1.31 ± 0.781
1.46 ± 0.75 vs. 1.44 ± 0.75[2 ]
Subanalysis of venous vessels (n = 144)
1.62 ± 0.62 vs. 1.35 ± 0.691
1.52 ± 0.67 vs. 1.35 ± 0.691
1.62 ± 0.62 vs. 1.52 ± 0.67[3 ]
Data are provided as mean ± standard deviation. hGb: indicates gadobutrol at half
dose, sGb: indicates gadobutrol at standard dose, GD: indicates Gadopentetate dimeglumine
at standard dose. Die Daten werden als Mittelwert ± Standardabweichung angegeben. hGb steht für Gadobutrol
bei Halbdosis, sGb steht für Gadobutrol bei Standarddosis, GD steht für Gadopentetat-Dimeglumin
bei Standarddosis.
1 indicates signficantly higher image quality rating at p < 0.001. steht für signifikant höhere Bildqualität-Wertungen mit einem p < 0,001.
2 indicates not signficantly different image quality ratings at p = 0.57. steht für nicht signifikant unterschiedliche Bildqualitätsbewertungen bei p = 0,57.
3 indicates signficantly higher image quality ratings at p < 0.05. steht für signifikant höhere Bildqualität-Wertungen mit einem p < 0,05.
Fig. 4 Peak properties in dCT and 4D-MRA measured in the descending aorta in seven minipigs.
A , C Gadolinium peak concentrations as determined by dynamic CT (dCT; A ) and peak signal intensity enhancement s(SI) in transverse time-resolved contrast-enhanced
MRA (4D-MRA; C ). B , D Bolus peak width (FWHM) in dynamic CT (dCT; B ) and transverse time-resolved MRA (4D-MRA; D ). Error bars represent standard deviations; P-values indicating possible significance
are given within the figure.
Abb. 4 Peak-Eigenschaften in dCT und 4D-MRA gemessen in der Aorta descendens in sieben Minischweinen.
A , C Anhand dynamischer CT (dCT; A ) bzw. maximaler Signalintensitätsverstärkung (SI) in transversal zeitaufgelösteten
kontrastverstärkten MRA (4D-MRA; C ) bestimmte Gadolinium-Spizenkonzentrationen. B , D Bolus-Peak-Breite (FWHM) im dynamischen CT (dCT; B ) und transversal zeitaufgelösten MRA (4D-MRA; D ). Fehlerbalken repräsentieren die Standardabweichungen. Die p-Werte der Signifikanztests
sind in der Abbildung angegeben.
Fig. 5 Impact of gadobutrol dose on arterial bolus profile: intra-individual comparison
of bolus curves in one representative example (gray: half-dose gadobutrol, black:
standard-dose gadobutrol) determined in the descending aorta at the level of the diaphragm
by dynamic CT (dCT) and transverse time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA (4D-MRA). Note
the marked difference of second pass bolus peaks between imaging modalities. While
in dCT opacification levels depend on gadolinium concentration and bolus parameters
such as injection time, in 4D-MRA signal intensity enhancement behaves non-linear
as it depends on magnetization effects. A broad plateau and slight peak reversal of
peak SI is observed in this case when using a standard dose of gadolinium at 3 T.
Abb. 5 Einfluss der Gadobutrol-Dosis auf das arterielle Bolusprofil: Intra-individueller
Vergleich der Boluskurven in einem repräsentativen Beispiel (grau: Halbe Dosis Gadobutrol,
schwarz: Standarddosis Gadobutrol) bestimmt in der Aorta descendens auf Höhe des Zwerchfells
anhand dynamischer CT (dCT) bzw. transversal zeitaufgelöster kontrastverstärkter MRA
(4D-MRA). Man beachte einen deutlichen Unterschied der Bolus-Spitzen während der zweiten
Kontrastmittelpassage zwischen den Bildgebungsmodalitäten. Während in der dCT die
Opazität von Gadolinium-Konzentration und Bolusparametern wie der Injektionszeit abhängen,
verhält sich die Signalintensitätsverstärkung in der 4D-MRA nicht linear, da sie von
Magnetisierungseffekten abhängt. Ein breites Plateau und eine diskrete Umkehr der
Signalintensitätsspitzen wird in diesem Fall unter Verwendung einer Standarddosis
von Gadolinium bei 3 T beobachtet.
Coronal thoracoabdominal 4D-MRA
Qualitative analysis revealed significantly better vessel segment visibility with
gadobutrol compared to that with gadopentetate dimeglumine, whereas no significant
differences concerning vessel visibility were observed between sGb and hGb in arteries.
Subanalysis of venous vessels (n = 144), however, revealed significantly higher ratings
for vessel visibility after the application of sGb ([Table 3 ]). Overall image quality was not rated significantly different with the three CA
application protocols (sGb, hGb, GD; 3.14 ± 0.59, 3.07 ± 0.40, 3.10 ± 0.52; ranges
2 to 4). The inter-rater agreement for qualitative vessel analyses (369 readings total)
by two independent and blinded readers was excellent (Cohen’s κ = 0.837).
Quantitative data analysis of high-spatial resolution coronal 4D-MRA revealed similar
maximum first-passage arterial bolus peak SIs to that of high-temporal resolution
transverse 4D-MRA for sGb, hGb and GD ([Table 4 ]). In coronal 4D-MRA broad plateaus or peak reversals of first-pass arterial bolus
peak SIs were found in 6/8 animals after sGb applications, in 3/8 animals after receiving
the GD and in no animal after hGb. Second arterial bolus pass peaks were significantly
higher when applying sGb compared to the other two CA application regimens ([Table 4 ]). Venous bolus pass peaks in the inferior vena cava and portal vein were highest
after sGb ([Table 4, ]
[Fig. 6 ]): inferior vena cava: 23.5 % higher than GD (p = 0.389) and 35 % higher than hGb
(p = 0.045); portal vein: 7.6 % higher than GD (p = 0.609) and 54.1 % higher than
hGb (p < 0.001).
Table 4
Peak signal intensity enhancement in 8 minipigs in coronal time-resolved contrast-enhanced
magnetic resonance angiography (4D-MRA) using half and standard doses of gadobutrol
and a standard dose of Gadopetetate dimeglumine.
Tab. 4 Maximale Signalintensitätsverstärkung in 8 Minischweinen in koronarer zeitaufgelöster
kontrastverstärkter Magnetresonanzangiographie (4D-MRA) unter Verwendung von Halb-
und Standarddosierungen von Gadobutrol und einer Standarddosis Gadopetetat-Dimeglumin.
gadobutrol
gadopentetate dimeglumine
standard dose
Half dose
standard dose
1 ml/s
1 ml/s
2 ml/s
aorta and branches
first bolus passage
49.2 ± 5.1
48.3 ± 8.9
46.7 ± 12.1
second bolus passage
40.1 ± 4.8[1 ]
[2 ]
28.7 ± 9.4
31.9 ± 7.4
inferior vena cava
39.5 ± 7.91
29.3 ± 6.3
32.0 ± 7.8
vena portae
32.0 ± 6.51
20.8 ± 6.0
29.7 ± 4.6
Data are provided as mean ± standard deviation. 4D-MRA: time-resolved contrast-enhanced
magnetic resonance angiography. Die Daten werden als Mittelwert ± Standardabweichung angegeben. 4D-MRA steht für zeitaufgelöste
kontrastmittelverstärkte Magnetresonanzangiographie
1 indicates signficantly higher SIs than 4D-MRA with half dose gadobutrol at p < 0.05. steht für signifikant höhere SIs als in der 4D-MRA mit halber Dosis Gadobutrol (p < 0,05).
2 indicates signficantly higher SIs than 4D-MRA with standard dose Gadopentetate dimeglumine
at p < 0.05. steht für signifikant höhere SIs als in der 4D-MRA mit Standarddosis Gadopentetat
Dimeglumin (p < 0,05).
Fig. 6 Coronal time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA (4D-MRA) signal intensities (SI) in the
vena portae (light gray) and in the vena cava inferior (black) after application of
standard doses of either gadopentetate dimeglumine or gadobutrol and after application
of a half dose of gadobutrol. All signals were measured within the same examination
with baseline normalized SI levels. Note the markedly increased SI of the vena portae
when applying the standard dose of gadobutrol.
Abb. 6 Koronare zeitaufgelöste kontrastmittelverstärkte MRA (4D-MRA) Signalintensitäten
(SI) in der Vena portae (hellgrau) und in der Vena cava inferior (schwarz) nach Applikation
von Standarddosen Gadopentetat Dimeglumin und Gadobutrol bzw. einer halben Dosis Gadobutrol.
Alle Signale wurden innerhalb derselben Untersuchung mit auf die den Ausgangswert
normalisierten Signalwerten gemessen. Zu beachten sind im Vergleich deutlich erhöhte
Signalintensitäten in der Vena portae bei Anwendung der Standarddosis Gadobutrol.
Discussion
As increasingly efficient 4D-MRA techniques become available, the evidence for their
usefulness in clinical applications is growing [4 ]. With this comes a growing need for evidence-based optimization of CA application
protocols. This inter- and intra-individual, multi-modality study shows marked differences
between absolute vascular gadolinium concentrations and 4D-MRA peak SIs and benefits
of standard-dose gadobutrol over half-dose gadobutrol and gadopentetate dimeglumine
particularly in venous phases of 4D-MRA at 3 T using an animal model and both dCT
and 4D-MRA to allow for intra-individual comparisons of absolute CA concentrations
to 4D-MRA SIs with identical CA application parameters.
Arterial phase of 4D-MRA
Arterial 4D-MRA peak SIs were shown to be similarly high with each of the three tested
injection protocols at 3 T even though higher absolute vascular gadolinium peak concentrations
were quantified by dCT when using sGb. Analysis of first-pass arterial bolus shapes
indicates that broad plateaus or peak reversals of peak SIs in 4D-MRA at 3 T may be
causing these discrepancies (broad plateaus or peak reversals of peak SIs were observed
in both high-temporal resolution 4D-MRA [in 5/7 animals after application of sGb,
none after hGb or during the second bolus pass] and in high-spatial resolution coronal
4D-MRA [in 6/8 animals after sGb, in 3/8 animals after GD and in none of the animals
after hGb]). Possible reasons include confounding factors such as different CA relaxivities
and pulse sequence parameters as well as too high Gd concentrations and resulting
T2* effects [20 ].
According to the above-mentioned quantitative results, the qualitative parameter of
arterial vessel visibility was rated high in 4D-MRA even when using half-dose gadobutrol.
Therefore, this study may explain earlier observations regarding high arterial image
quality of 4D-MRA using lower than standard CA doses [11 ]
[13 ]
[14 ].
In line with previous studies, it shows significantly higher MRA peak SIs and significantly
better vessel delineation in 4D-MRA with gadobutrol application than with gadopentetate
dimeglumine [8 ]
[21 ]
[22 ]
[23 ].
The current study further confirms earlier findings regarding arterial CA bolus shapes
and bolus arrival times at 1.5 T and shows that they similarly exist at 3 T with gadobutrol
providing more compact bolus shapes [shorter FWHM] and higher peak SIs in 4D-MRA compared
to gadopentetate dimeglumine [5 ].
Venous phase of 4D-MRA
Recently, it has been increasingly recognized that (in contrast to high-spatial resolution
static 3D-MRA) it is important to also acknowledge the venous phases of 4D-MRA in
order to provide appropriate and complete data analysis of 4D-MRA [9 ]
[10 ]
[24 ]
[25 ].
During the era of blood-pool CA (after discontinuation of gadofosveset in North America
in August 2016, the only clinically approved blood-pool CA became unavailable worldwide),
clinically important and unsuspected findings including incidental thromboses were
described in the literature thanks to the availability of venous as well as arterial
imaging [26 ].
In that context a possible benefit of venous imaging using sGb (significantly higher
venous vessel peak SIs and better venous vessel visibility in 4D-MRA at 3 T compared
to hGb and GD) may become particularly interesting [26 ]
[27 ]. Future studies that further elucidate the potential of gadobutrol for venous imaging
are therefore desirable.
Limitations
Some limitations of this study have to be acknowledged. First, an animal model may
never fully reflect human anatomy and physiology. Knowledge of differences between
humans and minipigs is required to allow for an appropriate image quality rating.
For instance, in minipigs the sequence of vessel enhancement in 4D-MRA differs from
that in humans in that the inferior vena cava enhances before the portal vein does.
However, minipig models have proven effective for testing of CAs in MR imaging administration
in settings where human experiments were not available or appropriate [5 ]
[28 ]
Second, the number of animals limits the statistical power of the obtained data. However,
taking into account the ambitious intra-individual study design including both dCT
and 4D-MRA in each animal, the number of experiments that can be realized is limited.
On the other hand, the intra-individual study design necessary to be able to directly
compare absolute gadolinium concentrations in dCT to 4D-MRA signal intensities while
avoiding differences, for instance, in co-founding factors such as inter-individual
cardiovascular status, may be considered a unique source for the optimization of future
4D-MRA CA application protocols [29 ]. Future studies on a broader variety of CAs and CA doses that analyze their impact
on peak 4D-MRA SIs and image quality are desirable but beyond the scope of this study.
Third, the time intervals of 45 min between examinations may be regarded as a limitation
of the study. However, due to the randomized application order of CAs and the return
of signal levels to almost baseline levels before 45 min ([Fig. 2 ]), residual contrast agent may not have affected 4D-MRA signal levels in a systematic
fashion and to a profound degree in this study design. Furthermore, 4D-MRA using 4D-TRAK
requires a high degree of temporal interpolation [4 ]. This may have contributed to intra-individually broader peaks in 4D-MRA compared
with those observed in dCT. The temporal fidelity of 4D-MRA is thus limited and must
be interpreted with care. However, in order to avoid sequence-related limitations
to the extent possible, all parameters except for the applied CA were kept constant
within experiments using the same modality.
Conclusion
Gadobutrol provides higher 4D-MRA peak SIs and vessel visibility than gadopentetate
dimeglumine. At 3 T maximum arterial peak SIs in 4D-MRA suffer from the presence of
broad plateaus or peak reversals that lead to arterial peak SIs in similar ranges
with standard-dose gadobutrol, half-dose gadobutrol and standard-dose gadopentetate
dimeglumine. In venous phases of 4D-MRA, these effects on peaks are no longer observed
and standard-dose gadobutrol provides significantly higher image quality than the
other contrast agent protocols.
Clinical relevance of the study
With the data of this systematically designed study on the influence of the choice
of contrast agent on image quality in time-resolved thoracoabdominal MR angiography
in an animal model, protocols for this examination may be optimized in the future.
In 4D-MRA at 3 T similar image quality and visualization of arteries are observed
with different concentrations and doses of contrast agents. The reason for this may
be the appearance of plateaus and peak signal reversals when using a standard dose
of gadobutrol.
Standard-dose gadobutrol, however, leads to significantly higher image quality of
4D-MRA in venous imaging phases compared to half-dose gadobutrol or gadopentetate
dimeglumine and should be preferred when all imaging phases of 4D-MRA are taken into
account.
Abbreviations and acronyms
4D-MRA:
time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography
CA:
contrast agent
dCT:
dynamic computed tomography
hGb:
gadobutrol at half dose
GD:
Gadopentetate Dimeglumine at standard dose
sGb:
gadobutrol at standard dose
SI:
signal intensity