Duodenal diverticula are usually asymptomatic, but complications such as cholestasis, inflammation, abscess formation, and perforation may occur, with clinically significant effects [1]
[2]. In certain cases, endoscopic intervention may be chosen over surgery [3]
[4]. However, the former is a complicated procedure requiring careful manipulation of the endoscope.
A 75-year-old man presented with a high temperature of 38.5 °C and pain in the right upper abdomen. Laboratory findings revealed notable inflammatory results, but with no elevation of liver enzymes or amylase level. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan showed a swollen juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum containing air and fluid, and an increased concentration of surrounding fatty tissue ([Fig. 1]). There was however no evidence of abscess formation or perforation. In spite of 2 days of fasting and the administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics, there was no clinical improvement, and resistance to conservative treatment was indicated in a subsequent endoscopic examination.
Fig. 1 A 56 × 40-mm juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum (blue arrowheads) containing food debris, with an increased concentration of surrounding fatty tissue.
Side-viewing endoscopy revealed a juxtapapillary diverticulum impacted with food debris. Following disimpaction of the food debris using forceps, pus was discharged from the diverticulum ([Fig. 2 a, b]). Thereafter, an endoscopic cannula was inserted on the underside of the diverticulum and plenty of water was delivered. A large amount of cylindrical food debris was released from the diverticulum around the cannula ([Fig. 2 c]; [Video 1]). The endoscopic treatment was completed without placement of a drainage tube.
Fig. 2 Endoscopic treatment of a duodenal diverticulum. a Food debris is seen impacted at the orifice of a juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum. b Disimpaction of the food debris using forceps led to a discharge of pus from the diverticulum. c Large amounts of cylindrical food debris were released from the diverticulum during water irrigation through the endoscopic cannula. d A diverticulogram revealed no residual food debris and no findings suggestive of perforation.
Video 1 Disimpaction of food debris at the orifice of the diverticulum led to the discharge of pus. Thereafter, cannulation on the underside of the diverticulum and water irrigation released cylindrical food debris.
A subsequent diverticulogram revealed no residual food debris or perforation ([Fig. 2 d]). The patient’s clinical symptoms disappeared and laboratory findings returned to normal immediately after the procedure, which allowed early resumption of oral food intake. No further clinical signs of exacerbation were observed within 3 months of discharge.
Placement of continuous drainage is considered unnecessary if the orifice is wide enough to allow the exodus of the content, unless abscess formation has been observed. In conclusion, endoscopic treatment may be a less complicated technique than surgical alternatives for treating duodenal diverticulitis, and it can be attempted before surgery in patients resistant to conservative treatment.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AD
Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online.
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos
