Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-0755-7801
Influence of Cranberry Extract on Tamm-Horsfall Protein in Human Urine and its Antiadhesive Activity Against Uropathogenic Escherichia coli
Correspondence
Publication History
received 17 August 2018
revised 26 September 2018
accepted 04 October 2018
Publication Date:
12 October 2018 (online)
Abstract
LC-MS characterized cranberry extract from the fruits of Vaccinium macrocarpon inhibited under in vitro conditions the bacterial adhesion of Escherichia coli strain 2980 uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC strains UTI89, NU14) to T24 bladder cells and adhesion of UPEC strain CFT073 to A498 kidney cells in a concentration-dependent manner. Within a biomedical study, urine samples from 16 volunteers (8 male, 8 female) consuming cranberry extract for 7 d (900 mg/d) were analyzed for potential antiadhesive activity against UPEC by ex vivo experiments. Results indicated inhibition of adhesion of UPEC strain UTI89 to human T24 bladder cells. Subgroup analysis proved significant inhibition of bacterial adhesion in case of urine samples obtained from male volunteers while female urine did not influence the bacterial attachment. Differences between antiadhesive capacity of urine samples from male/female volunteers were significant. Protein analysis of the urine samples indicated increased amounts of Tamm-Horsfall protein (THP, syn. uromodulin) in the active samples. Inhibition of bacterial adhesion by the urine samples was correlated to the respective amount of THP. As it is known that THP, a highly mannosylated glycoprotein, strongly interacts with FimH of UPEC, this will lead to a decreased interaction with uroplakin, a FimH-binding transmembrane protein of urothelial lining cells. From these data it can be concluded that the antiadhesive effect of cranberry after oral intake is not only related to the direct inhibition of bacterial adhesins by extract compounds but is additionally due to an induction of antiadhesive THP in the kidney.
#
Key words
adhesion - cranberry - Vaccinium macrocarpon - Ericaceae - Tamm-Horsfall protein - uropathogenic E. coliAbbreviations
Introduction
Extracts and juices from cranberry fruits (Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton, Ericaceae) have been investigated within a number of preclinical and clinical studies for prevention of UTI. A Cochrane meta-study concluded that cranberry products are not significantly different to standard antibiotic treatment for preventing UTI, but the evidence for a potentially significant benefit seems be too small for a clear recommendation for the prevention of UTI [1]. A strong heterogeneity of clinical data gets obvious when studying the available literature on the respective outcome from the clinical studies performed with cranberry extracts in humans. On one hand, this is due to the differently manufactured and thus chemically distinct extracts and juices used for medication. On the other side, a recent study indicated that also differences in the predominant adhesins expressed by UPEC, the major pathogens responsible for UTI, show different response toward cranberry extract. Only mannose-sensitive type 1 fimbriae bearing UPEC could be inhibited, while no interaction with P- and F1C-fimbriae dominated UPEC was observed [2].
Concerning the potential mode of action, cranberry extracts are claimed to inhibit UPEC attachment to bladder epithelial cells [3]. Additionally, inhibition of bacterial flagella expression and motility has been described [4], [5]. Also, effects of cranberry extracts on bacterial biofilm formation have been discussed with non-convincing and contradictory results [5], [6]. Tapiainen et al. [7] observed even increased biofilm formation after in vivo intake of cranberry juice for 20% of the UPEC strains.
In older literature, the inhibition of bacterial adhesion was described to be due to the presence of A-type PAC trimers, which were claimed to interact with P-receptor-coated beads with immobilized [α-D-Gal-(1 – 4)-β-D-Gal]-disaccharide [3], [8]. This theory has been rebutted recently, as also PAC-free extracts have significant antiadhesive effects within in vivo studies in humans, which are due to an interaction with type 1 fimbriae of UPEC but not with P and F1C-fimbriae dominated bacteria [2].
It remains unclear what secondary natural product from cranberry extract is responsible for this inhibition of the bacterial adhesion. During examination of the complex literature published on cranberry activity against UPEC, it seems astonishing that most of the authors claim PACs to be responsible for the antiadhesive activity. On the other hand, recent studies have shown that PACs get absorbed over the intestinal barrier only to a very limited extent and these oligomers are not bioavailable in relevant concentrations [9], [10]. Interestingly, polyphenols known to be microbial-derived metabolites of PACs from intestinal degradation–for example, phenylacetic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and catechol–have recently been identified as antiadhesive compounds against UPEC [11], and also myricetin has been pinpointed as an antiadhesive compound in human urine from volunteers after cranberry uptake [12]. From the current state of knowledge, it is assumed that PACs are not predominantly responsible for the antiadhesive effects of cranberry, while PAC metabolites, formed during the intestinal passage or cranberry-associated flavonoids, are bioavailable to a significant extent and can be found as potential antiadhesive compounds in the urine [13].
The purpose of the following investigations was to initiate an in vivo biomedical study in healthy volunteers for systematic evaluation of potential antiadhesive activity against UPEC in the urine after oral treatment with a fully characterized cranberry extract. Additionally, the influence of the urine on UPEC adhesion to bladder cells within ex vivo studies was to be studied, and the respective bioactivity was to be correlated to the respective metabolome. Surprisingly, it became obvious during the evaluation of the ex vivo assay that inhibition of the bacterial adhesion by cranberry extract seems to be strongly gender-specific. This report documents for the first time the situation that urine from cranberry-treated men significantly reduces under ex vivo condition the bacterial attachment of UPEC to bladder cells, which was not the case when urine from female volunteers had been used.
#
Results
For quality control, food-grade cranberry dry extract CDE-Q was characterized using LC-ESI-DAD-qTOF-HR-MS ([Fig. 1]). Peaks were assigned to the respective secondary compounds as displayed in Table 1, based on comparison of pseudomolecular ions and major fragmentsʼ exact m/z values with published data of V. macrocarpon constituents. CDE-Q is specified by the manufacturer as spray-dried cranberry concentrate powder standardized to 2.7% PACs. CDE-Q was investigated on potential cytotoxic effects against UPEC strain UTI89 by determination of bacterial growth in liquid culture over 24 h. Even with CDE-Q concentrations as high as 2500 µg/mL, no inhibition of bacterial growth was observed (data not shown). CDE-Q concentrations of up to 1000 µg/mL did not influence the viability of eukaryotic T24 bladder cells over 24 h incubation time as analyzed by MTT assay (data not shown).
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/plantamedica/201902/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0755-7801-ic0637pm01.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
Peak |
tR/min |
m/z (Ion) |
Ion |
Fragment m/z |
Λ max (nm) |
Area fraction |
Compound |
Reference |
Molecular formula |
Error |
mSigma |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
1.021 |
413.1093 |
M + Na |
236 |
1.2% |
not identified |
|||||
275.1130 |
base peak |
not identified |
|||||||||
2 |
1.042 |
132.1028 |
base peak |
236 |
2.8% |
not identified |
|||||
3 |
1.091 |
171.0281 |
base peak |
203, 230, 275 |
1.4% |
not identified |
|||||
4 |
1.204 |
293.1256 |
M + H |
200, 243, 274 |
1.6% |
not identified |
|||||
5 |
1.267 |
207.0538 |
[M + H] |
231, 271 |
0.8% |
not identified |
|||||
6 |
1.416 |
243.0868 |
M + Na |
212, 284 |
1.0% |
not identified |
|||||
7 |
1.526 |
166.0878 |
M + H |
120.0815 |
230, 292 |
0.6% |
phenylalanine |
mzCloud |
C9H11NO |
− 1.5 mDa |
5.7 |
8 |
1.826 |
461.2164 |
base peak |
240, 284 |
0.5% |
not identified |
|||||
9 |
1.896 |
323.1120 |
M + Na |
205.0876 |
244, 276 |
0.4% |
not identified |
||||
10 |
2.085 |
163.0606 |
M + H |
276 |
0.7% |
not identified |
C6H10O5 |
− 1.5 mDa |
5.9 |
||
11 |
2.141 |
317.1256 |
M + H |
260 |
1.1% |
glycoside of C6H12O3 |
C6H12O3 |
− 2.3 mDa |
48.3 |
||
12 |
2.754 |
595.1509 |
M + H |
303.0539 |
284, 305 sh |
0.7% |
prodelphinidin B3 |
C30H26O13 |
6.3 mDa |
12.7 |
|
13 |
2.835 |
349.0915 |
M + Na |
165.0563 |
292 |
0.5% |
coumaroyl-hexose |
[39] |
C15H18O8 |
− 2.1 mDa |
28.5 |
14 |
2.950 |
205.0984 |
M + H |
188.0721 |
280, 310 |
0.5% |
tryptophane |
mzCloud |
C11H12N2O2 |
1.3 mDa |
22.7 |
15 |
3.017 |
265.1573 |
base peak |
265.1573 |
204, 280, 368 |
0.5% |
not identified |
||||
16 |
3.111 |
354.1198 |
M + H |
192.068, 163.0474 |
204, 280, 320 |
0.5% |
3-caffeoylquinic amide |
C16H19NO8 |
1.4 mDa |
14.3 |
|
17 |
3.144 |
1153.2722 |
M + H |
577.1381 |
280 |
0.5% |
A-type procyanidin tetramer |
[38] |
C60H48O24 |
11.3 mDa |
145.3 |
18 |
3.283 |
579.1552 |
M + H |
289.0698 |
204, 280 |
0.2% |
procyanidin B2 |
[40] |
C30H26O12 |
− 9.6 mDa |
26.4 |
19 |
3.383 |
383.1332 |
M + Na |
181.0862 |
0.8% |
caffeoyl derivate |
|||||
20 |
3.686 |
343.1029 |
M + H |
181.0522 |
204, 284, 305 sh |
1.3% |
caffeoyl glucose |
[39] |
C15H18O9 |
− 0.5 mDa |
72.5 |
21 |
3.792 |
355.1047 |
M + H |
163.039 |
204, 296, 324 |
1.3% |
chlorogenic acid |
mzCloud |
C16H18O9 |
2.3 mDa |
16.9 |
22 |
3.887 |
162.0548 |
M + H |
204, 284 |
0.9% |
not identified |
|||||
23 |
3.919 |
349.0912 |
M + Na |
147.0443 |
204, 284 |
2.4% |
coumaroyl hexose |
C15H18O8 |
− 1.8 mDa |
8.2 |
|
24 |
4.011 |
419.1013 |
M + H |
287.1101 |
204, 280 |
4.1% |
kaempferol pentose |
C20H19O10 |
− 4.0 mDa |
7.7 |
|
25 |
4.125 |
463.1277 |
M + |
301.0738+ |
280, 313 sh |
1.9% |
peonidin-3-galactoside |
[41] |
C22H23O11+ |
− 4.3 mDa |
38.5 |
579.1552 |
M + H |
409.0968, 287.0583 |
B-type procyanidin dimer |
[38] |
C30H26O12 |
− 5.5 mDa |
9.5 |
||||
26 |
4.158 |
463.1281 |
M + |
301.0738+ |
282, 320 sh |
2.3% |
peonidin-3-galactoside |
C22H23O11+ |
− 4.6 mDa |
6 |
|
27 |
4.184 |
463.1281 |
M + |
301.0738 |
282, 320 sh |
4.8% |
peonidin-3-galactoside |
[35] |
C22H23O11+ |
− 4.4 mDa |
12.8 |
28 |
4.285 |
307.0818 |
M + Na |
285.0992, 163.0601, 123.0445 |
232, 280 |
24.2% |
benzoyl hexose |
C13H16O7 |
− 3.0 mDa |
4.3 |
|
29 |
4.373 |
433.1166 |
M + H |
301.0733 |
232, 280 |
8.5% |
peonidin-3-arabinoside |
C21H21O10+ |
3.6 mDa |
3.2 |
|
30 |
4.458 |
387.2015 |
M + H |
204, 280 |
2.2% |
not identified |
|||||
865.2055 |
M + H |
695.1475, 577.1469, 451.1122, 411.1116, 289.0730 |
A-type procyanidin trimer |
[38] |
C35H36O18 |
8.0 mDa |
130.4 |
||||
31 |
4.548 |
1153.2742 |
M + H |
577.1454 |
204, 280 |
0.5% |
A-type procyanidin tetramer |
[38] |
C60H48O24 |
− 13.4 mDa |
57.4 |
32 |
4.572 |
1155.2838 |
M + H |
865.2051 |
204, 280 |
0.4% |
B-type procyanidin tetramer |
[38] |
C60H50O24 |
− 7.3 mDa |
206.7 |
1153.2721 |
M + H |
A-type procyanidin tetramer |
C60H48O24 |
− 11.3 mDa |
332.2 |
||||||
33 |
4.598 |
207.1389 |
base peak |
204, 280 |
0.7% |
not identified |
|||||
34 |
4.67 |
481.1013 |
M + H |
319.0478, 153.0171 |
204, 276, 348 |
0.8% |
myricetin-hexoside |
mzCloud |
C21H20O13 |
3.7 mDa |
16.6 |
35 |
4.707 |
865.2040 |
M + H |
577.1438 |
204, 276 |
0.8% |
A-type procyanidin trimer |
[38] |
C45H36O18 |
6.5 mDa |
6.4 |
36 |
4.828 |
321.1100 |
M + H |
146.0602 |
204, 288 |
0.9% |
not identified |
||||
37 |
4.868 |
577.2060 |
M + H |
415.1518, 188.0711, 165.0557 |
204, 292 |
2.3% |
coumaroyl tryptophan derivate |
C27H32N2O12 |
3.2 mDa |
29.4 |
|
38 |
4.9 |
343.0922 |
base peak |
204, 308 |
1.2% |
not identified |
|||||
39 |
4.941 |
579.2186 |
M + H |
417.1667 |
204, 281, 305 sh |
1.3% |
coumaroyl tryptophan derivate |
C27H34N2O12 |
− 0.2 mDa |
10.1 |
|
40 |
5.014 |
465.1042 |
M + H |
303.0512, 153.0151 |
204, 280 |
1.8% |
quercetin-hexoside |
[39] |
C21H20O12 |
− 1.5 mDa |
18.6 |
41 |
5.04 |
519.1534 |
base peak |
204, 280 |
1.7% |
not identified |
|||||
42 |
5.114 |
577.1384 |
M + H |
425.0883, 287.0575 |
204, 280 |
4.3% |
B-type procyanidin dimer |
[39] |
C30H26O12 |
− 4.3 mDa |
5.3 |
43 |
5.163 |
435.0931 |
M + H |
303.0498 |
204, 280 |
2.0% |
quercetin-pentoside |
C20H18O11 |
− 0.9 mDa |
17.4 |
|
577.1378 |
M + H |
287.0578 |
A-type procyanidin dimer |
[38] |
C30H24O12 |
3.7 mDa |
23.2 |
||||
865.2026 |
M + H |
A-type procyanidin trimer |
C45H36O18 |
5.2 mDa |
51.8 |
||||||
44 |
5.21 |
435.0953 |
M + H |
303.498 |
204, 272 |
1.6% |
quercetin-pentoside |
C20H18O11 |
3.1 mDa |
85.3 |
|
449.1800 |
M + Na |
265.1424 |
not identified |
||||||||
45 |
5.332 |
347.0771 |
M + H |
331.0357, 303.0719 |
204, 225 sh, 266, 348 |
1.7% |
dimethylmyricetin (syringetin) |
mzCloud, [39] |
C17H14O8 |
− 4.4 mDa |
4 |
46 |
5.512 |
209.1150 |
base peak |
204, 225 sh, 280 |
0.3% |
not identified |
|||||
47 |
5.627 |
449.1118 |
M + H |
317.0672 |
220 sh, 266 sh, 372 |
0.7% |
methoxyquercetin-pentoside |
[42] |
C21H20O11 |
− 4.0 mDa |
31.9 |
319.0466 |
M + H |
217.0504, 153.0186 |
myricetin |
mzCloud |
C15H10O8 |
1.7 mDa |
87.9 |
||||
48 |
5.648 |
319.0469 |
M + H |
217.0504, 153.0186 |
220, 267 sh, 372 |
2.1% |
myricetin |
mzCloud |
C15H10O8 |
− 2.0 mDa |
10.5 |
49 |
5.694 |
319.0470 |
M + H |
153.0184 |
200, 228, 265, 372 |
1.1% |
myricetin |
mzCloud |
C15H10O8 |
2.1 mDa |
75.4 |
123.0442 |
M + H |
benzoic acid |
C7H6O2 |
− 0.2 mDa |
9.5 |
||||||
50 |
5.718 |
479.1190 |
M + H |
317.0462 |
200, 228, 272 |
0.4% |
isorhamnetin-pentoside |
[39] |
C22H22O12 |
− 0.6 mDa |
24.2 |
347.0775 |
M + H |
dimethylmyricetin |
[39] |
C17H14O8 |
− 1.3 mDa |
15.9 |
|||||
51 |
6.273 |
569.1326 |
M + H |
303.0521, 153.0178 |
208, 252, 368 |
2.1% |
3-O-(6″-O-benzoylglucosyl)quercetin (neobignonoside) |
[39] |
C28H24O13 |
− 3.7 mDa |
12.7 |
333.0619 |
M + H |
153.0229 |
methylmyricetin |
C16H12O8 |
1.4 mDa |
7.2 |
|||||
52 |
6.861 |
347.0765 |
M + H |
220, 272, 368 |
0.3% |
dimethylmyricetin |
C17H14O8 |
− 0.3 mDa |
12.8 |
||
53 |
6.936 |
317.0669 |
M + H |
224, 272, 368 |
0.5% |
isorhamnetin |
C16H12O7 |
1.3 mDa |
5.8 |
||
54 |
7.658 |
195.1177 |
M + H + H2O |
224, 280 |
0.2% |
not identified |
Co-incubation of T24 cells together with Escherichia coli strains 2980 or UTI89 under in vitro conditions together with CDE-Q (100 – 2500 µg/mL) and evaluation of the bacterial adhesion to the host cells by flow cytometry resulted in a concentration-dependent decrease in bacterial adhesion ([Fig. 2 A] and [B]). Similar results were obtained by monitoring the bacterial adhesion of UPEC strain CFT073 on human A498 kidney cells ([Fig. 2 C]), which was also significantly reduced in the presence of CDE-Q.
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/plantamedica/201902/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0755-7801-ic0637pm02ac.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
In addition, pre-incubation of UPEC strain NU14 with CDE-Q also resulted in significant and concentration-dependent effects (data not shown).
These in vitro findings correlate qualitatively and quantitatively with previously reported data on inhibition of bacterial adhesion to T24 bladder cells by cranberry extract [2]. The slightly higher inhibition rates of CDE-Q against E. coli UTI89 might be due to the fact that the main bacterial adhesin of UTI89 is FimH, which displays a higher mannose affinity in this strain than the FimH variant of UPEC strain CFT073 [14].
Within the scope of the 7-day treatment with cranberry extract in the context of the biomedical ex vivo study, no intolerances or drop-outs were observed. The monitoring of morning urine samples obtained from the volunteers before (day 0) and after treatment (days 2, 4, 6, 8) with CDE-Q showed no significant differences for creatinin, pH, leukocytes, erythrocytes, sodium, potassium, chloride, bilirubin, glucose, and ketones between the treated and nontreated samples.
The urine samples were tested ex vivo using 3 different E. coli strains (UTI89, NU14, and 2980) using 2 different flow-cytometry-based assay protocols: co-incubation of fluorescent-labeled bacteria, together with T24 bladder cells, and urine samples and pre-incubation of the bacteria for 48 h with the urine samples.
Both the individual urine samples from the volunteers and the pooled urine from 8 women and 8 men obtained during the different treatment intervals were tested separately in the pre- and co-incubation protocols.
As displayed in [Fig. 3], bacterial adhesion of E. coli strains UTI89 and 2980 to the host cells was reduced by the pooled urine samples over the time, with a (nonsignificant) inhibition rate of 37.7 ± 16.9% (UTI89) and 35.3 ± 12.5% (2980) at day 8 ([Fig. 3 A] and [B]). Testing of the individual urines in the co-incubation protocol for potential antiadhesive activity against UPEC revealed in total an inconsistent data set with a time-dependent tendency for inhibition of bacterial adhesion at day 8 ([Fig. 4]).
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/plantamedica/201902/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0755-7801-ic0637pm03ab.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/plantamedica/201902/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0755-7801-ic0637pm04.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
No effect of CDE-Q on bacterial invasion into the host was observed (data not shown).
Interestingly, subgroup analysis of the individual samples by differentiation into test samples obtained from male and female volunteers indicated time-dependent significant antiadhesive activity of urine samples obtained from men ([Fig. 5 A] and [B]). In contrast, urine samples from women did not show any significant influence on the bacterial adhesion ([Fig. 5 C] and [D]). [Fig. 6] displays the changes in the antiadhesive capacity of the individual urine samples obtained from men and women over the time. It is obvious from this evaluation that 7 from 8 test samples from men showed time-dependent effects on the bacterial adhesion. In contrast, incubation in female urine led even to increased bacterial adhesion with a much higher variance.
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/plantamedica/201902/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0755-7801-ic0637pm05ag.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/plantamedica/201902/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0755-7801-ic0637pm06.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
Pre-incubation of the bacteria for 48 h with the urine test samples and evaluation of the antiadhesive capacity against UPEC strain UTI89 again indicated a tendency but no significant inhibition of the bacterial adhesion ([Fig. 7 A] and [B]). Subgroup analysis did not indicate significant differences between urine samples from men and women, due to the high variance. Improved data were obtained when analyzing the pooled urine against strains UTI89 and NU14 ([Fig. 7 C] and [D]), indicating significant antiadhesive effects.
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/plantamedica/201902/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0755-7801-ic0637pm07ad.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
Intensive LC-MS analysis of the urine samples for identification of cranberry-related metabolites in combination with multivariate statistics did not lead to the identification of distinct compounds (data not shown). In vitro testing on antiadhesive activity against UPEC of a very high number of natural products related to cranberry extracts and also respective human metabolites from cranberry polyphenols did not indicate any superior inhibitory activity of individual compounds. At this point, the hypothesis was created that the antiadhesive effect observed by the urine samples could be due to an endogenous compound released from the human organism itself. As it is known that one of the most prominent proteins in human urine is THP (syn. uromodulin) [15] and THP as a part of the innate immune system can strongly modulate endogenous defense strategies, all urine samples obtained from the biomedical study were investigated by ELISA on the amount of THP. Data displayed in [Fig. 8 A] indicated that the pooled urine samples from 10 volunteers (5 women, 5 men) treated over 7 d with cranberry extract CDE-Q showed THP concentrations that increased very slightly over the time. Significance against the day 0 values was not detectable. Pooled urine from female volunteers ([Fig. 8 A]) showed nonsignificant decrease of THP titers. THP titers in urine samples obtained from male volunteers increased significantly from day 0 to day 8 ([Fig. 8 A]).
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/plantamedica/201902/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0755-7801-ic0637pm08ab.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
THP quantification in the individual urine samples of 16 volunteers ([Fig. 8 B]) indicated an increase in THP concentrations from day 0 to day 8 in the group of male volunteers within 5 out of 8 urine samples; 3 out of 8 showed decrease titers. In contrast, 6 samples out of 8 from the female urine samples showed decreased THP titers, while only 2 of 8 had increased THP concentrations.
#
Discussion
The clinical efficacy of cranberry extracts for prevention of UTI has been reviewed by a systematic Cochrane meta-analysis [1], indicating a small trend toward fewer UTIs in people taking cranberry products compared to placebo or no treatment. This was, however, not a significant finding [1]. This nonsignificance is discussed by the authors by the fact that the products used in the studies had been quite diverse concerning their composition. Juices have been used, as well as a variety of nonstandardized extracts. On the other hand, it is known from combined in vivo/ex vivo studies that antiadhesive activity of cranberry extracts depends also on the predominant adhesin types expressed by individual UPEC strains [2]. The bacterial adhesion of FimH dominated UPEC can be inhibited by cranberry extracts, while PapG-dominated strains are not susceptible [2]. Additionally, cranberry extracts are highly complex mixtures from various classes of natural products, including carbohydrates, polysaccharides, organic acids, flavonoids, oligomeric PACs, terpens, and many others. As shown in previous studies from different groups PAC metabolites [11], [16], anthocyanidins [17], flavonoids [18], and short-chain organic acids [19] might influence under in vitro conditions the bacterial adhesion. These in vitro data in most cases do not reflect the real pharmacokinetic properties of these compounds and are in part contradictory in the relevant literature ([11] vs. [16]). This uncertainty and high variability explains from our point of view why the clinical outcome until now is not as clear as it could be. Therefore, it seems essential to develop a standardized cranberry drug formulation, with known composition, standardized content, GMP-conform manufacture, documented stability, and clinical investigation according to the international GCP guidelines. Use of nonstandardized functional food or food supplement products might not be the right way toward a rationalized use of cranberry products against UTI.
Despite these problems, antiadhesive plant-derived formulations can have an increasing impact on prevention and therapy of UTI. The transfer of antiadhesive effects observed with plants extracts under in vitro conditions has been rationalized also by mouse infection models after oral application of extracts from Orthosiphon stamineus leaves [20] and Apium graveolens [21]. In both cases, significantly reduced infection rates in bladder and kidney tissues were observed, indicating that in vitro data from antiadhesive extracts and isolated compounds do correlate to in vivo reality after oral ingestion.
Within the present study, a fully characterized cranberry extract, for which antiadhesive potential under in vitro conditions against different UPEC strains has been shown, was administered to humans and the antiadhesive capacity of urine samples during the intervention was monitored by ex vivo adhesion assays against UPEC. The initial outcome of this biomedical study was comparable to results reported by previous studies [2]: the bacterial adhesion was decreased, but standard deviation was large and only limited significance was reached–similar to the observations from other studies. Interestingly, subgroup analysis clearly indicated gender-specific effects: urine samples from male volunteers had significantly higher antiadhesive capacity compared to samples obtained from women. From our point of view, this gender-specific action has not been reported for cranberry treatment until now. The reason for this can be seen in the higher concentrations of THP in the urine samples obtained from male volunteers; a significant and time-dependent increase in THP was obvious after cranberry intake. As THP is known to be part of the innate immune defense and is produced exclusively by the renal tubular cells in the Henle loop of the kidney, we assume that cranberry metabolites (which are not known until now) stimulate the expression and secretion of THP into the urine. The glycoprotein THP is characterized by conserved high-mannose moieties, which specifically binds to type 1 fimbriated UPEC. As type 1 fimbriae are known to interact with mannose residues from uroplakin on the surface of uroepithelial cells, which serves as adhesion receptor for the bacterium, THP abolishes the binding of the bacteria to uroplakins [22].
In principle, this means that the observed antiadhesive effect of cranberry extracts is not exclusively due to a direct interaction of metabolites with the bacteria but also to the stimulation of kidney cells to secrete higher amounts of THP, which prevents binding of UPEC to host cells via uroplakins.
This mechanism could also explain the situation that many studies, which have been performed to identify antiadhesive compounds from cranberry, failed more or less, as in all cases bladder cells have been used for adhesion assays. As THP is only produced in kidney cells, not in bladder cells, this indirect antiadhesive mechanism will not be observed in these in vitro assays.
For a future pinpointing of antiadhesive compounds from cranberry extract, the scientific question to be answered should be not “which compounds in the extract have antiadhesive activity against UPEC?” but “which compounds from cranberry stimulate the kidney to secrete increased amounts of THP?” In addition, the observed gender-specific effect on THP secretion caused by cranberry extract warrants further investigation. A recent study has revealed no differences in THP levels between men and women [23]. Use of primary cells of defined donors for ex vivo investigations should clarify this phenomenon. We assume that the response of the different biological subjects to cranberry metabolites in regards to THP secretion in the ascending limb of the loop of Henle might be different between men and women, but this has to be clarified in detail by follow-up studies. Additionally, it can be discussed that the degree of mannosylation of the secreted THP might be different between men and women; the higher the glycosylation, the higher should be the anti-FimH activity of the THP against UPEC.
We assess at this point the story around cranberry for UTI as follows: the multicomponent preparation cranberry extract exerts a dual activity against the adhesion of UPEC. On one side, a direct inhibition of FimH-mediated adhesion is observed, probably due to polyphenolic metabolites. Additionally, cranberry stimulates secretion of THP in the kidney, which again acts as a strong inhibitor of type 1 fimbriae adhesion. Both aspects together prevent bacterial adhesion and can act positively for prevention of UTI.
#
Materials and Methods
Materials
If not stated otherwise, solvents and reagents were obtained from VWR International; consumables were obtained from Sarstedt. All solvents and reagents were of analytical quality. Water was produced by a Millipore Simplicity 185 system (Merck).
The cranberry dry extract (NutriCran 90S_06155, batch EK036155, extract-fruit ratio: 25 : 1, PACs (HPLC) > 2.7%, supplier Naturex/Quiris Healthcare) from the fruits of V. macrocarpon is certified for the use as food product. The material was identified by HPLC analysis; voucher specimens are documented in the archives of University of Münster, Institute of Pharmaceutical Biology and Phytochemistry (IPBP-445). The extract is subsequently referred as CDE-Q.
#
Dereplication of cranberry dry extract CDE-Q (LC-MS)
For the preparation of LC-MS samples, CDE-Q was dissolved in water to a concentration of 5 mg/mL. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Dionex Ultimate 3000 RS Liquid Chromatography System over a Dionex Acclaim RSLC 120, C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 2.2 µm) with a binary gradient (A: water with 0.1% formic acid; B: acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid) at 0.4 mL/min; 0 – 9 min: linear from 5 to 100% B; 9 – 15 min: isocratic at 100% B; 15.0 – 15.1 min: linear from 100 to 5% B; 15.1 – 20 min: isocratic at 5% B. The injection volume was 2 µL. Eluted compounds were detected using a Dionex Ultimate DAD-3000 RS over a wavelength range of 200 – 400 nm and a Bruker Daltonics micrOTOF-QII time-of-flight mass spectrometer equipped with an Apollo electrospray ionization source in positive mode at 3 Hz over a mass range of m/z 50 – 1500 using the following instrument settings: nebulizer gas nitrogen, 4 bar; dry gas nitrogen, 9 L/min, 200 °C; capillary voltage − 4500 V; end plate offset − 500 V; transfer time 100 µs, prepulse storage 6 µs, collision energy 8 eV. MS/MS scans were triggered by AutoMS2 settings within a range of m/z 200 – 1500 using a collision energy of 40 eV and collision cell RF of 130 Vpp. Internal dataset calibration (HPC mode) was performed for each analysis using the mass spectrum of a 10 mM solution of sodium formate in 50% isopropanol that was infused during LC re-equilibration using a divert valve equipped with a 20 µL sample loop.
#
Manufacture of CDE-Q containing capsules for use in humans
CDE-Q, used for the biomedical study, was encapsulated (300 mg of extract per capsule) into cellulose capsules (size 1/white colored, batch-no. 10216036, WEPA) without addition of any further additives. The respective facility has been approved for manufacture of pharmaceuticals (Süd-Apotheke). The uniformity of mass of single-dose preparations was proven by a uniformity of mass test according to the requirements of European Pharmacopoeia [24]. Capsules were stored in plastic containers protected from heat and light at room temperature.
#
Biomedical study design
The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Münster (acceptance code: 2016-021-f-S, V. macrocarpon, 05.02.2016). Eight male and 8 female individuals gave written informed consent and volunteered to consume cranberry capsules over a 7-day period, with urine sampling at days 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 for ex vivo studies. Exclusion criteria included antibiotic treatment 2 wk prior to and all along the study. Before starting the trial, the volunteers were instructed to abstain from consumption of any other products containing cranberry or phytochemically or botanically similar fruits (especially from the plant family Ericaceae) 2 wk before and during the study. Each subject was asked to take 1 cranberry capsule 300 mg in the morning, afternoon, and evening regardless of food, equivalent to 900 mg CDE-Q per day for 7 d. Generally, the first midstream urine of the day was collected and used for functional and analytical investigations. A control urine sample (day 0) was collected prior to the consumption of the capsules.
The urine samples were filtered (0.22 µm pore size) and stored at − 20 °C until use. Five milliliters of each urine from 5 male and 5 female randomly chosen volunteers were pooled and named day 0 PU, day 2 PU, day 4 PU, day 6 PU, and day 8 PU. One milliliter samples of the respective urine from 8 female and from 8 male volunteers were pooled and named day 0/2/4/6/8 F PU (for women) or day 0/2/4/6/8 M PU (for men). These pooled urine samples were used for the adhesion assays as well as for quantitation of THP.
All urine samples obtained were tested on creatinin, pH, leukocytes, erythrocytes, sodium, potassium, chloride, bilirubin, glucose, and ketones. For investigating potential antiadhesive effects of the urine samples, an ex vivo antiadhesion assay was performed using 3 different E. coli strains and 2 different assay protocols: during co-incubation, fluorescent-labeled bacteria, T24 bladder cells, and urine samples were investigated; during pre-incubation, the bacteria were pre-incubated for 48 h with the respective urine samples.
The individual urine samples from the volunteers and the pooled urine samples obtained during the different treatment intervals were tested separately in the pre- and co-incubation protocols.
#
Cell culture and microbiology
T24 cells (ATCC HTB-4) represent a human epithelial bladder cell line, derived from the bladder carcinoma of an 82-year-old Swedish female [25]. These cells have been already demonstrated to be suitable for adhesion and invasion in vitro assays with UPEC [26] and were kindly provided by Prof. Straube (University of Jena, Germany). A498 cells (ATCC HTC-44) represent a human epithelial kidney cell line derived from the kidney carcinoma of a 52-year-old female [27] and were kindly provided by Dr. C. Hillgruber (Klinik für Hautkrankheiten, Münster, Germany).
#
Bacterial strains
E. coli strain 2980 (DSM 10791), provided by Prof. Straube (University of Jena), UPEC NU14 [28], a clinical cystitis isolate, UPEC UTI89 (NCBI: txid364106) [29], a clinical cystitis isolate, and UPEC CFT073 (NCBI: txid199310) [30], a clinical pyelonephritis isolate.
Bacteria from frozen stocks were cultivated for 48 h on UPEC agar supplemented with 0.2% CaCl2. CaCl2 is supposed to increase the expression of type 1 fimbria expression [31].
For urine culture, 1 CFU of overnight agar-grown bacteria was transferred to 9 mL of urine + 10% UPEC liquid medium (Tryptone 10 g, NaCl 8 g, glucose 1 g, yeast extract 1 g, water 1 L) in 50-mL tubes and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Afterward, 100 µL of the bacterial suspension (OD 640 nm = 0.1) were transferred into fresh urine with 10% liquid medium and again incubated at 37 °C.
#
Monitoring of bacterial growth in urine
One CFU of overnight agar-grown bacteria was transferred to 4.5 mL of urine + 10% UPEC liquid medium and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation and suspended in 1 mL liquid medium. Bacterial density was adjusted to an OD640 nm of 0.2 in liquid medium and transferred in 10 µL aliquots into a 96-well plate. Additionally, 90 µL of fresh urine were added to the wells. The plate was incubated at 37 °C and bacterial growth was monitored by measuring the optical density every 30 min over a 6-h period and after 24 h at λ = 640 nm. Day 0 urine served as a control.
#
Adhesion assay with urine samples by quantitative flow cytometry
In general, FITC-labeling of UPEC and flow cytometric adhesion assay was performed as described by [2], [32]. Cells (1.25 × 105 cells/well) were seeded into 6-well plates and incubated at 37 °C/5% CO2 until 90% confluence was reached (corresponding to 800 000 cells, after approximately 48 h of incubation). After this incubation period, the medium was removed and cells were washed once with PBS and once with DMEM (1 mL). All further steps with FITC-labeled E. coli (OD640 nm 0.4, corresponding to 8 × 107 CFU/mL) were carried out under direct light protection. For adhesion experiments, a bacterial cell ratio of 100 : 1 was used. UPEC and T24 cells were incubated for 1 h (strain UTI89) or for 1.5 h (strain NU14) or for 2 h (strain 2980) at 37 °C. UPEC CFT073 and A498 cells were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Subsequently, unattached UPEC were removed by gently washing the cells 3 times with 1 mL PBS/well. Cells were detached by addition of 1 mL trypsin/EDTA for 4 min at 37 °C. Trypsinization was stopped by addition of 2 mL DMEM + 10% FCS. The content of each well was transferred to tubes and centrifuged for 5 min at 450 g. The supernatant was discarded, and the cells resuspended in 700 µL of PBS. Fluorescence of the cell suspension was measured by flow cytometry. For data evaluation, 10 000 counts for each sample were used.
For quantitative in vitro flow cytometric adhesion assay with urine samples in co-incubation assay, 900 µL of urine samples were added per well, followed by addition of 100 µL of DMEM containing the labeled bacteria (OD640 nm = 4).
For quantitative in vitro flow cytometric adhesion assay with urine samples in bacterial pre-incubation assay, the adhesion assay was performed similar to the assay described above with the following changes: bacteria were grown as described above in static culture at 37 °C for 48 h (24 h + 24 h) to induce type 1 pilus expression [33]. Subsequently, the bacteria were centrifuged at 8000 g for 10 min and washed with PBS, and the suspension was adjusted to an OD640 nm of 8 in saline solution for FITC-labeling. After fluorescence-labeling, the density of bacteria was adjusted to an OD640 nm of 4 in DMEM. One hundred microliters of the bacterial suspension and 900 µL DMEM were added to the T24 cells in 6-well plates, and the culture was incubated for 1, 1.5, or 2 h (according to the bacterial strain) at 37 °C. Finally, the bacterial adhesion was quantified by flow cytometry. Urine samples from day 0 from each volunteer served as untreated control. D(+)-Mannose (puriss. pa., Fluka) served as an in vitro positive control.
#
Invasion assay with urine samples
Invasion assay was performed according to [34]. Cells (1.25 × 105 cells/well) were seeded into 6-well plates and incubated at 37 °C/5% CO2 until 90% confluence was reached (corresponding to 800 000 cells, after approximately 48 h of incubation). After this incubation, T24 cell culture medium was removed, and cells were washed once with PBS and once with DMEM. Bacteria were grown as described above in urine static culture at 37 °C for 48 h (24 h + 24 h) and afterward centrifuged at 8000 g for 10 min and washed with PBS, and the suspension was adjusted to an OD640 nm of 4/mL in DMEM. One hundred microliters of the bacterial suspension and 900 µL DMEM were added to the T24 cells in 6-well plates and the culture was incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. Bacteria that did not interact during the incubation with T24 cells were removed by washing the T24 cells with 1 mL PBS/well 3 times. Subsequently, DMEM containing 100 µg/mL of the membrane-impermeable antibiotic gentamicin was added for 1 h at 37 °C to the samples in order to eliminate selectively extracellular bacteria. The antibiotic was removed by rinsing 3 times with PBS. Finally, cells were lysed by addition of 0.1% Triton X-100, and the lysate was plated in 1 : 50 dilution onto UPEC agar and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Lysis released bacteria that have been already invasive before the addition of gentamicin and gave them the possibility to multiply on the agar plates. Anti-invasive activity was evaluated in the same dilution step for all samples by counting CFU. Bacteria grown in control urine (day 0) served as untreated control.
#
THP (uromodulin) assay
The concentrations of THP in the urines were quantified by Sandwich ELISA (Uromodulin Human ELISA Kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Urine samples were diluted 1 : 1000; 100 µL of the samples and different concentrations of THP reference standard were added. Incubation was performed for 2.5 h by gentle shaking (240/min) at room temperature. After rinsing, 100 µL biotinylated THP-antibody was added, followed by 1 h gentle shaking at room temperature. The supernatant was removed, and the wells were washed. One hundred microliters streptavidin HRP were added and the mixture was incubated for 45 min. The wells were rinsed and 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidin was added and incubated for 30 min at room temperature by gentle shaking. The reaction was stopped by addition of 0.2 M sulfuric acid and the absorption of the resulting product was determined by at λ = 450 nm and a reference wavelength of λ = 550 nm. The intensity of this signal is directly proportional to the concentration of THP present in the original specimen; concentration of THP was calculated by plotting a 4-parameter logistic curve fit for standard concentrations and then interpolation of sample absorbances.
#
Statistical analysis
Statistical results were obtained by use of GraphPad Prism statistics (version 3) (GraphPad Software). Results are expressed as the mean value (MV) ± standard deviation (SD). Data (n ≥ 3) were processed by analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA). Subsequent post hoc test was conducted using the Tuckey test to determine the statistical significance of differences between mean values of 2 with each other compared groups. The level of significance was set to p < 0.05.
#
#
#
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The study has been completely financed by intramural grants of the University of Münster, Germany. The cranberry extract has been supplied free of charge by Quiris Healthcare GmbH & Co.KG. The company did not have any influence on the study design, the experiments performed, and the evaluation of the data.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the provision of the cranberry extract by Quiris Health Care GmbH & Co KG, Germany.
-
References
- 1 Jepson RG, Williams G, Craig JC. Cranberries for preventing urinary tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (10) CD001321
- 2 Rafsanjany N, Senker J, Brandt S, Dobrindt U, Hensel A. In vivo consumption of cranberry exerts ex vivo antiadhesive activity against FimH-dominated uropathogenic Escherichia coli: a combined in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro study of an extract from Vaccinium macrocarpon . J Agric Food Chem 2015; 63: 8804-8818
- 3 Foo LY, Lu Y, Howell AB, Vorsa N. A-Type proanthocyanidin trimers from cranberry that inhibit adherence of uropathogenic P-fimbriated Escherichia coli . J Nat Prod 2000; 63: 1225-1228
- 4 Hidalgo G, Chan M, Tufenkji N. Inhibition of Escherichia coli CFT073 fliC expression and motility by cranberry materials. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011; 77: 6852-6857
- 5 Di Martino P, Agniel R, Gaillard JL, Denys P. Effects of cranberry juice on uropathogenic Escherichia coli in vitro biofilm formation. J Chemother 2005; 17: 563-565
- 6 Valentova K, Stejskal D, Bednar P, Vostalova J, Cíhalík C, Vecerova R, Koukalova D, Kolar M, Reichenbach R, Sknouril L, Ulrichova J, Simanek V. Biosafety, antioxidant status, and metabolites in urine after consumption of dried cranberry juice in healthy women: a pilot double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J Agric Food Chem 2007; 55: 3217-3224
- 7 Tapiainen T, Jauhiainen H, Jaakola L, Salo J, Sevander J, Ikäheimo I, Pirttilä AM, Hohtola A, Uhari M. Biofilm formation and virulence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli in urine after consumption of cranberry-lingonberry juice. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2012; 31: 655-662
- 8 Zafriri D, Ofek I, Adar R, Pocino M, Sharon N. Inhibitory activity of cranberry juice on adherence of type 1 and type P fimbriated Escherichia coli to eucaryotic cells. Antimicrob Agents Ch 1989; 33: 92-98
- 9 Rzeppa S, Bittner K, Döll S, Dänicke S, Humpf H. Urinary excretion and metabolism of procyanidins in pigs. Mol Nutr Food Res 2012; 56: 653-665
- 10 Zumdick S, Deters A, Hensel A. In vitro intestinal transport of oligomeric procyanidins (DP 2 to 4) across monolayers of Caco-2 cells. Fitoterapia 2012; 83: 1210-1217
- 11 de Llano DG, Esteban-Fernández A, Sánchez-Patán F, Martínlvarez PJ, Moreno-Arribas MV, Bartolomé B. Anti-adhesive activity of cranberry phenolic compounds and their microbial-derived metabolites against uropathogenic Escherichia coli in bladder epithelial cell cultures. Int J Mol Sci 2015; 16: 12119-12130
- 12 Kimble LL, Mathison BD, Kaspar KL, Khoo C, Chew BP. Development of a fluorometric microplate antiadhesion assay using uropathogenic Escherichia coli and human uroepithelial cells. J Nat Prod 2014; 77: 1102-1110
- 13 Peron G, Sut S, Pellizzaro A, Brun P, Voinovich D, Castagliuolo I, DallʼAcqua S. The antiadhesive activity of cranberry phytocomplex studied by metabolomics: intestinal PAC-A metabolites but not intact PAC-A are identified as markers in active urines against uropathogenic Escherichia coli . Fitoterapia 2017; 122: 67-75
- 14 Schwartz DJ, Kalas V, Pinkner JS, Chen SL, Spaulding CN, Dodson KW, Hultgren SJ. Positively selected FimH residues enhance virulence during urinary tract infection by altering FimH conformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110: 15530-15537
- 15 Serafini-Cessi F, Malagolini N, Cavallone D. Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein: biology and clinical relevance. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 42: 658-676
- 16 Walsh JM, Ren X, Zampariello C, Polasky DA, McKay DL, Blumberg JB, Chen CO. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry quantification of urinary proanthocyanin A2 dimer and its potential use as a biomarker of cranberry intake. J Sep Sci 2016; 39: 342-349
- 17 Ohnishi R, Ito H, Kasajima N, Kaneda M, Kariyama R, Kumon H, Hatano T, Yoshida T. Urinary excretion of anthocyanins in humans after cranberry juice ingestion. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2006; 70: 1681-1687
- 18 McKay DL, Chen CO, Zampariello CA, Blumberg JB. Flavonoids and phenolic acids from cranberry juice are bioavailable and bioactive in healthy older adults. Food Chem 2015; 168: 233-240
- 19 Jensen HD, Struve C, Christensen SB, Krogfelt KA. Cranberry juice and combinations of its organic acids are effective against experimental urinary tract infection. Front Microbiol 2017; 8: 542
- 20 Sarshar S, Brandt S, Asadi Karam MR, Habibi M, Bouzari S, Lechtenberg M, Dobrindt U, Qin X, Goycoolea FM, Hensel A. Aqueous extract from Orthosiphon stamineus leaves prevents bladder and kidney infection in mice. Phytomedicine 2017; 28: 1-9
- 21 Sarshar S, Sendker J, Qin X, Goycoolea FM, Asadi Karam MR, Habibi M, Bouzari S, Dobrindt U, Hensel A. Antiadhesive hydroalcoholic extract from Apium graveolens fruits prevents bladder and kidney infection against uropathogenic E. coli . Fitoterapia 2018; 127: 237-244
- 22 Pak J, Pu Y, Zhang ZT, Hasty DL, Wu XR. Tamm-Horsfall protein binds to type 1 fimbriated Escherichia coli and prevents E. coli from binding to uroplakin Ia and Ib receptors. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 9924-9930
- 23 Pruijm M, Ponte B, Ackermann D, Paccaud F, Guessous I, Ehret G, Pechère-Bertschi A, Vogt B, Mohaupt MG, Martin P, Youhanna SC, Nägele N, Vollenweider P, Waeber G, Burnier M, Devuyst O, Bochud M. Associations of urinary uromodulin with clinical characteristics and markers of tubular function in the general population. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 11: 70-80
- 24 European Pharmacopoeia 7.0/1220. General Methodology, Prüfung auf Gleichförmigkeit der Masse einzeldosierter Arzneiformen. Chapter 2.9.5. Eschborn, Germany: Govi-Verlag; 2011
- 25 Bubeník J, Baresová M, Viklický V, Jakoubková J, Sainerová H, Donner J. Established cell line of urinary bladder carcinoma (T24) containing tumour-specific antigen. Int J Cancer 1973; 11: 765-773
- 26 Miyazaki J, Ba-Thein W, Kumao T, Obata Yasuoka M, Akaza H, Hayshi H. Type 1, P and S fimbriae, and afimbrial adhesin I are not essential for uropathogenic Escherichia coli to adhere to and invade bladder epithelial cells. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2002; 33: 23-26
- 27 Giard DJ, Aaronson SA, Todaro GJ, Arnstein P, Kersey JH, Dosik H, Parks WP. In vitro cultivation of human tumors: establishment of cell lines derived from a series of solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 1973; 51: 1417-1423
- 28 Hultgren SJ, Schwan WR, Schaeffer AJ, Duncan JL. Regulation of production of type 1 pili among urinary tract isolates of Escherichia coli . Infect Immun 1986; 54: 613-620
- 29 Chen SL, Hung C, Xu J, Reigstad CS, Magrini V, Sabo A, Blasiar D, Bieri T, Meyer RR, Ozersky P, Armstrong JR, Fulton RS, Latreille JP, Spieth J, Hooton TM, Mardis ER, Hultgren SJ, Gordon JI. Identification of genes subject to positive selection in uropathogenic strains of Escherichia coli: a comparative genomics approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 5977-5982
- 30 Welch RA, Burland V, Plunkett G, Redford P, Roesch P, Rasko D, Buckles EL, Liou S, Boutin A, Hackett J, Stroud D, Mayhew GF, Rose DJ, Zhou S, Schwartz DC, Perna NT, Mobley HLT, Donnenberg MS, Blattner FR. Extensive mosaic structure revealed by the complete genome sequence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99: 17020-17024
- 31 Connell I, Agace W, Klemm P, Schembri M, Mărild S, Svanborg C. Type 1 fimbrial expression enhances Escherichia coli virulence for the urinary tract. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93: 9827-9832
- 32 Rafsanjany N, Lechtenberg M, Petereit F, Hensel A. Antiadhesion as a functional concept for protection against uropathogenic Escherichia coli: in vitro studies with traditionally used plants with antiadhesive activity against uropathognic Escherichia coli . J Ethnopharmacol 2013; 145: 591-597
- 33 Langermann S, Palaszynski S, Barnhart M, Auguste G, Pinkner JS, Burlein J, Barren P, Koenig S, Leath S, Jones CH, Hultgren SJ. Prevention of mucosal Escherichia coli infection by FimH-adhesin-based systemic vaccination. Science 1997; 276: 607-611
- 34 Elsinghorst EA. Measurement of invasion by gentamicin resistance. Meth Enzymol 1994; 236: 405-420
- 35 Prior RL, Lazarus SA, Cao G, Muccitelli H, Hammerstone JF. Identification of procyanidins and anthocyanins in blueberries and cranberries (Vaccinium spp.) using high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem 2001; 49: 1270-1276
- 36 Vvedenskaya IO, Rosen RT, Guido JE, Russell DJ, Mills KA, Vorsa N. Characterization of flavonols in cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) powder. J Agric Food Chem 2004; 52: 188-195
- 37 Turner A, Chen S, Nikolic D, van Breemen R, Farnsworth NR, Pauli GF. Coumaroyl iridoids and a depside from cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon). J Nat Prod 2007; 70: 253-258
- 38 Lin L, Harnly JM. A screening method for the identification of glycosylated flavonoids and other phenolic compounds using a standard analytical approach for all plant materials. J Agric Food Chem 2007; 55: 1084-1096
- 39 Iswaldi I, Gómez-Caravaca AM, Arráez-Román D, Uberos J, Lardón M, Segura-Carretero A, Fernández-Gutiérrez A. Characterization by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry of the phenolic fraction in a cranberry syrup used to prevent urinary tract diseases, together with a study of its antibacterial activity. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2012; 58: 34-41
- 40 Xiao Y, Hu Z, Yin Z, Zhou Y, Liu T, Zhou X, Chang D. Profiling and distribution of metabolites of procyanidin B2 in mice by UPLC-DAD-ESI-IT-TOF-MSn technique. Front Pharmacol 2017; 8: 231
- 41 Stein-Chisholm R, Beaulieu J, Grimm C, Lloyd S. LC-MS/MS and UPLC-UV evaluation of anthocyanins and anthocyanidins during rabbiteye blueberry juice processing. Beverages 2017; 3: 56
- 42 Vvedenskaya IO, Vorsa N. Flavonoid composition over fruit development and maturation in american cranberry, Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait. Plant Sci 2004; 167: 1043-1054
Correspondence
-
References
- 1 Jepson RG, Williams G, Craig JC. Cranberries for preventing urinary tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (10) CD001321
- 2 Rafsanjany N, Senker J, Brandt S, Dobrindt U, Hensel A. In vivo consumption of cranberry exerts ex vivo antiadhesive activity against FimH-dominated uropathogenic Escherichia coli: a combined in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro study of an extract from Vaccinium macrocarpon . J Agric Food Chem 2015; 63: 8804-8818
- 3 Foo LY, Lu Y, Howell AB, Vorsa N. A-Type proanthocyanidin trimers from cranberry that inhibit adherence of uropathogenic P-fimbriated Escherichia coli . J Nat Prod 2000; 63: 1225-1228
- 4 Hidalgo G, Chan M, Tufenkji N. Inhibition of Escherichia coli CFT073 fliC expression and motility by cranberry materials. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011; 77: 6852-6857
- 5 Di Martino P, Agniel R, Gaillard JL, Denys P. Effects of cranberry juice on uropathogenic Escherichia coli in vitro biofilm formation. J Chemother 2005; 17: 563-565
- 6 Valentova K, Stejskal D, Bednar P, Vostalova J, Cíhalík C, Vecerova R, Koukalova D, Kolar M, Reichenbach R, Sknouril L, Ulrichova J, Simanek V. Biosafety, antioxidant status, and metabolites in urine after consumption of dried cranberry juice in healthy women: a pilot double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J Agric Food Chem 2007; 55: 3217-3224
- 7 Tapiainen T, Jauhiainen H, Jaakola L, Salo J, Sevander J, Ikäheimo I, Pirttilä AM, Hohtola A, Uhari M. Biofilm formation and virulence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli in urine after consumption of cranberry-lingonberry juice. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2012; 31: 655-662
- 8 Zafriri D, Ofek I, Adar R, Pocino M, Sharon N. Inhibitory activity of cranberry juice on adherence of type 1 and type P fimbriated Escherichia coli to eucaryotic cells. Antimicrob Agents Ch 1989; 33: 92-98
- 9 Rzeppa S, Bittner K, Döll S, Dänicke S, Humpf H. Urinary excretion and metabolism of procyanidins in pigs. Mol Nutr Food Res 2012; 56: 653-665
- 10 Zumdick S, Deters A, Hensel A. In vitro intestinal transport of oligomeric procyanidins (DP 2 to 4) across monolayers of Caco-2 cells. Fitoterapia 2012; 83: 1210-1217
- 11 de Llano DG, Esteban-Fernández A, Sánchez-Patán F, Martínlvarez PJ, Moreno-Arribas MV, Bartolomé B. Anti-adhesive activity of cranberry phenolic compounds and their microbial-derived metabolites against uropathogenic Escherichia coli in bladder epithelial cell cultures. Int J Mol Sci 2015; 16: 12119-12130
- 12 Kimble LL, Mathison BD, Kaspar KL, Khoo C, Chew BP. Development of a fluorometric microplate antiadhesion assay using uropathogenic Escherichia coli and human uroepithelial cells. J Nat Prod 2014; 77: 1102-1110
- 13 Peron G, Sut S, Pellizzaro A, Brun P, Voinovich D, Castagliuolo I, DallʼAcqua S. The antiadhesive activity of cranberry phytocomplex studied by metabolomics: intestinal PAC-A metabolites but not intact PAC-A are identified as markers in active urines against uropathogenic Escherichia coli . Fitoterapia 2017; 122: 67-75
- 14 Schwartz DJ, Kalas V, Pinkner JS, Chen SL, Spaulding CN, Dodson KW, Hultgren SJ. Positively selected FimH residues enhance virulence during urinary tract infection by altering FimH conformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110: 15530-15537
- 15 Serafini-Cessi F, Malagolini N, Cavallone D. Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein: biology and clinical relevance. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 42: 658-676
- 16 Walsh JM, Ren X, Zampariello C, Polasky DA, McKay DL, Blumberg JB, Chen CO. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry quantification of urinary proanthocyanin A2 dimer and its potential use as a biomarker of cranberry intake. J Sep Sci 2016; 39: 342-349
- 17 Ohnishi R, Ito H, Kasajima N, Kaneda M, Kariyama R, Kumon H, Hatano T, Yoshida T. Urinary excretion of anthocyanins in humans after cranberry juice ingestion. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2006; 70: 1681-1687
- 18 McKay DL, Chen CO, Zampariello CA, Blumberg JB. Flavonoids and phenolic acids from cranberry juice are bioavailable and bioactive in healthy older adults. Food Chem 2015; 168: 233-240
- 19 Jensen HD, Struve C, Christensen SB, Krogfelt KA. Cranberry juice and combinations of its organic acids are effective against experimental urinary tract infection. Front Microbiol 2017; 8: 542
- 20 Sarshar S, Brandt S, Asadi Karam MR, Habibi M, Bouzari S, Lechtenberg M, Dobrindt U, Qin X, Goycoolea FM, Hensel A. Aqueous extract from Orthosiphon stamineus leaves prevents bladder and kidney infection in mice. Phytomedicine 2017; 28: 1-9
- 21 Sarshar S, Sendker J, Qin X, Goycoolea FM, Asadi Karam MR, Habibi M, Bouzari S, Dobrindt U, Hensel A. Antiadhesive hydroalcoholic extract from Apium graveolens fruits prevents bladder and kidney infection against uropathogenic E. coli . Fitoterapia 2018; 127: 237-244
- 22 Pak J, Pu Y, Zhang ZT, Hasty DL, Wu XR. Tamm-Horsfall protein binds to type 1 fimbriated Escherichia coli and prevents E. coli from binding to uroplakin Ia and Ib receptors. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 9924-9930
- 23 Pruijm M, Ponte B, Ackermann D, Paccaud F, Guessous I, Ehret G, Pechère-Bertschi A, Vogt B, Mohaupt MG, Martin P, Youhanna SC, Nägele N, Vollenweider P, Waeber G, Burnier M, Devuyst O, Bochud M. Associations of urinary uromodulin with clinical characteristics and markers of tubular function in the general population. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 11: 70-80
- 24 European Pharmacopoeia 7.0/1220. General Methodology, Prüfung auf Gleichförmigkeit der Masse einzeldosierter Arzneiformen. Chapter 2.9.5. Eschborn, Germany: Govi-Verlag; 2011
- 25 Bubeník J, Baresová M, Viklický V, Jakoubková J, Sainerová H, Donner J. Established cell line of urinary bladder carcinoma (T24) containing tumour-specific antigen. Int J Cancer 1973; 11: 765-773
- 26 Miyazaki J, Ba-Thein W, Kumao T, Obata Yasuoka M, Akaza H, Hayshi H. Type 1, P and S fimbriae, and afimbrial adhesin I are not essential for uropathogenic Escherichia coli to adhere to and invade bladder epithelial cells. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2002; 33: 23-26
- 27 Giard DJ, Aaronson SA, Todaro GJ, Arnstein P, Kersey JH, Dosik H, Parks WP. In vitro cultivation of human tumors: establishment of cell lines derived from a series of solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 1973; 51: 1417-1423
- 28 Hultgren SJ, Schwan WR, Schaeffer AJ, Duncan JL. Regulation of production of type 1 pili among urinary tract isolates of Escherichia coli . Infect Immun 1986; 54: 613-620
- 29 Chen SL, Hung C, Xu J, Reigstad CS, Magrini V, Sabo A, Blasiar D, Bieri T, Meyer RR, Ozersky P, Armstrong JR, Fulton RS, Latreille JP, Spieth J, Hooton TM, Mardis ER, Hultgren SJ, Gordon JI. Identification of genes subject to positive selection in uropathogenic strains of Escherichia coli: a comparative genomics approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 5977-5982
- 30 Welch RA, Burland V, Plunkett G, Redford P, Roesch P, Rasko D, Buckles EL, Liou S, Boutin A, Hackett J, Stroud D, Mayhew GF, Rose DJ, Zhou S, Schwartz DC, Perna NT, Mobley HLT, Donnenberg MS, Blattner FR. Extensive mosaic structure revealed by the complete genome sequence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99: 17020-17024
- 31 Connell I, Agace W, Klemm P, Schembri M, Mărild S, Svanborg C. Type 1 fimbrial expression enhances Escherichia coli virulence for the urinary tract. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93: 9827-9832
- 32 Rafsanjany N, Lechtenberg M, Petereit F, Hensel A. Antiadhesion as a functional concept for protection against uropathogenic Escherichia coli: in vitro studies with traditionally used plants with antiadhesive activity against uropathognic Escherichia coli . J Ethnopharmacol 2013; 145: 591-597
- 33 Langermann S, Palaszynski S, Barnhart M, Auguste G, Pinkner JS, Burlein J, Barren P, Koenig S, Leath S, Jones CH, Hultgren SJ. Prevention of mucosal Escherichia coli infection by FimH-adhesin-based systemic vaccination. Science 1997; 276: 607-611
- 34 Elsinghorst EA. Measurement of invasion by gentamicin resistance. Meth Enzymol 1994; 236: 405-420
- 35 Prior RL, Lazarus SA, Cao G, Muccitelli H, Hammerstone JF. Identification of procyanidins and anthocyanins in blueberries and cranberries (Vaccinium spp.) using high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem 2001; 49: 1270-1276
- 36 Vvedenskaya IO, Rosen RT, Guido JE, Russell DJ, Mills KA, Vorsa N. Characterization of flavonols in cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) powder. J Agric Food Chem 2004; 52: 188-195
- 37 Turner A, Chen S, Nikolic D, van Breemen R, Farnsworth NR, Pauli GF. Coumaroyl iridoids and a depside from cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon). J Nat Prod 2007; 70: 253-258
- 38 Lin L, Harnly JM. A screening method for the identification of glycosylated flavonoids and other phenolic compounds using a standard analytical approach for all plant materials. J Agric Food Chem 2007; 55: 1084-1096
- 39 Iswaldi I, Gómez-Caravaca AM, Arráez-Román D, Uberos J, Lardón M, Segura-Carretero A, Fernández-Gutiérrez A. Characterization by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry of the phenolic fraction in a cranberry syrup used to prevent urinary tract diseases, together with a study of its antibacterial activity. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2012; 58: 34-41
- 40 Xiao Y, Hu Z, Yin Z, Zhou Y, Liu T, Zhou X, Chang D. Profiling and distribution of metabolites of procyanidin B2 in mice by UPLC-DAD-ESI-IT-TOF-MSn technique. Front Pharmacol 2017; 8: 231
- 41 Stein-Chisholm R, Beaulieu J, Grimm C, Lloyd S. LC-MS/MS and UPLC-UV evaluation of anthocyanins and anthocyanidins during rabbiteye blueberry juice processing. Beverages 2017; 3: 56
- 42 Vvedenskaya IO, Vorsa N. Flavonoid composition over fruit development and maturation in american cranberry, Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait. Plant Sci 2004; 167: 1043-1054
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/plantamedica/201902/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0755-7801-ic0637pm01.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/plantamedica/201902/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0755-7801-ic0637pm02ac.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/plantamedica/201902/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0755-7801-ic0637pm03ab.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/plantamedica/201902/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0755-7801-ic0637pm04.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/plantamedica/201902/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0755-7801-ic0637pm05ag.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/plantamedica/201902/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0755-7801-ic0637pm06.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/plantamedica/201902/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0755-7801-ic0637pm07ad.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/plantamedica/201902/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0755-7801-ic0637pm08ab.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)