Key words
peripartum cardiomyopathy - PPCM - pregnancy - congenital heart defects
Introduction
Cardiomyopathies are defined, according to a position paper of the European Society
of Cardiology, as myocardial diseases characterised by structural or functional restrictions
of the myocardium in the absence of coronary heart disease, hypertension, valvular
disease or congenital cardiac disease that could explain the dysfunction [1]. Based on their specific morphological and functional phenotypes, the cardiomyopathies
are divided into hypertrophic, dilated, arrhythmogenic and restrictive forms, which
are readily identifiable in clinical practice by diagnostic echocardiography. Every
form or entity can be due to a familial form because of a potentially identifiable
and often monogenetic change, or can have other non-familial and non-genetic causes.
Dilated cardiomyopathy is characterised by dilation of the left ventricle with concomitant
impairment of function, and a familial form, usually due to autosomal dominant mutations
in genes of proteins of the cytoskeleton, the sarcomere, the nuclear membrane or the
intercalated discs, can be found in approximately 25% of all patients. Non-familial
forms can be caused by malnutrition or by infectious, autoimmune or toxic causes (alcohol
and chemotherapeutic agents).
In 2008, pregnancy or peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) was classified by Elliot et
al. as a separate idiopathic, non-familial and non-genetic cardiomyopathy. It is therefore
a cardiomyopathy that is characterised by left ventricular systolic dysfunction (< 45%),
which occurs at the end of pregnancy or in the months following delivery [2], [3]. Left ventricular dilation can but does not have to be detectable at the same time,
but other causes of cardiac dysfunction must be excluded and there must be a temporal
association with pregnancy. Diagnosis of peripartum cardiomyopathy is therefore a
diagnosis of exclusion.
Due to advances in the treatment of congenital heart defects, a large number of women
reach child-bearing age even with complex congenital heart defects. Congenital heart
disease now represents the largest number of pregnant women with structural heart
disease accounting for over 60 – 80% [4]. Congenital heart diseases are a non-homogeneous group that includes simple defects
with a low pregnancy-associated risk and complex lesions with a significant complication
rate [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. The foetal complications include an increased abortion rate, prematurity and smallness
for gestational age, as well as an increased risk of cardiac malformations. Depending
on the underlying disease, the cardiac malformation risk is between 2.5 and up to
50%.
The maternal risk comprises mainly arrhythmias, progressive heart failure and thrombembolic
complications, with the risk of vessel dissection in the case of aortopathies. Cohort
studies report a low mortality risk of < 1% [9]. However, only a small percentage of high-risk patients were included so the risks
of pregnancy and delivery may be underestimated particularly in these patients.
Peripartum Cardiomyopathy (PPCM)
Peripartum Cardiomyopathy (PPCM)
Pregnancy-associated diseases of the cardiovascular system affect up to 10% of all
pregnancies and the incidence is increasing. The increasing obesity in the population,
greater maternal age and increased multiple pregnancies appear to be promoting this
trend. Besides bleeding complications, cardiomyopathies in pregnancy and in the peripartum
period are today still among the most frequent causes of peripartum morbidity and
mortality. Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM), heart failure that can occur both acutely
and gradually shortly before or after delivery, represents a high risk for sustained
damage to the young motherʼs health, and may cause death [2], [12], [13].
Incidence
The incidence of PPCM is estimated globally at approximately 1 : 1000 pregnancies.
There are no reliable figures in Germany but estimates assume a prevalence of 1 : 1500 – 2000
births [12]. PPCM is defined through a diagnosis of exclusion; in the position paper of the
European Society of Cardiology from this year, which can be accessed at www.escardio.org
[2], the definition states: “PPCM is an idiopathic cardiomyopathy that occurs in the
last month of pregnancy or in the months following delivery or termination of pregnancy
in women with previously healthy hearts”. The only diagnostic criterion is the left
ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured by echocardiography or MRI, which should
be ≤ 45% [2]. Congenital or previously diagnosed heart disease such as chemotherapy-induced myocarditis,
genetically caused cardiomyopathies or known dilated cardiomyopathies exclude PPCM.
Risk factors
To date, the aetiology of PPCM is largely unknown. However, a series of risk factors
has been identified in the last few years. These include, for example, pregnancy-associated
hypertensive diseases (pre-eclampsia, HELLP syndrome), which were found in nearly
50% of PPCM patients in Germany. Multiple pregnancy, multiparity and pregnancy at
a later age, tocolysis and African and Afro-American origin also appear to be associated
with an increased PPCM risk [12], [13], [14].
Diagnosis
Early diagnosis is essential for a good chance of cure. The diagnosis of PPCM is made
more difficult by the fact that symptoms are often not clear and are sometimes difficult
to distinguish from normal pregnancy symptoms such as oedema, shortness of breath
and lethargy [2], [15]. The ECG is often normal also. Nonspecific chest symptoms, palpitations, nocturia
and nausea or pulmonary oedema with orthopnoea and tachypnoea as part of cardiogenic
shock, as well as restlessness and agitation are likewise possible. A delay in diagnosis
and hence in the start of treatment contributes significantly to long-term morbidity
and mortality. Moreover, spontaneous recovery is common in milder disease but the
risk of recurrence with a severe disease course in a further pregnancy is markedly
increased [12], [16], [17]. When making the diagnosis, it is important to measure biomarkers of cardiac damage/heart
failure. Besides the recommended transthoracic echocardiography, laboratory measurement
of natriuretic peptide (BNP or NT-proBNP) as soon as (pregnancy-associated) heart
failure is suspected has proved to be a useful guide and should be measured early
in a suspected case [18]. Measurement of troponin T (or troponin I) as well as determination of inflammatory
markers (CRP, PCT, leucocyte count) helps to distinguish it from, for instance, myocarditis.
Cardiac MRI should be performed in addition to follow-up echocardiography for differential
diagnosis. A 12-channel ECG is also recommended for prompt detection of possible changes
and an increased risk for ventricular arrhythmias.
Pathogenesis
The pathogenesis of PPCM is incompletely understood. It has been argued that it might
be a vascular disease triggered by the hormonal milieu and oxidative stress in late
pregnancy or the early post-delivery period. However, it remains unclear why only
a small number of pregnant women develop any symptoms of PPCM at all. Based on the
aetiology of dilated cardiomyopathy, inflammatory or genetic factors have also been
postulated in the pathogenesis of PPCM, but analysis of cardiac muscle biopsies has
yielded few indicative results. Only one genetic study in a study population of 172
patients with PPCM of mutations in proteins that are associated with dilated cardiomyopathy
suggests a genetic predisposition in 15% of the patients, the majority of which involve
changes in a structural protein named titin [15]. It can be assumed with certainty, however, that other exogenous and/or genetic
factors are involved in the development of PPCM since patients with PPCM and changes
in the titin gene develop the disease at an earlier time than patients with dilated
cardiomyopathy and demonstrate normal left ventricular function again much more often
subsequently. However, left ventricular function recovers in patients with PPCM in
most cases, while mortality of 5 – 10% is described [16]. Infectious diseases, viral myocarditides, autoimmune phenomena or major blood loss
at delivery are suggested as other possible causes [12], [13], [14].
Experimental studies showed that increased peripartum oxidative stress leads to cleavage
of the lactation hormone prolactin into an N-terminal 16 kDa prolactin fragment (also
called vasoinhibin), which then causes primary endogenous damage to the vascular system
through vasotoxic, proinflammatory and proapoptotic effects [19]. The efficacy of bromocriptine, a blocker of prolactin secretion, was successfully
tested as treatment in a mouse model of PPCM [19]. Since bromocriptine has long been used clinically as a drug to halt lactation,
several attempts at treatment and a pilot study in South African patients followed,
all of which showed very promising results [3]. A randomised multicentre dose-finding study initiated by us was sponsored by the
BMBF and published last year [20]. This showed that, alongside basic heart failure treatment (beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors),
a week of bromocriptine in a dosage of at least 2.5 mg p. o. and thrombosis prophylaxis
sufficed to cure the majority of the patients and drastically reduce the high morbidity
and mortality. This treatment concept was adopted in the current guidelines as the
BOARD treatment regimen (Bromocriptine, Oral heart failure therapies, Anticoagulation, vasoRelaxing agents, and Diuretics) [21]. It is important that this treatment concept can only be used after delivery. In
patients who become symptomatic in the last month of pregnancy, delivery should take
place as soon as possible, and an interdisciplinary team of obstetricians, anaesthetists,
cardiologists, cardiac surgeons and neonatologists should be on site. Following delivery,
the BOARD regime should be started, depending on the patientʼs haemodynamic stability.
Treatment
With early diagnosis and treatment in accordance with guidelines, over 60% of patients
recover completely within the first 12 months and a further 47% recover partially
(i.e., improvement in left heart pump function [left ventricular ejection fraction,
LV-EF] by at least 10% and at least one heart failure class [New York Heart Association,
NYHA class]), and only about 3% remain in heart failure [20]. Even if these patients recover clinically and also echocardiographically, an increased
long-term risk for sudden cardiac death unfortunately persists so that a defibrillator
vest or possibly an implantable defibrillator (ICD) must be considered in high-risk
patients even when cardiac function has recovered completely [22].
It is vitally important during intensive treatment that the frequently used stress
hormones (adrenalin, dobutamine) are not used for intensive therapy as these can harm
the patients and even cause irreversible terminal cardiac damage [23].
Further pregnancies
Further pregnancies are associated with a high risk of recurrence and patients should
be counselled about this [16]. A subsequent pregnancy is not impossible, however, but patients must be monitored
closely and delivery should take place in an experienced centre with the interdisciplinary
collaboration of cardiology, anaesthesia, neonatology and gynaecology/obstetrics [17]. The recommendations on medication for further planned pregnancy are in accordance
with the guidelines [24]. It is important that ACE inhibitors are contraindicated during the first trimester
because of their teratogenic effect; they are not a first-line treatment later in
the pregnancy but can be used. The AT antagonists (angiotensin II type 1 receptor
antagonists), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists or ivabradine are contraindicated
during pregnancy and lactation. Tapering and finally discontinuation of this medication
are therefore necessary before the start of a further pregnancy. Beta-blockers may
and should be continued during pregnancy (in Germany, only metoprolol is licensed
during pregnancy). Diuretics should be used restrictively and only when clearly indicated
(obvious fluid retention, pulmonary congestion); a pro-diabetogenic effect has been
described for thiazide diuretics. The dosage should be adjusted because of their influence
on placental perfusion and possible development of oligohydramnios. If an unplanned
pregnancy occurs, the contraindicated drugs should be discontinued immediately as
they can harm the embryo. An initial cardiology review with echocardiography, clinical
examination and measurement of natriuretic peptides is recommended when pregnancy
is diagnosed, at 4-week intervals from 20 weeks of gestation and at 2-week intervals
after 30 weeks. In addition, close gynaecological and obstetric attendance is recommended
for prompt detection of potential pregnancy complications. Close monitoring (echo,
even weekly if necessary) is necessary in the last two months of pregnancy so that
delivery can be initiated if there is clinical deterioration. The delivery should
take place in an experienced centre with interdisciplinary collaboration between cardiology,
gynaecology/obstetrics, anaesthesia and neonatology. Depending on the clinical status,
LV-EF (left ventricular ejection fraction) and concomitant diseases, the delivery
modality should also be considered (vaginal delivery versus section). Vaginal delivery
is possible in stable patients, but elective caesarean section should be discussed
with the patient if there are feared cardiological complications. Pharmacological
inhibition of lactation by means of bromocriptine is recommended following delivery,
with resumption of the oral heart failure medication, regardless of clinical symptoms
and LVEF. Outpatient cardiological review following delivery is strongly recommended
[25].
Long-term management
For the long-term management of PPCM patients, annual review is important, when medications
can be checked and adjusted if necessary. Advice on family planning and contraception
should be provided in every case. Hormone-free contraceptive methods (copper IUD,
condoms) should be suggested, and a hormonal IUD containing levonorgestrel or an oral
monopreparation containing desogestrel may be possible in women with heart failure.
On the other hand, patients should be advised explicitly against oestrogen-containing
preparations as there can be potentially negative interactions with the heart failure
therapy and there is an increased thrombosis risk.
Congenital Heart Disease in Pregnancy
Congenital Heart Disease in Pregnancy
Antenatal care
Patients with congenital heart disease require individual counselling prior to pregnancy
about the risks for mother and baby. This enables cardiac defects requiring treatment
to be managed before pregnancy. The patient should be aware of high risks so that
she can decide against pregnancy if appropriate. On the other hand, she must also
be conscious of the medical consequences including the need for close monitoring during
pregnancy.
With uncomplicated congenital heart defects, a single cardiology review to determine
cardiac status often suffices, while all other patients should have one clinical review
per trimester. Review of high-risk patients is necessary at intervals of 1 – 4 weeks
from 18 – 20 weeks, depending on the risk profile and clinical picture as the haemodynamic
stress increases. Organ screening ultrasound of the baby should be performed in all
pregnant women at 20 – 24 weeks.
Pregnancies with significant cardiac risks, especially when high-risk, need referral
to a maximum-care hospital with expertise in the treatment of congenital heart defects.
Close interdisciplinary collaboration comprising joint cardiological and gynaecological
care from the start is required.
Individual risk assessment is based on the underlying congenital condition, the cardiac
lesions and clinical symptoms [9], [11], [24], [25]. When assessing the overall situation, the biomarker NT-proBNP can provide additional
valuable information as NT-pro BNP < 128 pg/ml in the 20th week of pregnancy was detected
as an independent predictor of cardiac complications.
Prevention of complications
Patients with congenital heart disease have evidence of post-thrombotic syndrome in
up to 60% of cases, necessitating the use of compression hose [26], [27], [28]. Iron deficiency anaemia should also be treated promptly (Hb < 11.5 g/dl).
Cardiac lesions such as severe aortic or mitral stenosis, native aortic isthmus stenosis
and significant aneurysms of the aorta due to aortopathies should be treated interventionally
or surgically before a pregnancy.
Treatment of arterial hypertension is essential to reduce the risk of aortic complications;
an average blood pressure of less than 120 – 130 mmHg is desirable and blood pressure
peaks should be avoided. Beta-blocker therapy is regarded as basic treatment in Marfan
syndrome.
Cardiac complications
The most frequent complications that occur include arrhythmias, progressive heart
failure symptoms and thrombembolic complications.
Supraventricular tachycardias must be terminated as soon as possible as progressive
heart failure symptoms with worsening of ventricular function are possible with sustained
tachycardia. Depending on the existing status, prophylactic beta-blocker therapy and
intermittent or long-term anticoagulation are required subsequently [24]. If there is no spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm or haemodynamic instability
is present, cardioversion is indicated. Trans-oesophageal echocardiography is required
to exclude intracardiac thrombus production with more prolonged supraventricular tachycardia.
This necessitates an adequate fasting period because of the delayed gastric emptying
during pregnancy.
Digitalis glycosides and adenosine can be used safely during pregnancy. The data are
weak for specific antiarrhythmic agents (quinidine, procainide, flecainide, sotalol)
but there are no known significant teratogenic risks. Use of amiodarone requires monitoring
of thyroid function [11].
If heart failure symptoms occur, beta-blocker therapy is recommended initially. Treatment
escalation with diuretics (hydrochlorothiazide, furosemide, spironolactone) is required
if cardiac oedema or pulmonary congestion occurs. Even if foetal side effects are
possible (bradycardia, reduced foetal growth), this medication should not be withheld
from pregnant women when indicated but the foetal status should be monitored since
improvement of the heart failure symptoms with optimisation of maternal haemodynamics
improves foetal development and likelihood of survival. In the case of progressive
heart failure, an interdisciplinary decision on how to proceed is necessary [15].
Thrombosis of a mechanical valve replacement is a life-threatening complication. There
is currently no generally accepted concept of anticoagulation treatment during pregnancy
[6]. Vitamin K antagonists (observing a maximum dose) and fractionated heparins are
used, and close monitoring of the anti-Xa level is essential (target 0.6 – 1.2 IU/ml
depending on valve type/risk factors) [6], [24]. In this case, anticoagulation is a balancing act between avoidance of thrombosis,
bleeding complications and foetal malformation risks. The risk of valve thrombosis
is higher on heparin therapy but the foetal malformation risk is lower. Hospital admission
is essential if valve thrombosis occurs. Intravenous heparin therapy can be attempted
initially (target PTT 60 – 80 s). If this is unsuccessful or the patient is haemodynamically
unstable, lysis or surgical valve replacement is required.
Peripartum aortic dissection occurs in aortopathy or Marfan syndrome. Bicuspid aortic
valves (increased risk with an aortic diameter > 50 mm) and Marfan syndrome (increased
risk with aortic diameter > 45 mm) represent the most frequent congenital diseases
associated with this complication. It should be noted that the risk of dissection
is not limited to the delivery period only but is still markedly increased for a week
post partum.
Fixed severe pulmonary hypertension due to Eisenmenger syndrome continues to be associated
with high maternal morbidity and mortality. Medication with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors/prostacyclines
is licensed as specific therapy. Management of these patients requires close interdisciplinary
collaboration from the start. The haemodynamic stress is poorly tolerated even in
the second trimester, which leads to reduced placental perfusion. Moreover, saturation
of less than 90% is associated with a high early abortion rate.
If cardiac deterioration occurs, lung maturation should be initiated promptly and
caesarean section should be planned.
Delivery
In most pregnancies, transvaginal delivery under epidural anaesthesia is possible,
with a shortened second expulsive stage if appropriate. From the cardiological point
of view, planning a primary section should be limited to high-risk patients. These
are patients who are not able to deal with the up to 60% increase in cardiac output
during labour or who have aortic aneurysms with a high dissection risk. The use of
ECLS therapy should be considered early in the case of haemodynamic instability or
severely impaired ventricular function.
Summary
PPCM is a life-threatening disease that occurs in women with previously healthy hearts.
Since the symptoms cannot be clearly distinguished from other pregnancy-induced conditions
or infectious diseases, cardiological investigation with echocardiography should always
be performed in suspected cases. NT-proBNP is a suitable diagnostic marker, while
classic cardiac enzymes do not allow indicative diagnosis of PPCM [12], [24]. Heart failure therapy in accordance with the guidelines should then be started
as soon as possible [21]. Patients requiring intensive care or with a rapidly progressive disease course
with cardiogenic shock should be transferred promptly to experienced centres that
can provide extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Central bed allocation programmes
such as IVENA, which is used in the German state of Hesse, can be utilised. At the
University Hospital in Marburg, these patients receive interdisciplinary intensive
care in the ECLS unit of the cardiology intensive care unit. Since PPCM has a very
good recovery rate but is also associated with a sustained increased risk of recurrence,
especially in subsequent pregnancies, and an increased risk of sudden cardiac death,
PPCM should be followed by close cardiological follow-up and possibly defibrillator
implantation.
Uncomplicated pregnancy is possible in most patients with congenital heart defects.
Individual risk assessment is required, with corresponding close monitoring in pregnancy.
High-risk pregnancies require close interdisciplinary collaboration between gynaecologists
and cardiologists. Patients should attend an expert centre even in early pregnancy.
Pregnancies can be maintained longer by optimising the required cardiac treatment
through close cardiological monitoring to detect increasing cardiac problems, or delivery
can be planned before cardiac decompensation. When the mortality risk is high, delivery
with ECLS available on standby can improve the prognosis.