Download PDF
Z Orthop Unfall 2019; 157(03): 246-253
DOI: 10.1055/a-0783-2869
Original Article/Originalarbeit
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Results of Reinsertion of the Distal Achilles Tendon

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Heinz Lohrer
Zentrum für Sportorthopädie, European SportsCare Network (ESN), Wiesbaden-Nordenstadt
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 December 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Reattachment of the distal Achilles tendon to the posterior calcaneus following distal Achilles tendon tears/avulsions or after excision of large posterior heel spurs is a challenging task for the orthopaedic surgeon.

Patients/Material and Methods Between 2005 and the end of 2015, 22 patients who underwent repair/reconstruction of a lesion of the distal Achilles tendon were identified from our electronic records. Calcaneal reinsertions were performed following distal Achilles tendon tears/avulsions (n = 15) or following excision of a large symptomatic posterior heel spur (n = 7). The respective outcome was evaluated comparatively using the VISA-A – G (Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles tendon, German version) questionnaire (100 = maximum). Data were collected preoperatively (n = 11/22), and prospectively at three, six, and 12 months postoperatively (n = 5 – 11/22). Two further retrospective follow-ups were performed 12 – 114 and 21 – 149 months postoperatively (n = 17/22 and 22/22, respectively). All data were analysed retrospectively. Complications were searched from the electronic files.

Results Transosseous sutures and different anchor techniques (Panalok®, Corkscrew®, SpeedBridge®) were generally performed. Preoperatively, the VISA-A – G score was 27.3 ± 13.5 (6 – 45) following distal Achilles tendon reinsertions for avulsions and 45.3 ± 49.0 (0 – 100) when reattachment was performed after resection of a large posterior heel spur (p = 0.831). At the final follow-up, VISA-A – G values were 89.4 ± 13.9 (54 – 100) following distal Achilles tendon tear/avulsion and 82.5 ± 24.5 (51 – 100), when Achilles tendons were reattached after posterior heel spur excisions (p = 0.969). There were no complications in the “heel spur group”. In the Achilles tendon tear/avulsion group, four out of seven patients with Panalok® repairs developed a fistula. One patient suffered a thromboembolism. None of these complications affected the long-term outcome.

Conclusions This study demonstrates good long-term outcomes after distal Achilles tendon reinsertion. Knotless double row anchor repair provides a greater area of compression, simplifies and standardises the repair/reconstruction, and provides safety against fistula. These implants are therefore recommended for safe and effective reattachment of the distal Achilles tendon.

Key words

distal Achilles tendon avulsion - posterior heel spur - VISA-A – G - insertional Achilles tendon repair - distal Achilles tendon reconstruction
 

  • References/Literatur

  • 1 Lantto I, Heikkinen J, Flinkkila T. et al. Epidemiology of Achilles tendon ruptures: increasing incidence over a 33-year period. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2015; 25: e133-e138
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Jozsa L, Kvist M, Balint BJ. et al. The role of recreational sport activity in Achilles tendon rupture. A clinical, pathoanatomical, and sociological study of 292 cases. Am J Sports Med 1989; 17: 338-343
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Kilicoglu O, Turker M, Yildiz F. et al. Suture anchor tenodesis in repair of distal Achilles tendon injuries. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014; 24: 117-122
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Janis L, Massa E. Spiked metallic washer and screw for reattachment of the Achilles tendon after repair of a distal rupture. J Foot Ankle Surg 2000; 39: 49-53
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Maniscalco P, Bertone C, Bonci E. et al. Titanium anchors for the repair of distal Achilles tendon ruptures: preliminary report of a new surgical technique. J Foot Ankle Surg 1998; 37: 96-100
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Witt BL, Hyer CF. Achilles tendon reattachment after surgical treatment of insertional tendinosis using the suture bridge technique: a case series. J Foot Ankle Surg 2012; 51: 487-493
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Beitzel K, Mazzocca AD, Obopilwe E. et al. Biomechanical properties of double- and single-row suture anchor repair for surgical treatment of insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41: 1642-1648
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Ettinger S, Razzaq R, Waizy H. et al. Operative treatment of the insertional Achilles tendinopathy through a transtendinous approach. Foot Ankle Int 2016; 37: 288-293
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Lohrer H, Nauck T. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the VISA-A questionnaire for German-speaking Achilles tendinopathy patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009; 10: 134
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Lohrer H, Nauck T. [Validation of the VISA-A–G questionnaire for German-speaking patients suffering from Haglundʼs disease]. Sportverletz Sportschaden 2010; 24: 98-106
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Iversen JV, Bartels EM, Langberg H. The victorian institute of sports assessment-achilles questionnaire (visa-a) – a reliable tool for measuring achilles tendinopathy. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2012; 7: 76-84
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Robinson JM, Cook JL, Purdam C. et al. The VISA-A questionnaire: a valid and reliable index of the clinical severity of Achilles tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med 2001; 35: 335-341
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Nilsson-Helander K, Thomée R, Silbernagel KG. et al. The Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS): development and validation. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35: 421-426
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Sierevelt I, van Sterkenburg M, Tol H. et al. Dutch version of the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles questionnaire for Achilles tendinopathy: reliability, validity and applicability to non-athletes. World J Orthop 2018; 9: 1-6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Derr J. Valid paired data designs: make full use of the data without “double-dipping”. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2006; 36: 42-44
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Yelland MJ, Sweeting KR, Lyftogt JA. et al. Prolotherapy injections and eccentric loading exercises for painful Achilles tendinosis: a randomised trial. Br J Sports Med 2011; 45: 421-428
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Lohrer H, Arentz S. [Impingement lesion of the distal anterior Achilles tendon in sub-Achilles bursitis and Haglund-pseudoexostosis-a therapeutic challenge]. Sportverletz Sportschaden 2003; 17: 181-188
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Lohrer H. [Minimally invasive repair of an impingement induced partial tear of the anterior Achilles tendon in a top level athlete]. Z Orthop Unfall 2010; 148: 80-82
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Rufai A, Ralphs JR, Benjamin M. Structure and histopathology of the insertional region of the human Achilles tendon. J Orthop Res 1995; 13: 585-593
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Lohrer H. Achillessehnenpathologien. In: Stukenborg-Colsman C, Fuhrmann RA. Hrsg. Kurzgefasste Fußchirurgie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2017: 222-232
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Lohrer H, Nauck T. Results of operative treatment for recalcitrant retrocalcaneal bursitis and midportion Achilles tendinopathy in athletes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2014; 134: 1073-1081
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 McGarvey WC, Palumbo RC, Baxter DE. et al. Insertional Achilles tendinosis: surgical treatment through a central tendon splitting approach. Foot Ankle Int 2002; 23: 19-25
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar