Zugangswege Hüftendoprothetik – anterolateraler Zugang in Rückenlage

Zur Implantation von Hüftgelenksendoprothetik stehen mehrere Zugangswege zur Verfügung, die in dieser Ausgabe der Zeitschrift beschrieben werden. Dieser Beitrag stellt den historischen Werdegang, die OP-technischen Schritte, die Ergebnisse und speziellen Risiken des anterolateralen Zugangs in Rückenlage vor.

Schlüsselwörter

Hüft-TEP - Zugang - Schenkelhalsfraktur - Koxarthrose

• Literatur

• 1 Watson-Jones R. Fractures of the neck of the femur. Br J Surg 1936; 23: 787-808
• 2 Kuropatikin GV. Traditionelle Zugänge in der Hüftendoprothetik. In: Roth A, Venbrocks R. Hrsg. Minimal invasive Hüftendoprothetik. Bremen: UNI-MED; 2017: 30-38
• 3 Burwell HN, Scott D. A lateral intermuscular approach to the hip joint for replacement of the femoral head by a prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1954; 36-B: 104-108
• 4 Jerosch J, Theising C, Fadel ME. Antero-lateral minimal invasive (ALMI) approach for total hip arthroplasty technique and early results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006; 126: 164-173
• 5 Bertin KC, Röttinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 429: 248-255
• 6 Berger RA. Mini-incision total hip replacement using an anterolateral approach: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am 2004; 35: 143-151
• 7 Wohlrab D, Hagel A, Hein W. Vorteile der minimal invasiven Implantation von Hüfttotalendoprothesen in der frühen postoperativen Rehabilitationsphase. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2004; 142: 685-690
• 8 Schneider M, Kawahara I, Breusch SJ. Modifizierter Hardinge-Zugang mit Kurzinzision. Orthopäde 2006; 35: 751-760
• 9 Graf R, Azizbaig-Mohajer M. Der minimalinvasive Hüftgelenkersatz in Rückenlage mit hochgelagertem kontralateralem Bein. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2006; 4: 317-329
• 10 Roth A, Venbrocks RA. Total hip replacement through a minimally invasive, anterolateral approach with the patient supine. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2007; 19: 442-457
• 11 Basad E, Ishaque B, Stürz H. et al. The anterolateral minimally invasive approach for total hip arthroplasty: technique, pitfalls, and way out. Orthop Clin North Am 2009; 40: 473-478
• 12 Vicente JR, Croci AT, Camargo OP. Blood loss in the minimally invasive posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2008; 63: 351-356
• 13 Goldstein WM, Branson JJ, Berland KA. et al. Minimal-incision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A (Suppl. 04) 33-38
• 14 Chimento GF, Pavone V, Sharrock N. et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 139-144
• 15 Müller M, Tohtz S, Dewey M. et al. Age-related appearance of muscle trauma in primary total hip arthroplasty and the benefit of a minimally invasive approach for patients older than 70 years. Int Orthop 2011; 35: 165-171
• 16 Müller M, Tohtz S, Springer I. et al. Randomized controlled trial of abductor muscle damage in relation to the surgical approach for primary total hip replacement: minimally invasive anterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131: 179-189
• 17 Landgraeber S, Quitmann H, Güth S. et al. A prospective randomized peri- and post-operative comparison of the minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus the lateral approach. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2013; 5: e19
• 18 Repantis T, Bouras T, Korovessis P. Comparison of minimally invasive approach versus conventional anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2015; 25: 111-116
• 19 Laffosse JM, Chiron P, Molinier F. et al. Prospective and comparative study of the anterolateral mini-invasive approach versus minimally invasive posterior approach for primary total hip replacement. Early results. Int Orthop 2007; 31: 597-603
• 20 Matziolis D, Wassilew G, Strube P. et al. Differences in muscle trauma quantifiable in the laboratory between the minimally invasive anterolateral and transgluteal approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131: 651-655
• 21 Musil D, Stehlík J, Verner M. Biochemické porovnání invazity TEPO MIS-AL a standardní TEP lycelneho kloubu. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2008; 75: 16-20
• 22 Unis DB, Hawkins EJ, Alapatt MF. et al. Postoperative changes in the tensor fascia lata muscle after using the modified anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28: 663-665
• 23 Pumberger M, von Roth P, Preininger B. et al. Microstructural changes of tensor fasciae latae and gluteus medius muscles following total hip arthroplasty: a prospective trial. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2017; 84: 97-100
• 24 Layher F, Hädrich S, Sander K. et al. Klinische, radiologische und ganganalytische Ergebnisse nach minimalinvasiv implantierten Hüft-Totalendoprothesen. MOT 2007; 5: 47-58
• 25 Sander K, Layher F, Babisch J. et al. Evaluation of results after total hip replacement using a minimally invasive and a conventional approach. Clinical scores and gait analysis. Z Orthop Unfallchir 2011; 149: 191-199
• 26 Leuchte S, Riedl K, Wohlrab D. Frühfunktionelle Vorteile von minimalinvasiv implantierten Hüfttotalendoprothesen – Ganganalytische Befunde zur Symmetrie und Belastung aus der Messung der Bodenreaktionskraft. Z Orthop Unfallchir 2009; 147: 69-78
• 27 Foucher KC, Wimmer MA, Moisio KC. et al. Time course and extent of functional recovery during the first postoperative year after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with two different surgical approaches – a randomized controlled trial. J Biomech 2011; 44: 372-378
• 28 Van Oldenrijk J, Hoogland PV, Tuijthof GJ. et al. Soft tissue damage after minimally invasive THA. Acta Orthop 2010; 81: 696-702
• 29 Trč T, Chládek P. Minimalinvasive Zugänge in der Hüftendoprothetik. Eine Vergleichsstudie. MOT 2007; 5: 25-31
• 30 Howell JR, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. Orthop Clin North Am 2004; 35: 153-162
• 31 Martin R, Clayson PE, Troussel S. et al. Anterolateral minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study with a follow-up of 1 year. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26: 1362-1372
• 32 Kutzner KP, Hechtner M, Pfeil D. et al. Incidence of heterotopic ossification in minimally invasive short-stem THA using the modified anterolateral approach. Hip Int 2017; 27: 162-168
• 33 Hürlimann M, Schiapparelli FF, Rotigliano N. et al. Influence of surgical approach on heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty – is minimal invasive better? A case control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18: 27
• 34 Wang G, Gu GS, Li D. et al. Comparative study of anterolateral approach versus posterior approach for total hip replacement in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Chin J Traumatol 2010; 13: 234-239
• 35 Nöth U, Geiser T, Kranich T. et al. Fast-Track-Strategien in der Hüftendoprothetik. Orthopäde 2019; 48: 330-336
• 36 Greidanus NV, Chihab S, Garbuz DS. et al. 2013; Outcomes of minimally invasive anterolateral THA are not superior to those of minimally invasive direct lateral and posterolateral THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 471: 463-471
• 37 Tsai SW, Chen CF, Wu PK. et al. Modified anterolateral approach in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2015; 25: 245-250
• 38 Rittmeister M, Peters A. Vergleich des Hüftgelenkersatzes über eine posteriore Miniinzision oder einen klassischen anterolateralen Zugang. Orthopäde 2006; 35: 716 718–722
• 39 Kawarai Y, Iida S, Nakamura J. et al. Does the surgical approach influence the implant alignment in total hip arthroplasty? Comparative study between the direct anterior and the anterolateral approaches in the supine position. Int Orthop 2017; 41: 2487-2493
• 40 Woerner M, Weber M, Sendtner E. et al. Visual intraoperative estimation of range of motion is misleading in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2016; 136: 1015-1020
• 41 Innmann MM, Streit MR, Kolb J. et al. Influence of surgical approach on component positioning in primary total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 180
• 42 Mjaaland KE, Svenningsen S, Fenstad AM. et al. Implant survival after minimally invasive anterior or anterolateral vs. conventional posterior or direct lateral approach: an analysis of 21,860 total hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (2008 to 2013). J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99: 840-847
• 43 Schmolders J, Gravius S, Wirtz DC. Stellenwert minimalinvasiver Zugangswege bei der primären Hüftendoprothetik – ein Update. Z Orthop Unfallchir 2014; 152: 120-129
• 44 Goosen JH, Kollen BJ, Castelein RM. et al. Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 200-208
• 45 Nakai T, Liu N, Fudo K. et al. Early complications of primary total hip arthroplasty in the supine position with a modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach. J Orthop 2014; 11: 166-169
• 46 Hube R, Dienst M, von Roth P. Komplikationen nach minimal-invasiver Hüftendoprothetik. Orthopäde 2014; 43: 47-53
• 47 Reininga IH, Zijlstra W, Wagenmakers R. et al. Minimally invasive and computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 92