Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided rendezvous technique (EUS-RV) includes two approaches: the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct approaches from the stomach and duodenum, respectively [1]
[2]. However, the technique is impractical when drainage is required for right hepatic bile duct obstruction. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage has a possible risk of tumor seeding in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma; therefore, it is not recommended for surgical candidates [3]
[4]
[5]. We present a case of successful drainage of the obstructed right posterior bile duct using EUS-RV ([Video 1]).
Video 1 As drainage of the obstructed right posterior bile duct was impossible using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, an endoscopic ultrasonography-guided rendezvous technique was used successfully.
A 63-year-old woman was admitted with acute cholangitis. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed Bismuth-Corlette type 4 perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. The surgeons recommended left trisectionectomy. Drainage for the right posterior bile duct was required because the posterior segment of the liver was the future remnant lobe. Transpapillary insertion of the endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube was attempted. However, this procedure failed, despite the combination of a hydrophilic guidewire and steerable or double-lumen catheter, although biliary cannulation was achieved ([Fig. 1]). We exchanged the duodenoscope for a linear EUS scope and inserted it into the duodenal bulb. The dilated posterior bile duct was then punctured using a 19-gauge needle ([Fig. 2], [Fig. 3]). A 0.025-inch guidewire was manipulated into the duodenum via the obstruction site and ampulla. The EUS scope was removed with the guidewire left in place. The duodenoscope was reinserted where the EUS-placed guidewire passed from the ampulla. The distal end of the guidewire was grasped with a snare and pulled out through the accessory channel ([Fig. 4]). A catheter was inserted over the guidewire, and finally, a nasobiliary drainage tube was placed in the posterior bile duct ([Fig. 5]). No adverse event was encountered, and cholangitis and jaundice subsided.
Fig. 1 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography demonstrated hilar bile duct obstruction and dilated anterior bile duct. A hydrophilic guidewire could not be introduced into the posterior bile duct despite using a steerable catheter and double-lumen catheter.
Fig. 2 Endoscopic ultrasonography scope located at the duodenal bulb showed dilatation of the posterior bile duct.
Fig. 3 Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided cholangiography showed dilatation of the posterior duct.
Fig. 4 After a guidewire had been passed in an antegrade manner across the obstruction site and the ampulla into the duodenum, the endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) scope was exchanged for a duodenoscope, which was introduced alongside the EUS-placed guidewire. The guidewire was retrieved through its accessory channel.
Fig. 5 A nasobiliary drainage tube was passed over the guidewire and placed in the posterior bile duct.
EUS-RV can be useful, especially when drainage for the isolated right hepatic duct is needed in patients scheduled for surgery.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AS_2AD
Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high
quality video and all contributions are
freely accessible online.
This section has its own submission
website at
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos
