Introduction
Research on medicinal plants in Mali has been dynamic since political independence in
1960. In 1968, the Department of Traditional Medicine (DMT) was created under the
authority of the Ministry of Health. One of the objectives of the DMT is to assess
the biological activities of medicinal plants used in traditional medicine, and to
formulate and produce phytomedicines based on improved traditional medicines called
MTAs “Médicaments Traditionnels Améliorés”.
MTAs are categorized into four types. The requirements to get an official marketing
authorization vary according to the category ([Table 1]). The basic requirement is documenting the traditional uses of
the remedy, its safety and efficacy, indicating its standardized dosage, and
providing quality control data. Today, the majority of registered MTAs are
classified as Category 2, for which clinical trial data is not mandatory [1]. Recently, the DMT identified Terminalia
macroptera Guill. & Perr. (Combretaceae) as a potential candidate
for an MTA.
Table 1 MTA classes according to the Ministry of Health Regulation
in Mali and requested items for marketing authorization delivery [1].
|
|
MTA class
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
Description
|
Traditional medicine prepared by a traditional health
practitioner for an individual patient with fresh or dried raw
materials, with a short shelf life
|
Traditional medicine currently used in the community, prepared in
advance, and composed of crude raw materials
|
Standardized extracts prepared in advance following scientific
research
|
Molecules purified from traditional medicines following
scientific research
|
Requested items for marketing authorization delivery
|
Covering letter1
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
Samples2
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
Administrative dossier3
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
Pharmaceutical dossier4
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
Expert analytical report5
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
Pharmacology and toxicology dossier6
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
Clinical dossier7
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
Expert report on traditional use8
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
Fees9
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
1Addressed to the Ministry of Health, including the name and
address of the manufacturer. 2Ten samples as sold.
3Registration form of the manufacturer and memoranda of
understanding between the manufacturer and a research institution.
4Complete monograph(s) of the plant’s component(s).
Method and stages of preparation and production and Expert report on Good
Manufacturing Practices. 5Quality control method for raw
materials. Results of stability and quality control tests of raw materials
and excipients. Method and results of quality control during production.
Quality control results of the finished product. Stability tests results of
the finished product. 6Pharmacodynamic data. Results of acute and
subchronic toxicity tests. Literature review of pharmacology and toxicology.
Expert report on the tests carried out. 7Ethical approval for
clinical trials. Clinical trial protocol following standard methods (phase I
and II). Results of clinical trials. Expert report on clinical trials
carried out. 8Evidence of the long history of use of the medicine
in its current or traditional form (minimum 20 years). Detailed presentation
of known toxicological risks. Risks of incorrect use of the medicine. Risks
of physical or psychologic dependence. 9Registration fees
receipt.
This plant is widely used in West African countries to treat many health disorders,
although research that proves biological activity remains scarce. Eleven
publications reported the traditional use of different parts of the plant in the
treatment of disorders such as liver disease, malaria, urinary tract infection,
diarrhea, pain, fever, and wounds ([Table
2]). In vitro antibacterial, antifungal, antiplasmodial,
antitrypanosomal, leishmanicidal, and antiviral activities have been previously
reported in the roots, leaves, and bark of this species. Reported in vitro
biological activities include antioxidant, enzyme inhibition, antiproliferative,
hemolytic, and immunomodulatory effects ([Table
3]). Only two in vivo studies have been carried out [2]. In a recent study, our team demonstrated
the ability of T. macroptera roots (TMR) and leaves (TML) to limit
Plasmodium parasitemia and to increase survival in two murine models of
uncomplicated and cerebral malaria, respectively. In addition, we demonstrated that
according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s
(OECD) Globally Harmonized System of Classification, both extracts were non-toxic
orally [3]. The same batch of T.
macroptera was used in both studies.
Table 2 Traditional uses of T. macroptera described in
different countries of West Africa.
Indications
|
Number of quotes
|
Country of quote
|
Reference
|
Liver diseases
|
6
|
Burkina Faso, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Senegal
|
[5]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
|
Malaria
|
5
|
Burkina Faso, Guinea, Mali, Senegal
|
[5]
[32]
[33]
[35]
[36]
|
Urinary tract infection
|
5
|
Burkina Faso, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Senegal
|
[5]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
|
Diarrhea
|
5
|
Burkina Faso, Mali, Nigeria
|
[2]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[37]
|
Pain
|
3
|
Mali, Senegal
|
[5]
[32]
[34]
|
Fever
|
3
|
Mali
|
[5]
[30]
[34]
|
Wound
|
3
|
Mali, Senegal
|
[5]
[32]
[34]
|
Asthenia
|
2
|
Mali, Senegal
|
[5]
[32]
|
Snake bite
|
2
|
Mali, Senegal
|
[32]
[38]
|
Cough
|
2
|
Mali
|
[34]
[37]
|
Skin diseases and boils
|
2
|
Burkina Faso, Mali
|
[33]
[38]
|
Aphrodisiac
|
1
|
Senegal
|
[32]
|
Conjunctivitis
|
1
|
Senegal
|
[32]
|
Gastric ulcer
|
1
|
Burkina Faso
|
[33]
|
Absence or delay of menstruation
|
1
|
Mali
|
[37]
|
Table 3 Pharmacological activities of T. macroptera
reported in the literature.
Plant parts used
|
Type of test
|
Pharmacological activities
|
Model/test used
|
Reference
|
Leaf, stem bark, and root bark
|
In vitro
|
Antibacterial
|
In vitro microdilution, disk diffusion, and direct
bioautographic assay
|
[11]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
|
Leaf, stem bark, and root bark
|
In vitro
|
Antifungal
|
Disk diffusion assay
|
[43]
|
Root bark
|
In vitro
|
Antiplasmodial
|
Fluorometric assay
|
[3]
[36]
[44]
|
Root bark
|
In vitro
|
Antitrypanosomal
|
Fluorometric assay
|
[44]
|
Root bark
|
In vitro
|
Leishmanicidal
|
Fluorometric assay
|
[44]
|
Root
|
In vitro
|
Antiviral
|
In vitro antiviral assay by titration
|
[45]
|
Leaf, stem bark, and root bark
|
In vitro
|
Antioxidant
|
DPPH radical scavenging
|
[11]
[12]
[13]
|
Root
|
In vitro
|
Antiproliferative
|
Trypan blue assay
|
[12]
|
Leaf, stem bark, and root bark
|
In vitro
|
Enzymatic inhibitor
|
In vitro inhibition of α-glucosidase,
15-lipoxygenase, and xanthine oxidase assay
|
[13]
|
Leaf
|
In vitro
|
Hemolytic
|
Colorimetric assay
|
[11]
|
Leaf, stem bark, and root bark
|
In vitro
|
Immunomodulatory
|
Complement fixation assay
|
[13]
[20]
[21]
|
Root and leaf
|
In vivo
|
Antimalarial
|
Parasitemia and survival evaluation in P.
Plasmodium
chabaudi and P.
Plasmodium
bergei ANKA-infected mice models
|
[3]
|
Barks
|
In vivo
|
Antidiarrheal
|
Castor oil-induced diarrhea in rats
|
[11]
|
In order to complete these data and to investigate some of the ethnopharmacological
claims, especially the use of T. macroptera as an antipyretic,
anti-inflammatory, hepatoprotective, and analgesic agent, our team conducted the
first recorded in vivo studies to evaluate these properties. The study aims
to provide a stronger research basis for the potential future use of T.
macroptera as an MTA in Mali.
Results and Discussion
At present, the following chemical labelling and classification of acute systemic
toxicity, based on oral LD50 values, are from the recommendations of the
Globally Harmonized System of Classification [OECD, 2008], and ranked as: very
toxic,≤5 mg/kg; toxic,>5≤50 mg/kg;
harmful,>50≤500 mg/kg; and no
label,>500≤2000 mg/kg [4]. In our previous work [3], oral
administration of TML and TMR at a dose of 2000 mg/kg did not cause
mortality among experimental animals. This indicates that the LD50s of
TML and TMR are greater than 2000 mg/kg in albino Swiss mice. Therefore,
according to this classification, these fractions can be classed as Category 5 and
considered to have relatively low acute toxicity. To work under the most favorable
experimental conditions, T. macroptera extracts were used in the experiments
at 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg for antipyretic, analgesic, anti-inflammatory,
and hepatoprotective activity, corresponding to doses 20, 10, and 5 times lower than
the safe dose, respectively.
Leaves and roots of T. macroptera are traditionally used for the treatment of
inflammatory conditions like pain, fever, and liver diseases [5]. However, according to the literature
review, the analgesic, antipyretic, and anti-inflammatory properties of T.
macroptera have never been investigated before. Other species of
Terminalia have, however, demonstrated analgesic, antipyretic, and
anti-inflammatory properties in studies. The methanolic extract of the leaves of
Terminalia arjuna (Roxb, ex DC.) Wight & Arn. (100 mg/kg,
po) demonstrated in vivo analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities with a
51% inhibition of acetic acid-induced pain and a 75% inhibition of
edema from the third hour of carrageenan injection [6], respectively. Analgesic and antipyretic activities were also shown in
the ethanolic extract of the fruit of Terminalia bellirica (Gaertn.) Roxb.
(200 mg/kg, p.o.) with a 62% inhibition of acetic acid-induced pain
and a reduction of yeast-induced pyrexia from the first hour after administration of
the treatment [7].
The effect of ethanolic crude extracts on yeast pyrexia in rats is shown in [Table 4]. Pyrexia was significantly reduced by
TMR and TML treatments when compared to gavage with distilled water. Interestingly,
TML at 400 mg/kg was able to lower body temperature 1 h after treatment
(T25) (p<0.0001). At the same dose (400 mg/kg), TMR was active
against pyrexia 2 h after treatment (T26). Three hours after treatment (T27, T28),
the three doses (100, 200, and 400 mg/kg) showed similar efficacy,
efficiently reducing pyrexia (p<0.05). Paracetamol (100 mg/kg),
which was used as a reference drug, also significantly reduced pyrexia from T25 to
T28 when compared to the water-treated group (p<0.05), similarly to TMR and
TML from T27 (p>0.05). In addition, TMR and TML ethanolic crude extracts
were highly effective in reducing the number of contortions induced by acetic acid
compared to distilled water ([Fig. 1a]).
Efficacy using the three doses (100, 200, and 400 mg/kg) (p<0.0001
for all) was similar to the efficacy observed after treatment with paracetamol. The
maximum analgesic effect was obtained after using 400 mg/kg of TMR, with a
pain inhibition of 78.3±0.8%. Furthermore, TMR and TML ethanolic
crude extracts at the three doses (100, 200, and 400 mg/kg) were able to
significantly reduce edema 3 h after carrageenan injection when compared to the
distilled water treatment. Indomethacin, the reference treatment, presented similar
efficacy. The maximum anti-inflammatory effect (92.6±7.6%) was
obtained with TML treatment at 400 mg/kg 5 h after carrageenan injection
([Table 5]).
Fig. 1 Analgesic activity of T. macroptera leaf (TML) and root (TMR)
extracts on acetic acid-induced writhing in Swiss mice. One-way ANOVA
followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests were used for
analysis. Treatment efficacies were compared to distilled
water; **** p<0.0001.
Table 4 Antipyretic activity of T. macroptera extracts on
yeast-induced pyrexia in Wistar rats.
Group
|
Temperature (°C)
|
Basal temperature (T0)
|
T24
|
T25
|
T26
|
T27
|
T28
|
Distilled water
|
37.3±0.4
|
38.8±0.2
|
38.9±0.04
|
38.8±0.1
|
38.7±0.2
|
38.6±0.1
|
TML 100 mg/kg
|
37.3±0.3
|
38.2±0.3
|
39.0±0.3
|
38.7±0.2
|
37.7±0.3d
|
37.7±0.1d
|
TML 200 mg/kg
|
37.0±0.1
|
38.3±0.3
|
38.7±0.4
|
38.5±0.3
|
37.6±0.2c
|
37.3±0.1d
|
TML 400 mg/kg
|
37.8±0.3
|
38.9±0.5
|
38.2±0.4b
|
38.1±0.3a
|
37.8±0.4c
|
37.7±0.5c
|
TMR 100 mg/kg
|
37.3±0.3
|
38.2±0.3
|
39.0±0.3
|
38.7±0.2
|
37.7±0.3d
|
37.7±0.1d
|
TMR 200 mg/kg
|
37.1±0.2
|
38.3±0.3
|
38.8±0.6
|
38.7±0.4
|
37.9±0.4c
|
37.4±0.2d
|
TMR 400 mg/kg
|
37.2±0.3
|
39.0±0.6
|
38.7±0.4
|
37.9±0.6c
|
37.7±0.3d
|
37.7±0.4c
|
Paracetamol 100 mg/kg
|
37.1±0.1
|
38.3±0.4
|
38.1±0.5b
|
37.6±0.3d
|
37.2±0.2d
|
37.2±0.2d
|
The basal rectal temperature of the rats was taken using a digital clinical
thermometer (T0). At the end of the day (T8), each animal was given a
subcutaneous injection of a 20% w/v aqueous suspension of
yeast and then fasted overnight. The rectal temperature of the animals was
taken 16 h after the yeast injection (T24). The rectal temperature of the
rats was taken hourly during the 4 h following the administration of the
treatments (T25 to T28). Data are expressed as the mean±SD
(n=6 per group). Two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's
multiple comparison tests were used for analysis. Statistical significance
p<0.05. aP<0.05 compared to the distilled water
group, bp<0.01 compared to the distilled water group,
cp<0.001 compared to the distilled water group,
dp<0.0001 compared to the distilled water group.
Table 5 Anti-inflammatory activity of T. macroptera
extracts on carrageenan-induced edema in Swiss mice.
Group
|
Thickness of paw (mm)
|
% Inhibition
|
0 h
|
1 h
|
3 h
|
5 h
|
1 h
|
3 h
|
5 h
|
Distilled water
|
1.12±0.02
|
2.04±0.15
|
2.14±0.30
|
1.90±0.21
|
|
|
|
TML 100 mg/kg
|
1.13±0.05
|
1.99±0.22
|
1.85±0.22b
|
1.62±0.29b
|
11.70±3.90
|
33.00±12.20
|
53.30±4.90
|
TML 200 mg/kg
|
1.14±0.09
|
1.96±0.18
|
1.69±0.17d
|
1.55±0.12c
|
15.80±7.90
|
45.30±2.90
|
48.40±9.10
|
TML 400 mg/kg
|
1.20±0.09
|
1.55±0.26d
|
1.42±0.05d
|
1.30±0.06d
|
72.50±15.90
|
82.40±1.10
|
92.60±7.60
|
TMR 100 mg/kg
|
1.19±0.08
|
1.95±0.08
|
1.84±0.10b
|
1.50±0.12d
|
17.40±3.30
|
32.50±18.70
|
63.50±17.80
|
TMR 200 mg/kg
|
1.15±0.04
|
1.80±0.11a
|
1.68±0.10d
|
1.47±0.07d
|
28.60±3.70
|
46.40±9.00
|
59.10±0.80
|
TMR 400 mg/kg
|
1.13±0.04
|
1.50±0.06d
|
1.38±0.08d
|
1.32±0.04d
|
60.70±1.80
|
75.10±0.50
|
78.50±5.10
|
Indomethacin 8mg/kg
|
1.14±0.04
|
1.88±0.06
|
1.73±0.24d
|
1.45±0.13d
|
19.60±8.60
|
55.60±5.10
|
66.30±2.90
|
Data are expressed as the mean±SD (n=6 per group). Two-way
ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison tests were used for
analysis. Statistical significance p<0.05.
aP<0.05 compared to the distilled water group,
bp<0.01 compared to the distilled water group,
cp<0.001 compared to the distilled water group,
dp<0.0001 compared to the distilled water group.
Fever, pain, and inflammation are clinical manifestations associated with a wide
range of diseases. Fever is one of the symptoms marking the onset of an infection or
inflammation. The use of T. macroptera in feverish illnesses might be
explained by its ability to interfere with the fever pathway, where exogenous
pyrogens, such as microbes and/or their toxins, stimulate mononuclear
phagocytes to release proinflammatory and pyrogenic cytokines such as
TNF-α, IL1, IL-6, and IFNγ
[8]. The release of such cytokines was also
shown to be associated with pain in the murine model we used to measure the
analgesic activity of T. macroptera, based on acetic acid-induced writhing
[9]. These pyrogenic cytokines trigger
arachidonic acid metabolism, including prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production, a lipid
mediator largely associated with fever and inflammation [8]. Furthermore, in the present study, we
screened the efficacy of extracts of T. macroptera in a mouse model of
CCl4-induced acute hepatic damage to test its potential as a potent
hepatoprotective medicinal plant. CCl4 administration induces a high
hepatocyte injury, leading to the extensive formation of free radicals such as
trichloromethyl and peroxytrichloromethyl, which are highly toxic for the liver
[10]. The effect of TMR and TML treatments
at 400 mg/kg on hepatic marker enzymes in CCl4-induced hepatic
injury in rats is shown in [Fig. 2]. The
levels of alanine amino transferase (ALT), aspartate amino transferase (AST),
alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and total bilirubin (TB) were significantly increased in
the rat group intoxicated with the intraperitoneal injection of CCl4, and
treated with distilled water (CCl4 model control) compared with the
non-intoxicated rat group treated with distilled water (healthy control)
(p<0.0001). TMR and TML treatments significantly reduced the levels of ALT
([Fig. 2a]), AST ([Fig. 2b]), ALP ([Fig. 2c]), and TB ([Fig. 2d]) compared to distilled water in the
CCl4 model controls (p<0.0001) ([Fig. 2]). Several studies have demonstrated
the antiradical in vitro activity of leaf and root extracts of T.
macroptera
[11]
[12]
[13], suggesting that the hepatoprotective
activity of our extracts could partly be due to the inhibition of the production of
these free radicals. Furthermore, TMR and TML efficacy was similar to that of the
reference drug silymarin. Interestingly, levels of hepatic enzymes obtained after
TML, TMR, and silymarin treatments were similar to the healthy control group. These
results are consistent with those from studies carried out on other species of
Terminalia. These also demonstrated dose-dependent hepatoprotective
properties by reducing transaminases and alkaline phosphatase such as T.
bellirica fruits [14] and
Terminalia catappa leaves [15].
Fig. 2 Hepatoprotective effects of T. macroptera extracts in
CCl4-intoxicated rats. Rats were pretreated with distilled
water, TMR, TML, or silymarin daily for 7 days (n=5 per group).
Except for the healthy control group (white sticks), rats were intoxicated
with CCl4 (0.5 mL/kg i.p.) 1 h after the last treatment. a
Serum levels of ALT in UI/L. b Serum levels of AST in UI/L. c
Serum levels of ALP in UI/L. d Total bilirubin in mg/L. Data are
expressed as the mean±SD. One-way ANOVA followed by
Dunnett's multiple comparison tests were used for analysis.
Statistical significance p<0.05. aP<0.0001
compared to the distilled water
group; **** p<0.0001
compared to the CCl4-treated group
In this study, a qualitative analysis by LC-HRMS of T. macroptera extracts was
undertaken to compare their composition and biological activities. A total of 59
compounds were detected and identified through HRMS and MS/MS fragmentation patterns
using MS-FINDER and the DNP database ([Table
6]). The MS-FINDER dereplication method allowed us to annotate the
corresponding peaks, mostly found in the Combretaceae family ([Table 3]). We separated the detected compounds
into three categories: compounds detected only in the roots, compounds detected only
in the leaves, and compounds detected in both roots and leaves.
Table 6 Putative identified features in roots and leaves
(m/z×RT pairs) using HRMS and MS/MS
fragmentation patterns using MS-finder and the DNP database.
Detected only in the roots
|
m/z
|
Rt
|
Molecular formula
|
Identity
|
681.3842 [M+H]+
|
3.06
|
C36H56O12
|
Termiarjunoside II
|
600.9909 [M - H]-
|
1.00
|
C28H10O16
|
Terminalin
|
521.3469 [M+H]+
|
3.06
|
C30H48O7
|
Bellericagenin B
|
315.0852 [M+H]+
|
3.25
|
C17H14O6
|
Combretastatin C1
|
471.3475 [M+H]+
|
3.62
|
C30H46O4
|
2-α-Hydroxymicromeric acid
|
649.3951 [M+H]+
|
3.36
|
C36H56O10
|
Quadranoside VIII
|
991.5133 [M+H]+
|
3.36
|
C48H78O21
|
2,3,19,23-Tetrahydroxy-12-oleanen-28-oic
acid-(2-α,3β,19β)-
3-O-[β-D-Galactopyranosyl-(1->3)-β-D-glucopyranoside],
28-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl ester
|
461.0721 [M - H]-
|
2.52
|
C21H18O12
|
Ellagic acid-2,8-Di-Me ether,
3-O-β-D-xylopyranoside
|
463.3053 [M+H]+
|
2.59
|
C27H42O6
|
Norquadrangularic acid A
|
495.0784 [M - H]-
|
0.59
|
C21H20O14
|
1,5-Digalloylquinic acid
|
811.4467 [M - H]-
|
4.26
|
C42H68O15
|
Arjunolitin
|
469.0059 [M - H]-
|
0.98
|
C21H10O13
|
Flavogallonic acid
|
Detected only in the leaves
|
m/z
|
Rt
|
|
Identity
|
583.1117 [M - H]-
|
2.64
|
C28H24O14
|
2''-O-Galloylvitexin
|
611.1603 [M+H]+
|
2.32
|
C27H30O16
|
Quercetin 3-(4-galactosylrhamnoside)
|
953.0919 [M - H]-
|
1.00
|
C41H30O27
|
Terchebin
|
635.2003 [M - H]-
|
3.38
|
C23H40O20
|
β-D-Galactopyranosyl-(1->6)-β-D-galactopyranosyl-(1->6)-β-D-galactopyranosyl-(1->3)-L-arabinose
|
277.0343 [M+H]+
|
0.99
|
C13H8O7
|
3,4,8,9,10-Pentahydroxy-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-6-one
|
321.0240 [M+H]+
|
1.01
|
C14H8O9
|
Luteolic acid
|
765.0982 [M - H]-
|
2.36
|
C35H26O20
|
Ellagic acid-3-Me ether,
7-O-[3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoyl-(->3)-[3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoyl-(->4)]-α-L-rhamnopyranoside]
|
699.3561 [M+H]+
|
4.74
|
C35H54O14
|
3,14,19-Trihydroxycard-20(22)-enolide-(3β,5β,14β)-form-3-O-[β-D-galactopyranosyl-(1->4)-α-L-rhamnopyranoside]
|
473.1484 [M - H]-
|
0.37
|
C17H30O15
|
β-D-Galactopyranosyl-(1->6)-β-D-galactopyranosyl-(1->3)-L-arabinose
|
895.0855 [M - H]-
|
2.74
|
C39H28O25
|
Quisqualin A
|
295.1024 [M - H]-
|
0.42
|
C18H16O4
|
Combretastatin D2
|
Detected in both the leaves and roots
|
m/z
|
Rt
|
|
Identity
|
955.1099 [M - H]-
|
2.50
|
C41H32O27
|
Chebulinic acid
|
635.0901 [M - H]-
|
1.15
|
C27H24O18
|
1,3,6-Trigalloylglucose-β-D-Pyranose
|
785.0877 [M - H]-
|
2.24
|
C34H26O22
|
Tercatain
|
609.1478 [M - H]-
|
2.27
|
C27H30O16
|
Quercetin 3-(4-galactosylrhamnoside)
|
331.0668 [M - H]-
|
0.39
|
C13H16O10
|
3-Galloylglucose
|
503.3368 [M - H]-
|
4.07
|
C30H48O6
|
Belleric acid
|
197.0460 [M - H]-
|
1.33
|
C9H10O5
|
4-O-Ethylgallic acid
|
633.0734 [M - H]-
|
0.68
|
C27H22O18
|
Corilagin
|
801.4097 [M - H]-
|
3.54
|
C43H62O14
|
2,3,23-Trihydroxy-12-oleanen-28-oic
acid-(2α,3β)-23-O-(3,4,5-Trihydroxybenzoyl),
28-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl ester
|
447.0576 [M - H]-
|
2.04
|
C20H16O12
|
Eschweilenol C
|
631.3835 [M - H]-
|
4.11
|
C36H56O9
|
Jessic acid-3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside
|
793.4412 [M - H]-
|
3.50
|
C42H66O14
|
2,3,19-Trihydroxy-12-oleanen-28-oic
acid-(2α,3α,19α)-3-Ketone,
28-O-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1->4)-β-D-glucopyranosyl]
ester
|
451.3208 [M+H]+
|
3.37
|
C30H42O3
|
Erythrophyllic acid
|
1083.0579 [M - H]-
|
0.34
|
C48H28O30
|
Isoterchebulin
|
639.3526 [M - H]-
|
4.16
|
C37H52O9
|
23-Galloylarjunolic acid
|
933.0627 [M - H]-
|
0.41
|
C41H26O26
|
Arjunin
|
781.0525 [M - H]-
|
0.40
|
C34H22O22
|
Isoterchebuloylglucose
|
359.1492 [M+H]+
|
3.70
|
C20H22O6
|
2',4',5,7-Tetrahydroxy-8-methylflavanone-Tetra-Me
ether.
2',4',5,7-Tetramethoxy-8-methylflavanone
|
817.4045 [M - H]-
|
3.32
|
C43H62O15
|
2,3,6,23-Tetrahydroxy-12-oleanen-28-oic
acid-(2α,3β,6β)-23-O-(3,4,5-Trihydroxybenzoyl),
28-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl ester
|
297.1523 [M - H]-
|
4.65
|
C19H22O3
|
4-Hydroxy-4'-methoxy-7,7'-epoxylignan
|
603.3892 [M - H]-
|
5.75
|
C35H56O8
|
1,3-Dihydroxycycloart-24-en-28-oic
acid-(1α,3β)-3-O-α-L-arabinopyranoside
|
521.0953 [M - H]-
|
3.27
|
C23H22O14
|
Flavellagic acid-2,3,8-Tri-Me ether,
7-O-β-D-glucopyranoside
|
783.0685 [M - H]-
|
0.62
|
C34H24O22
|
Terflavin B
|
1085.0729 [M- H]-
|
0.62
|
C48H30O30
|
Terflavin A
|
487.3422 [M - H]-
|
4.22
|
C30H48O5
|
2,6-Dihydroxybetulic acid
|
667.4056 [M+H]+
|
3.37
|
C36H58O11
|
Chebuloside II
|
329.0313 [M - H]-
|
3.23
|
C16H10O8
|
3,8-Di-O-methylellagic acid
|
973.1208 [M - H]-
|
2.43
|
C41H34O28
|
Neochebulinic acid
|
311.1681 [M - H]-
|
4.94
|
C20H24O3
|
4,4'-Dimethoxy-7,7'-epoxylignan
|
485.3257 [M - H]-
|
4.30
|
C30H46O5
|
Lonchoterpene
|
631.0577 [M - H]-
|
0.57
|
C27H20O18
|
Terflavin D
|
501.3215 [M - H]-
|
3.90
|
C30H46O6
|
Ivorengenin A
|
513.3162 [M - H]-
|
3.82
|
C31H46O6
|
Methyl quadrangularate N
|
491.0825 [M - H]-
|
2.39
|
C22H20O13
|
Ellagic acid-3,8-Di-Me ether,
2-O-β-D-glucopyranoside
|
681.3880 [M - H]-
|
3.91
|
C36H58O12
|
Bellericaside B
|
505.3543 [M - H]-
|
3.87
|
C30H50O6
|
Quadrangularic acid L
|
Terminalia species have been shown to contain various secondary metabolites
including cyclic triterpenes and their derivatives (flavonoids, tannins, and
phenolic acids). In our study, the LC/MS analyses allowed us to highlight
the presence of tannins and triterpenes. Phenolic compounds are widely described in
the literature for their potential biological activity such as anti-inflammatory and
immunomodulatory effects [15]
[16]. They are excellent antioxidants due to
the presence of a hydroxyl group capable of capturing oxygen free radicals [17]. Of all the identified compounds, only the
anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antipyretic, and hepatoprotective properties of
ellagic acid have been reported in the literature. Ellagic acid administered orally
at doses of 1 to 100 mg/kg in mice presented analgesic, antipyretic, and
anti-inflammatory activities [18]. At a dose
of 50-100 mg/kg, ellagic acid had hepatoprotective effects [19]. Furthermore, eschweilenol C has also been
reported for anti-inflammatory activity in aqueous extracts of Terminalia
fagifolia by inhibition of the NFκB pathway in
lipopolysaccharide-activated microglial cells [16]. These results suggest that the analgesic, antipyretic,
anti-inflammatory, and hepatoprotective activities of the ethanolic extract of T.
macroptera leaves and roots may be due, at least partly, to the presence of
ellagic acid and its derivatives.
In addition, we also highlighted the presence of sugars by performing tube staining
reactions and by using LC-HRMS analysis, especially polysaccharides. Some of these
compounds were previously isolated from the T. macroptera leaves and roots
harvested in Mali by Zou and colleagues and showed immunomodulatory properties
through the complement fixation assay [20]
[21]. Polysaccharides isolated from two other
plants, Ganoderma lucidum and Panax ginseng, were shown to have
anti-inflammatory and hepatoprotective effects, respectively [22]
[23]. These data suggest that the
anti-inflammatory activity and hepatoprotective effect of T. macroptera may
be also due to the presence of polysaccharides, although this remains to be
demonstrated. Finally, our study did not reveal the presence of alkaloids, contrary
to a previous study [24], whose plant was
collected in Nigeria.
Therefore, it would be of great interest to repeat plant collection in different
areas of West Africa and at different times of the year in order to verify if
alkaloid content depends on environmental conditions. Additionally, it would be
valuable to proceed to a more detailed phytochemical analysis of this plant species
through the metabolomic approach described in a previous work [25]. This type of dereplication approach would
facilitate a better understanding of the link between molecular content and
biological properties. Further bioassay-guided fractionation is necessary to confirm
the origin of these biological activities, including synergistic potential between
tannins, lignans, and terpenoids found in this plant.
In summary, in this study, we have demonstrated, for the first time, the in
vivo antipyretic, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and hepatoprotective
activities of ethanolic extracts of TML and TMR coupled with a deep phytochemical
analysis through metabolomics. These in vivo pharmacological effects combined
with other in vitro activities previously demonstrated in other works suggest
that this species may be beneficial in alleviating pathologies associated with
symptoms of fever, pain, and inflammation. The hepatoprotective activity of T.
macroptera could also be useful to treat many different health conditions
related to liver integrity, i.e., hepatitis, either viral or toxic. Additionally, it
has been previously shown that according to the OECD’s Globally Harmonized
System of Classification, these extracts can be classified as Category 5 and their
oral administration considered weakly toxic orally. These results are in accordance
with the present study since no highly toxic compounds were detected by LC-HRMS of
root and leaf extracts. For all these reasons, we propose submitting a request in
Mali for authorization of a Category 2 MTA formulation of this species. This MTA
should be recommended in cases of hepatitis and liver-related disorders, fever, and
pain.
Materials and Methods
Plant material
The leaves and roots of T. macroptera were collected in August 2015 in
Siby, a village located in the Koulikoro region in Mali. A specimen of the
plant, voucher number 3752/DMT, was deposited in the herbarium of the
DMT/NIRPH and authenticated by Mr. Seydou Dembele, a forestry engineer.
Access and benefit sharing to biodiversity and its associated traditional
knowledge was established according to Malian national rules.
Preparation of extracts
T. macroptera leaves and roots were dried under shade at room temperature
for 2 weeks and ground into powder before extraction. In Mali, the difficulties
linked to drying aqueous extracts led us to choose a polar solvent that can
extract the maximum from chemical constituents, and which is easily evaporable
on a rotary evaporator. Therefore, we chose 90% ethanol instead of
water, which is usually used as the traditional extraction solvent for technical
reasons.
A total of 250 g dried samples was macerated in 1000 mL of 90% ethanol
for 24 h and filtered using Whatman filters N°1. This operation was
repeated three times. The three filtrates were combined and evaporated under
vacuo to dryness (Büchi rotary evaporator Model R-200).
Yields of leaf and root extraction were 17.6% (44 g) and 14% (35
g), respectively. The crude extracts of T. macroptera leaves (TML) and
roots (TMR) were stored in a refrigerator at 4–8°C before
use.
Drugs and chemicals
Paracetamol (solid,≥97%, UC448; Sigma-Aldrich), indomethacin
(I8280,≥98.5%; Sigma-Aldrich), silymarin (mixture of
anti-hepatotoxic flavonolignans from the fruit of Silybum marianum,
S0292; Sigma-Aldrich,), carrageenan (C1138; Sigma-Aldrich), yeast (YBD; Sigma
Aldrich), acetic acid (extra pure; Fisher Chemicals), and carbon tetrachloride
(99%; Fisher Chemicals) were used in the pharmacological studies.
Animals and ethics statement
Swiss albino mice (aged 4–6 weeks and weighing 20–25 g) and
Wistar rats (aged 8–10 weeks and weighing 100–150 g) of either
sex were taken from the DMT/NIRPH animal house. The animals were
maintained in standard laboratory conditions (25°C and
light/dark cycles, i.e., 12/12 h) and fed with standard
food and tap water. Animal welfare requirements were strictly considered during
these experiments, as required by the National Institute for Public Health
Research (INRSP) Ethics Committee in Bamako, Mali. INRSP Ethics Committee
authorization and approval were obtained (24/2016/CE-INRSP).
Assessment of antipyretic activity
The antipyretic activity of TML and TMR crude ethanolic extracts was assessed
using yeast-induced pyrexia in male Wistar rats (100-150 g) [26]. The basal rectal temperature of the
rats was taken using a digital clinical thermometer (T0). At the end of the day
(T8), each animal was given a subcutaneous injection of a 20%
w/v aqueous suspension of yeast and then fasted overnight. The rectal
temperature of the animals was taken 16 h after the yeast injection (T24). The
animals with a temperature difference of 0.5°C were selected, then
gathered into eight groups of five rats and submitted to oral gavage. The first
group was administered paracetamol (100 mg/kg) as the reference drug.
The second group, the control group, was given distilled water (10
mL/kg). The remaining groups were fed with TML and TMR crude extract
(100, 200, and 400 mg/kg). The rectal temperature of the rats was taken
hourly during the 4 h following the administration of the treatments
(T25–T28). The mean value for each group was calculated and compared
with the control and reference groups at each time point.
Assessment of analgesic activity
Analgesic activity was tested using Swiss albino mice (20-25 g) of either sex.
Animals were randomized into eight groups of six mice (three males and three
females). Group I (control group) was administered distilled water orally (25
mL/kg), and Group II (reference drug) was administered paracetamol
orally (100 mg/kg). The remaining groups were treated orally with TML
and TMR crude ethanolic extracts (100, 200, and 400 mg/kg). One hour
after these treatments, the animals were treated by intraperitoneal injection
(i.p.) with 1% acetic acid. The number of abdominal constrictions
(writhings) were counted for 20 min, starting 5 min after acetic acid injection
[27]. The mean number of writhings for
each group was calculated and compared with that of the control and reference
groups. The percentage of inhibition was calculated using the following
formula:
Where Wt means the number of writhings in the test animals and Wc means the
number of writhings in the controls.
Assessment of anti-inflammatory activity
Acute inflammation was produced by an injection of carrageenan (an edematogenic
agent) into the subplantar region of the right hind paw of the mice [28]. Swiss albino mice (20–25 g) of
either sex were randomized into eight groups of six mice (three males and three
females). Groups I and II were treated orally with distilled water (25
mL/kg) as the control group and with indomethacin (8 mg/kg) as
the reference drug, respectively. The remaining groups were treated orally with
TML and TMR crude ethanolic extracts (100, 200, and 400 mg/kg). One hour
after the treatments (T0), 0.025 mL of 1% carrageenan suspension was
subcutaneously injected into the right hind paw of the animals. Paw thickness
was measured using a sliding caliper before injection (V0) and after 1, 3, and 5
h (VT). The edema volume was estimated by subtracting the value of V0 to VT (1,
3, and 5 h after the injection). The average paw thickness of each group of mice
was calculated and compared with that of the control and reference groups. The
percentage of inhibition was calculated using the following formula:
Assessment of hepatoprotective activity
The hepatoprotective activity of the extracts was assessed using an
intraperitoneal injection of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) in male
Wistar rats using the method described in a previous work [29]. The insufficient number of rats at the
time of the test led us to evaluate one dose (400 mg/kg) of each
extract.
The rats (100–150 g) were randomized into five groups of five rats each
and treated once a day for 7 days. Groups I and II received distilled water (10
mL/kg, orally) as the control groups, and Group III received silymarin
(100 mg/kg, orally) as the reference hepatoprotective drug. Groups IV
and V received crude ethanolic extracts of TML and TMR (400 mg/kg,
orally). One hour after treatment on day 7, the rats of groups II–V were
intoxicated with an intraperitoneal administration of 0.5 mL/kg
CCl4 (1:1 in olive oil). Twenty-four hours after oral
administration of the hepatotoxic agent, rats were anesthetized with ether,
blood was collected from the retro-orbital plexus, and the serum was separated
by centrifugation at 2500 rpm. ALT, AST, ALP, and TB were measured in the serums
using a BS200 MINDRAY biochemistry automaton. The values obtained were compared
between treatment groups.
Metabolites profiling by UHPLC-HRMS
Metabolite profiles of the TMR ethanol extract (1 mg/mL) were acquired
using a UHPLC-DAD-CAD-LTQ Orbitrap XL instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific)
equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. The UHPLC system
consisted of an Ultimate 3000 UHPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with an
Acquity BEH C18 column (100×2.1 mm i.d., 1.7 μm; Waters). The
mobile phase was composed of solvent A (0.1% formic acid-water) and
solvent B (0.1% formic acid-acetonitrile) with a gradient elution (0-0.5
min, 95% A; 0.5-12 min, 95-5% A; 12-15 min, 5% A;
15-15.5 min, 5-95% A; 15.5-19 min, 95% A). The flow rate of the
mobile phase was 0.45 mL/min. The injection volume was 4 μL and
the column temperature was maintained at 40°C. ESI was applied in
negative ion (NI) and positive ion (PI) mode under the following conditions:
capillary voltage at 3.0 and 4.2 kV for NI and PI, respectively, and capillary
temperature at 300°C. The UV detection was performed by a diode array
detector from 210 to 400 nm. Full mass spectra were recorded between 100 and
1500 Da. Collision-induced dissociation mass spectra were obtained using the
following parameters: 35% normalized collision energy, isolation width 2
Da, activation Q 0.250. External mass calibration was accomplished before
starting the experiment [25].
Statistical analysis
The results are expressed as the mean±SEM. The data was analyzed using
GraphPad Prism 6 Software. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA (one-way
for analgesic and hepatoprotective activity and two-way for antipyretic and
anti-inflammatory activity), followed by Dunnett’s test. The differences
were considered significant if the p value was less than 0.05.