Key words
Oxidant/antioxidant status - paraoxonase - Sjögrenʼs syndrome
Schlüsselwörter
Oxidationsmittel- - Antioxidationsmittelstatus - Paraoxonase - Sjögren-Syndrom
Introduction
Sjogren’s syndrome (SS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by chronic
inflammation of the salivary and lacrimal glands. Xerostomia and keratoconjunctivitis
sicca are seen in about 95% of the patients [1].
Oxidative stress develops by increasing oxidants levels and/or decreasing antioxidant
capacity in organisms. The oxidants may damage cellular and extracellular structures,
and impair the genetic structures by having harmful effects on DNA [2].Reactive oxygen species play a role in the development and pathogenesis of diseases
including cardiovascular disorders (ie. atherosclerosis), some neurological diseases,
cancer, allergic symtomps, diabetes and diabetic cataract, retinopathy, and also in
autoimmune rheumatic diseases like sjogren’s syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic
lupus erythematosus and scleroderma [2]
[3].
Paraoxanases enzymes (PON 1, 2, 3) have roles in protection against oxidative damage
and lipid peroxidation, contribution to innate immunity, detoxification of reactive
molecules, bioactivation of drugs, modulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress and
regulation of cell proliferation/apoptosis [4]. PON 1 is an antioxidant, negative acute phase protein; and mostly used enzyme in
studies. It is synthesized from liver and can be used as a biomarker in oxidative
stress, inflammation, and liver diseases. PON 1 has 3 phenotypes; QQ representing
low, QR intermediate and RR high enzyme activity of PON1 [4].
There is very little literature regarding the role of oxidative stress in Sjögrenʼs
syndrome.We aimed to investigate serum paraoxonase activity, and other oxidant/antioxidant
parameters in patients with SS and healthy controls.
Materials and methods
Eighty five (76 female, 9 male) patients, age above 18 years old, without any liver
disease,with Sjögren’s syndrome according to American-European Consensus Classification
Criteria [5] attending to our rheumatology out-patient clinic, and 65 (43 female, 22 male) healthy
subjects, age and gender matched with SS group without any liver disease, were included
in the study. Serum paraoxonase (PON) 1 activity, stimulated paraoxonase (SPON), PON
1 phenotypes that represent polymorphism (Q192R; QQ, QR, RR), arylesterase (ARE),
total oxidant status (TOS), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), oxidative stres index
(OSI), advanced oxidative protein products (AOPP), total thioles (TTL) (Serum TTL
representing sulfhydryl groups have antioxidant properties), ischemia modified albumin
(IMA) were measured in all study participants. The study protocol was approved by
local ethics committee and was in accordance with Helsinki decleration 2008. Informed
consent was taken from all participitants.
Blood samples from patients with SS and the control group were taken, and were immediately
placed on ice 4 ℃. Plasma was separated from the cells by centrifugation (Hettich
Lab Technology, Tuttlingen, Germany) at 25°C.for 10 min and stored at -80 ℃ until
analysis.
The TOS of serum was determined using an automated measurement method developed by
Erel [6]. Oxidants present in the sample oxidize the ferrous ion-o-dianisidine complex to
ferric ion. The oxidation reaction is enhanced by glycerol molecules, which are abundant
in the reaction medium. The ferric ion generates a coloured complex with Xylenol Orange
in an acidic medium. Colour intensity, which can be measured spectrophotometrically,
is related to the quantity of oxidant molecules present in the sample. The assay is
calibrated with hydrogen peroxide and the results expressed in terms of micro-molar
hydrogen peroxide equivalents per liter (mmol H2O2 equiv./L).
Serum TAS was determined using an automated measurement method [6]. Hydroxyl radical, the most potent biological radical, is produced in this method.
Ferrous ion solution, present in Reagent 1, is mixed with hydrogen peroxide, which
is present in Reagent 2. Sequentially-produced radicals like the brown-colored dianisidinyl
radical cation, produced by the hydroxyl radical, also are potent radicals. Using
this method, the anti-oxidative effect of the sample against potent free-radical reactions,
which are initiated by the produced hydroxyl radical, can be measured. The assay has
excellent precision values, of greater than 97%. The results are expressed as mmol
Trolox® (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid) equivalents/L.
The OSI is defined as the ratio of the TOS to TAS level, expressed as a percentage.
For the calculation, TAS units were changed to mmol/L, and the OSI value calculated
according to the following formula (4): OSI (arbitrary units)=TOS (µmol H2O2 equivalents/L)/ TAS (mmol Trolox® equivalents/L)x10-1.PON1 polymorphism and ARE activities studied by previously determined methods [7]
[8]
[9].
Statistical analysis
Data analysis was performed by using SPSS for Windows, version 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago,
IL, United States). Whether the distributions of continuous variables were normal
or not was determined by Shapiro Wilk test. Levene test was used for the evaluation
of homogeneity of variances. Data are shown as mean±standard deviation or median (IQR),
where applicable. While the mean differences between groups (case vs control or QQ
vs QR+RR) were compared by Bonferroni Adjusted Student’s t test, otherwise, Bonferroni
Adjusted Mann Whitney U test was used for comparisons of the median values. All possible
multiple comparisons, the Bonferroni Correction was applied for controlling Type I
error. Thus, p<0.025 was considered statistically significant.
Results
When the age, gender and laboratory parameters of the patient and healthy control
groups were compared, both groups were similar, except that the female ratio was higher
in healthy control than the patient group. Among the SS patients included in our study,
there was no patient with organ involvement and on severe immunosuppressive therapy.
There were mostly sicca symptoms, arthralgia, and arthritis. ([Table 1])
Table 1 Patient characteristics and laboratory parameters of the study population.
|
Sjögren Syndrome patients, n=85
|
Control patients, n=65
|
p
|
Age, years, mean±SD
|
55.1±11.3
|
53.5±11.2
|
0.538
|
Female, n (%)
|
76 (89.4)
|
43 (66.2)
|
<0.0001
|
Disease duration, years, median (min-max)
|
7.8 (0.3–20)
|
NA
|
|
Hb g/dl, mean±SD
|
13.3±1.2
|
13.1±1.2
|
0.422
|
White blood cell count (109/L), mean±SD
|
6895±2313
|
6826±2067
|
0.849
|
Trombosit ,mean±SD
|
256±61
|
265±58
|
0.334
|
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h), median (min-max)
|
14 (5–48)
|
12 (4–44)
|
0.623
|
C-reactive protein (mg/dL), median (min-max)
|
3.0 (1.0–13.2)
|
3.2 (1.0–7.1)
|
0.187
|
Creatinine mg/dL, mean±SD
|
0.75±0.19
|
0.71±0.16
|
0.247
|
AST (IU), mean±SD
|
22.6±5.7
|
21.8±5.4
|
0.422
|
ALT (IU), mean±SD
|
21.5±7.4
|
21.0±7.1
|
0.834
|
Sicca symptom, n (%)
|
83 (97.6)
|
|
|
Schirmer test positivity (<5 mm/5 min), n (%)
|
61 (71.8)
|
|
|
Anti SSA/Ro antibody positivity, n (%)
|
35 (41.2)
|
|
|
Anti SSB/La antibody positivity, n (%)
|
21 (24.7)
|
|
|
ANA positivity, n (%)
|
69 (81.2)
|
|
|
Minor salivary gland biopsy positivity, n (%)
|
48/66 (72.7)
|
|
|
Arthritis, n (%)
|
47 (55.3)
|
|
|
Hydroxychloroquine, n (%)
|
85 (100)
|
|
|
Steroid, n (%)
|
38 (44.7)
|
|
|
DMARDs, n (%)
|
32 (37.6)
|
|
|
Of the SS patients, 39 (45.8%) had QQ phenotype, 38 (44.7%) had QR and 8 (9.4%) had
RR. Of healthy controls, 30 (46.2%) had QQ, 31 (47.7%) had QR and 4 (6.2%) had RR
phenotype ([Table 2]).
Table 2 Distribution of groups according to paraoxonase pheontypes.
|
Control
|
SjS Group
|
Total
|
QQ
|
30 (20.0%)
|
39 (26.0%)
|
69 (46.0%)
|
QR
|
31 (20.7%)
|
38 (25.3)
|
69 (46.0%)
|
RR
|
4 (2.7%)
|
8 (5.3%)
|
12 (8.0%)
|
Total
|
65 (43.3%)
|
85 (56.7%)
|
150 (100%)
|
*RR phenotype was not found to be enough in SjS and in control groups, the QR and the
RR phenotype groups were unified for statistical analysis.
The mean level of TAC was 3.48±0.48 μmol Trolox eqv./l in controls and 2.72±0.63 μmol
Trolox eqv./l in SS patients according to QQ. The mean level of TAC was 3.43±0.40
μmol Trolox eqv./l in controls and 2.60±0.59 in SS patients according to QR+RR. The
median level of TOS was 1.90 (1.55) μmol H2O2 eqv./I in controls and 2.96 (3.88) μmol
H2O2 eqv./I in SS patients according to QQ. The median level of TOS was 1.51 (1.50)
μmol H2O2 eqv./I in controls and 2.51 (2.02) μmol H2O2 eqv./I in SS patients according
to QR+RR. There were statistically significant differences between QQ and QR+RR phenotype
for TAC, and TOS (p<0.001) between controls and SS patients. The median level of TTL
of control group was 284.50 (57.75) μmol/L according to QQ . The median level of TTL
of SS patients was 207.81 (41.07) μmol/L according to QQ. There were statistically
significant differences between the groups (p<0.001). The median level of TTL of control
group was 296.00 (63.00) μmol/L according to QR+RR. The median level of TTL of SS
patients was 202.62 (64.96) μmol/L according to QR+RR. There were statistically significant
differences between the groups (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference
between the patients and the controls for the other parameters according to QQ and
QR+RR ([Table 3]).
Table 3 Distribution of measurements according to groups and PON 1 phenotypes.
|
Control
|
SS Patients
|
p-valuea
|
TAC (μmol Trolox eqv./l)
|
|
|
|
QQ
|
3.48±0.48
|
2.72±0.63
|
<0.001
|
QR+RR
|
3.43±0.40
|
2.60±0.59
|
<0.001
|
p-value b
|
0.659
|
0.382
|
|
TOS (μmol H2O2 eqv./I)
|
|
|
|
QQ
|
1.90 (1.55)
|
2.96 (3.88)
|
<0.001
|
QR+RR
|
1.51 (1.50)
|
2.51 (2.02)
|
<0.001
|
p-value b
|
0.385
|
0.160
|
|
PON (U/L)
|
|
|
|
QQ
|
94.18 (31.21)
|
110.36 (30.53)
|
0.015
|
QR+RR
|
282.08 (122.19)
|
308.28 (132.41)
|
0.139
|
p-value b
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
|
SPON (U/L)
|
|
|
|
QQ
|
279.35 (101.65)
|
216.68 (62.00)
|
<0.001
|
QR+RR
|
678.00 (259.00)
|
601.19 (220.96)
|
0.079
|
p-value b
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
|
TTL (μmol/L)
|
|
|
|
QQ
|
284.50 (57.75)
|
207.81 (41.07)
|
<0.001
|
QR+RR
|
296.00 (63.00)
|
202.62 (64.96)
|
<0.001
|
p-value b
|
0.155
|
0.640
|
|
|
Control
|
SS Patients
|
p-value a
|
ARES (U/L)
|
|
|
|
QQ
|
201.93±66.83
|
214.82±61.94
|
0.410
|
QR+RR
|
215.26±62.95
|
223.84±64.03
|
0.549
|
p-value b
|
0.411
|
0.513
|
|
OSI (AU; arbitrary unit)
|
|
|
|
QQ
|
0.08 (0.16)
|
0.07 (0.06)
|
0.140
|
QR+RR
|
0.07 (0.07)
|
0.06 (0.07)
|
0.075
|
p-value b
|
0.385
|
0.350
|
|
AOPP (mmol/L)
|
|
|
|
QQ
|
21.26 (21.17)
|
14.19 (8.38)
|
0.095
|
QR+RR
|
17.79 (15.06)
|
17.19 (13.10)
|
0.819
|
p-value b
|
0.407
|
0.130
|
|
IMA (U/mL)
|
|
|
|
QQ
|
6415.00 (4850.62)
|
5075.00 (2980.00)
|
0.345
|
QR+RR
|
61.05.00 (3697.50)
|
5280.00 (3223.75)
|
0.399
|
p-value b
|
0.854
|
0.788
|
|
SPONAR (U/mL)
|
|
|
|
QQ
|
1.50 (0.40)
|
1.02 (0.28)
|
<0.001
|
QR+RR
|
3.20 (0.79)
|
2.60 (0.79)
|
<0.001
|
p-value b
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
|
PONAR (U/mL)
|
|
|
|
QQ
|
0.47 (0.13)
|
0.50 (0.16)
|
0.116
|
QR+RR
|
1.32 (0.40)
|
1.38 (0.45)
|
0.947
|
p-value b
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
|
a=Comparisons between Control and SS groups according to PON 1 phenotypes. Bonferroni
Correction was applied for controlling Type I error. p<0.025 was considered statistically
significant, b=Comparisons of groups in their own right accordinrg to PON 1 phenotypes.
Bonferroni Correction was applied for controlling Type I error. p<0.025 was considered
statistically significant. RR phenotype was not found to be enough in SS groups and
in control groups, the QR and the RR phenotype groups were unified for statistical
analysis.
Discussion
In the present study, the SS patients with QQ and QR+RR phenotype of PON 1 enzyme
had lower TTL levels than controls. Serum TOS levels were higher in SS patients than
in controls. On the other hand, serum TAC levels were higher in controls than in SS
patients. The other parameters including ARE were not significantly different .
Similar to our study, Szanto et al studied human PON1 activity and phenotype distributionin
patients with Sjögren’s ayndrome by dual-substrate method [10]. It was found that phenotype distribution cause decrease in PON activity in patients
with SS.
Both plasma and tissue TAC, TOS and OSI levels had been previously studied in cardiovascular
diseases [11]. Plasma and tissue oxidant stress and antioxidant parameters were not different
than patients with rheumatic and degenerative heart valve disease [12].Harma et al suggested that measuring TAC, TOS, and OSI during pregnancy may help
us for determining oxidative damage on plasental tissue in preeclampsia which is another
vasculoendothelial disease [11]. Sarban et al studied plasma TAC levels, lipid peroxidation, erythrocyte antioxidant
enzyme activities in patiets with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA)
[13]. They suggested that TAC measurement may be useful for evaluating the plasma antioxidant
status of RA patients. Also, they found antioxidant defense system doesn’t work properly
in RA patients. Decreased levels of TAC, antioxidant enzymes (GSH-Px, CAT) and increased
MDA concentrations may be seen in RA patients in contrast to OA [13]. In another study, serum PON1, ARE activity and PON1 phenotype distribution were
evaluated in chronic liver disease [14]. It was suggested that serum PON1 and ARE activities were reduced in patients with
chronic liver damage and these could be promising biomarkers to evaluate of the presence
and severity of chronic liver damage [14].
PON and ARE activity were studied in some other rheumatic diseases. There was no significant
difference in ankylosing spondylitis and control group, and no relation with disease
activity [15]. In rheumatoid arthritis, their levels had significantly decreased [16]
[17]. In psoriasis, there was no relation with percentage of lesions [18]. In systemic lupus erythematosus, decreased levels of them were related with hyperlipidemia
and atherosclerosis [19]
[20]. In attack free patients with familial Mediterranean fever, their levels were normal
[21]and in active Behçet’s disease their levels were decreased [22].
Chronic lymphocytic infiltration of glands, and imbalance of antioxidant/oxidant status
could be responsible in the pathogenesis of SS. Excess expression of proinflammatory
cytokines may increase oxidative stress with reactive oxygen species produced by activated
granulocytes. In some studies, excess levels of oxidative stress markers in saliva,
decreased expression of antioxidant activities in cojunctival epithelial cells and
parotid gland tissue were reported in SS’ patients [23].Also, mitochondrial dysfunction was reported in SS pathogenesis [24]. It was postulated that oxidative modifications of inflammation of proteins contributes
to the development of autoantibodies of SS and systemic lupus erythemathosus by inactivating
T cells through nitration, epigenetically altering gene expression in a subset of
CD4+T cells [25].
We didn’t evaluated the relationship antioxidant and oxidant parameters according
to the SS disease activity which is limitation of the study In the present study,
we studied serum PON1 and ARE activities, PON1 phenotype distributions and correlation
between these and TAC, TOS, OSI and other parameters. We commended that antioxidant
parameters were lower in SS patients compared with healthy controls, and inversely
oxidants were higher. Further studies are necessary for determining and evaluating
for relationship oxidative stress and chronic inflammation of the salivary and lacrimal
glands, and other tissues such as vascular system in SS.