Die radiologische Verlaufskontrolle von primären Hüft- und Knieendoprothesen – Empfehlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Endoprothetik (AE)

Philipp von Roth; Jörg Lützner; Klaus-Peter Günther; Rudolf Ascherl; Karl-Dieter Heller; Stephan Kirschner; Carsten Perka

doi:10.1055/a-1164-9679

Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Table of Contents

Z Orthop Unfall 2020; 158(03): 276-279
DOI: 10.1055/a-1164-9679

Berichte aus den Sektionen

Die radiologische Verlaufskontrolle von primären Hüft- und Knieendoprothesen – Empfehlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Endoprothetik (AE)

Philipp von Roth

¹Sporthopaedicum, Straubing

,

Jörg Lützner

²UniversitätsCentrum für Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden

,

Klaus-Peter Günther

²UniversitätsCentrum für Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden

,

Rudolf Ascherl

³Kirchham

,

Karl-Dieter Heller

⁴Orthopädische Klinik Braunschweig, Stiftung Herzogin-Elisabeth-Hospital, Braunschweig

,

Stephan Kirschner

⁵St. Vincentius-Kliniken, Klinik für Orthopädie, Karlsruhe

,

Carsten Perka

⁶Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité Berlin

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Full Text

References

Literatur
1 IQTIG – Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen, Bobzin H, Neumann A, Tremmel R. Qualitätsreport 2019. Im Internet (Stand: 05.05.2020): https://iqtig.org/downloads/berichte/2018/IQTIG_Qualitaetsreport-2019_2019-09-25.pdf
2 Teeny SM, York SC, Mesko JW. et al. Long-term follow-up care recommendations after total hip and knee arthroplasty: results of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeonsʼ member survey. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 954-962
3 Thiele K, Perka C, Matziolis G. et al. Current failure mechanisms after knee arthroplasty have changed: polyethylene wear is less common in revision surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97: 715-720
4 Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C. et al. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today–has anything changed after 10 years?. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 1774-1778
5 Postler A, Lützner C, Beyer F. et al. Analysis of Total Knee Arthroplasty revision causes. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19: 55
6 Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E. et al. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 128-133
7 Ries MD, Link TM. Monitoring and risk of progression of osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 2013; 62: 207-214
8 Sundberg M, Lidgren L, W-Dahl A, Robertsson O. Annual report 2016 – Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Im Internet (Stand: 19.10.2017): https://www.myknee.se/pdf/SVK_2016_Eng_1.0.pdf
9 Behery OA, Kearns SM, Rabinowitz JM. et al. Cementless vs. Cemented Tibial Fixation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 1510-1515
10 Niemeläinen M, Skyttä ET, Remes V. et al. Total knee arthroplasty with an uncemented trabecular metal tibial component: a registry-based analysis. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 57-60
11 Henricson A, Nilsson KG. Trabecular metal tibial knee component still stable at 10 years. Acta Orthop 2016; 87: 504-510
12 Pulido L, Abdel MP, Lewallen DG. et al. The Mark Coventry Award: Trabecular metal tibial components were durable and reliable in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 34-42
13 Choy WS, Yang DS, Lee KW. et al. Cemented versus cementless fixation of a tibial component in LCS mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty performed by a single surgeon. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 2397-2401
14 Nelissen RG, Valstar ER, Rozing PM. Hydroxyapatite augmentation of the porous coating improves fixation of tibial components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81: 368-369
15 Carlsson A, Björkman A, Besjakov J. et al. Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation: a randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years. Acta Orthop 2005; 76: 362-369
16 Streit MR, Haeussler D, Bruckner T. et al. Early Migration Predicts Aseptic Loosening of Cementless Femoral Stems: A Long-term Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474: 1697-1706
17 Kroell A, Beaulé P, Krismer M. et al. Aseptic stem loosening in primary THA: migration analysis of cemented and cementless fixation. Int Orthop 2009; 33: 1501-1505
18 Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Valstar ER, Kaptein BL. et al. Good diagnostic performance of early migration as a predictor of late aseptic loosening of acetabular cups: results from ten years of follow-up with Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94: 874-880
19 Abrahams JM, Kim YS, Callary SA. et al. The diagnostic performance of radiographic criteria to detect aseptic acetabular component loosening after revision total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B: 458-464
20 Kim YS, Abrahams JM, Callary SA. et al. Proximal translation of > 1 mm within the first two years of revision total hip arthroplasty correctly predicts whether or not an acetabular component is loose in 80 % of cases: a case-control study with confirmed intra-operative outcomes. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B: 465-474
21 Bernthal NM, Celestre PC, Stavrakis AI. et al. Disappointing short-term results with the DePuy ASR XL metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27: 539-544
22 Pivec R, Meneghini RM, Hozack WJ. et al. Modular taper junction corrosion and failure: how to approach a recalled total hip arthroplasty implant. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 1-6
23 Meftah M, Haleem AM, Burn MB. et al. Early corrosion-related failure of the rejuvenate modular total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96: 481-487
24 Vanrusselt J, Vansevenant M, Vanderschueren G. et al. Postoperative radiograph of the hip arthroplasty: what the radiologist should know. Insights Imaging 2015; 6: 591-600