Adding efficiency to proficiency: a study of trainee polypectomy efficiency metrics

Abstract

Background Although validated colonoscopy assessment tools exist, they do not measure efficiency. This study aimed to assess content validity of polypectomy efficiency (PE) and neoplastic polypectomy efficiency (NPE) as colonoscopy efficiency indices.

Methods Data from a randomized controlled trial evaluating polypectomy among gastroenterology trainees were utilized. PE and NPE were defined as number of polyps (or neoplastic polyps) removed/withdrawal time × 100. Content validity was assessed by determining the association between efficiency indices and polypectomy times.

Results 20 trainees performed 601 colonoscopies. There was a strong association between PE/NPE and actual polypectomy times: as polypectomy time increased by 1 minute, the PE decreased by 0.48 (P = 0.001) and NPE decreased by 0.24 (P = 0.03).

Conclusions The study proposed and provided content validity for PE and NPE as colonoscopy efficiency indices.

• References

• 1 Rose S, Fix OK, Shah BJ. et al. Entrustable professional activities for gastroenterology fellowship training. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26: 1204-1214
• 2 Sedlack RE, Coyle WJ, Obstein KL. et al. ASGE’s assessment of competency in endoscopy evaluation tools for colonoscopy and EGD. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 1-7
• 3 Holmboe ES, Sherbino J, Long DM. et al. The role of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach 2010; 32: 676-682
• 4 Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA. et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 2010; 376: 1923-1958
• 5 Patel SG, Keswani R, Elta G. et al. Status of competency-based medical education in endoscopy training: a nationwide survey of US ACGME-accredited gastroenterology training programs. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 956-962
• 6 Sedlack RE. The Mayo Colonoscopy Skills Assessment Tool: validation of a unique instrument to assess colonoscopy skills in trainees. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1125-1133.e3
• 7 Barton JR, Corbett S, van der Vleuten CP. The validity and reliability of a Direct Observation of Procedural Skills assessment tool: assessing colonoscopic skills of senior endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 591-597
• 8 Patel SG, Duloy A, Kaltenbach T. et al. Development and validation of a video-based cold snare polypectomy assessment tool (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 1222-1230.e2
• 9 Downing SM. Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ 2003; 37: 830-837
• 10 McCashland T, Brand R, Lyden E. et al. The time and financial impact of training fellows in endoscopy. CORI Research Project. Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 3129-3132
• 11 Bitar H, Zia H, Bashir M. et al. Impact of fellowship training level on colonoscopy quality and efficiency metrics. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 88: 378-387
• 12 Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 31-53
• 13 Sedlack RE, Coyle WJ. Assessment of competency in endoscopy: establishing and validating generalizable competency benchmarks for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 516-523.e1