A Forensic Aspect of Fetal Shoulder Dystocia

Abstract

Fetal shoulder dystocia (FSD) is an unpredictable and critical obstetric intrapartum emergency, where an objective problem is the relationship between the mother's pelvis and the child, i. e., an anthropometric disorder of delivery mechanics and dynamics. It is evident that the need to perform other maneuvers indicates the severity of FSD, which in turn correlates with the consequent iatrogenic injury of the fetus and/or mother. FSD is certainly the most controversial forensic obstetric problem, with the most disputes, compensation for damages due to peripartum injury to the child and/or mother, pain suffered, the need for someone else's care, and permanent disability. Suboptimal procedures and inadequate documentation are factors of forensic risk and subsequent litigations. Prevention of FSD is generally not possible, although good antenatal care can sometimes exclude risky cases of FSD, and some rare, chronic intrauterine disorders can result in orthopedic and neurological sequelae, which is especially important in forensic analysis. Because FSD is largely impossible to predict, it must be viewed as an intrapartum acceptable risk. During childbirth, FSD may compromise the safety of the mother and unborn child, therefore education and skills acquisition are necessary for obstetric work. Risk control, proper procedures, and proper documentation, along with good communication with the pregnant women and their families, significantly reduce litigation procedures.

Key words

shoulder dystocia - forensic - clinical risk

Publication History

Received: 30 March 2020

Accepted: 16 May 2020

Article published online:
23 June 2020

• References

• 1 Menticoglou S. Shoulder dystocia: incidence, mechanisms, and management strategies. Int J Womens Health 2018; 10: 723-732
• 2 Habek D. Fetal shoulder dystocia. Acta Med Croat 2002; 56: 57-63
• 3 Habek D. Assisted delivery of the shoulder dystocia. Gynaecol Perinatol 2005; 14: 166-170
• 4 Habek D. Severe refractory bilateral shoulder dystocia released with digital hooking (Bourgeois–Siegemundin) manoeuvre. J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 39: 581
• 5 Habek D. (ed) Forensic Gynecology and Perinatology. Zagreb: Medicinska naklada and Catholic University of Croatia; 2018: 10-25
• 6 Baskett TF, Allen AC. Perinatal implications of shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86: 14-17
• 7 Spong CY, Beall M, Rodrigues D. et al. An objective definition of shoulder dystocia: prolonged head-to-body delivery intervals and/or the use of ancillary obstetric maneuvers. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86: 433-436
• 8 Dudenhausen JW. Die Schulterdystokie – Folgen und Vorgehen. Zbl Gynäkol 2001; 123: 369-374
• 9 McEwan A, Johnson IR. The problem of shoulder dystocia. Curr Obstet Gynecol 2001; II: 45-49
• 10 Skolbekken JA. Shoulder dystocia – malpractice or acceptable risk?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79: 750-756
• 11 Gilstrop M. An update on the acute management of shoulder dystocia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2016; 109: 813-819
• 12 Sancetta R, Khanzada H, Leante R. Shoulder shrug maneuver to facilitate delivery during shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133: 1178-1181
• 13 Schwenzer T, Bahm J. Schulterdystokie und Plexusparese. Klinik, Prävention, Gutachten und Dokumentation. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 2016: 129-142
• 14 Schwenzer T, Bahm J, Hitschold T. Schulterdystokie und konnatale Armplexusparese. Frauenarzt 2013; 54: 1175-1177
• 15 Torki M, Barton L, Miller DA. et al. Severe brachial plexus palsy in women without shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 539-541
• 16 Zaami S, Busardò FP, Signore F. et al. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy: a population-based retrospective case-control study and medicolegal considerations. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31: 1412-1417
• 17 Okby R, Sheiner E. Risk factors for neonatal brachial plexus paralysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 286: 333-336
• 18 Leigh TH, James CE. Medicolegal commentary: shoulder dystocia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 815-817
• 19 Domingues AP, Moura P, Vieira DN. Obstetric litigation: the importance of the quality of clinical files and its influence on expertise conclusions. J Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 35: 146-149
• 20 Fieux G. De la pathogene des paralysis brachiales chez le nouveaune. Paralysis obstetriciales. Ann Gynecol Obstet 1897; 47: 52-64
• 21 Taghizadeh Z, Pourbakhtiar M, Azimi K. et al. Claims about medical malpractices resulting in neonatal and maternal impairment in Iran. J Forensic Leg Med 2019; 66: 44-49
• 22 Habek D. Medical forensic expertise in obstetrics. Lijec Vjesn 2008; 130: 297-302
• 23 Habek D, Herman R, Đuran T. et al. Forensic aspect of fetal shoulder dystocia. Gynaecol Perinatol 2005; 14: 24-28
• 24 Hidža Čohar M, Čohar B, Habek D. Peripartum injuries: clavicular fracture and brachioparesis. Acta Medicorum 2001; 27: 59-62
• 25 Habek D. Intrapartal humerus fracture in severe refractory transverse shoulder dystocia. Gynaecol Perinatol 2018; 27: 42
• 26 Habek D. Transient recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis after shoulder dystocia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015; 130: 87-88
• 27 Hamida N, Hakim A, Fourati H. et al. Neonatal cervical artery dissection secondary to birth trauma. Arch Pediatr 2014; 21: 201-205
• 28 Shao Ern Tan T, Mohamad A, Dharmaraj S. Bilateral fractures in a shoulder dystocia delivery. BMJ Case Reports 2016;
• 29 Rozenberg P. In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2016; 45: 1037-1044
• 30 Chauhan SP, Laye MR, Lutgendorf M. et al. A multicenter assessment of 1,177 cases of shoulder dystocia: lessons learned. Am J Perinatol 2014; 31: 401-406
• 31 Rahman J, Bhattee G, Rahman MS. Shoulder dystocia in a 16-year experience in a teaching hospital. J Reprod Med 2009; 54: 378-384
• 32 Enekwe A, Rothmund R, Uhl B. Abdominal access for shoulder dystocia as a last resort – a case report. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2012; 72: 634-638
• 33 Draycott TJ, Crofts JF, Ash JP. et al. Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 14-20
• 34 Gerstner GJ. Forensische Geburtshilfe. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter Gmbh & Co. KG; 2011
• 35 Symon A. Obstetric Litigation from A–Z. Dinton–Salisbury:. Quay Books Mark Allen Publishing Ltd; 2001