Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common cause of hospital admissions worldwide. While health care systems are under significant strain during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is logical to reduce hospital admissions for patients at very low risk of poor outcomes. Additionally, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is recognized as an aerosol-generating procedure that should be restricted during the pandemic, because of the risk of spreading COVID-19 and the limited availability of personal protection equipment [1]
[2]. Therefore, elective and even urgent endoscopy has been suspended in many centers worldwide. Current guidelines recommend the use of the Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS) for predicting the need for hospital-based intervention in patients with UGIB [3]
[4]. Patients with GBS ≤ 1 are recognized to be at very low risk and can safely be managed as outpatients with no need for inpatient endoscopy [3]
[4].
Based on data from a large international multicenter study including 3012 consecutive patients with UGIB [5], we have evaluated the outcomes associated with extended low risk GBS thresholds for identifying patients needing hospital admission and endoscopic therapy.
[Table 1] shows the numbers of identified low-risk patients and outcomes for GBS thresholds 0 to ≤ 5. Use of GBS ≤ 2 or ≤ 3 as thresholds for avoiding hospital admission in UGIB would lead to avoidance of admission and in-hospital endoscopy in 26 % – 32 % of all UGIB patients. In patients classified as being at low risk, the risk of needing endoscopic therapy (3.3 % – 4.1 %), needing surgery or embolization (0.5 %), death within 30 days (0.8 % – 1.7 %), and delayed identification of upper gastrointestinal cancer (0.65 % – 0.75 %) would probably be acceptable in countries with a health care system facing significant strain or potential collapse from COVID-19. If such patients are admitted for other reasons, the very low risk of needing endoscopic therapy suggests endoscopy could be undertaken electively as an outpatient. Consistently with these suggested thresholds, re-analysis of data from a multicenter study of 1555 patients with UGIB found endoscopic therapy was required in 4.2 % – 4.4 % patients with GBS 2 or 3, but rose to 9.4 % for GBS 4 [6].
Table 1
Outcomes among patients (n = 3012 [5]) with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and low Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS), according to threshold used.
GBS threshold
|
Patients classified as low risk, n (%)
|
Outcomes, n (%)
|
Hemostatic intervention, and/or Need for transfusion, and/or, Death
|
Need for transfusion
|
Endoscopic therapy
|
Surgery/embolization
|
30-day mortality
|
0
|
254 (8.7)
|
5 (2.0)
|
0 (0)
|
3 (1.2)
|
1 (0.4)
|
1 (0.4)
|
≤ 1
|
564 (19)
|
19 (3.4)
|
10 (1.8)
|
8 (1.4)
|
2 (0.4)
|
2 (0.4)
|
≤ 2
|
770 (26)
|
45 (5.9)
|
20 (2.6)
|
25 (3.3)
|
4 (0.5)
|
6 (0.8)
|
≤ 3
|
934 (32)
|
72 (7.7)
|
28 (3.0)
|
38 (4.1)
|
5 (0.5)
|
16 (1.7)
|
≤ 4
|
1120 (38)
|
105 (9.4)
|
39 (3.5)
|
60 (5.4)
|
6 (0.5)
|
22 (2.0)
|
≤ 5
|
1299 (44)
|
159 (12)
|
61 (4.7)
|
80 (6.2)
|
7 (0.5)
|
41 (3.2)
|
Missing data: GBS, n = 80; need for transfusion, n = 23; endoscopic therapy, n = 20; surgery or embolization, n = 5; and mortality, n = 1.
Combining extended GBS thresholds with exclusion of patients with major risk factors including systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg, syncope, or liver cirrhosis was not superior to use of GBS ≤ 2 – 3 alone. However, clinical judgment would still be required for specific patients.
In countries severely affected by COVID-19, we suggest that the low risk threshold for defining UGIB patients who require hospitalization and inpatient endoscopy could be raised to GBS ≤ 2 or even GBS ≤ 3. These patients could be treated with high dose oral proton pump inhibitors and evaluated with endoscopy once the epidemic has peaked.