Key words
obesity - insulin resistance - adiponectin resistance - adiponectin paradox - diabetes mellitus
Introduction
The Global Burden of Disease Study estimated that overweight adults, that is, with a
body-mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m2 or higher, increased
from 28.8% to 36.9% in men and from 29.8% to 38.0%
in women between 1980 and 2013 worldwide [1].
In 2016, more than 1.9 billion adults aged 18 years and older were overweight. Of
these, over 650 million were obese [2].
Overweight and obesity are closely associated with a high risk of comorbidities, such
as insulin resistance and its most important outcomes, including type 2 diabetes
mellitus (T2DM), metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular diseases [3]. Among the causes of cardiovascular disease,
chronic heart failure has been increasing continuously worldwide, mostly as a factor
of the increase in life expectancy [4]
. Together, these comorbidities increase the mortality rates in weight excess
individuals [5].
Evidence both from experimental studies and from clinical data suggests that in
obesity, the expansion and differentiation of adipocytes cause recruitment of
several types of inflammatory cells, leading to increased expression of inflammatory
cytokines, with adverse effects such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α),
monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), interleukin 6 (IL-6), lipocalin-2,
adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [6].
Adiponectin has emerged as a major salutary adipocytokine, with insulin-sensitizing
[7], anti-inflammatory [8], anti-atherogenic [9], and cardiovascular protective functions
[10]. Adiponectin circulates in healthy
subjects at very high concentrations, with levels ranging from 3 to
30 μg/ml [11].
However, under metabolically unfavorable conditions, visceral adipose tissue-derived
cytokines might reduce the transcription of the adiponectin gene [12] and consequently its circulating levels
[13]. Hypoadiponectinemia is negatively
associated with various conditions, such as insulin resistance, abdominal obesity
and T2DM [14], non-alcoholic fatty liver
disease (NAFLD) [15], metabolic syndrome [16], dyslipidemia [17], hypertension [18] , and cardiovascular diseases [19].
In contrast, several recent clinical trials and meta-analyses have reported that high
circulating adiponectin levels were positively associated with cardiovascular
mortality and all-cause mortality in different cohorts of patients and clinical
settings [20]
[21]
[22]
[23]. High adiponectin levels are also
associated with weight loss, low muscle mass, and poor physical functioning among
the elderly [24]. As adiponectin has been
considered a healthy adipokine, these results are biologically intriguing and
counterintuitive, and came to be termed “the adiponectin paradox”
[25]. Adiponectin paradox is frequently
associated with adiponectin resistance, a concept that was introduced to report the
down-regulation of adiponectin receptors in insulin-resistance and obesity [26]
[27]
.
Here, we review the contradiction that both basic scientific knowledge and results
from earlier observational and prospective clinical studies show adiponectin as a
health promoter, whereas recent evidence from Mendelian randomization studies
indicates that circulating adiponectin levels are an unexpected predictor of
increased morbidity and mortality rates in several clinical conditions.
Adiponectin and Inflammation
Adiponectin and Inflammation
Anti-inflammatory actions of adiponectin
An extensive body of research suggests that adiponectin acts as an
anti-inflammatory mediator in cardiometabolic disorders such as T2DM, hepatic
steatosis, and cardiovascular disease. At the cellular level, several processes
are involved in the beneficial role of adiponectin in inflammation, including:
(i) the inhibition of Toll-like receptor family-induced activation of
NFκB in macrophages [28]; (ii) the
suppression of TNF-α expression and monocyte chemoattractant protein
[29]; (iii) the increase of tissue
inhibitor-1 through the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 expression [30]; (iv) the promotion of macrophages
polarization and its transformation from a proinflammatory M1 to an
anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype [30]; (v)
the inhibition of transformation of human monocyte-derived macrophages into foam
cells, thus protecting against atherogenesis [31]; and (vi) its inhibitor effect on oxidative stress of
db/db mice aortic endothelial cells by increasing nitric oxide
bioavailability through AMPK and cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) [30].
Proinflammatory actions of adiponectin
Paradoxically and unexpected, adiponectin may exert a deleterious effect related
to its capacity in promoting inflammation. However, the proinflammatory action
of adiponectin is controversial, particularly in conditions of in vitro assays,
under the dependence of experimental conditions such as the source of
adiponectin, the molecular weight of adiponectin, and the temporal response of
cell (usually macrophages) exposition to inflammatory stimuli [32]
[33]. Differently from in vitro studies,
the immune system in vivo is permanently submitted to higher circulating levels
of adiponectin, which mediate a cell memory effect that induces an
anti-inflammatory response [32].
Nonetheless, there is an extensive literature showing both in vitro and in vivo
conditions a paradoxically elevated adiponectin concentration in human
inflammatory diseases such as chronic inflammatory bowel disease
(Crohon’s disease) [34],
rheumatoid arthritis [35], end stage renal
disease [36], hepatic cirrhosis [37] and chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease [38]
. Although these data may explain the divergent results of in-vitro and
in-vivo studies reported in the literature, the precise mechanism of adiponectin
proinflammatory actions and in what way adiponectin can also modulate its
anti-inflammatory responses are still unknown.
Understanding Adiponectin Resistance
Understanding Adiponectin Resistance
Adiponectin resistance in obesity and diabetes
The concept of adiponectin resistance was initially introduced to describe the
downregulation of AdipoR1 in insulin-resistant states and obesity [26]][27]
. Adiponectin and insulin have numerous metabolic similarities, as both
promote glucose uptake and inhibit liver gluconeogenesis ([Figs. 1]
[2]). In high-fat-diet-induced obesity
and insulin-resistant states, insulin-cascade signaling is lessened by excess
lipid accumulation in skeletal muscle, impairing mitochondrial bioenergetics and
morphology [39]. Extensive published data
provide evidence that adiponectin and insulin resistances frequently co-exist,
and a vicious circle might be established in certain circumstances. For example,
any dysmetabolic condition associated with insulin resistance may result in
adiponectin resistance and hyperadiponectinemia, as the insulin/FOXO1
pathway regulates the levels of expression of adiponectin receptors and
adiponectin sensitivity [40].
Fig. 1 Adiponectin pathways: Adiponectins are secreted into the
bloodstream in different forms: globular, trimer, hexamer, and
high-molecular-weight (HMW) multimer. Adiponectin’s biological
effects are mediated by its specific receptors: AdipoR1, AdipoR2 and
T-cadherin (not shown). AdipoR1/R2 recruits the adaptor protein APPL1,
which initiates AMPK activation. APPL1 also activates other signaling
molecules, such as p38 MAPK, PPARα and the RAS-associated
protein Rab5. These pathways induce fatty-acid oxidation and glucose
uptake, by GLUT-4 translocation to the cell membrane. In addition,
adiponectin’s pathway enhances mitochondrial biogenesis by
sirtuin 1 activation. Adiponectin exerts anti-apoptotic actions by
stimulation of ceramidase activity and the formation of
sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P). It was shown that adiponectin effectively
induces insulin sensitivity by interaction with ISR 1/2. On the other
hand, APPL2 binds to AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 blocking adiponectin signaling
by both competitive inhibition of APPL1 and formation of APPL1/APPL2
heterodimers, thereby reducing APPL1 availability to AdipoRs. InsR:
Insulin receptor; ISR 1/2: Insulin receptor substrate 1 and 2; APPL 1/2:
Adaptor protein, phosphotyrosine interacting with PH domain and leucine
zipper 1 and 2; PI3K: Phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PDK1:
3-Phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1; AKT or PKB: Protein
kinase B; AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase; p38MAPK: p38
Mitogen-activated protein kinase; ACC: Acetylcarboxylase;
PGC1-α, Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma
coactivator 1-alpha; SIRT1: Sirtuin 1; Casp8: Caspase 8; GLUT-4: Glucose
transporter type 4; PPAR-α: Peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptor alpha; ACO: Enzyme acyl-CoA oxidase.
Fig. 2 Adiponectin and insulin sensitivity: Adiponectin isoforms
activate AMPK and PPAR-α in the liver and skeletal muscle. In
skeletal muscle, the globular form activates AMPK, mediated by the
AdipoR1 response. AMPK stimulation results in ACC activation, increasing
fatty-acid β-oxidation and glucose transporter (GLUT4)
translocation to the cell membrane, which enhances glucose uptake.
PPAR-α activation by adiponectin is an alternative pathway for
β-oxidation stimulation. In the liver, AMPK and PPAR-α
also increase fatty acid β-oxidation. In addition, the AMPK
pathway is responsible for reducing molecules involved in
gluconeogenesis. These two actions increase insulin sensitivity and
respond to the adiponectin-induced lowering of glucose in vivo. In
skeletal muscles, all forms of adiponectin activate the AMPK pathway. In
liver cells, only full-length adiponectin evokes AMPK activation. PEPCK:
Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; G6Pase: Glucose-6-phosphatase G6Pase;
AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase; PPAR-α: peroxisome
proliferator-activated receptor alpha; GLUT-4: Glucose transporter type
4; AdipoR1/2: Adiponectin receptor 1 and 2; ACC: Acetylcarboxylase.
Experimental protocols have extensively confirmed the co-occurrence of
adiponectin resistance and insulin resistance. In genetically obese mice,
AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 are significantly reduced in several insulin-sensitive
tissues such as skeletal muscle, liver, and adipose tissue, compared with
non-obese animals. Insulin reduces the expression of AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 via
downregulation of FOXO1 phosphorylation, with subsequent attenuation of
adiponectin binding and reduction of their metabolic homeostatic actions ([Fig. 3]) [26].
Fig. 3 Mechanisms of insulin and adiponectin resistance: In
normal insulin sensitivity, adiponectin enhances insulin sensitivity by
interacting with both ISRs and AKT. On the other hand, insulin
activation of PI3K/Akt pathway results in FOXO1 phosphorylation and
recruitment to cytosol. In normal conditions, this upregulates AdipoRs
expression enhancing adiponectin’s pathway (arrows) that
controls fatty acid oxidation, decreasing cells ceramides internal
levels. Under insulin and adiponectin resistant state, insulin pathway
is less active (dotted arrows) decreasing FOXO1 phosphorylation,
inducing its nucleartranslocation. In this case, FOXO1 reduces the
expression of AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 with subsequent attenuation of
adiponectin signaling (dotted arrows). AdipoRs downregulation attenuates
PGC1-α and PPARα activity, with a subsequent increase in
ceramides levels which in turns leads to endoplasmic reticulum stress
and a major reduction in adiponectin’s sensitivity. AdipoRs:
Adiponectin’s receptors; InsR: Insulin receptor; ISR 1/2:
Insulin receptor substrate 1 and 2; APPL1: Adaptor protein,
phosphotyrosine interacting with PH domain and leucine zipper 1; PI3K:
Phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PDK1: 3-Phosphoinositide-dependent protein
kinase-1; AKT or PKB: Protein kinase B; PGC1-α: Peroxisome
proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-α;
PPAR-α: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha; ACO,
enzyme acyl-CoA oxidase.
Simultaneous disruption of AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 might abolish adiponectin binding
and actions, resulting in increased tissue triglyceride content, inflammation,
and oxidative stress, thus leading to insulin resistance and marked glucose
intolerance [41]. Furthermore,
insulin-resistant obese mice show lower AdipoR1 protein levels in skeletal
muscle and reduced adiponectin sensitivity [40]. Mice with muscle-specific insulin resistance show high
circulating adiponectin levels and adiponectin resistance. The
PI3K/Akt/FOXO1 pathway mediates the insulin-inhibited expression
of AdipoR1 in skeletal muscle [42]. In
humans with genetically defective insulin receptors, high plasma adiponectin
levels and low leptin concentrations were reported [43].
Taken together, high insulin levels related to insulin resistance downregulate
AdipoR1 expression and adiponectin pathway, consequently reduces peroxisome
proliferator-activated receptor coactivator-1α (PGC1-α), with a
subsequent increase in ceramides, ultimately leading to adiponectin resistance
([Fig. 3]) [44]. Despite the experimental evidence
suggesting that increased insulin concentrations down-regulate AdipoR1 and
AdipoR2, the question of whether adiponectin resistance precedes and is
associated with the development of insulin resistance remains. In this regard,
Mullen and colleagues [27] conducted a
time-course high-fat diet (HFD) trial in rats for 3 days, 2 weeks, or 4 weeks,
to determine the onset of adiponectin resistance and to identify the resulting
temporal changes in lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity in skeletal muscle.
Adiponectin resistance emerged very quickly (as early as 3 days in HFD animals),
clearly demonstrating that it precedes the accumulation of skeletal muscle
lipids and insulin resistance in high-fat-fed rats.
Adiponectin resistance and chronic heart failure – An example of a
biologically two-faced molecule
Recently, adiponectin received the eponym “Janus molecule” [45], referring to its dual performance in
the natural history of certain chronic diseases, for example in chronic heart
failure (CHF). At an early stage of CHF, when the ventricular ejection fraction
is preserved (HFpEF), circulating adiponectin levels are lower and adiponectin
exerts a cardioprotective effect. In contrast, hyperadiponectinemia, reflecting
adiponectin resistance, and a possible detrimental effect of adiponectin on the
myocardium characterize advanced stages of heart failure reduced ejection
fraction (HFrEF) [45]
[46]. It has also been shown that the
biological response of AdipoRs to adiponectin in skeletal muscle tissue obtained
from patients with advanced heart failure is significantly impaired [45].
Adiponectin levels vary not only with the functional capacity of the heart, but
also with the patient’s metabolic status. Adiponectin levels are
increased in patients with advanced heart failure, but to a lesser extent in
diabetics than in non-diabetics [47].
Experimental protocols have demonstrated that higher adiponectin levels are
associated with severe myocardial dysfunction, advanced heart failure, and
higher mortality rates. Obese diabetic mice induced by a high-fat diet, when
submitted to myocardial infarction reperfusion (MIR) injury, needed a three-fold
higher dose of adiponectin to achieve significant cardioprotection, compared
with mice on a normal diet treated with a standard adiponectin dose. In
addition, the obese diabetic mice showed a significant reduction in both the
AMPK-dependent and AMPK-independently mediated cardioprotective effects of
adiponectin [48]. These findings strongly
suggest that adiponectin resistance develops in the obese diabetic heart.
Van Berendoncks and co-workers [49]
reported a local adiponectin system in skeletal-muscle biopsies obtained from
patients with HFrEF, which also showed high circulating levels of adiponectin. A
five-fold increase in the expression of adiponectin mRNA and protein were
observed in these patients, although the mRNA and protein expression levels of
skeletal muscle AdipoR1 were decreased. The authors also reported a deactivated
PPARα/AMPK pathway and down-regulation of several enzymes
involved in the metabolism of free fatty acids (FFA) and glucose, thus
characterizing a skeletal muscle metabolic deficiency and a functional
adiponectin resistance state. On the other hand, insulin resistance increases in
parallel with the severity of heart failure and accelerates the development of
skeletal-muscle wasting in cardiac patients [50].
Contributing to better comprehension of adiponectin resistance in the evolution
of heart failure, Cui and colleagues [51]
have shown, in hyperinsulinemia rat models induced by chronic infusion of
insulin, increased serum and myocardial adiponectin concentrations and decreases
in skeletal muscle and myocardial AdipoR1 expression and AMP-activated protein
kinase phosphorylation. These results indicate that despite an increase in serum
and myocardial adiponectin, the decreased AdipoR1 expression and AMPK
phosphorylation suggest an adiponectin-resistance state occurring in the early
stage of hyperinsulinemia.
However, the association of hyperadiponectinemia and heart failure must be
interpreted with caution. For example, it is not yet clear whether high
adiponectin levels are deleterious or beneficial to heart failure patients,
especially in those exhibiting reduced ejection fractions. On the other hand, no
relationship of adiponectin levels with incident heart failure was found in data
from the Framingham Offspring Study [52].
In addition, a U-shaped association between adiponectin and total mortality has
been reported in older men and women [53]
. Similarly, results from the Physicians’ Health Study
have shown data consistent with a J-shaped association between total adiponectin
and the risk of heart failure among male physicians in the USA [54]
. In a similar context, a nonlinear relationship between total and
high-molecular-weight adiponectin with incident T2DM, considered a major risk
factor for heart failure, was reported in older adults [55]. Taken together, this apparently
contradictory effect of adiponectin may be related to the evolution and
metabolic conditions of the natural history of heart failure, reinforcing a
nonlinear relationship of adiponectin and heart failure.
Some evidence suggests that adiponectin resistance can be reversed to adiponectin
sensitivity. In patients with advanced heart failure, the favorable impact of
hemodynamic correction (mechanical unloading) through implantation of a
ventricular assistance device (VAD) may reduce tissue inflammation and
adiponectin resistance in these patients. In 2012, Khan and colleagues [56] demonstrated, after implantation of a
VAD in a failing myocardium, a significant reduction in adiponectin levels,
reversed down-regulation of AdiopoR1 and AdipoR2, besides decreasing adiponectin
expression in adipose tissue, and decreased insulin resistance. Notably,
macrophage infiltration in adipose tissue was higher in heart-failure patients
compared with control subjects, but was normalized after VAD implantation. On
the other hand, in patients with HFrEF, endurance and resistance-training
exercise reduces circulating adiponectin concentrations, and normalized the
muscle-specific expression of adiponectin, AdipoR1, and genes involved in lipid
and glucose metabolism [57].
Recently, Waragai and collaborators [58]
suggest that hyperadiponectinemia might also be associated with Alzheimer
disease (AD). This group has proposed that adiponectin might be involved during
the reproductive stage promoting the amyloidogenic evolvability, which may
subsequently manifest as AD in senescence by the antagonistic pleiotropy
mechanism. Although adiponectin has been considered a neuroprotective cytokine
in experimental protocols, the result of a large prospective study conducted by
the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (n=535, aged 70 years, without dementia)
showed that higher levels of adiponectin were associated with significant
neuroimaging changes for hippocampal and cortical volumes, and cognitive
deficits [59]. In addition, there are
evidence suggesting that AD and CHF overlap and converge from the
pathophysiological point of view [60]. It
has been speculated that adiponectin paradox in certain chronic diseases, such
as CHF and chronic kidney disease, might be attributed to the stimulation of the
amyloidogenic evolvability [58].
Adiponectin Resistance and Adiponectin Paradox
Adiponectin Resistance and Adiponectin Paradox
Early findings from in vitro studies support the cardioprotective effects of
adiponectin [61]
[62]. Experimental and clinical evidence has
also shown that low adiponectin levels predict the risk of cardiovascular events
[63] and myocardium infarction [64], and are inversely associated with
early-onset coronary artery disease (CAD) and multiple coronary-artery stenosis
[65].
However, as already mentioned, in late stages of certain chronic diseases, high
adiponectin levels are associated with low functional capacity of organs, as occurs
in patients with chronic heart failure [66].
Moreover, hyperadiponectinemia is associated with a poor prognosis in elderly
subjects with weight loss, skeletal-muscle wasting, and disability [45], and in patients with cachexia in the
terminal phase of cancer [67]. Lee and
co-workers [68] have shown in a population
recruited from the Hong Kong Diabetes Registry the adiponectin paradox associated
with the development of new cases of cancer and cancer related deaths in type 2
diabetic patients. They concluded that hyperadiponectinemia could be a risk
biomarker of incident cancer in type 2 diabetes.
These results have been confirmed by numerous prospective studies and meta-analyses,
now focusing on the association of adiponectin levels with primary outcomes
(all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality rates), scientifically more robust
than surrogate endpoints. In this context, the apparently contradictory impact of a
reverse positive, rather than expected negative, relationship between adiponectin
and mortality rate came to be designated as the “adiponectin
paradox” [25]
[45]
[69].
The causes of the adiponectin paradox are still under debate, but some hypotheses
have been formulated. Tsukamoto and colleagues [70] have shown that atrial natriuretic peptide (NAP) and brain
natriuretic peptide (BNP) enhance the expression and secretion of adiponectin in
vitro by human adipocytes, and in subjects with CHF. In the same report, the
infusion of recombinant adiponectin increased the adiponectin serum concentration
and had a beneficial therapeutic effect on cardiomyocytes of patients with heart
failure [70]. Hyperadiponectinemia might also
be a compensatory mechanism in insulin-resistance states, reflecting a lowered
activity of insulin/IGF-1 receptor signaling pathways, which are essential
for homeostatic modulation of the central nervous system and cardiovascular systems
[71].
As stated above, besides adipose tissue, adiponectin can be expressed and secreted
ectopically in tissues such as bone marrow, osteoblasts, and vascular and skeletal
muscle cells. A recent study showed that bone-marrow adipose tissue (MAT) is a major
source of serum HMW adiponectin in subjects with anorexia nervosa [72]. MAT is also increased in aging- associated
leanness, which may explain the higher level of adiponectin in frail elderly persons
[73]. Last, plasma adiponectin might be
up-regulated because of adiponectin resistance, which reflects a decreased
expression and/or activity of adiponectin-receptor signaling, increased
endoplasmic reticulum stress, and inflammation.
Biologically, it can be speculated whether in individuals at greater risk of death,
increased adiponectin levels would not represent an in extremis failing attempt to
overcome adiponectin resistance in adipose tissue, vasculature, heart, kidney and
skeletal muscle [69]. Indeed, this response
would be beneficial and expected, as it could lead to prolongation of life.
Consistent with this hypothesis, adiponectin has been considered a protective
molecule for disease prevention in aging, particularly in healthy centenarians [74]. In humans, adiponectin/AdipoR
signaling activates the AMPK–SIRT1 pathway and positively regulates the PPAR
pathway, reducing oxidative stress. These signaling pathways have been considered
essential for longevity [75]. Unfortunately,
none of these data allow robust conclusions. So, further efforts are needed to
unravel the role of adiponectin in cardiometabolic health and, most importantly, its
paradoxical association with increased mortality risk.
Association of Circulating Adiponectin with Different Clinical Outcomes –
Expected and Unexpected Results
Association of Circulating Adiponectin with Different Clinical Outcomes –
Expected and Unexpected Results
Cross-sectional and prospective studies
Earlier studies conducted in a population highly prone to developing obesity and
exhibiting the highest reported prevalence of T2DM in the world, the Pima
Indians of Arizona, showed that Pima adults had lower plasma adiponectin levels
compared with Caucasians [76].
Hypoadiponectinemia in these patients predicted a reduction in insulin
sensitivity [77]. Subsequently, the
inverse relationship between plasma adiponectin and adiposity and
fasting-insulin levels recorded in adults was confirmed in Pima children [78]. These findings agreed with previous
observational studies in Japan [79]
[80], and were later confirmed in several
studies, including in multi-ethnic participants from the Dallas Heart Study
[81].
A close correlation of hypoadiponectinemia with a decrease in insulin sensitivity
and T2DM has been described in various population-based studies [82]. A meta-analysis emphasized the inverse
association between total plasma adiponectin levels and the incidence of T2DM
among various populations [83].
Conversely, a high level of adiponectin predicted a reduced risk for T2DM and
metabolic syndrome [84]
[85].
Another recent meta-analysis analyzed the accuracy and validity of circulating
adiponectin in the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome, and showed that plasma
levels of this adipokine may be a potentially useful biomarker for the detection
of individuals with metabolic syndrome, especially in populations with
significant insulin resistance. In addition, the risk of metabolic syndrome
associated with hypoadiponectinemia was higher in men than in women [86]. In addition, results from our group
have shown that the HMWA/HOMA-IR ratio, when compared with HOMA-IR (a
robust clinical and epidemiological marker of metabolic syndrome) and the active
circulating form of adiponectin (HMWA), was a sensitive predictor for metabolic
syndrome, being the only marker that was significantly associated with all the
individual components of metabolic syndrome [87].
Results of Mendelian randomization studies
Although some epidemiological evidence from observational and longitudinal
studies shows an association of hypoadiponectinemia with insulin resistance,
metabolic syndrome, and T2DM, these results have the limitations of classical
observational epidemiology. Overall, they point to the role of adiponectin as a
predictive biomarker, but do not support a causal relationship. Fortunately,
determining the causal relationship between an intermediate phenotype and the
outcome of interest became possible after genetic variants were identified that
consistently affect the outcome of certain traits. Thus, using genes as
instruments for inferring causal relationships in epidemiological studies,
through Mendelian randomization [88], has
been considered a valid approach to explore the relationships between
adiponectin and metabolic outcomes.
In this respect, studies of candidate genes and GWA have identified common and
rare variants at the ADIPOQ locus that are associated with the serum adiponectin
level [89]. Additional contributing loci
have been identified by large-scale GWA meta-analyses [90]
[91]
[92]. In the same context, Dastani and
colleagues [92], using datasets from an
international consortium, found strong evidence of an association between
several single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) adiponectin-decreasing gene scores
and hypertriglyceridemia, low-HDL-cholesterol, higher HOMA-IR, increased risk of
T2DM and increased waist-to-hip ratio, all component variables of metabolic
syndrome. Although the Mendelian randomization approach has limitations, it
provides consistent evidence to accept or reject a causal relationship between
intermediary biomarkers and complex diseases [93].
One of the first studies to explore the relationship of adiponectin to
metabolic-outcome phenotypes using Mendelian randomization was conducted in a
population comprised of Canadians of European, South Asian, Chinese, and
Aboriginal origins who had previously participated in two cross-sectional
studies of cardiovascular disease. The results showed an association of the
functional promoter SNP rs266729 in the ADIPOQ gene with lower serum
adiponectin and increased insulin resistance as evaluated by HOMA-IR, thus
suggesting a causal relationship between adiponectin level and insulin
resistance [93]
. Gao and co-workers confirmed these results, demonstrating in a
Caucasian population of Swedish men a strong causal relationship of genetic
variants of the ADIPOQ gene with adiponectin levels and insulin
sensitivity [94].
However, entirely different results were obtained from a larger multicenter
population sample from different countries, which indicated no causal
relationship between a genetic-risk score using available common SNPs associated
with adiponectin levels and insulin resistance (as measured by fasting insulin),
and T2DM, thus providing no consistent evidence that genetically influenced
decreased circulating adiponectin levels increase the risk of insulin resistance
or diabetes [95]. More recently, the
metabolic profiling of adiponectin levels was analyzed in a large population of
European adults who have participated in six longitudinal studies and one GWA
study. Using multivariate regression analyses, higher circulating adiponectin
levels were associated with a salutary metabolic profile. However, these
findings have not been confirmed by Mendelian randomization using genetic
variants in the vicinity of the adiponectin-encoding gene. These results
indicate that adiponectin levels are not a key determinant of metabolic profile,
but rather are an epiphenomenon in the context of cardiometabolic metabolic
traits [96].
Although pioneering studies have pointed toward the predictive value of
adiponectin levels in assessing the risk of myocardial infarction [97] and the extent of coronary heart
disease (CHD) [98]
, it is still controversial whether adiponectin is causally related to
CHD. Borges and colleagues conducted a Mendelian randomization study using data
from the GWA studies consortia CARDIoGRAM and CARDIoGRAMplusC4DMetabochip, with
more than 250 000 cases (CHD) and control subjects, the majority of European
ancestry. There was no evidence that genetic predisposition to increased
adiponectin levels reduced the risk of CHD, when the analysis was restricted to
ADIPOQ SNP. When the analysis used variants associated with
adiponectin across the genome, a protective effect of adiponectin appeared,
which disappeared after adjustment for CHD predictors [99].
The Mendelian randomization approach can be considered as nature’s
counterpart to randomized controlled studies, and has been widely used to
investigate the possible causal relationship between intermediate phenotypes
with metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes [100]
. In addition, Mendelian randomization studies are not as vulnerable as
observational studies, and can improve causal inference [101]
. In sum, Mendelian randomization is a means through which genetic
epidemiology may contribute to a better understanding of the environmental
determinants of disease [102].
Circulating adiponectin levels and risk of death – arguments favoring
the adiponectin paradox
Presently, consistent lines of evidence demonstrate that hyperadiponectinemia is
an important independent positive risk predictor for all-cause mortality and
cardiovascular mortality in patients with advanced heart failure, particularly
when associated with wasting skeletal muscle [69].
The association of adiponectin with fatal outcomes was initially described by
Efstathiou and coworkers, who reported that low adiponectin plasma levels were
independently associated with an increased risk of mortality after a first
ischemic stroke [103]. Subsequently,
however, the majority of studies have shown a positive association or no
association of adiponectin with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality
[69]. These associations were
described in a wide range of clinical conditions, in different genders and
diverse ethnicities, and in the general population of older individuals [20]
[53]
[104]
[104]
[106]; older patients with weight loss,
low skeletal-muscle mass, and poor physical functioning [24]; elderly people with T2DM [107]; T2DM patients with acute coronary
syndrome [21]; elderly men with chronic
heart failure [104]; patients with chronic
heart failure and cachexia [108];
myocardial infarction patients [109];
stable ischemic heart disease [110];
individuals with diabetes and recent acute coronary syndrome [21]; acute stroke patients [111]; peripheral artery diseases [112]; Japanese hemodialysis patients [113]; end-stage renal disease in patients
with T1DM and T2DM [114]; cancer [115]; women with breast cancer [116]; and patients with colorectal cancer
[117].
Most of these studies indicate that adiponectin levels, regardless of whether
they were measured as total, HMW, or LMW adiponectin, are valuable predictive
biomarkers for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. In the analysis
of these results, however, one must take into account the presence of
confounding factors, for example the frequent use of polypharmacy, particularly
in populations of frail elderly, diabetics and cardiovascular patients. BMI is
another confounding factor, with some studies demonstrating an association of
adiponectin with mortality rate in specific BMI subgroups [105] and others not [21]
[110]
.
Recent evidence has confirmed the causal relationship between adiponectin and
cardiovascular mortality. The Gargano Heart Study, employing the
Mendelian randomization approach, has shown a positive causal-effect
relationship between serum adiponectin and cardiovascular mortality in subjects
with type 2 diabetes. Regression-modeling studies have shown that BMI, HbA1c,
total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, insulin therapy and
hypertension, and rs822354 polymorphism in the ADIPOQ locus, as well as
the genetic equivalent of total adiponectin change, were significantly
associated with cardiovascular mortality [118]. These results, based on the methodological robustness of
genetic variants affecting the outcomes, point to a deleterious action of
adiponectin on metabolic and cardiovascular pathophysiological processes. A
systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by Scarale and collaborators
demonstrated a significant increase of 24% and 28% in pooled
hazard ratios for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, respectively [23]. Interestingly, in a subgroup analysis,
the all-cause mortality rate was significantly reduced after adjusting for
natriuretic peptides (NPs). This raises the possibility that the association of
adiponectin with mortality may be modulated by NPs.
In fact, Scarale’s meta-analysis extended and confirmed previous
meta-analyses published in 2013 [119],
although both were based on less evidence, considering the number of collected
prospective studies.
Perspectives
Given the evidence that loss of AdipoRs functions might be related to
insulin-resistant states, it has been postulated that agonists of these receptors
could be a promising alternative for the treatment of dysmetabolic conditions, such
as metabolic syndrome and T2DM. Recently, AdipoRon, an orally active synthetic
peptide AdipoRs agonist [120], has emerged as
a possible candidate for treatment and prevention of insulin-resistance states,
cancer, depression and Alzheimer’s disease, all conditions that may be
associated with adiponectin resistance [74]
.
The extensive literature on AdipoRon is presently limited to in vitro and in vivo
animal models. AdipoRon mimics the beneficial metabolic effects of adiponectin,
activating AMPK, PPAR-α, and the transcriptional co-activator PGC-1, which
enhance mitochondrial proliferation and energy metabolism [121]. Okada-Iwabu and colleagues have reported
that mice fed a high-fat diet and treated with AdipoRon showed a significant
improvement of skeletal muscle and liver-mediated glucose metabolism, thereby
ameliorating insulin resistance and glucose intolerance, besides increasing fatty
acid β-oxidation [120]. AdipoRon has
also shown a renoprotective role against lipotoxicity and oxidative stress in mice
with diabetic nephropathy, by ameliorating glomerular endothelial cells and podocyte
injury through activation of the intracellular
Ca2+/LKB1-AMPK/PPARα pathway [48].
Other favorable results of AdipoRon, not restricted to the metabolic area, were
reported in experimental conditions such as pancreatic cancer cells [122], depression [123], liver injury, liver inflammation [124], and cutaneous-thickness fibrosis in a
murine model of systemic sclerosis [125]
. Notwithstanding these favorable results, they do not provide consistent
evidence that interventions aimed at increasing adiponectin levels will improve the
metabolic profile in humans.
As mentioned above, findings from Mendelian randomization studies do not support a
salutary role of adiponectin in the incidence of T2DM [95] or a protective effect in CHD [96]. Thus, the pharmaceutical
industry’s efforts to prioritize the development of drugs that increase
adiponectin levels seem, at this point, premature. Coincidentally, a search in the
archives of the US National Library of Medicine through October 2019 found no
references to clinical trials conducted with AdipoRon (US National Library of
Medicine 2020, available online at: https://clinicaltrials.gov – accessed
February 21, 2020).
Adiponectin gene therapy has been also successfully used to ameliorate obesity
induced insulin resistance and T2DM, in animal models [126]
[127]. Recently, the development of targeted
gene modification via chimeric genome editing tools enabled investigators to use
engineered animals to better understand the pathophysiological process of a variety
of diseases. The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat
(CRISPR)-associated 9 (Cas9) nuclease and the transcription activator-like effector
nucleases (TALEN) platforms have been successfully applied for animal models to
better understand human metabolic diseases such as obesity, insulin and adiponectin
resistances and T2DM [128]
[129]. They also represent an extremely
promising future for the development of novel and effective therapies in clinical
practice.
Adiponectin antagonist has emerged as an alternative therapeutic approach to
conditions that evolve into adiponectin resistance. Based on previous evidence
showing that circulating adiponectin concentrations are elevated in advanced stages
of disease in several clinical settings, it has been proposed that
adiponectin-receptor antagonists might play an important role in these terminal
conditions. Compared with the literature on adiponectin agonists, there are a
limited number of reports on adiponectin receptor antagonists [130]. Even considering their potential
indication in specific situations, this proposal would be restricted to diseases
characterized by adiponectin overproduction, as in cases of severe rheumatoid
arthritis [131], or when overexpression of
AdipoRs occurs, as in cartilage osteoarthritis [132]
.
Conclusions
For years, adiponectin was considered a healthy adipocytokine because of its
anti-inflammatory properties, favorable effects on intermediary metabolism, and
cardioprotection. Several observational and prospective studies have shown that low
levels of circulating adiponectin were associated with insulin resistance,
hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and T2DM and its cardiovascular complications.
Due to the nature of these studies, a causal relationship between adiponectin with
systemic metabolic profile and cardiovascular outcomes has not been effectively
proven. Findings from Mendelian randomization studies, a robust genetic approach to
test causality, have not supported a salutary role of adiponectin in the incidence
of T2DM or a protective effect in CHD. Adiponectin was therefore considered as a
mere biomarker of components of metabolic syndrome, including insulin resistance,
hypertension and dyslipidemia, or an epiphenomenon in the context of cardiometabolic
metabolic traits.
Paradoxically and counterintuitively, in late stages of chronic diseases, high
adiponectin levels are associated with low functional capacity of organs, as in
patients with chronic heart failure, in the elderly exhibiting weight loss and
skeletal-muscle wasting, and in cachectic subjects in the terminal phase of cancer.
These results were confirmed by several prospective studies and meta-analyses, now
focusing on the association of adiponectin levels with primary outcomes (all-cause
mortality and cardiovascular mortality rates), which is scientifically more
consistent than surrogate endpoints. In a broader context, this contradictory
behavior of adiponectin has been termed the adiponectin paradox ([Fig. 4]). In terms of biological plausibility,
there is an extensive literature indicating that the adiponectin paradox is closely
related to insulin resistance and adiponectin resistance. Although important
advances have been achieved in the last three decades, thanks to basic scientific
research and clinical studies, there still remain a number of open questions about
adiponectin. We expect that the ongoing dialogue among basic scientists, clinical
researchers, and epidemiologists can consistently further elucidate the concept of
adiponectin paradox.
Fig. 4 The natural history of circulating levels of adiponectin
according to the stages of functional capacity of organs and systems:
Adiponectin has been considered a salutary adipocytokine a. Results
from experimental protocols and early observational and prospective studies
have shown that low levels of adiponectin are associated with weight excess,
insulin resistant, glucose intolerance, T2DM, dyslipidemia, and
cardiovascular events, usually with preserved heart function (non-fatal CHD
and MI) b. In contrast, hyperadiponectinemia has been frequently
associated with late stages chronic heart failure (usually with reduced
ejection fraction), cardiovascular mortality, end stage renal disease,
skeletal muscle mass wasting of elderly, cachexia of terminal stages of
cancer, and all-cause mortality (c). Recent findings from Mendelian
randomization studies have not supported a salutary role of adiponectin in
the incidence of T2DM or a protective effect in CHD. * The cut-off
point considered as low or high adiponectin depends on each class of
study-specific distribution. T2DM: Type 2 diabetes mellitus; CHD: Coronary
heart disease; HFpEF: Heart failure with ventricular ejection fraction
preserved; CHF: Chronic heart failure; MI: Myocardial infarction; NAFLD:
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed equally to the manuscript. The illustrations were designed by
Rômulo Sperduto Dezonne.