Key words
bioavailability - Fabaceae -
Macaca fascicularis
- pharmacokinetics -
Pueraria mirifica
- puerarin
Abbreviations
ADME:
absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion
ALT:
alanine aminotransferase
AR:
accumulation ratio
AST:
aspartate aminotransferase
AUC0-inf
:
area under the curve from time zero to infinity
AUC0-t
:
area under the curve from time zero to the last sampling time
AUC0-tau
:
area under the curve within dosing interval of last dose to first dose
AUC0-tau,ss
:
area under the curve over dosing interval at steady state of first dose to last dose
CL/F:
clearance
Cmax
:
maximum plasma concentration
IV:
intravenous
MRT:
mean residence time
PME:
Pueraria mirifica extract
PO:
per os or oral administration
PUE:
puerarin
T1/2
:
half-life
Tmax
:
time to reach maximum plasma concentration
Vd/F:
volume of distribution
Introduction
Pueraria candollei var. mirifica (Airy Shaw & Suvat.) Niyomdham, known in Thai as white Kwao Krua, is an endemic Thai plant belonging to the family Fabaceae [1]. Its tuberous root has long been used as a Thai traditional medicine for rejuvenation, sleep disorder, memory loss, general vigor, and development of the breasts [2], [3]. Later, it was tested in laboratory animals for its efficacy on tumor incidence [4], bone remodeling [5], and cardiovascular diseases [6]. PME from the roots has minimal toxicity to cardiovascular function, blood lipid levels, and liver enzyme activity in rabbits [6] and menopausal women [7], [8]. The major bioactive components of PME are isoflavones [9],
with PUE being the main (highest amount) one [4]. PUE ([Fig. 1]) has several pharmacological effects, such as increasing osteoblast activities [10] and inhibiting osteoclast activities [11], blood clotting [12], and neuronal apoptosis [13], and exhibiting anti-inflammation and antioxidant activities [14]. Moreover, PUE exhibits limited toxicity to cardiovascular function and hematological parameters in rats [15], [16]. Based on these diverse pharmacological and safety data of PUE and PME, the development of these 2 substances as phytopharmaceutical products for clinical use is planned.
Fig. 1 Chemical structures of PUE (MW = 416.38 g/mol) and its derivatives.
There have been reports on the pharmacokinetics of PUE in various animal species, and interspecies differences in their pharmacokinetic profiles were found [17], [18], [19]. The pharmacokinetics of PUE in mice, rats, and dogs fitted a 2-compartment model, while it fitted a 3-compartment model in rabbits [17], [18], [19]. The absorption of PUE after a single oral administration also differed among rats, rabbits, and dogs. In rats, PUE was absorbed at 2.10 – 7.50% of the given dose [20], [21] and reached a Cmax at 0.19 – 1.83 h [20], [21], [22], [23]. In rabbits and dogs, PUE reached the Cmax at 0.83 – 1.08 h
[24] and 1.50 – 4.00 h [25], respectively. After 1 h of PUE IV administration in rats, PUE was found in the liver, spleen, kidneys, femurs, tibias, mammary glands, lungs, heart, and brain [20]. Moreover, PUE administered to rats could cross the blood-brain barrier and become widely distributed in many areas of the brain, such as the hippocampus, cerebral cortex, and striatum [26]. The biotransformation of PUE in humans and rats has been reported to occur via multiple reactions [20], [27], [28], [29]. Phase I hydrolysis and phase II glucuronidation in humans changed PUE into daidzein and PUE glucuronides [27], respectively, while, in rats, the daidzein was further biotransformed by phase I reduction to
dihydrodaidzein and finally into equol [28]. Daidzein was also metabolized by phase II (sulfation) to obtain daidzein-sulfate as a final product in rats [29]. For excretion in rats, PUE glucuronides, as the major metabolites of PUE, were mainly excreted via urine and to a lesser extent via feces [20], [28].
Although the pharamcokinetic data on PUE are vast, it is still inconclusive because of the contradictory results and the different anatomical and physiological characteristics of those animal models from the humans. If we aim to develop PUE and PME as phytopharmaceutical products for human use, especially for oral dosing, then pharmacokinetic studies of PUE and PME in animals with phenotypes and a gastrointestinal tract that are similar to those of humans should be used, and nonhuman primates are the animals of choice. Among many existing species of nonhuman primates, cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis) is the most commonly used animal model for pharmacokinetic studies of pharmaceutical products [30]. The gastric pH and gastric emptying time after fasting in cynomolgus monkeys are 1.9 – 2.2 and 153 ± 87 mins [31], respectively, compared to pH 1.5 – 3.5 and 248 ± 39 mins in humans [32], [33], and a gastric pH of 4 – 4.3 and 74 min liquid orocecal transit after fasting in rats [32], [34]. Besides, CYP3A, a drug metabolizing enzyme found in the liver, showed 93% similarity of animo acid sequences between monkeys and humans [35]. Therefore, in this study, we compared the pharmacokinetics of PUE alone and in PME in female cynomolgus monkeys. The PUE and PME (at an equivalent PUE dose of 10 mg/kg) were selected based on their efficacy in amelioration of osteoporotic and postmenopausal symptoms in female cynomolgus monkeys [36], [37].
Results
The biochemical markers indicating liver and kidney functions, including AST, ALT, and creatinine levels before (0 h) and after (24 h) a single oral administration and after (24 h) a single IV and multiple oral administrations in all 4 experimental groups are shown in [Table 1]. After a single oral administration of the vehicle (single oral dose of 9 : 91 [v/v] DMSO : PBS) for 24 h, only the AST level was significantly increased. No significant differences between the vehicle control group and the 3 other treatment groups after 24 h administration for AST, ALT, and creatinine levels were detected. After a single IV of 1 mg/kg PUE (PUE-IV group) and at day 1 of multiple PO of 10 mg/kg PUE (PUE-PO group) or 826 mg/kg PME (PME-PO group), the AST and creatinine levels were not significantly different between the groups, whereas the ALT levels in both the PUE-PO and PME-PO groups were numerically but not significantly higher than in the PUE-IV group
(p = 0.056). Comparing between day 1 and day 7 in the PUE-PO and PME-PO groups, the levels of AST significantly decreased at day 7 in both groups, while there were no changes in the ALT and creatinine levels. All 3 biochemical markers had returned to the normal range of adult cynomolgus monkeys at day 7. Animals in all 4 groups had a normal physical appearance throughout the study period.
Table 1 Plasma levels of AST, ALT, and creatinine before (0 h) and after (24 h) single oral dosing (PO) of vehicle (9 : 91 [v/v] DMSO: PBS), and after (24 h) single IV of 1 mg/kg PUE and multiple oral dosing (at day 1 and day 7) of 10 mg/kg PUE or 826 mg/kg PME in female cynomolgus monkeys. Data are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 4 for each treatment group).
|
Biochemical marker
|
Vehicle
|
PUE-IV
|
PUE-PO
|
PME-PO
|
|
0 h
|
24 h
|
Day 1
|
Day 7
|
Day 1
|
Day 7
|
|
*p < 0.05: 0 h vs. 24 h; ap < 0.05: day 1 vs. day 7.
|
|
AST (U/L)
|
36.54 ± 7.43*
|
165.13 ± 122.16
|
106.25 ± 49.00
|
170.25 ± 19.87
a
|
70.63 ± 25.04
|
244.63 ± 110.20
a
|
67.25 ± 26.48
|
|
ALT (U/L)
|
48.00 ± 43.98
|
99.42 ± 69.83
|
46.38 ± 38.14
|
103.00 ± 29.11
|
89.63 ± 54.06
|
137.13 ± 66.81
|
95.63 ± 55.76
|
|
Creatinine (mg/dL)
|
0.94 ± 0.15
|
0.90 ± 0.14
|
0.91 ± 0.09
|
0.88 ± 0.10
|
0.93 ± 0.10
|
0.90 ± 0.12
|
0.81 ± 0.05
|
Mean plasma concentration-time profiles of PUE after a single IV injection of 1 mg/kg PUE and multiple PO of 10 mg/kg PUE or 826 mg/kg PME (equivalent to 10 mg/kg PUE) are illustrated in [Fig. 2]. For the PUE-IV group, PUE showed a concentration range from 10 – 10 000 µg/L at day 1 during 5 min to 24 h after dosing. For the PO groups, monkeys had a 10- to 100-fold lower level of PUE than the IV group, even though the PO dose was 10-fold higher than the IV dose. Interestingly, the PME-PO group exhibited a shorter time to reach the Tmax and at a higher Cmax than the PUE-PO group during 24 h. Multiple daily oral dosing with either the PUE-PO or PME-PO resulted in higher PUE levels at day 7 than at day 1 (after a single oral dosing).
Fig. 2 Plasma concentration-time profile of PUE after a single IV injection of 1 mg/kg PUE and a multiple oral dosing (PO; at day 1 and day 7) of 10 mg/kg PUE and 826 mg/kg PME in female cynomolgus monkeys. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 4).
The pharmacokinetic parameters of PUE were determined using noncompartmental analysis and are summarized in [Table 2]. Absolute bioavailability of PUE as a pure compound (PUE-PO group) was 0.88% and in PME (PME-PO group) was 1.44% after a single oral dose (day 1). The AR after multiple oral dosing for 7 days of PUE alone was higher than the PME (3.19 vs. 1.94). The MRT of PUE in both oral groups was higher on day 7 (39 – 46 h) than on day 1 (4 – 6 h). Similarly, elimination half-lives of PUE in both groups were also longer on day 7 (34 – 38 h) than on day 1 (3 – 5 h). No significant differences of all pharmacokinetic parameters between day 1 of PUE-PO and PME-PO groups were detected, but the clearance rate at day 7 of the PUE-PO group was significantly lower than the PME-PO group.
Table 2 Pharmacokinetic parameters after a single IV injection (IV) of 1 mg/kg PUE, multiple oral administration (PO; at day 1 and day 7) of 10 mg/kg PUE or 826 mg/kg PME in female cynomolgus monkeys (n = 4 for each treatment group).
|
Pharmacokinetic parameter
|
PUE-IV
|
PUE-PO
|
PME-PO
|
|
Day 1
|
Day 7
|
Day 1
|
Day 7
|
|
Notes: a Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 4). b Data are shown as median (P25; P75); *p < 0.05: day 1 vs day 7;
†
p < 0.05: PUE-PO vs. PME-PO at Day 7. Abbreviations: Cmax: maximum concentration; Tmax: time to reach maximum concentration; AUC0-t: area under concentration-time curve from time 0 to last observed time; AUC0-inf: area under concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity; Vd/F: apparent volume of distribution; MRT: mean residence time; T1/2: half-life; CL/F: apparent clearance; AR: accumulation ratio; N/A: not available.
|
|
Cmax
a
(µg/L)
|
N/A
|
125.97 ± 68.68
|
219.94 ± 101.61
|
262.13 ± 335.70
|
237.03 ± 315.62
|
|
Tmax
b
(h)
|
N/A
|
1.50 (1.00; 2.50)
|
1.50 (1.00; 2.50)
|
0.25 (0.25; 0.56)
|
0.63 (0.25; 1.50)
|
|
AUC0-t
a
(µg*h/L)
|
6751.86 ± 9781.80
|
541.79 ± 373.67
|
1376.40 ± 704.45
|
648.31 ± 383.89
|
893.23 ± 330.38
|
|
AUC0-inf
a
(µg*h/L)
|
6751.86 ± 9781.80
|
595.67 ± 384.85*
|
3138.73 ± 1035.35
†
|
975.06 ± 656.42
|
1658.74 ± 377.32
|
|
MRT
b
(h)
|
0.46 (0.24; 1.08)
|
6.03 (4.03; 13.19)*
|
45.69 (42.89; 36.12)
|
4.32 (2.94; 69.87)
|
39.40 (19.78; 30.53)
|
|
Vd/F
a
(L/kg)
|
0.47 ± 0.34
|
231.70 ± 333.87
|
222.55 ± 99.85
|
171.12 ± 275.37
|
258.49 ± 93.90
|
|
CL/F
a
(L/h/kg)
|
0.44 ± 0.31
|
26.99 ± 23.75
|
3.42 ± 0.96
†
|
15.58 ± 11.62
|
6.25 ± 1.28
|
|
T1/2
b
(h)
|
0.71 (0.66; 0.11)
|
4.78 (0.69; 17.64)*
|
37.96 (35.83; 25.15)
|
2.61 (0.66; 54.63)
|
34.33 (18.49; 17.57)
|
|
Bioavailability (%)
|
N/A
|
0.88
|
N/A
|
1.44
|
N/A
|
|
AR
a
|
|
3.19 ± 1.45
|
|
1.94 ± 1.57
|
|
According to metabolite identification, performed by QTOF LCMS analysis, 2 major metabolites were found after IV and PO dosing in female cynomolgus monkeys ([Fig. 3]). The hydroxylation product of PUE was detected at a MW of 432.38 g/mol and a retention time of 28.85 min. In addition, the deglycosylation product of PUE, known as daidzein (MW 254.06 g/mol and a retention time of 15.45 min), was found in the plasma, urine, and feces of the monkey. A negligible amount of unchanged PUE was detected in the excreta at 24 and 48 h after administration of a single IV dose or after multiple PO at both day 1 and day 7 ([Table 3]).
Fig. 3 Proposed metabolic pathway of PUE in female cynomolgus monkeys.
Table 3 Percent recovery of PUE in the urine and feces of female cynomolgus monkeys after a single IV injection of 1 mg/kg PUE, multiple oral administration (PO; at day 1 and day 7) of 10 mg/kg PUE or 826 mg/kg PME. Data are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 4).
|
Percent recovery
|
PUE-IV
|
PUE-PO
|
PME-PO
|
|
Day 1
|
Day 7
|
Day 1
|
Day 7
|
|
Urine
|
|
0 – 24 h
|
< 1.00
|
< 1.00
|
< 1.00
|
< 1.00
|
< 1.00
|
|
24 – 48 h
|
< 1.00
|
< 1.00
|
< 1.00
|
< 1.00
|
< 1.00
|
|
Feces
|
|
0 – 24 h
|
< 1.00
|
< 1.00
|
< 1.00
|
1.30 ± 1.60
|
1.91 ± 1.74
|
|
24 – 48 h
|
< 1.00
|
< 1.00
|
< 1.00
|
< 1.00
|
< 1.00
|
Discussion
Comparative pharmacokinetics of PUE and PME, at an equivalent PUE dose of 10 mg/kg, after oral dosing for 7 consecutive days was conducted to elucidate the pharmacokinetic profiles of PUE in 2 preparations. Cynomolgus monkeys were selected as animal models for this study because the interspecies differences between rats and humans, based upon a previous report [20], needs to be addressed before it can be applied for human use. The pharmacokinetics were analyzed at day 1, which counted as a single oral dose, and at day 7, which was considered as multiple oral dosing. The results at day 1 were also compared with that of a single IV injection of 1 mg/kg PUE to evaluate the oral bioavailability.
All female monkeys did not show any abnormal physical appearance or abnormal liver and kidney functions after multiple oral dosing. Constant levels of a plasma kidney marker (creatinine) were in line with those reported in cynomolgus monkeys [38] and humans [39]. A significant elevation of plasma AST level, a liver marker, at 24 h after oral dosing of the vehicle was assumed to indicate the stress effect on animal manipulations during the experiment. Indeed, similar conditions were observed previously in healthy rhesus monkeys (M. mulatta) after oral dosing of normal saline [40]. Thus, a significant decrease in plasma AST levels on day 7, compared to day 1, of PUE and PME administration indicated that the animals had adapted to the experimental condition.
The administration of PME showed a slightly higher oral bioavailability than the PUE after a single oral dose in cynomolgus monkeys. This phenomenon might be explained by the fact that PME is a mixture of several compounds from the tuberous root of P. mirifica, which contains bioenhancers and can inhibit both the efflux transporters and drug metabolizing enzymes at the brush border membrane of the small intestine. Therefore, superior absorption parameters (higher Cmax and shorter Tmax) were observed in the PME group compared to PUE alone. The oral bioavailability of PUE in nonhuman primates was lower than that previously reported in rodents (1.0 vs. 7.0%) [20]. One possible explanation is that the small intestine of cynomolgus monkey had a lower membrane permeability than those in rats [41]. In accord, a previous study demonstrated that the bioavailability of a single oral dose of
piroxicam, a nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drug, in rats was higher than that in cynomolgus macaques [42].
Note that multiple oral dosing of PUE and PME showed a similar tendency for systemic accumulation, with an AR of 1.94 – 3.19. The MRT, which is a summation of the ADME process, increased approximately 7- to 9-fold after multiple oral dosing in both groups. This phenomenon correlated well with the excretion parameters, with lower clearance and longer elimination half-life being observed on day 7. It was previously reported that the AUC0-inf for oral dosing of PME in humans after 3 consecutive days, 3 times a day, was higher than after a single dose and had a steady-state concentration of 40.98 µg/L [39]. Since 2 preparations of PUE were given to monkeys in this study, in PME and as PUE alone, the drug-drug interaction and drug metabolizing reaction that affect the bioavailability should be different between these 2 preparations. The drug-drug interaction and drug metabolizing reaction should occur after multiple dosing of PME, while
the drug metabolizing reaction should mainly be observed in the PUE-alone preparation. Drug metabolizing reaction was reported in the PUE treated rats. It was shown that PUE inhibits the activity of P‑gp or CYP3A4 [43]. P-gp is an ATP-dependent transmembrane efflux pump that is expressed in columnar epithelial cells of the lower gastrointestinal tract and canalicular surface of hepatocytes [44]. CYP3A4 is the most abundant cytochrome P450 presented in human hepatocytes and intestinal enterocytes [45], [46]. PME contains at least 17 phytoestrogenic substances [1]; drug-drug interaction can occur via bioenhancement or efflux transporter activity [47] as mentioned earlier. Thus, multiple oral dosing of PUE and PME caused the 3- to 5-fold lower clearance rate and longer T1/2. Accordingly,
multiple dosing of PUE and PME could improve metabolic exposure and should result in better pharmacological outcomes in nonhuman primates as well as in humans.
Glucuronidation is reported to be the major reaction pathway in the biotransformation of PUE in rats and humans [20], [48]. However, we found that hydroxylation and deglycosylation were the 2 major biotransformations of PUE in female cynomolgus monkeys. Indeed, hydroxylated PUE and daidzein were the 2 major metabolites found in the plasma after IV and oral dosing of PUE and PME. The hydoxylated PUE was also reported in rats and detected in the urine in a 0 – 4 h period [28]. Since the intestinal bioavailability (FI=F/[FH*Fa]) in female cynomolgus monkeys is very low (about 0.012 or 1.2%), this suggests that the intestine plays a major role in the metabolism of PUE. The plausible enzymes in intestinal enterocytes metabolizing the PUE are P-gp and CYP3A [43]. PUE was reported as a plausible substrate of P-gp [47]. In monkeys, CYP3A4
might induce hydroxylation and produce hydroxylated PUE [45]. CYP3A may also hydrolyze PUE to daidzein. Interspecies differences in the metabolic pathway of PUE and the enzyme(s) responsible for these biochemical reactions might need further exploration. Only negligible amounts of unchanged PUE was found in the excreta of cynomolgus monkeys after dosing with PUE or PME for 48 h, and so most of the PUE was biotransformed into other products before excretion.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and plant materials
The PUE powder (99.0% purity) was purchased from Pure Chemistry Scientific, while P. mirifica tuberous root powder (Lot no. 141 023) was provided by Smith Natural. The P. mirifica powder was extracted using 95% (v/v) ethanol in a Soxhlet extractor at 60 °C for 6 h, filtered through Whatman no. 4 filter paper, and dried by a rotary evaporator at 60 °C. The obtained PME was prepared and stored in a dark bottle at 4 °C until used in the pharmacokinetic study, while a portion was used for analysis of the PUE content by LCMS analysis. The PUE content was 1.21 mg/100 mg of PME. The DMSO (purity > 99.5%), ethanol (purity > 95.0%), and PBS were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Glycyrrhetinic acid (purity > 90.0%), as an internal standard, was acquired from Wako Pure Chemical Industries. HPLC-grade methanol (100.0% purity) was acquired from Merck.
Preparation of PUE and PME solution
The PUE and PME were freshly prepared by dissolving in DMSO until a clear solution and then diluted with PBS (pH 7.4) and mixed to obtain a clear PUE or PME solution of the desired concentration in 9 : 91 (v/v) DMSO: PBS. To compare the pharmacokinetics of PUE alone and in PME after oral dosing, the dosage of PME was adjusted to 826 mg/kg, equivalent to 10 mg/kg of PUE. In addition, PUE at a dose of 1 mg/kg was used for IV administration. Each test substance solution was aseptically filtered using a 0.22-µm pore size polytetrafluoroethylene syringe filter.
Animal subjects
Sixteen adult female cynomolgus monkeys, aged 5- to 7-y-old and with a body weight of 3.5 – 5.0 kg, were supplied by the Breeding Facility of the National Primate Research Center of Thailand-Chulalongkorn University (NPRCT-CU). The female monkeys were selected for the study due to the ease in handling for oral administration of the test items under nonanesthetized condition. They were individually housed in stainless-steel cages with controlled lighting (12 h of dark-light cycle, light on from 6 a. m. to 6 p. m.) at 25 ± 1 °C and 50 ± 10% relative humidity at the Animal Biosafety Level-1 facility of the NPRCT-CU, Thailand. The facility has been AAALAC International accredited. The animals were fed with standard monkey chow diet (Perfect Companion Group Co., Ltd.) in the morning (09 : 00 – 10 : 00 h) and fresh fruits and vegetables in the afternoon (14 : 00 – 15 : 00 h), with free access to hyperchlorinated water pH 7.3 – 7.7. To ensure the complete absorption of the test
items, however, monkeys were fasted for at least 4 h after each time of the test item administration [31]. The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the NPRCT-CU (Protocol review number: 1 975 005; Approval date: April 17, 2019). During the study, the monkeys were clinically observed daily by a veterinary technician and a veterinarian.
Animals were randomized and divided into 4 groups (n = 4 per group) and administered a single IV injection of PUE at 1 mg/kg, a single oral vehicle (9 : 91 [v/v] DMSO: PBS), and multiple oral PUE at 10 mg/kg or PME at 826 mg/kg (equivalent to 10 mg/kg of PUE), respectively. In the multiple-oral dosing groups, PUE or PME was administered daily for 7 consecutive days.
Pharmacokinetics study
For the IV group, blood samples (1 mL each) were collected at 0 (pre-dose), 5 min, and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h after dosing. For the oral group, serial blood samples were collected at 0 (pre-dose), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h after dosing on day 1 and then day 7. Blood samples were collected in a heparinized tube and centrifuged at 1700 g at 4 °C for 20 min. The obtained plasma was harvested and kept at − 20 °C until analysis of PUE and its metabolites. Urine and fecal samples were collected at 2 periods: at 0 – 24 h and 24 – 48 h after dosing (on day 1 of single IV dosing and on day 1 and day 7 of multiple oral dosing). Excreta were homogenized and centrifuged at 5000 g at 4 °C for 20 min. The supernatant was then isolated and kept at − 20 °C until analyzed for pharmacokinetics and identification of PUE metabolites by LCMS.
Blood chemistry analysis
Additional blood samples (2 mL) were collected from femoral vein of each animal at 0 h (on day 1 of single PO dosing of vehicle only) and 24 h (on day 1 of single PO and IV dosing, and on day 1 and day 7 of multiple oral dosing) after administration of the respective test substances. Blood plasma (500 µL) was separated as explained above in the pharmacokinetics study and analyzed for plasma AST, ALT, and creatinine levels using a Sysmex BX-3010 automated biochemistry analyzer (Furuno electric).
Bioanalysis of PUE and its metabolites in biological specimens
Plasma, urine, and feces specimens were collected and then treated by the protein precipitation method [28]. In brief, 50 µL of each sample was mixed with 200 µL of methanol containing 100 ng glycyrrhetinic acid (as an internal standard) and vortexed for 10 min. The mixture was then centrifuged at 12 000 g at 4 °C for 10 min, and 150 µL of supernatant was collected to determine the concentration of PUE and its metabolites by LCMS. The internal standard, and PUE at concentrations of 1000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5, 31.25, 15.625, 7.8125, and 3.90 625 ng/mL were spiked in the blank matrices (plasma, urine, and feces) and the different standard curves were constructed to measure the concentration of PUE in each biological specimen.
The LCMS system was run on a Shimadzu LCMS 8060, equipped with a vacuum degasser, a binary pump, an autosampler, and a triple quadrupole LCMS with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source, operated and controlled by LabSolution version 5.86 software (Shimadzu). The Nexera Ultra-High-Performance LC system was equipped with C18 column, Phenomenex Synergi Fusion-RP, with an oven temperature of 40 °C. The mobile phase was 100% (v/v) methanol and 0.2% (v/v) formic acid in water (pH 2.5), at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min, run as a gradient starting at 10% (v/v) methanol for 1.5 min, increased to 90% (v/v) methanol at 1.5 to 3.5 min, and then decreased to 10% (v/v) methanol at 4 to 4.5 min. The MS analysis was operated in a negative ionization mode by monitoring precursor ion to product ion transitions with mass to charge ratios of 415.05/267.00 (PUE) and 469.35/409.40 (glycyrrhetinic acid). Retention times of PUE and glycyrrhetinic acid were 1.46, and 2.09 min, respectively.
Calibration curves of PUE presented a good linearity range from 5 – 1000 µg/L (R2 > 0.99). The limit of detection was estimated to be 1 µg/L with a signal-to-noise ratio of 5. The intra- and inter-assay accuracy was within ± 10%. The analysis showed good specificity that there was no other impurity interference around the retention times of the target compound and internal standard. The recovery of the quality control samples was between 80 – 98%, and the stability during the procedure and storage remained stable.
For metabolite identification, the experiment was analyzed using an Agilent mass spectrometer 6540 QTOF equipped with liquid chromatograph 1260 (Agilent technologies). The stationary phase was Phenomenex Luna C18 column, and the mobile phase was methanol and 0.2% (v/v) formic acid in water, run at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min with gradient elution from 5% (v/v) methanol to 95% (v/v) methanol within 30 min, and then maintained until 40 min. Column oven was kept constant at 35 °C, and injection volume was 5 µL per sample. The MS analysis was conducted in negative mode with ESI. Mass spectra were screened from 100 – 1000 m/z, and chromatogram analysis was conducted by Mass Hunter B.06.00 (Agilent Technologies).
Pharmacokinetic and statistical analysis
Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a noncompartmental method with the PK solutions software version 2.0 (Summit Research Services). The Cmax and Tmax were determined directly from the plasma concentration-time profile. The AUC0-t was calculated using the trapezoidal rule, and AUCt-inf was calculated as Ct/kel
, where Ct was the last observed plasma concentration after administration and k
el is the elimination rate constant, calculated from the slope of the terminal phase of the plasma concentration time curve. The terminal elimination T1/2 was calculated as 0.693/kel
, where the kel
was the apparent elimination rate constant of PUE from plasma. CL/F was the apparent total clearance and Vd/F was the apparent volume of distribution. The apparent clearance was calculated as dose/AUC0-inf, and the apparent
volume of distribution was equal to (CL/F)/k
el. The MRT was calculated using trapezoid area calculations extrapolated to infinity, as equal to AUMC0-inf/AUC0-inf. The absolute oral bioavailability (F) was calculated as (mean AUC0-inf of PO/mean AUC0-inf of IV) × (dose IV/dose PO) × 100. In the multiple dosing, the AR was calculated as the ratio of AUC0-tau,ss on day 7 to AUC0-tau on day 1, where tau is the dosing interval (24 h) and the AUC values were calculated by the mixed log-linear trapezoidal summations.
All statistical tests were conducted using the SPSS for Window Software (version 22.0). Data are presented as mean ± 1 standard deviation (SD) or the median with 25 – 75% interquartile range. Nonparametric tests were used to determine the significance among groups, accepting significance at the p < 0.05 level.
Contributorsʼ Statement
Conception and design of the work: S. Namken, P. Khemawoot, S. Malaivijitnond; data collection: S. Namken, P. Songvut, N. Nuengchamnong, T. Kemthong; analysis and interpretation of the data: S. Namken, P. Khemawoot, S. Malaivijitnond; statistical analysis: S. Namken, P. Khemawoot; drafting the manuscript: S. Namken, P. Khemawoot, S. Malaivijitnond; critical revision of the manuscript: S. Namken, S. Malaivijitnond.
