Phlebologie 2021; 50(02): e21
DOI: 10.1055/a-1335-7687
Leserbrief

In reply to the response of the Letter to the Editor regarding Lipoedema – myths and facts, Part 1 and Part 5. European Best Practice of Lipoedema – Summary of the European Lipoedema Forum consensus

Felicitie Daftuar
 

We find the publication of the Response Letter [1] an unprofessional and regrettable decision on the part of the authors and editorial staff, given its factual inaccuracies. We have posted our reply to the inaccuracies here: www.lipedema.org/phlebologie-letter.

Publication note

Letters to the editor do not necessarily represent the opinion of the editor or publisher. The editor and publisher reserve the right to not publish letters to the editor, or to publish them abbreviated or in extracts.


#

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  • References

  • 1 Tobias B, Gabriele E. Response to the Letter to the Editor regarding Lipoedema – myths and facts, Part 1 and Part 5. European Best Practice of Lipoedema – Summary of the European Lipoedema Forum consensus. Phlebologie 2020; 49: 31-49 . doi:10.1055/a-1250-3334

Correspondence

Felicitie Daftuar
Founder & Executive Director

Publication History

Article published online:
19 March 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

  • References

  • 1 Tobias B, Gabriele E. Response to the Letter to the Editor regarding Lipoedema – myths and facts, Part 1 and Part 5. European Best Practice of Lipoedema – Summary of the European Lipoedema Forum consensus. Phlebologie 2020; 49: 31-49 . doi:10.1055/a-1250-3334