Key words
pseudotumor cerebri - idiopathic intracranial hypertension - secondary intracranial
hypertension - MRI - MR-venography
Introduction
Physiologically, intracranial pressure in healthy adults is 5–15 cmH2O. Values above
20–25 cmH2O are considered pathologically increased intracranial pressure (intracranial
hypertension) [1]. Elevated CSF pressure can lead to symptoms such as headache, vision disturbance,
pulsatile tinnitus and nausea [2]. This syndrome was grouped under the name pseudotumor cerebri (PTC) and described
by the German neurologist Max Nonne in 1904. His aim was to differentiate this group
of patients from those with increased intracranial brain pressures due to cerebral
tumors, as they exhibited the same clinical symptoms [3]. Nowadays, this definition is no longer up-to-date, since several pathologies, pathophysiological
changes and drugs are now known to lead to an increase in intracranial pressure. If
an underlying cause is found, it is referred to as secondary intracranial hypertension
(SIH). If the etiology remains unknown, the disease pattern is called idiopathic intracranial
hypertension (IIH), a concept introduced in 1989 by Corbett and Thomson.
IIH is a complex condition that is not yet fully understood, with an incidence of
0.9/100 000 in Western countries [4], although it can be assumed that unreported cases are significantly higher. On the
one hand, technical developments in recent years have significantly improved diagnostics;
on the other hand, the prevalence of obesity has increased worldwide [5].
Large differences are also observed depending on geographical location; the reason
for this is not yet fully understood. It seems that genetic predisposition plays a
minor role compared to environmental factors [6], although BMI provides the strongest correlation [7]. This explains the higher incidence of 19/100 000 in overweight women (20 % overweight).
IIH can occur at any age, but the largest risk group is overweight women of childbearing
age [8]. Depending on the study, the female-to-male incidence ratio varies from 4:1 to 15:1
[9]. In children, an incidence of 0.5/100 000 was found without gender and BMI-related
differences [10].
Symptomology
Clinical symptoms are caused by increased intracranial pressure and may vary from
individual to individual.
Headaches are the most common, occurring in 68–98 % of cases [4]. Headache characteristics may vary widely, can aggravate under certain circumstances
such as coughing, body positioning and exertion, and may also show similarities to
migraine and tension headache [11]. The latter is also the reason why IIH can easily be misdiagnosed.
The second most common complaint is vision disturbances, which are described in 72 %
of cases, occurring on one or both sides and ranging from reduced visual acuity to
blindness [12]. Vision disturbances are mainly caused by papillary edema, which can be detected
in 95 % of cases during ophthalmological examinations, thus vision disturbances are
a good indicator of increased CSF pressure. The remaining cases are referred to as
idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilledema (IIHWOP) [13]
[14].
Pulsatile tinnitus is another common symptom at 60 % [12].
In addition, there are other, non-specific symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and olfactory
disorders [15]
[16].
Pathophysiology
Although aspects of this disease pattern are increasingly becoming known, the exact
pathomechanism has not yet been clarified.
The Monro-Kellie doctrine states that in a rigid system such as the cranium, the three
components (brain tissue, blood, cerebrospinal fluid) within it form a constant volume,
whereby a change in one component necessarily results in a change in the other two
[17].
There are several theories regarding the genesis of IIH. The common characteristic
is the increased CSF pressure, but it is questionable whether there is a uniform mechanism
at all and not rather several pathophysiological events acting on each other, which
culminate in a vicious circle and result in the syndrome.
Cerebral spinal fluid
CSF is largely produced by the choroid plexus; its production is pressure-independent
and relatively constant, but decreases with age. The theory that the increased intracranial
pressure is due to an overproduction of cerebrospinal fluid could not be proven [18].
Dysregulation in water transport may play a role in the pathomechanism, as the water
channel protein aquaporin-4 is known to be associated with brain edema and, together
with aquaporin-1, forms the therapeutic approach to drug therapy. Thus, downregulation
of these channels can lead to symptom improvement, whereas glucocorticoids and retinoids
upregulate AQP1 channels and cause symptoms to worsen [19].
CSF flows from the ventricles into the subarachnoid space, where it is reabsorbed
via arachnoid granulations. The resorption rate depends on the pressure gradient between
the subarachnoid space and the veins and sinuses. With increased venous pressure,
CSF reabsorption is impeded, increasing cerebrospinal and intracranial pressure [20].
There are also additional CSF drainage pathways, such as the lymphatic and g-lymphatic
systems [21], which explains why fetuses and children without arachnoid granulations have functioning
CSF circulation.
Venous sinus
We know from invasive studies that intracranial venous pressure is elevated in IIH
patients [22]. Whether this is a consequence or cause of increased intracranial pressure is still
under discussion today. MR morphological correlates are uni- or bilateral sinus stenoses,
which are found in almost all IIH patients [23].
Several publications describe the decrease in sinus stenosis after normalization of
CSF pressure, suggesting the primary role of this pressure [24]
[25]
[26]
[27].
Other authors have observed that in the vast majority of cases, sinus stenoses persist
after CSF pressure relief [28]
[29]. Accordingly, sinus stenosis can probably be considered the cause of increased CSF
pressure rather than the consequence in some cases.
Current scientific knowledge also widely accepts that sinus stenosis (primary or secondary)
plays an important role in increasing intracranial venous and CSF pressure.
Due to the changed pressure gradient between the spinal fluid and veins, CSF resorption
is reduced, which maintains or increases the pathological condition [30].
According to another hypothesis, disturbed vascular autoregulation can lead to cerebral
hyperemia due to increased intracranial arterial influx even without a relevant venous
outflow obstruction, which forms the basis for the increased intracranial pressure
[31]. However, this could not be confirmed in a more recent study [32].
Parenchymal edema
The role of cerebral edema in the development of IIH has not been adequately demonstrated
to date [33].
Obesity and sex
Associations between increased BMI or recent weight gain, female sex, and IIH are
statistically proven, but pathophysiological bases are still lacking [34]. Various hormonal aspects are discussed, such as leptin, glucocorticoids, aldosterone
or sex hormones [18]
[35].
With certain drugs (various hormones, antibiotics, NSAIDs, vitamin A, lithium), increased
intracranial pressures have been observed in some cases, although the causal correlation
has not been clearly established [36]
[37].
Diagnosis
IIH is a diagnosis of exclusion. The modified Dandy criteria continue to form the
basis for diagnosis [15]:
-
Symptoms of intracranial pressure increase (headache, vision disturbance, etc.), papilledema
-
Evidence of elevated cerebrospinal fluid pressure (> 25 cmH20 with lumbar puncture
in the supine position)
-
Normal CSF composition
-
Exclusion of differential diagnoses
-
No focal neurological deficit (except unilateral and bilateral abducens palsies)
-
Normal CT or MRI
Technical developments of the last decades, especially in imaging diagnostics, led
to the revision of item 6. MRI imaging made it possible to visualize indirect intracranial
pressure signs [38]
[39].
In addition, the increasing number of publications in recent years has led to expansion
of diagnostic criteria. In 2013, the diagnostic criteria were revised and updated,
especially for patients with IIHWOP, who often have less elevated CSF pressure than
patients with papilledema [14]. In such cases, the diagnosis of IIH should be made on the basis of radiological
features in conjunction with other available clinical and diagnostic findings. Thus,
the limit of CSF opening pressure between 20–25 cmH20 is also discussed as a diagnostic
gray area and considered pathological by some authors from 20 cmH20 onwards [1]
[28]
[40]. If not all criteria are met, the diagnosis of IIH is an individual decision [40].
MRI findings
MRI is now the most important component in the diagnosis of IIH, used not only to
rule out causes of increased intracranial pressure, but also to detect subtle changes
in the cranium caused by increased pressure. Due to higher sensitivity and lack of
radiation exposure, it is clearly superior to computed tomography.
An appropriate standard MRI protocol to rule out secondary intracranial pressure elevation
includes:
-
Axial DWI (3 mm),
-
Axial T2w (3 mm),
-
FLAIR (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, 4 mm),
-
MR venography, e. g. PCA (venous phase contrast angiography, velocity encoding VENC
15 cm/s) for non-contrast imaging of the venous vessels,
-
Coronal STIR (fat-suppressed inversion recovery sequence) of the orbita and sella
(3 mm).
There are now numerous published MR morphologically detectable signs of intracranial
pressure elevation that are reliably detected with the MR protocol listed above, although
good quality MR venography is of critical importance [41].
Typical pitfalls of venous phase-contrast angiography include Paccioni granulations,
which can mimic stenosis. In most cases, these can be identified as such based on
their strong T2w hyperintense signal. “Genuine” sinus stenoses do not show high signals
in T2w images. In case of ambiguous findings, contrast-enhanced MR angiography in
combination with a 3 D T1 data set can also be performed as a supplement.
The most important MRI signs in descending diagnostic weighting are:
-
Uni- or bilateral sinus stenoses ([Fig. 1]),
-
Excavation of the pituitary gland to the “empty sella” ([Fig. 2]),
-
Bilateral dilatation of the optic sheaths ([Fig. 3]),
-
Flattening of posterior sclera ([Fig. 4a]),
-
Tortuosity of the optic nerve ([Fig. 4b]),
-
Preliminary enhancement of the optic nerve,
-
Dilatation of the Meckel cavity,
-
Expansion of the superior ophthalmic vein,
-
Dilatation of the foramina of the skull base, such as the foramen ovale [42].
Fig. 1 Venous PCA shows bilateral sinus stenoses at the junction of the transverse sinus
and the sigmoid sinus (arrows), coronal a, axial b.
Fig. 2 Left a a healthy young female patient (filled arrow), right b female patient with increased CSF pressure and excavated pituitary gland (empty arrow)
in the sagittal FLAIR sequence.
Fig. 3 Expanded optic sheaths (arrows) in the coronal STIR sequence.
Fig. 4 Congestive papillae and flattening of the posterior sclera (empty arrows) in the
axial T2w sequence a and tortuosity of the optic nerve (white arrow) in the sagittal FLAIR image b.
Uni- or bilateral sinus stenoses are found in almost all IIH patients. Bilateral sinus
stenoses are especially pathognomonic for this disease [11]. These are found predominantly at the transition from the transverse sinus to the
sigmoid sinus ([Fig. 1]), but also in the course of the transverse sinus and in the distal sigmoid sinus
above the confluence of sinuses [43]. The extent of stenosis ranges from mild constriction to flow interruption. In some
cases, reversibility of the stenoses is then seen after successful pressure reduction
via lumbar puncture [24]
[44], in other cases, however, a persistence of the stenoses can be observed, which makes
them appear as fixed stenoses [28]
[29].
In a healthy state, the pituitary gland has a roundish configuration, especially in
younger patients. Under increased CSF pressure, however, it shows flattening or excavation
to the point of an “empty” sella ([Fig. 2]). After normalization of CSF pressure, there may be an increase in pituitary height
again. The normal values for pituitary height differ between the sexes; in addition,
pituitary volume decreases with age, which must be taken into account when assessing
this pressure phenomenon [45].
The width of the liquid-filled optic sheaths shows no age-related variance, which
is why it is a good marker for intracranial pressure conditions [45]. The optic sheaths are barely detectable when there is negative pressure; they are
usually slender, and when the pressure is positive they expand ([Fig. 3]). In the latter case, one speaks of an optic sheath hydrops, which can also be visualized
sonographically.
Although congestion papillae are not an MRI phenomenon, they are still visible MR
morphologically in pronounced cases ([Fig. 4a]).
Unlike other forms of CSF hypertension (hydrocephalus), the ventricles in IIH are
normally wide.
Differential diagnosis includes all diseases that may lead to or be associated with
increased intracranial pressure. The clinical work-up includes a detailed neurological
examination with laboratory and cerebrospinal fluid diagnostics as well as ophthalmological
examinations with special regard to congestion papillae. It should be noted that a
pathologically altered CSF status rules out the diagnosis of IIH, but absent congestive
papillae does not (IIHWOP).
Radiologically relevant differential diagnoses are primarily sinus or venous thromboses
([Fig. 5]), intracranial and spinal lesions, various forms of hydrocephalus, vascular malformations
(dAVF), meningeosis, meningitis, and encephalitis.
Fig. 5 Thrombosis of the transverse and sigmoid sinuses on both sides and part of the superior
sagittal sinus in the venous PCA a. Correlated to this is the lack of a flow signal in the right transverse sinus (arrow)
in the axial T2-weighted sequence b.
Therapy
To date, there are no evidence-based treatment guidelines [46]. The therapeutic decision is individual and depends on the severity of the symptoms.
The primary goal is to preserve vision and relieve headache symptoms. The desired
pressure reduction can be achieved by means of invasive and non-invasive forms of
therapy.
Unless acute visual disturbances (loss of visual acuity) force an immediate therapy,
treatment follows an escalation strategy:
-
Non-invasive options include medications and weight loss.
The most effective drugs are acetazolamides from the group of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors,
which reduce CSF production by up to 57 % [46]. Other medications include the diuretic furosemide and the antiepileptic topiramate
[47]
[48]; the latter is also used in migraine prophylaxis. Corticosteroids are now no longer
recommended in therapy [49].
Numerous studies have shown a positive correlation between BMI and CSF pressure [50]. Congestive papillae in particular react sensitively to weight reduction, their
reversibility is a good indicator of successful therapy [51].
-
Invasive methods include lumbar puncture (LP), which is also considered the diagnostic
gold standard. Lumbar puncture is used to determine opening pressure, obtain CSF for
analysis, and provide therapeutic pressure relief. In a few cases, a single LP is
sufficient to produce longer-term clinical improvement [27], but most often the procedure must be repeated several times. On average, approximately
30 ml of CSF is collected.
-
Stent angioplasty of the sinuses: Endovascular therapy has become the first invasive
treatment option of choice, especially in specialty centers. For a long time, this
was mainly true for MR-morphologically fixed sinus stenoses after lumbar puncture,
but is now also valid for non-fixed stenoses. Regardless of the direction of the causality
between increased CSF pressure and venous pressure, there is positive interaction
between the two components [52]. Implantation of a stent in the stenosis not only reduces the venous but also the
CSF pressure, which leads to an improvement in the clinical symptoms [53]
[54] ([Fig. 6]).
-
Other surgical measures to reduce the CSF pressure should be mentioned here, but apart
from bariatric approaches, they are becoming more and more of a secondary importance:
lumboperitoneal and ventriculoperitoneal shunt [55], optic nerve fenestration [56] as well as bariatric surgery for weight reduction [57].
Fig. 6 Diagnostic angiography of a 21-year-old female IIH patient with bilaterally fixed
sinus stenoses as demonstrated by MRI. Digital subtraction angiography shows a pressure
gradient of 11 cmH20 a over the sinus stenosis on the right at the transverse-sigmoid junction. After successful
stent angioplasty of this stenosis, normalization of the pressure gradient to 0 cmH20
above the stent b.
Summary
IIH is an often unrecognized condition and predominantly affects young overweight
women. Patients often present to the clinic with nonspecific headaches. Because headaches
occur as a concomitant symptom in many diseases, they often go unrecognized although
they are much more common than assumed. In these patients, MRI should be performed
during the diagnostic workup to exclude secondary causes of headache. Since IIH is
associated with increased CSF pressure, it is imperative to know the pressure signs
on MRI and choose an appropriate related protocol. In particular, a good MR phlebography
technique is of great relevance, since bilateral sinus stenoses are pathognomonic
for this pathology.
