Keywords
thrombosis - haemorrhage - thrombin generation - blood cells - whole blood
Introduction
The blood coagulation system consists of a serial of coagulation factors and cofactors that are separated from their physiological activators by the endothelium under normal conditions.[1]
[2]
[3]
[4] Upon exposure to subendothelial tissue factor (TF)[5] or intravascular TF,[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10] coagulation could be triggered by the formation of the factor(F) VII–TF complex, which then triggers the formation of a tiny amount of thrombin through the activation of FIX and FX on a negatively charged surface.[11]
[12]
[13]
[14] Thrombin amplifies its own formation via positive feedback loops involving the activation of FXI, FVIII and FV.[15]
[16] The subsequent burst of thrombin converts fibrinogen into fibrin monomers, which polymerize and are cross-linked into a dense clot to seal the wound. Meanwhile, thrombin also limits its own production through negative feedback by acting together with the endothelial receptor thrombomodulin to activate the anticoagulant protein C. Activated protein C (APC), together with cofactor protein S, cleaves FVIIIa and FVa to regulate the amount of thrombin generated.[13]
[14]
[17]
[18] Blood cells, most notably platelets, also contribute to the formation of a blood clot. Once in contact with subendothelial collagen, platelets get activated, form aggregates and expose procoagulant surfaces to support thrombin generation (TG).[19]
[20]
[21]
Assessment of blood coagulability is essential for the clinical management of replacement therapy or anticoagulation in the settings of haemophilia or thrombophilia, respectively. Traditionally, this was done primarily by monitoring fibrin clot formation after TG is initiated with high concentrations of extrinsic or intrinsic activators through prothrombin time (PT) or activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) measurements.[22]
[23] A limitation of testing fibrin formation is that it occurs at very low levels (∼5%) of thrombin formation,[24]
[25] whereas important physiological information after the TG initiation phase is not represented. Indeed, PT and APTT are insensitive to changes in the anticoagulant pathways, and are therefore not indicative for thrombotic risks caused by anticoagulant pathway impairment.[25]
In contrast to PT and APTT, TG assays (TGAs) are usually initiated with low concentrations of TF, and report the full process of thrombin activation and inactivation. Furthermore, TG can be further optimized for specific pathway testing such as the protein C pathway by addition of thrombomodulin.[26]
[27] Nowadays, TG is mainly tested in platelet-poor plasma (PPP-TG), with exogenous synthetic phospholipid vesicles added to mimic the physiologic procoagulant surfaces. Although PPP-TG gives, in many aspects, deeper insights into coagulation than PT and APTT, it does not represent the involvement of blood cells, such as the platelets, erythrocytes and leukocytes. By testing TG in platelet-rich plasma (PRP-TG), many influences of platelets on coagulation have been revealed (vide infra). However, the impact of other cells is still unclear, primarily due to the lack of assessment tools. In this review, we discuss currently available TGAs, especially those capable of testing TG in the presence of blood cells (i.e., in PRP or whole blood [WB]). In addition, we summarize the effects of blood cells on coagulation and highlight the direct influences of these cells on TG testing. Advantages and limitations of these blood cell–dependent TG tests will also be discussed.
PPP-TGA: Principle, Advantage and Pitfalls
PPP-TGA: Principle, Advantage and Pitfalls
History and Principle of TG Assays
TGA was pioneered in 1953 by Macfarlane and Biggs,[28] who subsampled an activated blood sample at regular time intervals into test tubes containing fibrinogen, and then calculated the thrombin activity at each time point by comparing the respective clotting time with a calibration curve. The time- and labour-consuming nature of the assay was drastically improved in 1993 by Hemker et al through the introduction of a slow-reacting chromogenic thrombin substrate, which allowed thrombin activity to be continuously measured by monitoring the cleavage of the substrate, without the need for timed subsampling.[29] Although chromogenic methods allow continuous TG measurement, fibrin formation in plasma needs to be prevented to avoid disturbance on optical density detection. This is usually done by defibrinating PPP or by adding an inhibitor of fibrin polymerization into the test; both are known to influence TG.[30]
[31] Hemker and colleagues solved this problem by introducing a fluorogenic thrombin substrate that is not disturbed by fibrin formation ([Fig. 1]).[32]
[33] Issues related to fluorescence monitoring, such as the inner filter effect, substrate consumption or the influence of the colour of plasma on fluorescence, were solved by introducing a parallel calibration experiment in which substrate cleavage by the α2-macroglobulin–thrombin complex with a constant thrombin activity in the same plasma is recorded.[32]
[34] A dedicated H-transform algorithm was developed to calibrate against the above-mentioned issues to allow objective calculation.[35] This fluorogenic TGA is commercially known as the Calibrated Automated Thrombography (CAT) which allows relatively fast and high throughput measurement of up to 48 samples per run in PPP and PRP, a tremendous improvement compared with the subsampling method of 1 man-hour per curve.[32]
[34]
Fig. 1 Overview of the thrombin generation (TG) assay. (A) A schematic illustration of fluorogenic TG assays. After coagulation is triggered with tissue factor (TF) in a recalcified blood sample, the complex interactions between pro- and anticoagulant factors as well as blood cells lead to prothrombin conversion. The generated thrombin cleaves a fluorogenic thrombin substrate and result in an increase in fluorescence signal. Thrombin is inactivated by its natural inhibitors in blood into antithrombin–thrombin (TAT) and α2-macroglobulin–thrombin (α2M-T) complexes. (B) The fluorescence signals of TG experiments are used to generate a thrombogram, which can be characterized by the so-called TG parameters, including lag time, time to peak, thrombin peak, velocity index and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP; i.e., the area under the TG curve [AUC]).
Currently, there are several commercially available semi-automated chromogenic TGAs,[36] including HemoScan Thrombin Generation Assay (HemoScan), Pefakit in-TDT (Pentapharm) and Innovance ETP (Siemens Healthcare). Semi-automated fluorogenic TGAs include Technothrombin-TGA (Technoclone) and CAT (Diagnostica Stago). There are also two fully automated fluorogenic TGAs: the CEVERON-TGA (Technoclone) and ST-Genesia (Diagnostica Stago).
Thrombogram Parameters
The whole course of prothrombin conversion and thrombin inactivation over time is shown as a thrombogram, which is typically characterized by five parameters ([Fig. 1B]). The time needed for thrombin to reach a detectable concentration is defined as lag time. The highest transient thrombin concentration during the reaction is referred to as peak height, and the time needed to reach this peak is called time to peak. Velocity index (VI) can be obtained by dividing peak height by the difference between time to peak and lag time. Finally, the area under the TG curve, which represents the total amount of thrombin activity during the reaction, is termed endogenous thrombin potential (ETP).
Clinical Utilities of PPP-TG
The clinical utility of PPP-TG A has been extensively explored and reviewed in detail elsewhere.[25]
[37]
[38] In brief, the PPP-TG parameters have been shown to be predictive of the risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolism (VTE)[39] and VTE recurrence,[40] as well as the amount of blood loss after cardiac surgery.[41] TGAs also have the potential to serve as a laboratory tool to monitor replacement therapy in haemophilia[42] or anticoagulant treatments.[43] In addition, TGAs are useful tools for exploring novel mechanisms of haemostasis or thrombosis. For example, thrombomodulin- or APC-modified TGAs were essential tools for the establishment of prothrombotic effect of oral contraceptive pills,[44]
[45] as well as the rebalanced pro- and anticoagulant coagulation system in liver disease.[26]
[46]
Limitations of PPP-TG Assays
In the early development phase of the TGA, there were major concerns about the high inter-centre variation of PPP-TG, which render the assay not suitable for clinical laboratories. Later, it was shown that acceptable imprecision can be obtained given that standardized reagents and good thermal control are guaranteed, and that pre-analytical conditions, including blood collection method, the use of a contact pathway inhibitor, transportation method, storage time and centrifugation protocol, are standardized.[47]
[48]
[49]
[50]
[51] The use of a reference plasma to normalize the TG parameters further improved the inter-laboratory variation.[52]
[53] Recently introduced fully automated TG testing systems are good tools for standardized TG and are expected to bring TG to the routine repertoire of tests conducted in haemostasis centres.
Despite the above-mentioned improvements, PPP-TGA still has some limitations (summarized in [Table 1]). One major limitation of PPP-TG is that the physiological procoagulant surfaces, that is, blood cells, are not available in plasma, while instead synthetic phospholipids are used at saturated concentration to resemble the function of blood cells. As a result, the blood cell–dependent variations between individuals are not studied with this method. It is now widely established that physiological haemostasis follows a cell-based model, instead of the classical models which divide haemostasis into primary and secondary haemostasis.[14]
[54] The cell-based model describes a three-phase interplay between blood cells and TG. First, TF-bearing cells initiate TG and lead to the activation of a small amount of thrombin (i.e., the initiation phase). Thrombin then activates platelets to expose phosphatidylserine, as well as activating FXI, FV and FVIII (the amplification phase); these processes prepare necessary procoagulant surface and reactants to allow a burst of thrombin formation during the ‘propagation phase’. The influence of blood cells on TG is not limited to providing phospholipids, but includes many other mechanisms ([Fig. 2]). TGA that includes blood cells, either in PRP or in WB, may be useful for studying the cellular influences in coagulation disorders and may allow more comprehensive coagulation profiling.
Table 1
Characteristics of TG in PPP, PRP and WB
|
PPP-TG
|
PRP-TG
|
WB-TG
|
|
Advantage
|
Commercially available semi-automated assays and fully automated assays
|
Commercially available semi-automated assays
|
Includes all circulating cells and therefore reflects the influences of these cells on TG
|
|
High throughput
|
Reflects the influence of platelet dysfunction on TG
|
Less influenced by pre-analytical variations than plasma tests
|
|
Good standardization
|
Reflects the influence of some platelet-associated factors (e.g., VWF, FXI)
|
Fast measurement (potential for point-of-care use)
|
|
|
Low blood volume required
|
|
Disadvantage
|
Blood cells are omitted in the test, thus not possible to study cell-mediated thrombosis or bleeding
|
Erythrocytes, leucocytes (and cancer cells) are omitted
|
There is no commercial assay or standardized reagent
|
|
Centrifugation is needed to prepare PPP from WB, therefore has a long turnaround time
|
Pre-analytical variations during PRP preparation and long turnaround time
|
Lack of standard sample for normalization and influence of blood flow or endothelium is not included
|
|
Influence of blood flow or endothelium are not included
|
Lack of standard sample for normalization and influence of blood flow or endothelium is not included
|
|
Abbreviations: FXI, factor XI; PPP, platelet-poor plasma; PRP, platelet-rich plasma; TG, thrombin generation; VWF, von Willebrand factor; WB, whole blood.
Fig. 2 Brief summary of the influence of blood cells on thrombin generation (TG). Blood cells affect TG through many mechanisms, including the exposure of procoagulant phosphatidylserine (PS), releasing of granule contents, production of PS-positive and/or tissue factor (TF) positive microparticles, or through the localization of coagulation factors to membrane receptors, etc. (NETs, neutrophil extracellular traps; VWF, von Willebrand factor; FX, factor X.).
PRP-TGAs and the Influence of Platelets on TG
PRP-TGAs and the Influence of Platelets on TG
PRP-TG was first explored by subsampling methods,[28] which, although was time- and labour-consuming, provided early evidences for a role of platelets in TG.[55] The fluorogenic assays largely avoid unwanted platelet activation caused by frequent subsampling and are now the most widely used method in the field.
Influence of Platelet Granule Secretion on PRP-TG
Platelets possess two kinds of storage organelles, the α-granules and dense granules. The contents of these granules are released to the surrounding environment upon platelet activation.[56]
[57] Polyphosphates, stored in platelet-dense granules, may enhance the activation of FV and FXI by thrombin. In addition, it was also reported that polyphosphate nanoparticles released onto the platelet surface cause the (auto)activation of FXII, thus potentially enhancing TG and fibrin clot formation.[58]
[59] Coagulation factors secreted from the α-granules, including FV, prothrombin, fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor (VWF), high molecular weight kininogen and FXIII, promote TG and fibrin clot formation. Platelets also secrete anticoagulant proteins such as TF pathway inhibitor (TFPI), protease nexin-1and protein S. It was shown that ∼62% of plasma-free TFPIα are stored in platelets, and TFPIα released from platelets were able to diminish plasma TG.[60] In addition, activated platelets induce APC resistance in TG testing via the release of platelet factor 4 (PF4)[61] and a special pool of FV(a)[62] from their α-granules. Furthermore, several independent groups have shown that platelets store in their α-granules considerable amounts of TF[10] that are originated from megakaryocytes[63] or by de novo synthesis using mRNA templates.[64] Both the antigen and the procoagulant activity of TF have been detected on platelets,[8]
[65] although Østerud and Olsen and Bouchard et al contradicted these findings,[66]
[67]
[68]
[69] likely due to methodological differences.[70]
[71]
Platelet granular contents have been shown to influence TG. An illustrating example was found in FV-deficient patients who have no detectable plasma FV and PPP-TG, in which the absence of life-threatening bleedings could be explained by FV contribution from platelets leading to sufficient PRP-TG.[72] In addition, in patients with Quebec platelet disorder (QPD), who have defects in α-granule proteins including FV due to the presence of excessive α-granule urokinase-type plasminogen activator levels, normal PPP-TG profile but defective PRP-TG were found, and the lower ETP and peak thrombin in PRP showed a strong association with platelet FV level,[73] further supporting a notable impact of platelet-derived FV on TG.
Influence of Platelet-coagulation Factor Binding on PRP-TG
Besides phosphatidylserine, several platelet membrane receptors can also bind coagulation factors and localize coagulation factors to the procoagulant surface, thus modifying the kinetics of TG.[54] For example, glycoprotein (GP) Ib-V-IX binds VWF and brings VWF-bound FVIII to the platelet membrane. Integrin αIIbβ3, the most abundant receptor on platelets, binds fibrinogen and VWF in its active conformation. Furthermore, FXI is a ligand for apolipoprotein E receptor 2 (ApoER2) on platelets and thrombin is recognized by both GP Ib-V-IX and protease-activated receptors (PARs). There is also functional evidence suggesting the existence of receptors for FVIII, FIX and FX on the platelet surface.[54]
The binding of coagulation factors to platelets can modify TG. Platelet inhibition in vitro by either blocking membrane receptors (e.g., αIIbβ3 blockage by abciximab) or blocking procoagulant surface (e.g., annexin V) leads to decreased peak and ETP of PRP-TG.[74]
[75] Glanzmann's thrombasthenia or Bernard–Soulier syndrome, bleeding disorders due to deficiencies in platelet αIIbβ3 or GPIbα, respectively, reduces the amount of thrombin generated in PRP.[55]
[76]
[77] Further evidence of a regulating role of platelets in TG is the finding that the bleeding phenotype in patients with FXI deficiency can be better differentiated by measuring TG in PRP than PPP-TG testing.[78]
[79] This observation implies the importance of physiological-relevant interactions between platelets and FXI during the amplification phase of TG, and suggests that PRP-TG could be a potential diagnostic tool in this setting.
Influence of Platelet–VWF Binding on PRP-TG
In primary haemostasis, VWF is an essential mediator for platelet adhesion and aggregation. Normally, VWF circulates in an inactive coiled conformation, but upon exposure to subendothelial collagen, VWF exposes its A1 domain and is able to bind platelet GPIb, which subsequently induces platelet activation.[80] Pelkmans et al[81] showed that TG in the presence of platelets is sensitive to the activation status of VWF. They reported that a recombinant VWF variant (VWF-2B), which has a gain-of-function mutation in the VWF A1 domain that corresponds to mutations in type IIB VWD, was able to augment PRP-TG presumably because VWF-2B induced spontaneous platelet activation via GPIb. In addition, when TG was tested in reconstituted PRP by adding washed normal platelets resuspended in PPP from VWD-2B patients or controls, the ratio of ETP in PRP-to-ETP in PPP was higher with patient plasma than that of controls, demonstrating that the procoagulant effect of VWF-2B is platelet dependent.
VWF also mediates the translocation of FVIII from solution to platelet surface and therefore modulates TG on platelet surface. Patients with quantitative or functional defects in VWF have an increased risk of bleeding, but this phenotype is not always explained by the degree of VWF deficiency.[82] Rugeri et al studied TG in a group of patients with various types of von Willebrand disease (VWD) and found that these patients had markedly reduced ETPs and peak heights in PPP.[83] Interestingly, in PRP-TG they found comparable ETPs with a significantly decreased peak height. The low FVIII level in these patients seemed to be the major cause of defect in TG peak height, because FVIII supplementation was able to restore TG in both PPP and PRP, but VWF supplementation in the presence of normal FVIII level did not influence TG. Recently, Szanto et al reproduced the above results in a group of patients with type 3 VWD (absence of VWF) in which they found diminished PPP-TG (lower peak and ETP) but overall comparable ETP and 13% decreased peak height in PRP-TG compared with healthy controls.[84] The reason behind the discrepancy between ETP and peak height of PRP-TG in VWD patients is still unclear, but Szanto et al[84] attribute the normal ETP in type 3 VWD to the compensatory role played by hyper-responsive platelets. Additional evidences are required to establish whether ETP or peak height of PRP-TG is more useful in predicting the bleeding risk in these patients, but Rugeri et al[83] found that a sub-threshold peak height was associated with a higher bleeding score in these patients, and argued that the ETP is not the only important parameter of the thrombogram.
Influence of Platelet–autoantibody Binding on PRP-TG
Autoantibodies against platelets can be generated due to immune disorders (immune thrombocytopenic purpura or systemic lupus erythematosus) or secondary to viral infections, as well as upon vaccination or administration of certain drugs.[85] Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare but severe complication caused by autoantibodies against the heparin–PF4 complex during heparin therapy and these antibodies cause spontaneous activation and accelerated clearance of platelets. Tardy-Poncet et al[86] recapitulated the hypercoagulable state in these patients by showing that HIT antibody-positive PPP reacts stronger (higher peak height) to suppletion of unfractionated heparin than HIT-negative PPP after the plasmas were mixed with PRP of normal controls, thus demonstrating that HIT antibodies were able to potentiate platelet-dependent TG. Remarkably, they also showed that a HIT thrombogram profile defined by three ratios with/without heparin of TG parameters (peak, VI and time to peak) allowed sensitive identification (22 out of 23) of HIT-positive patients without false positive, suggesting PRP-TG might have a place in the diagnosis of HIT.
Influence of Platelet Number and Size on PRP-TG
Normal platelet count in humans is between 150 and 450 × 109/L, and altered numbers have been seen in thrombocytopenia and thrombocythemia. Studies on the influence of platelet counts on PRP-TG using reconstituted PRPs have shown that platelet counts correlate with TG acceleration if the platelet numbers are below 100 × 109/L: increasing platelet counts reduce the lag time of TG and increase the peak thrombin level and ETP.[32]
[74]
[87] If the platelet numbers are above 100 × 109/L, then platelet numbers still correlate with the peak height, but the ETP becomes independent of the numbers. Currently, to control the pre-analytical variation of platelet count introduced during PRP preparation, platelet-dependent TG is often tested with platelet count adjusted to 150 ×109/L,[51] but this may mask the impact of individual platelet count differences, especially in patients with thrombocytopenia.
In the population-based Gutenberg Health Study which studied PRP-TG profile of ∼400 individuals, mean platelet volume (MPV, a measure of platelet size) and platelet count were both independent determinants of PRP-TG parameters.[88] Increased platelet count and MPV were both related to shorter lag time and increased peak height. Platelet count was also significantly associated with increased ETP. Consistent with the above observation, increased MPV was related to higher platelet reactivity and was shown to be predictive of stroke and atrial fibrillation.[89] It was also shown that larger platelets (MPV = ∼11 fL) express threefold higher levels of TF compared with smaller counterparts (MPV = ∼7 fL).[70]
Thrombocytopenia is a common complication of liver cirrhosis, with a prevalence of thrombocytopenia between 15 and 75%.[90] Tripodi et al studied thrombomodulin-modified TG with different counts of platelets in cirrhotic patients and found that the ETP of these patients was lower than controls if platelet counts were adjusted to their WB level, but became comparable to normal controls if the platelet count was adjusted to 100 × 109/L.[91] They also showed that ETP was positively correlated with platelet counts and estimated that a minimum of 56 × 109/L platelet is required to guarantee sufficient TG.
PRP-TG Assays: Advantages and Limitations
PRP-TG is of additional value to PPP-TG because it gives insight into the role of platelets in coagulation and in the interplay between platelets and coagulation (summarized in [Tables 1] and [2]). This may give insight into coagulation complications in platelet-related disorders.
Table 2
Platelet-dependent thrombin generation tested in humans
|
Study
|
Tested population and main characteristics
|
TG method
|
PPP-TG result
|
PRP-TG result
|
Platelet-related mechanism
|
|
Duckers et al[72]
|
Patients with severe congenital factor V deficiency
|
CAT; various TF concentrations and 20-µM PL (PPP-TG); various TF concentrations (PRP-TG)
|
Lower or even undetectable TG in patients compared with controls
|
Adequate TG when platelets were pre-activated
|
Residual platelet FV and low TFPI level together ensured an adequate TG
|
|
Brunet et al[73]
|
Patients with Quebec platelet disorder (increased uPA in platelets)
|
CAT; 5-pM TF and 4-µM PL (PPP-TG); 0.5-pM TF (PRP-TG)
|
Comparable ETP and peak height between patients and controls
|
↓ETP and peak height in patients
|
Decreased platelet α granule FV, due to exceptionally high kallikrein activity in platelets
|
|
Béguin et al[77]
|
Patients with Bernard–Soulier syndrome (GPIb deficiency)
|
CAT; 0.5-pM TF
|
None
|
↓ETP and peak height in patients compared with control
|
GPIb deficiency or inhibition (in normals) reduces TG in a fibrin-dependent manner
|
|
Reverter et al[55]
|
Patients with Glanzmann's thrombasthenia (integrin αIIbβ3 deficiency)
|
Subsampling; unknown TF; platelets of Glanzmann's thrombasthenia resuspended in normal PPP
|
None
|
↓ETP and peak height with patient platelets compared with normal platelets
|
αIIbβ3 deficiency or inhibition (in normals) reduces TG
|
|
Pelkmans et al[81]
|
Patients with type IIB von Willebrand disease (VWF-2B variant, a gain-of-function mutation in the VWF A1 domain)
|
CAT; 1- or 5-pM TF (PRP-TG)
|
Tested, but exact numbers and comparison between patients and controls not shown
|
↑ETP and peak after adding VWF-2B into normal PRP; normal platelets added into patient plasma had ↑ TG than added into normal plasma
|
Incubation of platelets with VWF-2B resulted in a fivefold increased exposure of phosphatidylserine and a threefold increased expression of P-selectin
|
|
Rugeri et al[83] and Szanto et al[84]
|
Patients with von Willebrand's disease (type 1, 2 and/or 3)
|
CAT; 1-pM TF and 4-µM PL (PPP-TG); 0.5-pM TF (PRP-TG)
|
↓ETP and peak height in patients compared with control
|
↓peak height, but comparable ETP
|
Enhanced platelet activation markers in flow cytometric assay
|
|
Tardy-Poncet et al[86]
|
Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT; autoantibody against PF4-heparin complex)
|
CAT; TF concentration unclear and ± 0.2 U/mL UFH (PRP-TG); mixing patient PPP with PRP from normals
|
None
|
↑ratio of ETP, peak height and VI (with/without heparin) in HIT-positive than in HIT-negative plasma
|
HIT antibody-induced platelet activation, which could be abolished by blocking FcγRIIa receptor
|
|
Panova-Noeva et al[88]
|
407 adults from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study
|
CAT; 1-pM TF and 4-µM PL (PPP-TG); 1-pM TF (PRP-TG)
|
No comparison
|
No comparison
|
Platelet count and MPV are independent determinants of ETP and peak height of PRP-TG in multivariable linear regression analysis
|
|
Tripodi et al[91]
|
Cirrhotic patients (reduced pro- and anticoagulant factors and thrombocytopenia)
|
CAT; 1-pM TF, 1-µM PL and 4-nM TM (PPP-TG); 1-pM TF and 4-nM TM (PRP-TG)
|
Comparable ETP between patients and healthy controls; peak height not shown
|
↓ETP when PRP has physiological platelet count; but normal ETP when platelet count was adjusted to 100 × 109/L
|
Platelet count of 56 × 109/L is needed to guarantee sufficient TG
|
Abbreviations: CAT, calibrated automated thrombogram; ETP, endogenous thrombin potential; FV, factor V; GPIb, glycoprotein Ib; MPV, mean platelet volume; PF4, platelet factor 4; PL, phospholipids; PPP, platelet-poor plasma; PRP, platelet-rich plasma; TF, tissue factor; TG, thrombin generation; TM, thrombomodulin; UFH, unfractionated heparin; uPA, urokinase plasminogen activator.
Similar to PPP-TG, PRP-TG is performed under near-static conditions, so the impact of blood flow on the interaction between platelets and VWF or other coagulation protein is lacking. Furthermore, although the addition of thrombomodulin can partly resemble the anticoagulant function of endothelial cells, they also synthesize and release other coagulation proteins, most notably TFPI and VWF. The representation of endothelial function is also complexed by the fact that these proteins/receptors are differentially expressed across different vascular beds and are altered post-activation.[92]
It is also noteworthy that PRP-TG still needs further standardization to be clinically applicable. Although the existence of commercial assay systems[32] and expert recommendations[48]
[51] ensure acceptable within-laboratory reproducibility, it may still suffer from large inter-centre variations because of the lack of standardization of pre-analytical conditions between laboratories.[93] Because platelets are activated during long time storage, currently there is no established standardized PRP sample for PRP-TG results normalization.[94] As a result, comparison of results between different centres is still troublesome. The requirement that PRP needs to be tested within a short time (6 hours if blood is collected with corn trypsin inhibitor [CTI] and 2 hours if not[49]) also raises logistic issues for large-scale multicentre studies, which are currently needed to evaluate the real clinical value of this technique.
WB-TGAs and the Influence of Erythrocytes, Leukocytes and Cancer Cells
WB-TGAs and the Influence of Erythrocytes, Leukocytes and Cancer Cells
In contrast to platelets whose role in coagulation has been well established, little is known about the involvement of other circulating blood cells in coagulation and TG. WB-TGA is a promising solution to study the interplay between all blood cells and coagulation in relation to thrombotic and bleeding complications. There are some studies about the influence of erythrocytes on TG, but other blood cells such as leukocytes and cancer cells remain largely unexplored.
WB-TG Assays: Technical Challenges and Recent Advances
Although TG with the subsampling technique can be applied to all blood preparations including WB, it has major drawbacks: it is time- and labour-consuming. Furthermore, this method only measures active thrombin in free solution but not those bound to fibrin.[32] Alternatively, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based assay was developed to quantify the thrombin–antithrombin (TAT) complex in timed subsamples from clotting WB.[95] This assay allows indirect estimation of TG but is still time-consuming. An electrochemical TGA for plasma and WB has also been introduced in 2009,[96] but was not reproduced in any further studies. Continuous chromogenic TGAs cannot be applied in WB because erythrocytes seriously disturb optical measurement.
Fluorogenic TGAs allow continuous and high throughput TG measurements in plasma, but their application in WB has been challenging. Erythrocytes sediment and contract with clot during TG measurement, which may cause variable quenching of the fluorescent signal over time and lead to erratic signals.[97]
[98] Several methods have been previously presented to solve this problem. In 2007, Tappenden et al[97] reported a method in which an orbital shake was applied to the assay plate during the idle time between two rounds of readings, but this method still gave rather high variations. Ninivaggi et al[99] later reported another approach which utilizes a filter paper matrix to restrain the erythrocytes in a thin layer to avoid erythrocyte sedimentation. This technique yields reproducible results, but requires good level of pipetting to guarantee reproducibility.[100] In 2016, Kelchtermans et al reported a rheometer-based fluorogenic assay for simultaneous measurement of TG and fibrin formation in PPP and WB,[30] in which the issue of erythrocyte sedimentation was minimized by constantly mixing the blood with the rotation of the cone in the rheometer. A major disadvantage of this procedure is the low sample throughput: only one sample can be measured per run. Recently, we developed a novel fluorogenic TGA for WB measurements in which erythrocyte sedimentation is prevented by a continuous mixing induced by maintaining a continuous movement of the assay plate.[87] This assay has good reproducibility while requiring less handling than the filter paper–based assay.
Influence of Erythrocytes Phosphatidylserine and Number on WB-TG
Until recently, erythrocytes have been considered passive bystanders in coagulation and are often omitted in coagulation tests. However, clinical abnormalities in both erythrocyte quantity (elevated haematocrit) and quality (e.g., sickle cell disease [SCD], thalassemia) have been associated with arterial and venous thrombosis.[101]
[102]
[103]
[104]
[105] Causality of this relation has not been determined, although it was speculated that altered blood rheology, caused by the elevated haematocrit, altered erythrocyte deformability and the formation of erythrocyte aggregates (rouleaux), could reduce the velocity of blood flow, diminish the anti-adhesive effect of endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) and increase the migration/adhesion of platelets to the vessel walls.[101]
[102]
[106]
[107] Apart from the above-mentioned mechanism, a subset of normal erythrocytes[108] and erythrocyte-derived microparticles (MPs) showed phosphatidylserine exposure,[106] and patients with certain diseases (e.g., SCD) had up to 10 times higher proportion of phosphatidylserine-positive erythrocytes compared with healthy individuals.[109] Considering that erythrocytes are more abundant (around 20 times higher) and have a larger size than platelets (6–10 vs. 1.5–3 µm in diameter, respectively), they may represent a major source of procoagulant phosphatidylserine in a red clot.
WB-TG is dependent on erythrocyte count in reconstituted blood. Using the subsampling technique, Peyrou et al[108] and Horne et al[110] showed that peak thrombin increased when the erythrocyte count added into PPP increased from 0 to a physiological level (haematocrit = 40%), similar to the effect seen when adding platelets into PPP. The ability of erythrocyte to support TG could be related to their membrane phosphatidylserine exposure.[108] Similar observations were also obtained using fluorogenic methods.[87]
[99]
[111] Moreover, we recently showed that erythrocytes augmented peak thrombin level even in the presence of high platelet count.[87] Furthermore, both in a group of healthy adults[87] and cirrhotic patients[112] we observed a positive correlation between haematocrit and the peak of WB-TG, indicating that erythrocytes have a positive effect on the velocity of WB-TG.
Interestingly, erythrocyte count exhibits a different effect on the ETP than peak height in WB-TG.[87] In reconstituted blood, ETP was augmented when the haematocrit was increased from 0 to 20%, but it remained largely unchanged when the haematocrit further increased from 20 to 45%. In contrast, the peak of WB-TG was affected in the full range of haematocrit from 0 to 45%. The differential influence of erythrocyte counts on peak and ETP was also observed in the WB-TG profiles of cirrhotic patients.[112] In cirrhotic patients, erythrocyte and platelet counts are only moderately reduced; however, this reduction in haematocrit decreased the peak thrombin level but not the ETP level of WB-TG.[112]
Studies on the influence of erythrocyte (dys)function on WB-TG in disease settings are scarce. SCD results in elevated plasma TAT and D-dimer levels, and is associated with an increased thrombosis risk.[105]
[113] In contrast to in vivo data, in vitro tests in plasma of SCD patients showed that this procoagulant phenotype was not due to plasma factors, as the PPP-TG in SCD patients was comparable or lower than in healthy controls. In WB, it was shown that SCD patients form more TAT complexes in TF-trigged WB,[113] thus indicating that sickled erythrocytes cause hypercoagulation in SCD patients. A higher percentage of the erythrocytes from SCD were phosphatidylserine positive but, interestingly, the percentage of phosphatidylserine exposure was negatively correlated with WB-TAT formation, suggesting certain cellular factors, other than phosphatidylserine exposure, contribute to TG in SCD. Alternatively, erythrocyte membrane and erythrocyte-derived MPs can trigger coagulation through the intrinsic pathway.[114]
[115]
[116] Recently, it is shown that an unrecognized protein in erythrocyte MPs directly activated FXII and prekallikrein.[117] The activation of the contact pathway induces FXI activation; it was also shown that FXIIa and kallikrein can both directly activate FIX.[117]
[118]
[119]
Influence of Erythrocyte–Platelet Interaction on WB-TG
Platelets and erythrocytes are the most abundant cells in circulating blood and their interactions may be an underestimated player in coagulation. Erythrocytes can directly activate platelets through the release of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP).[120] Additionally, intercellular adhesion molecule 4 (ICAM-4) on erythrocytes was suggested as ligand for αIIbβ3 on platelets,[121] and their interaction was shown to further promote platelet activation as evidenced by increased p-selectin expression. In accordance, the blockage of ICAM-4–αIIbβ3 interaction caused reduced fibrin and thrombus formation in an in vitro perfusion model.[106] An alternative direct interaction between erythrocytes and platelets is mediated by binding of Fas receptor (FasR) on erythrocytes to Fas ligand (FasL) on activated platelets, which promotes phosphatidylserine exposure on both cells.[122] Blockage of this interaction leads to reduced thrombus formation underflow, reduced phosphatidylserine exposure on platelets and erythrocytes, as well as reduced WB-TG. FasR- or FasL-knockout mice exhibit delayed initiation of thrombus formation and reduced occlusion after FeCl3 treatment on mesenteric arterioles.[122] Interfering with the FasL–FasR interaction might be an innovative and promising approach for a completely novel antithrombotic strategy.
Influence of Leukocytes on TG
Leukocytes are important players in host defence and regulation of inflammatory response. Leukocytes are categorized into neutrophils (constitute 62% of all leukocytes), eosinophils (2.3%), basophils (0.4%), lymphocytes (30%), and monocytes (5.3%). Monocytes have been known to synthesize and express TF on their cytoplasmic membrane and release TF-positive MPs in response to various cytokines, growth factors and biogenic amines.[9]
[123] Although lipopolysaccharides (LPS) stimulated monocytes also express TFPI besides TF, it was still able to induce considerable amount of TG, which was only marginally enhanced by anti-TFPI antibodies.[124] Synthesis of TF in neutrophils is controversial,[125]
[126]
[127] but neutrophils can release procoagulant matrix metalloproteinases and serine proteases, such as cathepsin G and elastase upon stimulation and directly activate FV, FVIII and FX, as well as down-regulate anticoagulant factors including antithrombin, heparin cofactor II and TFPI.[128] In addition, stimulated neutrophils release chromatin components, that is, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), after exposure to microorganisms, inflammatory cytokines and activated platelets.[128]
[129] NETs serve as a scaffold for many procoagulant stimuli, such as platelets, erythrocytes, VWF and TF.[130] Moreover, several components of NETs have been independently shown to trigger coagulation. For example, histone H4 directly triggers auto-activation of prothrombin to thrombin,[131] whereas contact pathway activation can be triggered by purified DNA, albeit different purification methods yield DNA products with drastically different procoagulant activities.[132]
[133] Furthermore, activated leukocytes induce platelet activation and aggregation by granule release and ligand–receptor interactions.[134]
Influence of Cancer Cells on TG
Patients with cancer have a fivefold higher risk of VTE than those without malignancy.[135]
[136]
[137] The mechanism of cancer-associated hypercoagulability is still unclear and is not always detectable with PPP-TG.[138]
[139] Several types of cancer cell lines, including pancreatic, leukaemia and breast origins, express TF, and these cells can induce coagulation in CAT assays.[6]
[7]
[140] Moreover, cancer cell–induced TG is inhibited by anti-TF antibodies, suggesting a role for in vivo TF-positive cancer cells in thrombogenesis,[6]
[7]
[140] although the expression of TF on cancer cells and its effect on TG varies between different cancer types.[138] Procoagulant MPs have been found both in cultured cancer cell lines[141]
[142]
[143] and in the circulation of cancer patients,[143]
[144]
[145] and these vesicles were found to support TG, probably because of TF or phosphatidylserine exposed on their outer membrane. Furthermore, malignant tissues have been reported to produce a cysteine protease that triggers coagulation by directly activating FX independent of FVIIa.[146]
[147] Cancer cells also promote coagulation activation indirectly through the activation of other blood cells; tumour-derived factors, such as ADP, thrombin and cytokines can activate platelets and/or leucocytes, resulting in phosphatidylserine-positive platelet surfaces or NETs; both are known to be procoagulant (reviewed in Reddel et al[138] and Abdol Razak et al[148]).
Although the influence of leukocytes, cancer cells and MPs on TG has been studied in isolated plasma model systems, their influence in a complex near-physiological environment like WB remains to be assessed. Further studies are needed to advance this field.
WB-TG Assays: Advantages and Limitations
Compared with plasma tests, WB-TGAs do not need the centrifugation steps for plasma preparation and thus avoid the possible pre-analytical variations of plasma preparation and allow faster measurement. By including all circulating cells, WB-TG reaches one step closer to physiology than plasma coagulation tests and may be useful for the assessment of blood cell–related coagulation disorders ([Table 1] and [Fig. 2]). In addition, WB-TG is inhibited by antiplatelet drugs[87] and anticoagulants (rivaroxaban and dabigatran, unpublished data), suggesting a potential of these assays to serve as a point-of-care (POC) test to monitor anticoagulant and antiplatelet treatments.
The major difference that WB-TGAs have over the currently established POC viscoelastic tests (rotational thromboelastometry [ROTEM] or thromboelastography [TEG]) is that the latter measures the elasticity of a blood clot instead of the amidolytic activity of thrombin.[149] The viscoelastic tests have shown usefulness for the management of bleeding complications during surgery and in acute trauma care, especially in reducing the amount of blood product transfusion.[150] However, assessing fibrin clot formation only reflects the procoagulant effect of thrombin, whereas incomplete information is given on the anticoagulant pathways, particularly the anticoagulant effect of thrombin through the protein C pathway. On the contrary, WB-TG covers the entire course of thrombin activation and inactivation, even including the function of the protein C pathway if thrombomodulin is supplemented, making it more suitable for predicting thrombophilia.[87]
[112]
WB-TGA is still in its infancy and a long way from clinical application. The lack of standardization on pre-analytical variables and analytical protocols, as well as the absence of standardized reagents and reference sample, greatly hampers the wide evaluation of its clinical application. For example, the use of CTI was shown to improve the reproducibility of plasma-TG when the assay was triggered with low concentration of TF.[48]
[51] WB-TG is typically triggered with low amounts of TF (0.5 or 1 pM)[87]
[99] so that coagulation is dependent on physiological PL provided by blood cells and on feedback loops, but whether the use of CTI would also impact the reproducibility of the WB-TGA requires further assessment. The assay trigger should also be optimized for different settings; for instance, a trigger that contains low or even no TF may be necessary to reflect the procoagulant effect of TF/phosphatidylserine on cancer cells or MPs. Lastly, similar to PRP-TGA, the influence of blood flow and endothelium is not represented and it is a technical challenge to develop a standard sample for result normalization.
General Discussion on the Added Value of PRP-TG and WB-TG
General Discussion on the Added Value of PRP-TG and WB-TG
Blood cells are important players in coagulation and can influence TG testing. The complex interplay between platelets and the coagulation system has been underappreciated for many decades. Physiological platelet thrombus formation is augmented by thrombin formation, whereas physiological coagulation is in many stages facilitated by expression of procoagulant surfaces, the expression or activation of specific receptors on platelets and the delivery of FV. As shown earlier, the differentiation of platelet-related coagulation disorders, including platelet secretion/receptor defect, VWD and FXI-related bleeding disorder requires the presence of platelets to ensure a more comprehensive TG profiling. In addition, abnormally high haematocrit, TF-positive cancer cells, inflammation-activated monocytes have all been shown to promote TG by exposing phosphatidylserine and/or TF; therefore, testing WB-TG is a more logical choice than PPP-TG in this context. Furthermore, there are active interactions between blood cells, such as between platelets and erythrocytes or between platelets and leukocytes. The effect of these interactions on TG needs to be assessed in a WB context. Our group recently developed a WB-TGA that shows good correlations with plasma TG tests, with platelet/erythrocyte numbers and with the use of platelet inhibitors,[87] and may serve as a useful tool for studying the involvement of blood cells in coagulation.
There are also limitations with these blood cell–related TGAs. First, there is a lack of standardization. The inter-laboratory variation of PPP-TG has been drastically improved by ensuring good thermal control, the use of standardized pre-analytical protocols and reagents, as well as the use of normal pooled plasma to normalize the data in each run.[48]
[49]
[50]
[51]
[52] In contrast, the standardization of pre-analytical conditions and analytical variables for PRP-TG and WB-TG are still poor.[93] Furthermore, due to the limitation that PRP or WB cannot be stored for a long time, there is still no standardized sample for the normalization of the TG parameters in PRP and WB. This may further hamper result comparison between different centres. Second, it is noteworthy that, similar to PPP-TG, some aspects of physiological coagulation are not represented in PRP- or WB-TGAs, including the effect of blood flow and endothelium, although the latter can be partly represented by adding soluble thrombomodulin. Lastly, the differential effect of blood cell counts on the TG parameters, most notably peak and ETP, of PRP-TG and WB-TG calls for caution when interpreting the results of these assays. Further mechanistic and clinical studies are needed to determine which parameter(s), or the integration of parameters into a score, are most useful.
