Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1472-3146
Bewertung der Lebensqualität im Rahmen einer Hörsystemversorgung
Quality of Life Assessment in the Context of Hearing System Supply![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/ssg/202103/lookinside/thumbnails/14723146sp-grundmann_10-1055-a-1472-3146-1.jpg)
Medizinische Versorgungsqualität definiert sich nicht mehr rein aus der klinischen Wirksamkeit, sondern betrachtet zusätzlich den individuellen, alltäglichen Nutzen. Die Erfassung der Lebensqualität spielt hierbei eine zentrale Rolle. In diesem Beitrag wird der Begriff der Lebensqualität insbesondere im Kontext von Hörschädigungen definiert, Möglichkeiten und Grenzen ihrer Messung sowie die Bedeutung der Gesundheitskompetenz werden diskutiert.
Abstract
Hearing impairment often have a negative impact on the quality of life, especially due to the problems that arise in communication. In addition to clinical measurement parameters, the subjective benefit in everyday life is gaining in importance as a factor for evaluating the outcome of healthcare. This article provides an overview of the factors known to influence well-being and health-related quality of life, as well as current developments in individual assessment in the context of hearing system supply.
Publication History
Article published online:
13 September 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Diener E. Guidelines for National Indicators of Subjective Well-Being and Ill-Being. Appl Res Qual Life 2006; 1: 151-157 DOI: 10.1007/s11482-006-9007-x.
- 2 Dodge R, Daly A, Huyton J. et al. The challenge of defining wellbeing. Int J Wellbeing 2012; 2: 222-235 DOI: 10.5502/ijw.v2i3.4.
- 3 Miller T. Inklusion – Teilhabe – Lebensqualität. Tragfähige Beziehungen gestalten. Stuttgart: Lucius und Lucius 2012
- 4 WHOQOL Group. Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 153-159
- 5 Bullinger M. Lebensqualität – Aktueller Stand und neuere Entwicklungen der internationalen Lebensqualitätsforschung. Ravens-Sieberer U, Cieza A. Lebensqualität und Gesundheitsökonomie in der Medizin. Landsberg: ecomed; 2000: 13-24
- 6 Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948.
- 7 Schumacher J, Klaiberg A, Brähler E. Diagnostische Verfahren zu Lebensqualität und Wohlbefinden. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2003
- 8 Growson M, Semenov Y, Tucci D. et al. Quality of Life and Cost-Effectiveness of Cochlear Implants: A Narrative Review. Audiol Neurotol 2017; 22: 236-258 DOI: 10.1159/000481767.
- 9 Finke M, Bönitz H, Lyxell B. et al. Cochlear implant effectiveness in postlingual single-sided deaf individuals: What’s the point?. Int J Audiol 2017; 56: 417-423
- 10 Zhao F, Bai Z, Stephens D. The relationship between changes in self-rated quality of life after cochlear implantation and changes in individual complaints. Clin Otolaryngol 2008; 33: 427-434
- 11 Mo B, Lindaek M, Harris S. Cochlear implants and quality of life: A prospective study. Ear Hear 2005; 26: 186-194
- 12 McRackan T. Bauschard M, Hatch J et al. Meta-analysis of quality of life improvement after cochlear implantation an associations with speech recognition abilities. Laryngoscope 2018; 128: 982-990 DOI: 10.1002/lary.26738.
- 13 Andries E, Gilles A, Topsakal V. et al. Systematic Review of Quality of Life Assessemtn after Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults. Audiol Neurotol 2021; 26 : 61-75 DOI: 10.1159/000508433.
- 14 Nuesse T, Schlueter A, Lemke U. et al. Self-reported hearing handicap in adults aged 55 to 81 years is modulated by hearing abilities, frailty, mental health, and willingness to use hearing aids. Int J Audiol 2021; 1-9 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1858237.
- 15 Francis H, Yeagle J, Thompson C. Clinical and psychosocial risk factors of hearing outcome in older adults with cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 2015; 125: 695-702
- 16 Kobosko J, Jedrzejczak W, Pilka E. et al. Satisfaction with cohlear implants in postlingually deaf adults and its no- naudiological predictors: Psychological distress, coping strategies, and self-esteem. Ear Hear 2015; 36: 605-618
- 17 Eisenwort B, Schlanitz F, Niederkrotenthaler T. Schwerhörigkeit. Gelungene Kommunikation als Hauptquelle positiver Erfahrungen. HNO 2010; 58: 459-464
- 18 Mandel A, Mandel K, Stadler E. et al. Einübung in Partnerschaft durch Kommunikationstherapie und Verhaltenstherapie. München: Pfeiffer; 1979
- 19 Vernooij M. Kommunikation. Zur kontextgebundenen Komplexität eines Prozesses. Wittrock M, Lütgenau B. Wege zur Partizipation. Oldenburg: Universitätsverlag; 2004: 9-25
- 20 Thoutenhoofd E, Knot-Dickscheit J, Rogge J. et al. The sound of study: Student experiences of listening in the university soundscape. J Further Higher Educ 2016; 40: 804-823
- 21 Keidser G, Naylor G, Brungart D. et al. The Quest for Ecological Validity in Hearing Science: What It Is, Why It Matters, and How to Advance It. Ear Hear 2020; 41: 5-19
- 22 Shiffman S, Stone A, Hufford M. Ecological Momentary Assessment. Ann Rev Clin Psychol 2008; 4: 1-32
- 23 Sørensen K, van den Broucke S, Fullam J. et al. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC public health 2012; DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-80.
- 24 Grundmann M, Plotz K, Radeloff A. et al. Psychometry and test of a questionnaire tool for evaluationg the patients’ Health related Quality of Life in the realm of bimodal hearing system supply. Z Audiol 2019; 58 : 50-56
- 25 Nationaler Aktionsplan Gesundheitskompetenz. Die Gesundheitskompetenz in Deutschland stärken. Schaeffer D, Hurrelmann K, Bauer U, Kolpatzik K. Berlin: KomPart; 2018
- 26 Schaeffer D, Berens EM, Gille S. et al. Gesundheitskompetenz der Bevölkerung in Deutschland – vor und während der Corona Pandemie: Ergebnisse des HLS-GER 2. Bielefeld: Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Gesundheitskompetenzforschung (IZGK), Universität Bielefeld. 2021 DOI: 10.4119/unibi/2950305
- 27 Gilligan J, Weinstein B. Health Literacy and Patient-Centered Care in Audiology – Implications for Adult Aural Rehabilitation. Commun Disord Deaf Stud Hearing Aids 2014; 2: 2 DOI: 10.4172/2375-4427.1000110.
- 28 Institute of Medicine. Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press 2004. DOI: 10.17226/10883 (Stand: 09.03.2021)