Sulodexide in the Treatment of Patients with Early Stages of COVID-19: A Randomized
Controlled Trial
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), infects endothelium, lung, heart, vascular system, gastrointestinal
tube, kidney, and other organs via interaction of virus' spike S protein with angiotensin-converting
enzyme 2 receptor on cell surfaces.[1] The infection mechanism includes proinflammatory changes in the arterial and venous
walls resulting in endotheliitis followed by acute venous and arterial thrombosis
contributing to up to 20% of COVID-19-related mortality.[2] However, patients may remain asymptomatic following infection or develop symptoms
suspicious for COVID-19 approximately 5 days after infection with SARS-CoV-2.[3] Upon deterioration of symptoms, patients are hospitalized and anticoagulation with
low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is now regarded as cornerstone therapy for admitted
patients with COVID-19.[4]
[5]
For asymptomatic patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, it is uncertain whether
hydroxychloroquine reduces hospitalization.[6] The National Institutes of Health treatment guidelines express uncertainty regarding
the use of anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies, bamlanivimab and casirivimab, in
this population.[7] Fluvoxamine, otherwise used for compulsive obsessive disorder, exerts σ-1 receptor
agonism with reduction of sepsis-related inflammatory response and was in a small
randomized controlled trial (RCT) in nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19 associated
with reduced clinical deterioration.[8] Convalescent plasma with high titers of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies reduced deterioration
of respiratory symptoms in older outpatients with mild COVID-19 symptoms in a small
RCT,[9] although a meta-analysis of four RCTs failed to demonstrate any benefit.[10]
Heparins and other glycosaminoglycans act on the thromboinflammatory process by their
anticoagulant and nonanticoagulant effects.[11] Taking these potential new mechanisms of anticoagulants in consideration, the benefit
of any glycosaminoglycan or anticoagulant of other origin may offer an attractive
therapy for persons with mild or moderate symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 to prevent hospitalization.
Several studies are in progress to investigate the benefit of an anticoagulant given
as early as possible for patients suffering from mild to moderate severity of COVID-19
using LMWH, sulodexide, the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) apixaban and edoxaban,
and the antiplatelet drug acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) at various doses. Some studies
add colchicine to ensure an anti-inflammatory action of DOACs or ASA ([Table 1]).[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19] The unmet clinical need is speeding up planning of studies and therefore, some of
the planned or ongoing trials may be missing in this listing.
Table 1
Clinical studies on treatment of COVID-19 at home. Search results in https://clinicaltrials.gov with keywords: COVID-19, anticoagulation, as of 18 March 2021:
|
Trial ID (ref.)
|
Anticoagulant control
|
Dose duration
|
Primary outcome
|
Participants
(N)
|
Design
|
Estimated study end-date
|
|
NCT04400799[12]
|
Enoxaparin
control
|
40 mg od
No study drugs
14 days
|
Hospitalization
all-cause mortality
day 14
|
1,000
|
Prospective, open label
randomized
multicentric
|
April 2021
|
|
NCT04508439[13]
|
Enoxaparin
enoxaparin
|
40 mg od and
1 mg/kg bw bid sc
15 days crossover
30 days total
|
Hospital care admission
days in hospital care,
days supplemental oxygen
day 30
|
130
|
Prospective, randomized open label, crossover assignment, monocentric
|
December 2020
|
|
NCT04483830[15]
|
Sulodexide
placebo
|
500 LRU bid
placebo pills
21 days
|
Hospital care admission, days in
hospital care, days supplemental
oxygen, day 21
D-dimer and CRP, days 0 vs. 14
|
243
|
Prospective
randomized
placebo-controlled,
multicentric
|
September 2020
|
|
NCT04746339[16]
|
Apixaban
placebo
|
2.5 mg bid
Placebo pills
|
Days alive and out of hospital
day 30
|
1,000
|
Prospective, randomized, quadruple blind, multicentric
|
December 2021
|
|
NCT04498273[17]
|
Apixaban
aspirin
placebo
|
2.5 mg bid
5 mg bid
81 mg od
No treatment
30 days
|
Composite endpoint:
hospitalization for cardiovascular/pulmonary events, symptomatic VTE, arterial thromboembolism,
myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality
day 45
|
7,000
|
Prospective
randomized
quadrupleblind,
multicentric
|
September 2021
|
|
NCT04516941[18]
|
Edoxaban
colchicine
control
|
60 mg od
30 mg od if CrCl ≤ 50 mL/min or BW ≤ 60 kg
25 ± 3 days
0.5 mg bid, 3 days
0.5 mg od day 4 to 14 ± 3 or 25 ± 3
No active treatment
|
Edoxaban vs. control: asymptomatic proximal DVT, symptomatic PE and DVT, myocardial
infarction, ischemic stroke, non-CNS systemic embolism, mortality, day 25 ± 3
Colchicine vs. control: SARS-CoV-2 clearance rates determined by PCR or freedom from
death or hospitalization, day 14 ± 3
|
420
|
Prospective
randomized
open label
22 factorial design
bicentric
|
December 2021
|
|
NCT04324463[19]
|
Colchicine
aspirin
control
rivaroxaban
interferon-beta
|
0.6 mg bid 3 days
0.6 mg od day 4 to 25
75–100 mg od
Usual care 25 days
2.5 mg bid, inpatients only Inpatients only
|
Colchicine–aspirin:
composite of hospitalization or death
day 45
|
4,000
|
Prospective
open-label
parallel group
22 factorial design
randomized
multicentric
|
June 2021
|
|
NCT04518735[24]
|
Chronic therapy
warfarin, acenocumarol
dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban
rivaroxaban
aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor, dipyridamole no anticoagulant
therapy
|
According approved treatment regimens, any indication
|
VKA and antiplatelet therapy and control: comparison of clinical outcomes depending
on previous antithrombotic therapy per group, mortality, transfer to the intensive
care unit, day 28
|
1,707
|
Retrospective
case–control
monocentric
|
June 2020
|
Abbreviations: bid, twice a day; BW, body weight; CNS, central nervous system; DVT,
deep vein thrombosis; od, once daily; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PE, pulmonary
embolism; sc, subcutaneous; VKA, vitamin K antagonist; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
The first trial is now published by Gonzalez Ochoa et al evaluating sulodexide for
individuals with early stages of COVID-19 to reduce the proportion of hospitalized
patients and their length of hospital stays, the proportion of patients requiring
oxygen support, and the number of days on such support.[15]
[20] They took advantage of the lack of an approved anticoagulant therapy to design a
trial with the orally available glycosaminoglycan sulodexide versus placebo with blinding
of study personal and participants. The low risk of bleeding during treatment with
sulodexide may have increased the confidence in this treatment. A recent meta-analysis
has shown that sulodexide was associated with reduced odds of all-cause mortality,
cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and deep vein thrombosis, without
a significant increase in bleeding compared with placebo or no treatment.[21]
Gonzalez Ochoa et al followed the standard procedures with permuted block randomization
at a 1:1 ratio of capsules containing 500 lipid releasing units sulodexide or placebo
given twice daily for 21 days. They included patients aged >40 years with suspicion
of COVID-19 and with at least 3 days with two of the symptoms: cough, fever, or headache,
plus one of runny nose, diarrhea, dyspnea, loss of taste or smell, conjunctivitis,
and body or muscle ache. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 had
to be presented by participants within 3 days of randomization and if negative, medication
was stopped and patients were observed until end of study for intention-to-treat (ITT)
analysis. Follow-up of participants was done virtually or in person for 21 days and
further until an outcome had occurred or until the end of the trial. The primary endpoint
of hospitalization occurred statistically significantly less frequently in participants
on sulodexide (17.4%) versus placebo (29.4%) (p = 0.031). Secondary endpoints showed significantly less frequent and shorter requirement
of oxygen support at home plus in-hospital for participants on sulodexide compared
with placebo. Length of hospital stay, mortality, and hemorrhage were not different
between the groups. All results were confirmed by the ITT analysis.
The concentrations of D-dimer and C-reactive protein (CRP) were normal and not different
between participants treated with sulodexide and placebo at baseline. At day 14, D-dimer
and CRP were higher in both groups compared with baseline, but were significantly
higher during administration of placebo compared with sulodexide. This finding is
of particular interest for the pathophysiology of COVID-19 and the anticoagulant and
anti-inflammatory properties of sulodexide and potential usefulness for identification
of patients who may suffer from a progression of COVID-19 when treated at home.
Strengths and limitations of the study were considered by the authors and some may
be worth to be added.
Strengths of the study:
-
Not to wait for the results of the PCR result for SARS-CoV-2 to start the study drug.
-
To use the higher of the available doses of sulodexide for the participants.
-
To determine D-dimer and CRP at start and after 14 days to generate information on
the potential benefit of the anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory actions of sulodexide
for home treatment.
Limitations may be added, such as:
-
The relatively small sample size and that 12% could not be analyzed due to lack of
data.
-
The lack of dose adjustment or change to LMWH or a DOAC in participants with increase
of D-dimer at day 14.
-
The lack of analysis according to elevation of D-dimer and/or CRP at day 14 per group.
Other Anticoagulant Options
The studies available through ClinicalTrials.gov as of March 15, 2021 include LMWH
enoxaparin, the DOACs apixaban and edoxaban, and ASA in comparison to placebo or colchicine for treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 infection, verified by a positive PCR
test for SARS-CoV-2. Endpoints and some other details are listed in [Table 1].
Advantages of LMWHs are the simultaneous anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory properties
which, however, differ in the dose–response effect regarding the two actions.DOACs
may act through inhibition of factor Xa and thrombin via the thrombin receptor on
inflammatory diseases. Some of the direct factor Xa inhibitors are approved for prevention
of venous thromboembolism in patients with malignant disease, which is thought to
be mediated by nonanticoagulant effects DOACs.[22]
Chronic Anticoagulant Therapy
It has been hypothesized that chronic oral anticoagulation with vitamin-K antagonists
(VKAs) or DOACs may mitigate the course of mildly or moderately symptomatic SARS-CoV-2-positive
tested persons to more severe COVID-19 disease stages.[23] This hypothesis is currently being investigated in the retrospective, observational,
single-center CORONA study on the clinical evolution (in terms of survival and thromboembolic
complications) of patients on chronic treatment with anticoagulants or antiplatelet
agents who are hospitalized for COVID-19 compared with patients who do not receive
these agents.[24] However, it needs to be acknowledged that two studies reported failure of long-term
anticoagulation to reduce hospitalization and mortality in COVID-19 patients.[25]
[26]
