Quinoxalin-2(1H)-one scaffolds exist in many natural products. Due to the significant biological activities and pharmaceutical properties of this structure, such as antitumor,[1] ALR2 inhibition,[2] antibiotic,[3] analgesic,[4] antimicrobial,[5] and aldose reductase inhibition activities (Figure [1]),[6] a range of 3-functionalized quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones has been synthesized, with approaches including arylation,[7] alkylation,[8] etherification,[9] amidation,[10] amination,[11] cyanation,[12] phosphonation,[13] and trifluoromethylation (Scheme [1]).[14]
Figure 1 Pharmaceutically active quinoxalin-2(1H)-one derivatives
Scheme 1 Synthesis of 3-functionalized quinoxalin-2(1H)-one derivatives
Activation of C–H bonds has recently emerged as a powerful method for the construction of C–C bonds.[15]
[16] Furthermore, radical addition is a powerful method to form C–C bonds,[17] with the iodide/TBHP system being considered as a dominant protocol in the radical field to achieve C–H bond activation and construction of heterocyclic rings.[18]
[19]
Typical approaches for synthesizing 3-(2-oxo-2-phenylethylidene)-3,4-dihydroquinoxalin-2(1H)-ones involve reaction of aroyl- and hetaroylpyruvic acid or ester derivatives with N-phenyl-o-phenylenediamine (Scheme [2]).[20]
[21]
Scheme 2 Synthesis of 3-acetylquinoxalin-2(1H)-one derivatives
As for the synthesis of diverse 3-aryl-quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones, there were two main approaches. One strategy to construct the heterocyclic ring involves two-step acylation of benzene-1,2-diamines with arylglyoxylic acids, followed by subsequent cyclization (Scheme [3], method 1).[7a] Other methods involve direct functionalization. Paul reported the novel Pd(TFA)2-catalyzed direct dehydrogenative cross-coupling of quinoxalin-2-ones with arenes for the construction of diverse 3-aryl quinoxalin-2-ones (Scheme [3], method 2).[7b] Ramesh reported an oxidative cross-coupling of arylboronic acids with quinoxalin-2-ones using the readily available oxidant Mn(III) acetate dihydrate (Scheme [3], method 3).[7c] Yin’ s group used diaryliodonium tetrafluoroborates at room temperature, with arylhydrazines as the arylating agent (Scheme [3], method 4).[7d] Lee and co-workers reported iodosobenzene-promoted direct arylation with arylhydrazines as radical precursors (Scheme [3], method 5).[7e] However, drawbacks such as the requirement for prefunctionalized substrates, multistep protocols, low atom economy, use of transition-metal catalysts and strong base in these protocols have limited their general application and development. Metal-free systems have replaced tradition metal systems, and iodide or hypervalent iodine possess advantages such as ease of handling, strong electrophilicity, commercial availability, and low toxicity.[22]
Scheme 3 Synthetic approaches to 3-arylquinoxalin-2(1H)-ones
The I2/TBHP system is a central reagent combination in the radical field.[23]
[24] It has been shown that tert-butyl peroxybenzoate (TBPB) is an efficient and highly chemoselective benzoylating reagent.[25,26] In this area, we first disclosed that TBPB could translate into aryl radicals, triggering subsequent reactions, providing a novel method for the introduction of an aryl group.
Herein, we disclose a simple method to synthesize 3-functionalized quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones. In the first part, we present a n-Bu4NI-catalyzed radical oxidative coupling of acetophenone and quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones using TBHP as oxidant to access 3-(2-oxo-2-phenylethylidene)-3,4-dihydroquinoxalin-2(1H)-ones. In the second part, the direct arylation of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones is disclosed. Therein, TBPB is used both as reagent to generate aryl radical and as free radical initiator, while I2 is used as catalyst (Scheme [4]).
Scheme 4 Studies reported herein
Initially, we chose 1-methylquinoxalin-2-(1H)-one (1a) and acetophenone (2a) as model substrates. The reaction was carried out using 20 mol% of TBAI, 5 equivalents of tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP, 70% solution in water) in DCE at 100 °C. Under these conditions, the desired product 3a was obtained in 32% yield (Table [1], entry 4).
Table 1 Optimization of the Reaction Conditionsa
|
Entry
|
[I]/mmol%
|
[O]/equiv.
|
Solvent
|
Temp (°C)
|
Yield (%)b
|
1
|
I2/20
|
TBHP/5
|
DCE
|
100
|
12
|
2
|
CuI/20
|
TBHP/5
|
DCE
|
100
|
24
|
3
|
NIS/20
|
TBHP/5
|
DCE
|
100
|
NR
|
4
|
TBAI/20
|
TBHP/5
|
DCE
|
100
|
32
|
5
|
TBAI+I2/20+10
|
TBHP/5
|
DCE
|
100
|
23
|
6
|
TBAI/10
|
TBHP/5
|
DCE
|
100
|
8
|
7
|
TBAI/100
|
TBHP/5
|
DCE
|
100
|
12
|
8
|
TBAI/20
|
BPO/5
|
DCE
|
100
|
25
|
9
|
TBAI/20
|
K2S2O8/5
|
DCE
|
100
|
NR
|
10
|
TBAI/20
|
DDQ/5
|
DCE
|
100
|
NR
|
11
|
TBAI/20
|
TBPB/5
|
DCE
|
100
|
30
|
12c
|
TBAI/20
|
TBHP/5
|
DCE
|
100
|
79
|
13c
|
TBAI/20
|
TBHP/3
|
DCE
|
100
|
86
|
14c
|
TBAI/20
|
TBHP/3
|
dioxane
|
100
|
16
|
15c
|
TBAI/20
|
TBHP/3
|
DMSO
|
100
|
trace
|
16c
|
TBAI/20
|
TBHP/3
|
H2O
|
100
|
58
|
17c
|
TBAI/20
|
TBHP/3
|
DCE
|
90
|
70
|
18c
|
TBAI/20
|
TBHP/3
|
DCE
|
110
|
67
|
a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.3 mmol), 2a (2.0 equiv.), solvent (2 mL), sealed tube, 48 h.
b Isolated yields.
c
1a (0.3 mmol), 2a (4.0 equiv.).
Next, we studied a series of iodides and found that using TBAI as catalyst gave higher yields (Table [1], entries 1–7). Then, several oxidants were investigated, such as dibenzoyl peroxide (BPO), tert-butyl peroxybenzoate (TBPB), dibutyl peroxide, K2S2O8, and DDQ, but the reaction with TBHP still resulted in the best result (Table [1], entries 8–11). When we increased the amount of (2a) from 2 equivalents to 4 equivalents and decreased the amount of TBHP from 5 equivalents to 3 equivalents, the yield of target product was increased to 86% (Table [1], entries 12, 13). Finally, other solvents (DMSO, H2O, 1,4-dioxane, toluene) were studied instead, but unfortunately no improvement in yield was observed (Table [1], entries 14–17). Ultimately, we chose (1a, 0.3 mmol), (2a, 4.0 equiv.), TBAI (20 mol%), and TBHP (3.0 equiv.) in DCE (2 mL) at 100 °C for 48 hours as the optimal reaction conditions.
Unexpectedly, we observed a byproduct in a relatively low yield, with 3-arylquinoxalin-2(1H)-one 4a being observed when BPO or TBPB were used as oxidant. It was observed that reaction with iodine showed a slightly higher yield (Table [2], entry 2). Subsequently, a variety of solvents such as acetonitrile, 1,4-dioxane, and DMSO was investigated (Table [2], entries 6–8). Finally, we surveyed varying the effect of temperature (Table [2], entries 4, 5), but the reaction did not proceed well. In order to confirm the source of the aryl group, we conducted experiments without acetophenone. To our satisfaction, the yield of 4a was increased from 34% to 61% (Table [2], entry 9). Finally, the number of equivalents of iodine and TBPB was investigated, and the yield was eventually improved to 95% (Table [2], entries 10–13). Considering the hazards associated with TBPB, 5 equivalents of TBPB were chosen as the preferred conditions. Thus, the optimized reaction conditions were chosen as TBPB (5 equiv.), I2 (2 mol%) in DCE at 100 °C for 8 hours.
Table 2 Optimization of the Reaction Conditionsa
|
Entry
|
[I]/mmol%
|
[O]/equiv.
|
Solvent
|
Temp (°C)
|
Yield (%)b
|
1
|
TBAI/20
|
TBPB/5
|
DCE
|
100
|
30
|
2
|
I2/20
|
TBPB/5
|
DCE
|
100
|
34
|
3
|
KI/20
|
TBPB/5
|
DCE
|
100
|
33
|
4
|
I2/20
|
TBPB/5
|
DCE
|
90
|
25
|
5
|
I2/20
|
TBPB/5
|
DCE
|
110
|
28
|
6
|
I2/20
|
TBPB/5
|
CH3CN
|
100
|
38
|
7
|
I2/20
|
TBPB/5
|
dioxane
|
100
|
41
|
8
|
I2/20
|
TBPB/5
|
DMSO
|
100
|
NR
|
9c
|
I2/20
|
TBPB/5
|
DCE
|
100
|
61
|
10c
|
I2/50
|
TBPB/5
|
DCE
|
100
|
27
|
11c
|
I2/2
|
TBPB/5
|
DCE
|
100
|
88
|
12c
|
I2/2
|
TBPB/4
|
DCE
|
100
|
71
|
13c
|
I2/2
|
TBPB/7
|
DCE
|
100
|
95
|
a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.3 mmol), 2a (2.0 equiv.), solvent (2.0 mL), sealed tube, 48 h.
b Isolated yields.
c Acetophenone was not present.
With the optimized conditions in hand, a range of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones was investigated to give the corresponding derivatives 3 (Scheme [5]). These N-substituted quinoxalin-2(1H)-one analogues showed good reactivities, giving the anticipated products 3aa–aj in 32–93% yields.
Scheme 5 Substrate scope of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones. Reagents and conditions: 1 (0.3 mmol), 2a (4.0 equiv.), TBAI (0.2 equiv.), TBHP (3.0 equiv.), DCE (2 mL), sealed tube.[27]
In particular, an N-phenyl-substituted quinoxalin-2(1H)-one was well tolerated, giving the corresponding product 3aj in 64% yield. Likewise, it was found that substrates with N-propyl, N-butyl and N-cyclohexylmethyl substitution provided the desired products (3ag, 3ae, and 3af) in good yields. Then, we explored substitution at R1 and R2 with R3 = CH3 (Scheme [5]). Electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups provided the desired products in moderate to good yields (3ak, 3al, and 3an). Subsequently, we found that electron-withdrawing substituents (–F, –Br) had a positive effect compared to an electron-donating group (–CH3). Furthermore, a substrate with an additional aromatic ring resulted a high yield of 73% (3am).
Finally, we studied the scope of acetophenones (Scheme [6]). When the substrates possessed electron-donating groups, the yields were lower with a substituent at the ortho position than at the para position. In addition, o-hydroxyacetophenone also gave the desired product 3ba in 57%. yield. With electron-withdrawing groups present at the ortho or para positions, the corresponding products 3bb–bi were obtained in 33–74% yields. The π-extended aromatic substrate provided the expected product 3bj in a 78% yield.
Scheme 6 Substrate scope of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones. Reagents and conditions: 1a (0.3 mmol), 2 (4.0 equiv.), TBAI (0.2 equiv.), TBHP (3.0 equiv.), DCE (2 mL), sealed tube.[27]
Most of the substrates studied gave the expected products 4aa–ai in moderate to excellent yields (Scheme [7]). N-Substituted quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones containing N-ester, N-benzyl, N-benzene acetyl, N-propyl, and N-aryl substituents were all suitable for this reaction, providing the desired products in moderate to good yields. In addition, N-phenyl quinoxalinone gave the corresponding product 4af in 94% yield. Finally, we explored substitutions at R1 and R2 with R3 = CH3. An electron-withdrawing substituent (–Cl) had a positive effect compared to an electron-donating group (–CH3). Appending an additional aromatic ring also led to 4ai in 70% yield (Scheme [7]).
Scheme 7 Substrate scope of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones. Reagents and conditions: 1a (0.3 mmol), I2 (0.02 equiv.), TBPB (5.0 equiv.), solvent (2.0 mL), sealed tube.[27]
Addition of a radical-trapping reagent such as 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine N-oxide (TEMPO) or BHT to the reaction suppressed the transformation, strongly indicating that the C–C bond formation is a radical-mediated process (Scheme [8]).
Scheme 8 Experiments with added radical inhibitors
On the basis of this result, a plausible reaction mechanism can be proposed (Scheme [9]). Either the tert-butoxy radical or tert-butylhydroperoxy radical can remove a hydrogen atom from 2a to form radical intermediate 5. Addition of intermediate 5 to 1a affords intermediate 6. Then intermediate 6 can undergo 1,2-H shift to form the more stable intermediate 7. Finally, the final product 3a is obtained by hydrogen-atom removal by a tert-butoxy radical.
Scheme 9 Plausible reaction mechanism
For the TBPB reaction catalyzed by I2, the benzoyl radical releases carbon dioxide forming the phenyl radical under standard conditions. Addition of the phenyl radical to the carbon–nitrogen double bond affords radical intermediate 10, which is further oxidized by the iodide cation to form nitrogen cation compound 11 that then undergoes 1,2-H shift to give 12. Finally, the desired compound is obtained by hydrogen-atom removal to give 4a (Scheme [10]).
Scheme 10 Plausible reaction mechanism
In conclusion, we have developed a novel protocol for direct synthesis of 3-(2-oxo-2-phenylethylidene)-3,4-dihydroquinoxalin-2(1H)-ones.[] The iodide/peroxide system has been shown to be a powerful combination to activate the C–H bond of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones. This process exhibits good functional group tolerance with a broad substrate scope, resulting in acetylation of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones and providing a new method for the introduction of an aryl group.