Endoscopy 2022; 54(07): E396-E397
DOI: 10.1055/a-1554-4660
E-Videos

Endoscopic management of a perforated gallbladder

Arvind J. Trindade
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, United States
,
Mohammed Alshelleh
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, United States
,
Nichol Martinez
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, United States
,
Anam Rizvi
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, United States
,
Petros C. Benias
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, United States
,
Stephen Litvak
2   Department of Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, United States
› Author Affiliations
 

An 88-year-old woman with obesity (body mass index 40 kg/m2), diabetes, and heart failure presented with acute cholecystitis. Computed tomography (CT) showed a distended gallbladder with a large stone ([Fig. 1]). She was started on intravenous fluids and antibiotics. After 5 hours into her admission, she began to become lethargic and had increasing tachycardia. The patient was deemed a nonsurgical candidate owing to her comorbidities and age. Given the recent evidence [1], the patient was referred for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage after multidisciplinary discussion.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Computed tomography showed a distended gallbladder with a large stone.

On EUS, free fluid was noted around the gallbladder, which was consistent with a perforated gallbladder ([Fig. 2], [Video 1]) and explained the clinical deterioration. The decision was made to drain the gallbladder where the gallbladder wall was intact. A 10 × 10 mm lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) was placed into the gallbladder through a site of intact wall in a transduodenal approach ([Fig. 3]). Repeat CT scan was performed after the procedure given the suspicion of a perforated gallbladder, and confirmed the diagnosis ([Fig. 4]). The LAMS was positioned away from the perforation on CT and was in place in the gallbladder. The patient was discharged 7 days later with resolution of symptoms and normalization of laboratory values.

Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Endoscopic ultrasound showed free fluid around the gallbladder, consistent with a perforated gallbladder.

Video 1 Endoscopic management of a perforated gallbladder.


Quality:
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Endoscopic image showing a lumen-apposing metal stent, which was placed in a transduodenal approach into the gallbladder at a site of intact wall.
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Computed tomography scan after the procedure confirmed a perforated gallbladder.

CT scan at 8 weeks showed resolution of the gallbladder perforation, with the LAMS in place ([Fig. 5]). Endoscopy was performed, and the stent and gallstone were removed. Contrast was injected into the gallbladder and showed no further filling defects in the entire biliary system. On 4-week follow-up the patient was doing well without any symptoms.

Zoom Image
Fig. 5 Computed tomography scan 8 weeks after the procedure showing resolution of a perforated gallbladder.

This case demonstrates that EUS-guided drainage can be effective in patients with acute cholecystitis who are unsuitable for surgery, even when a perforated gallbladder is suspected. It is important to place the LAMS at a site of intact gallbladder wall.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CCL_1AF_2AF_3AB

Endoscopy E-Videos
https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos

Endoscopy E-Videos is an open access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online. Processing charges apply (currently EUR 375), discounts and wavers acc. to HINARI are available.

This section has its own submission
website at
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos


#

Competing interests

Arvind J. Trindade is a consultant for Olympus America and Pentax Medical, and has received research support from Ninepoint Medical. Petros C. Benias is a consultant for Olympus America, Pentax Medical, Creo Medical, Apollo Overstitch, and FujiFilm. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  • Reference

  • 1 Teoh AYB, Kitano M, Itoi T. et al. Endosonography-guided gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy in very high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: an international randomised multicentre controlled superiority trial (DRAC 1). Gut 2020; 69: 1085-1091

Corresponding author

Arvind J. Trindade, MD
Division of Gastroenterology
Long Island Jewish Medical Center
Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell
Northwell Health System
270-05 76th Avenue
New Hyde Park, NY 11040
United States   

Publication History

Article published online:
27 August 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

  • Reference

  • 1 Teoh AYB, Kitano M, Itoi T. et al. Endosonography-guided gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy in very high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: an international randomised multicentre controlled superiority trial (DRAC 1). Gut 2020; 69: 1085-1091

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Computed tomography showed a distended gallbladder with a large stone.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Endoscopic ultrasound showed free fluid around the gallbladder, consistent with a perforated gallbladder.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Endoscopic image showing a lumen-apposing metal stent, which was placed in a transduodenal approach into the gallbladder at a site of intact wall.
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Computed tomography scan after the procedure confirmed a perforated gallbladder.
Zoom Image
Fig. 5 Computed tomography scan 8 weeks after the procedure showing resolution of a perforated gallbladder.