Download PDF
Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2022; 147(09): 549-556
DOI: 10.1055/a-1554-8450
Dossier

Stellenwert des CT in der kardialen Diagnostik

Cardiac computed tomography – Current diagnostic role in cardiology
Stephan Achenbach
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Aufgrund der schnellen Bewegung des Herzens spielte die CT lange Zeit für die kardiale Bildgebung kaum eine Rolle. Seit allerdings etwa 20 Jahren gestatten speziell ausgerüstete „High-end“-CT-Systeme die Bildgebung des Herzens mit eindrucksvoller Qualität und hoher Aussagekraft. Im Folgenden werden Voraussetzungen und Anwendungsgebiete der CT in der kardialen Diagnostik geschildert: dies unter Erwähnung spezieller Vorteile und auch Limitationen.

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) imaging of the heart requires specific equipment and protocols in order to synchronize image generation with the electrocardiogram (ECG), usually achieved via ECG-gated reconstruction or ECG-triggered acquisition. The main application of cardiac CT is coronary artery imaging. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery CT allows the identification and rule-out of stenoses and is a diagnostic approach to patients with suspected chronic coronary artery disease or acute chest pain, provided that patient characteristics are associated with a high likelihood of fully diagnostic image quality. In addition, CT has the potential to visualize coronary atherosclerotic plaque, even if non-obstructive, and data suggest that this may be a valuable guide towards more intensive risk modification strategy such as statin therapy. In recent years, the use of CT imaging to guide structural heart interventions has become another important application, and many interventions, such as transcatheter aortic valve implantation, substantially depend on CT imaging to plan the procedure, minimize risks, and optimize outcome.

Schlüsselwörter

Computertomografie - koronare Herzerkrankung - Atherosklerose - Intervention

Key words

computed tomography - coronary artery disease - atherosclerosis - intervention


Publication History

Article published online:
25 April 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A. et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2020; 41 (03) 407-477
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM. et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J 2021; 42 (34) 3227-3337
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Blanke P, Weir-McCall JR, Achenbach S. et al. Computed tomography imaging in the context of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): an expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019; 12 (01) 1-24
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Abbara S, Blanke P, Maroules CD. et al. SCCT guidelines for the performance and acquisition of coronary computed tomographic angiography: A report of the society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee: Endorsed by the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2016; 10: 435-449
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F. et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 2009; 301 (05) 500507
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Gerber TC, Carr JJ, Arai AE. et al. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation 2009; 119: 1056-1065
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Natürliche Strahlung in Deutschland. Salzgitter: Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz 2021. Im Internet (Stand: 06.02.2022): https://www.bfs.de/DE/themen/ion/umwelt/natuerliche-strahlung/natuerliche-strahlung_node.html
    PubMed
  • 8 Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D. et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 340-346
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA. et al. Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 2008; 246: 742-753
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Hell MM, Bittner D, Schuhbaeck A. et al. Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary angiography with third-generation dual-source CT at 70 kVp tube voltage: Feasibility, image quality, radiation dose, and effect of iterative reconstruction. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2014; 8: 418-425
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Stocker TJ, Deseive S, Leipsic J. et al. Reduction in radiation exposure in cardiovascular computed tomography imaging: results from the PROspective multicenter registry on radiaTion dose Estimates of cardiac CT angIOgraphy iN daily practice in 2017 (PROTECTION VI). Eur Heart J 2018; 39 (41) 3715-3723
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Menke J, Kowalski J. Diagnostic accuracy and utility of coronary CT angiography with consideration of unevaluable results: a systematic review and multivariate Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis with intention to diagnose. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 451-458
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR. et al. Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 (15) 1395-1407
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D. et al 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2021; S1934-5925(21)00469-X
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Patel MR. et al. Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1291-1300
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Newby DE, Adamson PD, Berry C. et al. Coronary CT Angiography and 5-Year Risk of Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med 2018; 379 (10) 924-933
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Chow BJ, Small G, Yam Y. et al. Prognostic and therapeutic implications of statin and aspirin therapy in individuals with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: results from the CONFIRM (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter registry) registry. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2015; 35: 981-989
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Mitchell JD, Fergestrom N, Gage BF. et al. Impact of Statins on Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 72 (25) 3233-3242
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E. et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2021; 42 (14) 1289-1367
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ. et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J 2015; 36 (44) 3075-3128
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Hell MM, Biburger L, Marwan M. et al. Prediction of fluoroscopic angulations for transcatheter aortic valve implantation by CT angiography: influence on procedural parameters. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 18 (08) 906-914
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar