Incorporating Cyano Groups to a Conjugated Polymer Based on Double B←N-Bridged Bipyridine Units for Unipolar n-Type Organic Field-Effect Transistors

Abstract

The development of n-type semiconductors lags far behind that of their p-type counterparts, demonstrating the exploration of exclusive n-type π-conjugated polymers is significant. The double B←N-bridged bipyridine (BNBP)-based polymers P-BNBP-TVT containing (E)-1,2-di(thiophen-2-yl)ethene (TVT) previously reported exhibits ambipolar character because of the electron-rich nature. Herein, we incorporated strong electron-withdrawing cyano groups into the 3,3′-positions of the TVT moiety to a copolymer P-BNBP-2CNTVT to develop n-type π-conjugated polymers. The LUMO/HOMO energy levels of P-BNBP-2CNTVT are −3.80/−5.95 eV, respectively, which are ~0.4 eV lower than that of P-BNBP-TVT without cyano groups. Unsurprisingly, compared with ambipolar P-BNBP-TVT, the organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) based on P-BNBP-2CNTVT showed unipolar n-type characteristics with an electron mobility of 0.026 cm² · V⁻¹ · s⁻¹ and a lower threshold voltage of ~25 V as well as high I _on/I _off of ~10⁵. This study demonstrates that organoboron π-conjugated polymers could be regarded as a tool for constructing exclusive n-type semiconducting polymers used in OFETs.

Key words

π-conjugated polymers - cyano-functionalization - organic field-effect transistors - electron transports - n-type polymer semiconductors

Introduction

π-Conjugated polymers have attracted increasing attention for their potential applications in organic electronic devices due to their advantages of low cost and flexibility.[1] Organic field-effect transistors (OFETs), one of the vital components of organic electronics, have been a hot topic because of their wide use in integrated circuits, displays, memory storage, skin sensors and so forth.[2] Over the past three decades, significant progresses have been made in the state-of-the-art p-type semiconducting polymers in OFETs with impressive hole mobilities of higher than 10 cm² · V⁻¹ · s⁻¹.[3] However, the evolution of n-type semiconducting polymers still lags far behind that of their p-type counterparts, which is mainly attributed to the deficiency of π-conjugated polymers with high electron affinity and electron mobility. This unbalanced hole and electron mobilities will inevitably become an obstacle to organic complementary inverters and complementary logic circuits constructed with organic p–n junctions.[4] Therefore, it is imperative to explore the high-performance n-type semiconducting polymers by rational molecular designs.

The dominating challenges in achieving effective electron transport in polymer semiconductors consist in the implementation of sufficiently low-lying LUMO/HOMO energy levels. The deep LUMO energy levels could enhance the electron injection from the electrodes and facilitate the stable electron transport, and a low enough HOMO energy levels can also block the hole injection and accumulation. However, it is proverbial that a number of high-mobility polymers based on naphthalene diimide (NDI),[5] diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP)[6] and isoindigo (IID)[7] exhibit ambipolar transport characteristics in OFETs, even though they typically contain electron-withdrawing imide- and amide-substituted groups. Conventionally, replacing hydrogen atoms in the backbone with strong electron-withdrawing groups including halogens (fluorine atoms and chlorine atoms)[8] and cyano moiety[9] could deepen the LUMO/HOMO energy levels further, which has been regarded as a facile and promising strategy to design exclusive n-type polymers. For example, Gao et al.[7a] reported that the multifluorination of IID-based polymers shows a conversion of ambipolar to n-type with a high electron mobility up to 4.97 cm² · V⁻¹ · s⁻¹. Kim et al.[10] also reported an electron mobility of 1.20 cm² · V⁻¹ · s⁻¹ for DPP-based polymers containing cyano groups.

A highly π-extended (E)-1,2-di(thiophen-2-yl)ethene (TVT) unit is a versatile building block for high-performance polymers because of its good coplanarity to promote intrachain charge transport.[11] On the other hand, there are a lot of copolymers based on the TVT unit having p-type or ambipolar character owing to its electron-rich nature.[12] In our previous study,[13] we copolymerized the electron-deficient double B←N-bridged bipyridine (BNBP) with the TVT unit, and the corresponding copolymer (P-BNBP-TVT) exhibits ambipolar character due to the high-lying LUMO/HOMO energy levels. To lower the frontier energy levels, herein, we introduced cyano groups at the 3,3′-positions of the TVT moiety to successfully synthesize the copolymer, P-BNBP-2CNTVT. As we expected, the strong electron-withdrawing nitrile moieties could dramatically enhance the electron affinity of the copolymers. CV measurements verified that P-BNBP-2CNTVT shows lower LUMO/HOMO energy levels of −3.80 eV/−5.95 eV, respectively, which are much lower than those of P-BNBP-TVT. The difference with ambipolar P-BNBP-TVT is that the OFETs based on P-BNBP-2CNTVT exhibit exclusive n-type charge transport with a moderate electron mobility of 0.026 cm² · V⁻¹ · s⁻¹.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis and Characterizations. The chemical structures of P-BNBP-TVT and P-BNBP-2CNTVT are shown in [Figure 1]. We decorated the cyano groups at the 3,3′-positions of the TVT unit to construct a promising n-type π-conjugated polymer based on the BNBP unit. P-BNBP-TVT has been reported in our previous study.[13] The synthetic route of P-BNBP-2CNTVT is depicted in [Scheme 1], and the detailed synthetic procedures are provided in the Supporting Information. In terms of the syntheses reported, the monomer of 2CNTVT was successfully prepared under the treatment of lithium diisopropylamine (LDA), then we performed the Stille-coupling polymerization between the monomer of BNBP and the monomer of 2CNTVT. The long and branched alkyl chain 2-tetradecyloctadecyl was used to ensure the solubility. The crude product was purified by sequential Soxhlet extraction with acetone, n-hexane and chloroform to obtain the desired copolymer P-BNBP-2CNTVT with 93% yield. Expectedly, P-BNBP-2CNTVT exhibits good solubility in common solvents, such as chloroform, chlorobenzene (CB), ο-dichlorobenzene and so on, so that we carried out ¹H NMR to confirm the chemical structure. And the number-average molecular weight (M _n) and polydispersity index (PDI) of the copolymer are estimated by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) using distribution polystyrene as a standard. The molecular weight (M _n) of P-BNBP-2CNTVT is 51.5 kDa with a PDI of 1.91 (Figure S2), which is comparable that of with P-BNBP-TVT.[13] P-BNBP-2CNTVT displays good thermal stability with a thermal decomposition temperatures (T _d, 5% weight loss) of 334 °C, as measured by thermogravimetric analysis under a nitrogen atmosphere (Figure S3). The differential scanning calorimetry scans of P-BNBP-2CNTVT show no melting or glass transitions in the 25 – 250 °C range (Figure S4).

Figure 1 Molecular design and chemical structures of the polymers P-BNBP-TVT and P-BNBP-2CNTVT.

Scheme 1 Synthetic route of P-BNBP-2CNTVT.

Molecular Geometry and Electronic Structures. In order to elucidate the influences on polymer backbone configurations and electronic structures after incorporating cyano groups, density functional theory (DFT) calculations of two model tetramers (P-BNBP-TVT and P-BNBP-2CNTVT containing four repeating units) were performed at the B3LYP/6 – 31 G level of theory. The long alkyl side chains were replaced with methyl groups to simplify the calculations, and the results are shown in [Figures 2] and S1. For P-BNBP-TVT, the torsion angle between BNBP and TVT is 22°; however, after the introduction of cyano groups, the torsion angle between BNBP and 2CNTVT is up to 27°, demonstrating negative influences on the molecular configuration due to the large steric hindrance of the cyano groups (vide infra). Although with the twisty backbone, the LUMO of P-BNBP-2CNTVT remains delocalized along the conjugated backbone, which is the same as that of P-BNBP-TVT. However, the HOMO of P-BNBP-2CNTVT is mainly localized on the BNBP moiety as compared with P-BNBP-TVT, in which the HOMO is delocalized along the conjugated backbone, indicating the strong electron-withdrawing properties of cyano groups. Further, P-BNBP-2CNTVT based on DFT calculations exhibits deeper LUMO/HOMO energy levels of −3.58 eV/−5.78 eV than those of P-BNBP-TVT of −3.00 eV/−5.28 eV. The results demonstrate that cyano‐functionalization on the TVT moiety dramatically lowers the LUMO/HOMO energy levels, which could effectively enhance electron injection and block the hole injection to ensure the exclusively n-type transport character.

Figure 2 Molecular structures, Kohn–Sham LUMO and HOMO and their energy levels for the tetramer model compounds of a) P-BNBP-TVT and b) P-BNBP-2CNTVT calculated at the B3LYP/6 – 31 G(d,p) level of theory.

Photophysical and Electrochemical Properties. The UV-vis absorption spectra of P-BNBP-TVT and P-BNBP-2CNTVT in diluted CB solutions with the concentration of 10⁻⁵ M and in thin films are shown in [Figure 3]. The corresponding photophysical characteristics are summarized in [Table 1]. Both the absorption spectra of P-BNBP-TVT and P-BNBP-2CNTVT in CB solutions at room temperature exhibit the similar shape to their absorption spectra of thin films. In addition, the maximum absorption peaks of the two copolymers are almost impervious from the solutions to thin films, which demonstrates the strong pre-aggregation in the solutions. The pre-aggregation characteristics further could be confirmed by the temperature-dependent absorption spectra shown in Figure S5. The maximum absorption peaks gradually blue-shift with the increasing temperature of the solution, along with the reduction of the absorption peak intensity. It is worth mentioning that the absorption spectra of P-BNBP-2CNTVT attaching cyano groups display a hypochromic shift in comparison to that of P-BNBP-TVT, and the maximum absorption peaks (λ _max) of P-BNBP-TVT and P-BNBP-2CNTVT are 653 nm and 623 nm, respectively. This could be mainly attributed to the weak intramolecular charge transfer character after the cyano‐functionalization leading to a significant decrease of electron-donating ability of the TVT moiety.[14]

Figure 3 Normalized UV-vis absorption spectra of PBNBP-TVT and P-BNBP-CNTVT in their a) diluted CB solutions (10⁻⁵ M) and b) thin films.

Table 1 Molecular, photophysical and electrochemical properties of P-BNBP-TVT and P-BNBP-2CNTVT

Polymer	M n [a] [kg · mol−1]	PDI	λ max, sol [b] [nm]	λ max, film [c] [nm]	E g opt [d] [eV]	E onset red [V]	E onset ox [V]	E LUMO [e] [eV]	E HOMO [e] [eV]
a M n and PDI of the polymers were determined by GPC using polystyrene standards in TCB at 150 °C. bMeasured in diluted CB solutions (10−5 M) at 25 °C. cMeasured in thin films. dCalculated from the absorption band edge of the polymer films, E g = 1240/λ edge. eLUMO and HOMO energy levels were determined from the first reduction potential (E onset red) and oxidation potential (E onset ox) (vs. Fc/Fc+) with the equations of E LUMO/E HOMO = –(4.80 + E onset red/E onset ox) eV.
P-BNBP-TVT [13]	41.6	4.35	653	652	1.84	−1.40	+0.85	−3.40	−5.65
P-BNBP-2CNTVT	51.5	1.91	628	627	1.88	−1.0	+1.15	−3.80	−5.95

To investigate the electrochemical properties of P-BNBP-TVT and P-BNBP-2CNTVT, we carried out film CV measurements using ferrocene/ferrocenium (FC/FC⁺) as the internal standard, and a solution of 0.1 M tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBAPF₆) in acetonitrile was employed as the electrolyte. The CV curves are displayed in [Figure 4]. Both of the two copolymers exhibit obvious reduction and oxidation processes. On the basis of the onset potentials, the LUMO/HOMO energy levels are estimated to be −3.40 eV/−5.65 eV for P-BNBP-TVT and −3.80 eV/−5.95 eV for P-BNBP-2CNTVT, respectively. Obviously, the LUMO/HOMO energy levels of P-BNBP-2CNTVT dramatically decrease by 0.4 eV and 0.3 eV compared with those of P-BNBP-TVT, respectively, which demonstrates that the introduction of two strong electron-withdrawing cyano groups in the TVT moiety effectively lowers the LUMO/HOMO energy levels. The experimental LUMO/HOMO energy levels of the two copolymers are in good agreement with the theoretical calculations. The deeper LUMO/HOMO energy levels of P-BNBP-2CNTVT are expected to enhance the electron injection from the electrodes and generate a hole injection barrier.[15] These results strongly imply that P-BNBP-2CNTVT is going to be a promising candidate for exclusively electron transport materials.

Figure 4 a) Cyclic voltammograms of P-BNBP-TVT and P-BNBP-2CNTVT in thin films (Fc/Fc⁺ = ferrocene/ferrocenium); b) Schematic of their LUMO/HOMO energy level alignments.

OFET Performance. P-BNBP-2CNTVT possesses low-lying LUMO/HOMO energy levels, which strongly motivates us to investigate the charge-transporting properties of the copolymer. The solution-processed OFETs with the top-gate/bottom-contact (TGBC) configuration were fabricated. [Figure 5] illustrates the representative transfer and output characteristics of the OFETs. The detailed device optimization processes by different annealing temperatures are shown in Figure S6 and Table S1. Expectedly, in comparison to P-BNBP-TVT showing ambipolar character, P-BNBP-2CNTVT exhibits typical unipolar n-type transport characteristic because of the deep LUMO/HOMO energy levels enhancing the electron injection and restricting hole injection after introducing cyano groups. And the maximum electron mobility (µ _e) of P-BNBP-2CNTVT extracted in the saturation regime is up to 0.026 cm² · V⁻¹ · s⁻¹ with high I _on/I _off of 10⁵ after thermal annealing at 200 °C. In addition, the OFETs based on P-BNBP-2CNTVT show a lower threshold voltage (V _T) of about 25 V (V _T ~50 V for P-BNBP-TVT [13]) and leakage current (I _g) (Figure S7). All the above observations verified that cyano‐functionalization could effectively down-shift the LUMO/HOMO energy levels. However, the causations for moderate electron mobility probably are attributed to the steric repulsion with neighboring BNBP units after the attachments of the cyano groups, which gives rise to distortion of the polymer backbone having been reported in the literatures.[16] In a word, we developed a new n-type semiconductor based on a BNBP unit using cyano-functionalization.

Figure 5 a) Transfer and b) output curves of the OFETs based on the P-BNBP-2CNTVT films annealed at 200 °C.

Film Morphology and Microstructural Analysis. The film morphology of semiconductors plays a crucial role in OFETsʼ performance. We firstly performed atomic force microscopy (AFM) of P-BNBP-2CNTVT thin films to investigate the relationship between the film morphology and device performances. [Figures 6a] and S8 show the AFM height images and phase images of the P-BNBP-2CNTVT films after thermal annealing at different temperatures of 100, 200 and 300 °C. The P-BNBP-2CNTVT film annealed at 200 °C shows continuous and smooth film topography with the smallest root mean square surface roughness value of 0.57 nm, which indicates its enhanced film ordering, taking an account for the improved electron transport performance in the OFETs.[17]

Figure 6 a) AFM high images and phase images for spin-coated P-BNBP-2CNTVT films annealed at 200 °C. b) GI-XRD patterns of the spin-coating films in the out-of-plane direction and the in-plane direction of P-BNBP-2CNTVT films.

We also utilized grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GI-XRD) to clarify the polymer crystallinity and packing structure, which are closely associated with transport properties. The out-of-plane and in-plane XRDs of P-BNBP-2CNTVT films are displayed in [Figures 6b] and S9. The previous study reported that P-BNBP-TVT exhibits edge-on packing mode in thin films with a compact π–π stacking distance of 0.36 nm along the in-plane direction, which is beneficial to the interchain charge transport.[13] However, the P-BNBP-2CNTVT film gives a (100) diffraction peak at 2θ = 4.5° and a (010) diffraction peak at 2θ = 21.2° along the out-of-plane direction. Lamellar and π–π stacking distance based on the (100) and (010) diffraction peaks could be calculated to be 1.96 nm and 0.42 nm, respectively. And there are no obvious diffraction peaks in the in-plane direction. The large π–π stacking distance is not favorable for electron transport.[18] These results demonstrate that the introduction of cyano groups in polymer backbones causing steric hindrance has undesirable influences on the molecular packing, which gives the reason why P-BNBP-2CNTVT exhibits moderate electron mobilities.

Conclusions

In summary, we successfully synthesized a novel unipolar n-type transport polymer semiconductor based on a BNBP unit, P-BNBP-2CNTVT, where the cyano groups are decorated in the TVT moiety. In comparison to P-BNBP-TVT without cyano groups, the LUMO/HOMO energy levels of P-BNBP-2CNTVT dramatically down-shift by 0.4 eV and 0.3 eV, respectively, demonstrating the high electron affinity which are very desirable for electron injection. Thus, the OFETs based on P-BNBP-2CNTVT show unipolar n-type behavior with a moderate electron mobility of 0.026 cm² · V⁻¹ · s⁻¹. Moreover, P-BNBP-2CNTVT manifests an unsatisfying π–π stacking distance up to 0.42 nm owing to the large steric hindrance after the incorporation of cyano groups, which gives an explanation for the moderate electron mobility. In a word, this study demonstrates that organoboron π-conjugated polymers could be regarded as a tool for constructing exclusive n-type semiconducting polymers used in OFETs. And we are convinced that the enhanced electron mobility of organoboron π-conjugated polymers could be realized through the optimizations of chemical structures and thin film morphology, and the further investigations are in progress in our lab.

Experimental Section

All reagents and solvents were purchased at reagent grade from commercial suppliers and were used without further purification unless otherwise noted. ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra were measured with a Bruker AV-400 (500 MHz for 1H and 126 MHz for ¹³C) spectrometer in CDCl₃ and C₆D₆ at 25 °C or deuterated 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (C₂D₂Cl₄) at 100 °C. Chemical shifts are reported in δ ppm using CDCl₃ (7.26 ppm), C₂D₂Cl₄ (5.98 ppm) and C₆D₆ (7.16 ppm) for ¹H NMR, as well as using CDCl₃ (77.16 ppm) for ¹³C NMR as an internal standard. The molecular weights of the polymers were determined by gel permeation GPC on a PL-GPC 220-type at 150 °C. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene (TCB) was used as the eluent and monodisperse polystyrene was used as the standard. UV-vis absorption spectra were measured with a Shimadzu UV-3600 spectrometer. CV was performed on an CHI660a electrochemical workstation using Bu₄NClO₄ (0.1 M) in acetonitrile as the electrolyte solution and ferrocene as an internal reference at a scan rate of 50 mV · s⁻¹. The CV cell consisted of a glassy carbon working electrode, a Pt wire counter electrode, and a standard calomel reference electrode. The polymer was casted on the working electrode for measurements. The redox potentials were calibrated with ferrocene as the standard. The HOMO and LUMO energy levels of the materials were estimated by the equations: E _HOMO/E _LUMO = –(4.80 + E _onset ^ox/E _onset ^red). Thermal analysis was performed on a Perkin-Elmer 7 instrument at a heating rate of 20 °C · min⁻¹ under a nitrogen flow. AFM was performed with a SPA300HV (Seiko Instruments, Inc., Japan) in the tapping mode. GI-XRD data were obtained on a Bruker D8 Discover reflector (Cu Kα, λ = 1.54 056 Å) under 40 kV and 40 mA tube current. The scanning speed was 5 s per step with 0.05° step size (2θ). The measurement was obtained in a scanning interval of 2θ between 2° and 30°. The in-plane XRD profiles were obtained using a Rigaku SmartLab with an X-ray generation power of 40 kV tube voltage and 30 mA tube current. The diffraction was recorded in the 2θ – χ mode. The scanning speed was 5 s per step with 0.02° step size (2θ). The measurement was obtained in a scanning interval of 2θ between 2° and 30°.

Procedures

(E)-1,2-Bis(3-bromothiophen-2-yl)ethene

(E)-1,2-Bis(3-bromothiophen-2-yl)ethene was prepared using improved post-treatment methods with higher yield compared to references.[10] TiCl₄ (4.38 mL, 39.9 mmol) was added dropwise to a slurry of 3-bromothiophene-2-carbaldehyde 1 (5 g, 26.2 mmol) in THF (75 mL) with stirring at −18 °C. After stirring at this temperature for 30 min, Zn powders (5.2 g, 79.5 mmol) were divided into several equal parts and added in over a period of 30 min. The mixture was stirred at −18 °C for another 30 min, and then refluxed for 4 h. The reaction was quenched by adding ice-cold H₂O. The mixture was extracted with dichloromethane several times and dried over Na₂SO₄. The solvent was removed and purified by recrystallization from chloroform to give a pale brown solid. Yield: 57% (2.7 g). The ¹H NMR spectrum is consistent with the previous report.[10]

¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃, ppm): δ 7.20 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.12 (s, 2 H), 6.98 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 2 H).

(E)-1,2-Bis(3-cyanothiophene-2-yl)ethene

A mixture of (E)-1,2-Bis(3-bromothiophen-2-yl)ethene (1.5 g, 4.28 mmol) and CuCN (1.92 g, 21.4 mmol) in anhydrous DMF (65 mL) was stirred for 24 h at 150 °C. Subsequently, it was allowed to cool to 70 °C. Then, FeCl₃·6H₂O (4.65 g, 17.14 mmol) in 2 M aqueous HCl (9 mL) was added and stirred at 70 °C for 1 h. Next the mixture was extracted with dichloromethane several times and dried over Na₂SO₄. The solvent was removed and purified by silica gel column chromatography using dichloromethane : petroleum (2 : 1 v/v) to obtain the desired compound as a yellow solid. Yield: 79% (0.82 g). The ¹H NMR spectrum is consistent with the previous report.[10]

¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃, ppm): δ 7.39 (s, 2 H), 7.35 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.22 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 2 H).

(E)-1,2-Bis(5-(trimethylstannyl)-3-cyanothiophene-2-yl)ethene (2CNTVT)

2CNTVT was prepared according to references.[10] The fresh made LDA (1.0 M LDA, 2.42 mL, 2.42 mmol) was added dropwise at −78 °C to a solution of compound 3 (0.24 g, 1 mmol) in anhydrous THF (34 mL). After stirring for 1.5 h at −78 °C, trimethyltin chloride (0.6 g, 3 mmol) was added in one portion to the reaction mixture. Subsequently, the reaction flask was warmed to room temperature and stirred another 2 h. After the reaction finished, the mixture was quenched with distilled cold water and extracted with cold diethyl ether. The organic layer was dried over Na₂SO₄. After removing the solvents, the obtained residue was purified by recrystallization from ethanol to give a yellow product. Yield: 50% (0.28 g). The ¹H NMR spectrum is consistent with the previous report.[10]

¹H NMR (500 MHz, C₆D₆, ppm): δ 7.50 (s, 2 H), 6.72 (s, 2 H),0.11 (s, 18 H).

Polymer P-BNBP-2CNTVT

Starting materials of BNBP (100 mg, 0.075 mmol), 2CNTVT (42.4 mg, 0.075 mmol), Pd₂(dba)₃•CHCl₃ (1.6 mg, 0.02 mmol) and P(o-Tolyl)₃ (3.6 mg, 0.16 mmol) were mixed under argon, and then dried toluene (7.5 mL) was added. The mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 24 h. After cooling, the solvent was dispersed in methanol and then the precipitate was collected. The obtained dark solid was purified by Soxhlet extraction using acetone, hexane and chloroform. The chloroform fraction was concentrated and poured into methanol, which were collected and dried in vacuum overnight. Yield: 100.0 mg (93%). GPC (TCB, polystyrene standard, 150 °C): M _n = 51 523, PDI = 1.91.

¹H NMR (400 MHz, C₂D₂Cl₄, 100 °C, ppm): δ 9.73 (s, 2 H), 9.05 (s, 2 H), 8.93 (s, 2 H), 8.89 (s, 2 H), 4.98 (s, 4 H), 3.25 (s, 2 H), 2.69 – 2.83 (m, 32 H), 2.60 – 2.64 (m, 80 H), 2.23(t, 12 H).

Device Fabrication and Characterization

TGBC OFETs were fabricated on silicon wafer covered with 300 nm SiO₂. The substrates were first cleaned with double-distilled water, acetone and isopropanol in an ultrasonic bath and then dried under a nitrogen flow. The substrates were heated to 120 °C for 1 hour and finally treated with a UV-ozone instrument for 15 min. First, Au source/drain electrodes (~25 nm) were deposited on cleaned bare Si/SiO₂ wafer with W/L = 70 (W = 5.6 mm, L = 80 µm). P-BNBP-2CNTVT was first dissolved in hot chloroform solutions (55 °C, 1 mg/mL) by stirring for 2 hours, and then aging for more than 8 hours. The polymer films were spin-coated on the substrates, followed by thermal annealing at 200 °C for 10 min. Then the solution of 80 mg/mL poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) (product no. 182 230 from Aldrich, M _w = 120 kDa) in butyl acetate (~500 nm) as a dielectric was deposited by spin coating at 2000 rpm for 2 min and then annealed at 100 °C for 1 h. Finally, Al (~70 nm) was vacuum-deposited as a gate electrode. Field-effect mobility was extracted in the saturation regime by using the equation: I _D ^sat = (µC _i W/2 L)(V _G-V _T)², where I _D is the drain–source current, µ is the field-effect mobility, C _i is the capacitance per unit area of the gate dielectric layer (dielectric constant of PMMA, 500 nm, 5.5 nF/cm²), and V _G and V _T are the gate voltage and threshold voltage, respectively.

Funding Information

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFE0 100 600) funded by MOST and Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21 625 403, 21 875 244).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

• References

• 1 Arias AC, MacKenzie JD, McCulloch I, Rivnay J, Salleo A. Chem. Rev. 2010; 110: 3
• 2a Sirringhaus H. Adv. Mater. 2014; 26: 1319
• 2b Zhao Y, Guo Y, Liu Y. Adv. Mater. 2013; 25: 5372
• 2c Sun H, Liu B, Ma Y, Lee J.-W, Yang J, Wang J, Li Y, Li B, Feng K, Shi Y, Zhang B, Han D, Meng H, Niu L, Kim BJ, Zheng Q, Guo X. Adv. Mater. 2021; DOI: 10.1002/adma.202102635.
• 3a Kang I, Yun H.-J, Chung DS, Kwon S.-K, Kim Y.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 14896
• 3b Back JY, Yu H, Song I, Kang I, Ahn H, Shin TJ, Kwon S.-K, Oh JH, Kim Y.-H. Chem. Mater. 2015; 27: 1732
• 4 Meijer EJ, de Leeuw DM, Setayesh S, van Veenendaal E, Huisman BH, Blom PW. M, Hummelen JC, Scherf U, Klapwijk TM. Nat. Mater. 2003; 2: 678
• 5a Zhao Z, Yin Z, Chen H, Zheng L, Zhu C, Zhang L, Tan S, Wang H, Guo Y, Tang Q, Liu Y. Adv. Mater. 2017; 29: 1602410
• 5b Fei Z, Han Y, Martin J, Scholes FH, Al-Hashimi M, AlQaradawi SY, Stingelin N, Anthopoulos TD, Heeney M. Macromolecules 2016; 49: 6384
• 6a Gao Y, Zhang X, Tian H, Zhang J, Yan D, Geng Y, Wang F. Adv. Mater. 2015; 27: 6753
• 6b Gruber M, Jung S.-H, Schott S, Venkateshvaran D, Kronemeijer AJ, Andreasen JW, McNeill CR, Wong WW. H, Shahid M, Heeney M, Lee J.-K, Sirringhaus H. Chem. Sci. 2015; 6: 6949
• 6c Yang J, Liu Q, Hu M, Ding S, Liu J, Wang Y, Liu D, Gao H, Hu W, Dong H. Sci. China Chem. 2021; 64: 1410
• 6d Liu L.-N, Li Y.-P, Khalil M, Xu Z.-W, Xie G, Zhang X, Li J, Li W.-S. Chin. J. Chem. 2020; 38: 1663
• 6e Yang J, Wang H, Chen J, Huang J, Jiang Y, Zhang J, Shi L, Sun Y, Wei Z, Yu G, Guo Y, Wang S, Liu Y. Adv. Mater. 2017; 29: 1606162
• 7a Gao Y, Deng Y, Tian H, Zhang J, Yan D, Geng Y, Wang F. Adv. Mater. 2017; 29: 1606217
• 7b Yang J, Zhao Z, Geng H, Cheng C, Chen J, Sun Y, Shi L, Yi Y, Shuai Z, Guo Y, Wang S, Liu Y. Adv. Mater. 2017; 29: 1702115
• 7c Kim M, Park W.-T, Park SA, Park CW, Ryu SU, Lee DH, Noh Y.-Y, Park T. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019; 29: 1805994
• 7d Lei T, Cao Y, Fan Y, Liu C.-J, Yuan S.-C, Pei J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 6099
• 7e Xue G, Zhao X, Qu G, Xu T, Gumyusenge A, Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Diao Y, Li H, Mei J. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017; 9: 25426
• 7f Lei T, Dou J.-H, Pei J. Adv. Mater. 2012; 24: 6457
• 8a Chen Z, Wei X, Huang J, Zhou Y, Zhang W, Pan Y, Yu G. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019; 11: 34171
• 8b Chen Z, Zhang W, Huang J, Gao D, Wei C, Lin Z, Wang L, Yu G. Macromolecules 2017; 50: 6098
• 8c Sui Y, Shi Y, Deng Y, Li R, Bai J, Wang Z, Dang Y, Han Y, Kirby N, Ye L, Geng Y. Macromolecules 2020; 53: 10147
• 8d Wei C, Zhang W, Huang J, Li H, Zhou Y, Yu G. Macromolecules 2019; 52: 2911
• 8e Zheng Y.-Q, Lei T, Dou J.-H, Xia X, Wang J.-Y, Liu C.-J, Pei J. Adv. Mater. 2016; 28: 7213
• 9a Shi S, Wang H, Chen P, Uddin MA, Wang Y, Tang Y, Guo H, Cheng X, Zhang S, Woo HY, Guo X. Polym. Chem. 2018; 9: 3873
• 9b Iguchi K, Mikie T, Saito M, Komeyama K, Seo T, Ie Y, Osaka I. Chem. Mater. 2021; 33: 2218
• 9c Wei C, Tang Z, Zhang W, Huang J, Zhou Y, Wang L, Yu G. Polym. Chem. 2020; 11: 7340
• 9d Yang M, Du T, Zhao X, Huang X, Pan L, Pang S, Tang H, Peng Z, Ye L, Deng Y, Sun M, Duan C, Huang F, Cao Y. Sci. China Chem. 2021; 64: 1219
• 9e Han W, Wang Z, Hu Y, Yang X, Ge C, Gao X. Sci. China Chem. 2020; 63: 1182
• 9f Casey A, Han Y, Fei Z, White AJ. P, Anthopoulos TD, Heeney M. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015; 3: 265
• 9g Kim HG, Kim M, Clement JA, Lee J, Shin J, Hwang H, Sin DH, Cho K. Chem. Mater. 2015; 27: 6858
• 10 Kim HS, Huseynova G, Noh Y.-Y, Hwang D.-H. Macromolecules 2017; 50: 7550
• 11a Yu H, Park KH, Song I, Kim M.-J, Kim Y.-H, Oh JH. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015; 3: 11697
• 11b Choi HH, Baek JY, Song E, Kang B, Cho K, Kwon S.-K, Kim Y.-H. Adv. Mater. 2015; 27: 3626
• 11c Zhu C, Zhao Z, Chen H, Zheng L, Li X, Chen J, Sun Y, Liu F, Guo Y, Liu Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 17735
• 12a Shin J, Um HA, Lee DH, Lee TW, Cho MJ, Choi DH. Polym. Chem. 2013; 4: 5688
• 12b Chen H, Guo Y, Yu G, Zhao Y, Zhang J, Gao D, Liu H, Liu Y. Adv. Mater. 2012; 24: 4618
• 13 Long X, Gao Y, Tian H, Dou C, Yan D, Geng Y, Liu J, Wang L. Chem. Commun. 2017; 53: 1649
• 14a Sui Y, Deng Y, Han Y, Zhang J, Hu W, Geng Y. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018; 6: 12896
• 14b Lei T, Dou J.-H, Ma Z.-J, Yao C.-H, Liu C.-J, Wang J.-Y, Pei J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 20025
• 15a Newman CR, Frisbie CD, da Silva Filho DA, Brédas J.-L, Ewbank PC, Mann KR. Chem. Mater. 2004; 16: 4436
• 15b Nicolai HT, Kuik M, Wetzelaer GA. H, de Boer B, Campbell C, Risko C, Brédas JL, Blom PW. M. Nat. Mater. 2012; 11: 882
• 15c Chua L.-L, Zaumseil J, Chang J.-F, Ou EC. W, Ho PK. H, Sirringhaus H, Friend RH. Nature 2005; 434: 194
• 15d Hauschild M, Borkowski M, Dral PO, Marszalek T, Hampel F, Xie G, Freudenberg J, Bunz UH. F, Kivala M. Org. Mater. 2020; 02: 204
• 16a Lei T, Wang J.-Y, Pei J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014; 47: 1117
• 16b Chochos CL, Economopoulos SP, Deimede V, Gregoriou VG, Lloyd MT, Malliaras GG, Kallitsis JK. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007; 111: 10732
• 16c Wang H, Huang J, Uddin MA, Liu B, Chen P, Shi S, Tang Y, Xing G, Zhang S, Woo HY, Guo H, Guo X. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019; 11: 10089
• 16d Yun H.-J, Kang S.-J, Xu Y, Kim SO, Kim Y.-H, Noh Y.-Y, Kwon S.-K. Adv. Mater. 2014; 26: 7300
• 17a Wang X.-Y, Zhuang F.-D, Zhou X, Yang D.-C, Wang J.-Y, Pei J. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014; 2: 8152
• 17b Zhan X, Zhang J, Gong Y, Tang S, Tu J, Xie Y, Peng Q, Yu G, Li Z. Mater. Chem. Front. 2017; 1: 2341
• 18 Zhao R, Min Y, Dou C, Lin B, Ma W, Liu J, Wang L. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2020; 2: 19

Publication History

Received: 24 July 2021

Accepted: 02 September 2021

Accepted Manuscript online:
07 September 2021

Article published online:
15 October 2021