Keywords
SARS-CoV-2 - COVID-19 - thrombosis - venous thromboembolism
Schlüsselwörter
SARS-Cov2 - COVID-19 - Thrombose - venöse Thromboembolie
Clinical Case of Venous Thromboembolism in a COVID-19 Patient
Clinical Case of Venous Thromboembolism in a COVID-19 Patient
A 68-year-old patient with fatigue, nausea, and vomiting presented at the emergency
department. The patient had a history of chronic coronary syndrome with normal systolic
left ventricular ejection fraction after an ST-elevation myocardial infarction 4 years
ago. Due to hypoxemia (initial oxygen saturation <85%), leukocytosis, and elevated
C-reactive protein (CRP; 10.25 mg/dL) with a low procalcitonin (0.19 ng/mL), a viral
respiratory pneumonia was suspected. The patient could be stabilized via noninvasive
ventilation and soon tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus
2 (SARS-CoV-2).
Due to highly elevated plasma concentrations of D-dimer, a computed tomography pulmonary
angiography (CTPA) was performed and revealed embolism of the right pulmonary artery
as well as left segmental pulmonary arteries ([Fig. 1A]). To detect the source of embolism, a compression ultrasonography was performed
and revealed a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the right lower extremity. Due to advanced
age, no screening of thrombophilia was performed. It was, however, recommended to
perform a tumor screening after discharge.
Fig. 1 (A) Thrombi in the right pulmonary artery and left segmental pulmonary arteries; (B) bilateral pulmonary consolidations.
No opacities typical for COVID-19 could be detected initially; however, bilateral
mostly right-sided pulmonary consolidations developed later ([Fig. 1B]). Bacterial pneumonia could not be ruled out; therefore, empirical antimicrobial
therapy was initiated.
The patient remained hemodynamically stable (Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index 77
points, Class II, low risk); therefore, no indication for a systemic thrombolysis
was present. The initial therapy with therapeutic dose of unfractionated heparin (UFH)
was switched to an oral anticoagulation with rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily for 21
days followed by 20 mg once daily).
The patient could be discharged after 8 intra-hospital days. A control compression
ultrasonography of the lower extremities after 6 months showed no signs of thrombosis.
The anticoagulation was discontinued and a therapy with acetylsalicylic acid was restarted.
We postulated that DVT in this patient was provoked by initial immobilization due
to severe respiratory infection and/or because of enhanced thrombogenicity in COVID-19.
Incidence and Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2-Associated Thrombotic Complications
Incidence and Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2-Associated Thrombotic Complications
As the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic progressed, high rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE)
in hospitalized patients were observed.[1] Most studies report the incidence of VTE in critically ill patients between 15 and
40%, which is significantly higher compared with other critical illnesses leading
to hypercoagulability.[2] Thrombotic complications occur less commonly in hospitalized noncritically ill patients
(2–4%).[3]
[4] The risk of VTE persists after inpatient treatment. A 7.2% incidence of VTE in 90
days after admission was reported.[5] Another study reported a median of 21 days for development of VTE since the onset
of COVID-19 disease.[6]
Numbers are not unanimous, but it is commonly reported that PE occurs more frequently
than DVT[1]
[7]
[8] and usually independently of DVT, suggesting that thrombosis in pulmonary vasculature
is often not a result of embolism from lower extremities but a local process of pulmonary
vasculature (microangiopathy vs. macroangiopathy). This is supported by imaging studies
which report that pulmonary thromboses are rather found in segmental or subsegmental,
that is, smaller and peripheral arteries.[2]
[9] Autopsy findings of the lungs of COVID-19 patients also show a significant endothelial
damage and microthrombi in alveolar capillaries.[10]
Thrombotic complications in COVID-19 disease are associated with worse clinical outcomes.
A 24.5% higher all-cause mortality was reported in patients with COVID-19 disease
as well as both venous and arterial thrombotic complications.[4] A recent meta-analysis reports 74% higher odds of death in COVID-19 patients with
thrombotic complications.[11] During a 90-day follow-up, mortality of 24% was reported; 20.5% deaths were caused
by pulmonary embolism (PE) compared with 62.5% due to respiratory failure.[12]
An overview of prevalence of thromboembolism and bleeding complications in COVID-19
disease reported in this review article is presented in [Table 1].
Table 1
Prevalence of thromboembolism and bleeding complications in COVID-19 disease
|
Author
|
Total cohort
|
VTE
|
PE
|
DVT
|
Bleeding
|
|
Prophylactic anticoagulation
|
Therapeutic anticoagulation
|
|
Helms et al[1]
|
n = 179 (ICU)
|
n = 57, 31.8%
|
n = 25, 14.0%
|
n = 11, 6.1%
|
n = 2
|
n = 1
|
|
Piazza et al[3]
|
n = 1,114 (ICU, non-ICU, outpatient)
|
n = 51, 4.6%
|
n = 8, 0.7%
|
n = 39, 3.5%
|
–
|
–
|
|
Bilaloglu et al[4]
|
n = 3,334 (ICU, non-ICU)
|
n = 533, 16.0%[a]
|
n = 106, 3.2%
|
n = 129, 3.9%
|
–
|
–
|
|
Al-Samkari et al[64]
|
n = 3,239 (ICU)
|
n = 204, 6.3%
|
n = 32, 15.7%
|
n = 176, 86.3%
|
n = 90, 2.8%
|
|
Musoke et al[63]
|
n = 355 (ICU, non-ICU)
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
n = 7, 4.0%
|
n = 11, 11.0%
|
|
Rentsch et al[62]
|
n = 4,297 (ICU, non-ICU)
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
n = 198, 4.6%
|
|
Salisbury et al[5]
|
n = 303 (ICU, non-ICU)
|
n = 18, 5.9%
|
n = 13 (concomitant DVT, n = 3)
|
n = 5
|
n = 5
|
n = 6
|
|
Klok et al[8]
|
n = 184 (ICU)
|
27.0%
|
n = 25, 81.0%
|
n = 1
|
–
|
–
|
|
Cohen et al[25]
|
n = 9,407 (ICU, non-ICU)
|
n = 274, 2.9%
|
n = 85, 31.0% (concomitant DVT, n = 19)
|
n = 170, 62.0%
|
–
|
–
|
|
Fauvel et al[26]
|
n = 1,240 (ICU, non-ICU)
|
–
|
n = 103, 8.3%
|
n = 18, 1.5%
|
–
|
–
|
Abbreviations: DVT, deep vein thrombosis; ICU, intensive care unit; PE, pulmonary
embolism; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
a Any thrombotic event.
Thrombotic Events after Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2
A concern was raised after thrombotic events around the world occurred approximately
14 days after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/AZD1222 (University
of Oxford, AstraZeneca, and the Serum Institute of India) vaccine. Seven cases of
blood clotting in multiple vessels and 18 cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis,
which occurred mostly in women under 55 years, were reported.[13] The first clinical trial on efficacy and safety of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/AZD1222 vaccine,
however, reported no thrombotic adverse events.[14] No thrombotic complications were reported among severe or serious adverse events
in a clinical trial for BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine).[15] DVT occurred in 2 (<0.1%) subjects after vaccination with mRNA-1273 (Moderna COVID-19
vaccine)[16] and in 1 recipient (0.006%) of Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V) vaccine.[17] More thrombotic events (0.06%) were observed among recipients of Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen
COVID-19 vaccine): six cases of DVT, four cases of PE, and three cerebrovascular events,
including transverse sinus thrombosis which occurred in a 25-year-old male.[18]
Later a similar prothrombotic syndrome to that associated with AstraZeneca COVID-19
vaccine was observed in a small number of patients who received the Janssen COVID-19
vaccine.[19]
[20] Thrombotic events were accompanied by thrombocytopenia,[21] therefore, an entity of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT)
has been established.[22]
According to the latest findings, VITT is caused by antibodies against platelet factor
4 (PF4), bound to platelets.[20]
[23] PF4 causes platelet activation and enhanced thrombosis, on the contrary to other
thrombocytopenic disorders.[22] The clinical constellation resembles heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT); however,
VITT occurs without exposure to heparin.[20]
[22]
[24] Laboratory findings include elevated level of D-dimer, thrombocytopenia, and PF4
antibodies.[21] It is postulated that production of antibodies against PF4 may be the result of
a strong immune response after vaccination or a cross-reaction between vaccine components
and platelets/PF4.[22]
To this day, benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine outweigh the risk of adverse events;
therefore, vaccination with AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine continues. However, further
accumulation of evidence to improve diagnosis, management, and prevention of VITT
is needed.
Predictors of COVID-19-Associated Venous Thromboembolism
Predictors of COVID-19-Associated Venous Thromboembolism
Advanced age (>60 years), male sex, Hispanic ethnicity, and obesity (Body mass index > 35)
were found to be risk factors for VTE in COVID-19 disease.[4]
[25] Patients with a history of heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, and active malignant
disease were more likely to develop VTE.[6]
[25] Elevated levels of D-dimers at admission or a fourfold elevation in the course of
disease was also associated with risk of VTE and increased mortality.[6]
[25]
Occurrence of PE was associated with male sex, history of stroke or atrial fibrillation,
and elevated levels of D-dimer and CRP.[26] However, after a multivariate analysis, male sex, elevated CRP and time from symptom
onset to hospitalization remained significant risk factors for PE.[26] Therefore, immunothrombosis seems to be the crucial pathophysiological mechanism
in the development of PE in COVID-19 disease, not always driven by typical risk factors
for VTE.
Pathophysiology of Enhanced Thrombogenicity in COVID-19 Disease
Pathophysiology of Enhanced Thrombogenicity in COVID-19 Disease
Reduced blood flow, endothelial damage, and hypercoagulability, also referred to as
the Virchow's triad, are the main three factors leading to increased thromboembolism.[27]
Endothelial damage seems to be one of the key mechanisms in thrombosis in COVID-19
due to disruption of anticoagulant and/or anti-aggregatory function of endothelial
cells. SARS-CoV-2 may enter the endothelial cells directly leading to their damage
and activation.[28] Damaging the endothelium leads to uncovering of the thrombogenic basement membrane
and expression of the tissue factor. The latter activates the factors VII and X, which
trigger the extrinsic coagulation pathway.
Endothelial cells are also a target of cytokines, e.g., interleukin-1 (IL-1), tumor
necrosis factor α, which activate the endothelium enhancing its prothrombotic effects.[29] This leads to attraction of leukocytes and chemokines, which then migrate into subendothelial
space.[29] Dead or dying neutrophils form neutrophil extracellular traps enhancing thrombus
formation.[30] Endothelial cell activation also causes excretion of von Willebrand factor (VWF),
stored in the platelets,[31] as well as production of prothrombotic thromboxane. Activated platelet degranulation
products (e.g., VWF, P-selectin) contribute to platelet aggregation and thrombus formation.
Activated platelets also recruit immune cells, cytokines, and interact directly with
pathogens, facilitating the coordination of inflammatory and prothrombotic processes.[32]
[33] Platelet–monocyte aggregate formation, which triggers tissue factor expression and
platelet activation, was observed.[34] Recent observations also suggest that platelet gene expression is altered in COVID-19
leading to platelet hyperreactivity.[35] In addition, enhanced megakaryopoiesis with presence of megakaryocytes in pulmonary
and cardiac tissues from autopsies of COVID-19 patients has been reported.[36] These observations usually occurred without reactive thrombocytosis. Instead, thrombocytopenia
has been described as a predictor of poor outcome in COVID-19 patients.[37]
It remains to be determined whether platelet hyperactivity is specifically linked
to SARS-CoV-2 infection or just a reactive response to severe infection comparable
to other inflammatory conditions. The prognostic role of antiplatelet therapy apart
from other indications for secondary prevention is still unclear and should be carefully
weighed against the bleeding risk.
Induced production and activity of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) leads
to disruption of fibrinolysis, also described as “fibrinolysis shutdown.”[29]
[38] Hepatic acute phase response also leads to enhanced production of PAI-1 and fibrinogen
causing prothrombotic and fibrinolytic imbalance ([Fig. 2]).[29] Another acute phase reactant is the coagulation factor VIII which is induced through
IL-6 and binds to the nuclear factor-κB of the endothelial cells, further triggering
the proinflammatory pathway and enhancing the cytokine storm.[39]
[40] The role of these prothrombotic factors is supported by the fact that elevated levels
of fibrinogen, factor VIII, and VWF could be detected in plasma of patients with COVID-19
disease.[41]
Fig. 2 The pathomechanism of hypercoagulability in COVID-19 disease.
Antiphospholipid antibodies, which can prolong the activated partial thromboplastin
time (aPTT), could also be detected in three critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2
infection[42]; however, this remains a rare finding so far.
In summary, thrombosis in COVID-19 disease seems to be a complex interplay between
the endothelium and a range of proinflammatory cytokines. Moreover, endothelium-based
thrombosis is not limited to pulmonary vasculature and rather spreads to cerebral,
coronary circulation as well as to venous vasculature.[29]
Elevated D-dimer in COVID-19 disease seems to be not only a diagnostic tool for thrombosis
but also a prognostic marker. Several studies showed a significant relationship between
the concentration of D-dimer and the severity of the SARS-CoV-2 infection.[43] Plasma D-dimer concentration of >1 µg/L was a strong predictor of mortality due
to COVID-19 disease.[44]
Another cornerstone of thrombosis is hypercoagulability, which is enhanced not only
through elevated levels of prothrombotic factors and cytokines as well as hyperviscosity
detected by thromboelastography measurements in COVID-19 patients.[38]
[41]
Immobilization, especially in hospitalized patients, as a constituent of the Virchow's
triad, also contributes to DVT in COVID-19 disease. However, it seems to be of secondary
importance compared with immunothrombosis.
Diagnostics of VTE in COVID-19 Disease
Diagnostics of VTE in COVID-19 Disease
Complete blood count including platelet count, aPTT, and levels of fibrinogen and
D-dimer are recommended for routine screening in COVID-19 patients. Prevention or
treatment of VTE, however, should not be initiated based on abnormal findings of these
laboratory parameters (elevated D-dimer, fibrinogen, prolonged aPTT, or thrombocytopenia/thrombocytosis),
if no clinical signs or positive diagnostic findings are present. Abnormal or rapidly
rising levels of D-dimer do not confirm the diagnosis of VTE, and adequate diagnostics
should be sought, whereas a negative value of D-dimer excludes VTE with high probability
if the pretest probability (e.g., Wells score) is low.
Increased D-dimer and thrombocytopenia may raise the suspicion of disseminated intravascular
coagulation (DIC) syndrome.[45] However, levels of clotting factors are usually elevated in COVID-19 patients, contradicting
to the consumption of coagulation factors seen in DIC.[41] Furthermore, as already mentioned, thrombotic rather than bleeding complications
occur in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients.
A diagnostic approach of PE should include standard imaging tools, e.g., CTPA, and
less commonly ventilation/perfusion scan or magnetic resonance imaging, if clinical
suspicion arises. Transthoracic echocardiography should also be performed to evaluate
right ventricular and tricuspid valve function, pulmonary artery pressures, or detect
a thrombus in transit in pulmonary arteries. Compression ultrasonography should be
used to detect DVT. If the standard diagnostic tools are not available, a point-of-care
compression ultrasonography or echocardiography should be applied. However, bedside
imaging may be difficult due to patient instability, prone positioning, etc.[46]
Prevention and Treatment of VTE in COVID-19 Disease
Prevention and Treatment of VTE in COVID-19 Disease
Inpatient Prophylaxis of VTE
Prophylactic anticoagulation reduces the risk of VTE in critically ill COVID-19 patients.[47] Evidence from randomized trials considering management of VTE in COVID-19 disease
is still lacking. Therefore, prevention of VTE in COVID-19 patients should be based
on available interim recommendations as well as guidelines on prevention of VTE for
general population, e.g., American Society of Hematology,[48] American College of Chest Physicians,[49] or National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines. Assessment
of the risk of VTE in COVID-19 patients can be objectified using extensively validated
risk assessment models, e.g., IMPROVE or Padua scores.[50]
[51]
Prophylactic-dose anticoagulation is recommended for all hospitalized critically and
noncritically ill COVID-19 patients provided no contraindications exist, e.g., bleeding
complications, HIT, etc. In general, subcutaneous use of low-molecular-weight heparin
(LMWH) once daily, e.g., enoxaparin, dalteparin, tinzaparin, or UFH twice daily, is
recommended. Dose adjustment of LMWH based on creatinine clearance or use of UFH is
recommended in patients with impaired renal function.[52]
Mechanical prophylactic measures, e.g., intermittent pneumatic compression, in intensive
care unit patients should also be considered when pharmacological prophylaxis is contraindicated.[53] Mechanical thromboprophylaxis should not, however, be combined with pharmacological
treatment due to lack of evidence.[46]
In some patients, intensified regimens of prophylactic anticoagulation may be considered,
as occurrence of VTE despite prophylactic-dose anticoagulation was observed.[4] In these patients, intermediate dosing of LMWH (twice-daily or increased weight-based
dosing) may be chosen.[46] Several studies report better clinical outcomes (shorter in-hospital stay, reduced
mortality) in critically ill COVID-19 patients who received therapeutic anticoagulation
without confirmed VTE.[54]
[55] The benefit, however, could only be observed in selected patients with certain risk
factors for VTE. A multiplatform randomized clinical trial (REMAP-CAP, ACTIV-4, ATTACC)
is currently assessing the benefits of full-dose prophylactic anticoagulation in over
1,000 critically ill patients. The occurrence of VTE could be reduced; however, no
improvement in survival and no significant reduction of days free of organ support
could be observed.[56] The trial is further investigating the benefit–risk balance of therapeutic anticoagulation
in noncritically ill COVID-19 patients.
To this day, empiric therapeutic anticoagulation remains controversial and further
accumulation of evidence is needed, but it may be considered when there is a high
clinical probability of VTE and no confirmatory imaging is possible, or by clotting
of intravascular devices.
Outpatient Prophylaxis of VTE
The risk of VTE may persist in some discharged COVID-19 patients; however, it does
not seem to be higher compared with the general population of critically ill patients.[57] According to current guidelines, it is generally not advisable to extend thromboprophylaxis
in critically ill patients postdischarge.[48]
[58] The evidence on postdischarge thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 patients is still lacking.
Several ongoing trials are investigating the benefits of extended thromboprophylaxis
(apixaban 2,5 mg twice daily [NCT04650087] or rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily [NCT04662684]
for approximately 30 days postdischarge), and its influence on occurrence of venous/arterial
thromboembolism and/or all-cause mortality.
Currently, extended thromboprophylaxis after discharge in patients with COVID-19 may
be considered in patients with high thrombotic risk, e.g., advanced age, cancer, prior
history of VTE, known thrombophilia, severe immobility, elevated D-dimer, IMPROVE
VTE score of 4 or more, and low bleeding risk, all of which should be evaluated on
a case-by-case basis.[53]
[59] LMWH or a direct oral anticoagulant for approximately 14 days at least, up to 30
days, may be prescribed.[53]
In- and Outpatient Treatment of VTE
In case of confirmed VTE in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, therapeutic anticoagulation
with weight-adjusted LMWH or UFH should be initiated, according to general guidelines
on the treatment of VTE.[49]
[60] In patients with high or intermediate clinical probability of VTE, treatment should
be initiated before the diagnosis is confirmed by imaging tools.[60] In patients with VTE and no contraindications (severe renal impairment, pregnancy,
antiphospholipid syndrome), DOACs should be chosen over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).[49]
[60] Patients with VTE and cancer should be treated with LMWH or rivaroxaban, apixaban
if no gastrointestinal cancer is present.[60] DOACs are not recommended as initial therapy due to possible drug-to-drug interactions
or in case of deteriorating hemodynamic and/or respiratory situation of the patient.[53] Therapeutic anticoagulation in discharged patients should be continued with a DOAC
or VKA for at least 3 months based on the guidelines of management of VTE in general
population; the bleeding risk should be evaluated individually.[49]
[60]
Bleeding Complications Associated with Therapeutic/Prophylactic Anticoagulation
Evidence on the benefits of anticoagulation in COVID-19 disease to this day is rather
inconsistent. Diminishing micro- and/or macrothrombosis with prophylactic or therapeutic
anticoagulation results in reduced all-cause mortality, as long as no significant
increase in bleeding complications is observed.[54]
[55]
[61]
[62] On the contrary, several studies report on increased mortality in patients receiving
anticoagulation, mainly due to adverse bleeding events.[63]
[64] Incidence of bleeding complications in COVID-19 disease is reported to be around
1.7 to 4.6% under prophylactic and 2.8 to 11% under full-dose anticoagulation ([Table 1]).[61]
[64]
Discrepancies in reported data may arise as outcomes are compared in different patient
cohorts (consecutive SARS-CoV-2 positive vs. only critically ill patients), definition
of bleeding varies, differences between types and dosage of anticoagulants exist,
etc.
Finally, anticoagulation may not be the only therapeutic approach in VTE, as thrombosis
in SARS-CoV-2 infection is partly a result of a cytokine storm; therefore, control
of inflammatory response may also be crucial.
Summary
SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with increased risk of VTE compared with other
critical illnesses. Reported incidence of VTE ranges from 15 to 40%. Thrombotic complications
accompanying COVID-19 disease are associated with significantly increased mortality.
Several pathophysiological mechanisms leading to enhanced thrombogenicity in SARS-CoV-2
infection have been identified so far. Endothelial cell damage and excessive inflammatory
response lead to activation and enhanced prothrombotic functions of the endothelium.
Simultaneously, inhibition of fibrinolysis results in a prothrombotic and fibrinolytic
imbalance and enhanced thrombus formation. Prophylactic-dose anticoagulation is recommended
for all hospitalized COVID-19 patients and should be extended after discharge. The
benefit of a full-dose anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis remains controversial.
Confirmed VTE is treated with therapeutic anticoagulation according to the guidelines
on management of VTE in general population. Immunothrombosis is a crucial aspect of
COVID-19 disease and further evidence on optimal management of VTE needs to be accumulated.
Zusammenfassung
COVID-19 geht mit erhöhtem Risiko thromboembolischer Komplikationen gegenüber zu anderen
mit akutem Atemnotsyndrom assoziierten Infektionserkrankungen einher. Die Inzidenz
von venösen Thrombosen variiert zwischen 15 bis 40%. Thromboembolische Komplikationen
im Rahmen einer COVID-19 Erkrankung sind mit erhöhter Mortalität assoziiert. Einige
pathophysiologische Mechanismen erhöhter Thrombogenität in SARS-CoV-2 Infektion konnten
bereits identifiziert worden. Endothelschaden und übermäßige Inflammation triggern
prothrombotische Endothelfunktionen. Störungen in fibrinolytischen Prozessen resultieren
in einem Missverhältnis zwischen Thrombose und Fibrinolyse und somit gesteigerter
Thrombusbildung. Eine Thromboseprophylaxe wird für alle stationären Patienten empfohlen
und sollte im ambulanten Bereich fortgesetzt werden. Der Nutzen therapeutischer Antikoagulation
zur Thromboseprophylaxe verbleibt umstritten. Bestätigte venöse Thromboembolien sollten
entsprechend den vorhandenen Leitlinien behandelt werden. Da die Immunothrombose einen
wichtigen Aspekt im Rahmen einer COVID-19 Erkrankung darstellt, sind weitere Untersuchungen
zur optimalen Therapie venöser Thromboembolien notwendig.