Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(07): 924-934
DOI: 10.1055/a-1788-4642
Original Article

Recovery from Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in a Prospective Cohort of First Births

Laura B. Attanasio
1   Department of Health Promotion and Policy, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts
,
Brittany L. Ranchoff
1   Department of Health Promotion and Policy, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts
,
Jaime B. Long
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
,
Kristen H. Kjerulff
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
3   Department of Public Health Science, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations Funding The First Baby Study was funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), grant number: R01 HD052990. Research reported in this publication was supported by NICHD, grant number: R03 HD098392.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective To identify risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) for primiparous women who gave birth vaginally and to compare recovery by OASIS status in three domains as follows: (1) physical health and functioning, (2) mental health, and (3) healthcare utilization.

Study Design This secondary analysis used data from 2,013 vaginal births in the First Baby Study, a prospective cohort study of women with first births between 2009 and 2011. Interview data at multiple time points were linked to birth certificate and hospital discharge data. The key exposure of interest was OASIS (3rd or 4th degree perineal laceration, identified in the hospital discharge data; n = 174) versus no OASIS (n = 1,839). We used multivariable logistic regression models to examine the association between OASIS and a range of outcomes including physical health and functioning, depression, and health care utilization, assessed at 1 month and 6 months postpartum.

Results Eight percent of women had OASIS. In adjusted models, there were no differences in general physical health and functioning measures by OASIS (such as fatigue and overall self-rated health), but women with OASIS had higher rates of reporting perineal pain (p < 0.001), accidental stool loss (p = 0.001), and bowel problems (p < 0.001) at 1-month postpartum. By 6-month postpartum, there were no differences in reported physical health and functioning. There were no differences in probable depression at 1- or 6-month postpartum. Women with OASIS were more likely to attend a comprehensive postpartum visit, but there were no other differences in health care utilization by OASIS.

Conclusion Women with OASIS were at increased risk of accidental stool loss, bowel problems, and perineal pain in the immediate postpartum period. Women who had OASIS had similar physical functioning across a range of general health outcomes to women who gave birth vaginally without OASIS.

Key Points

  • Higher risk of bowel problems and accidental stool loss 1-month postpartum with OASIS.

  • Higher risk of perineal pain 1-month postpartum with OASIS.

  • No differences in health outcomes at 6-months postpartum by OASIS.

Keywords

obstetric anal sphincter injury - perineal laceration - nulliparity - recovery - vaginal delivery

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 23 February 2021

Accepted: 17 February 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
04 March 2022

Article published online:
30 June 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 198: prevention and management of obstetric lacerations at vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132 (03) e87-e102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Friedman AM, Ananth CV, Prendergast E, D'Alton ME, Wright JD. Evaluation of third-degree and fourth-degree laceration rates as quality indicators. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125 (04) 927-937
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Dudding TC, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA. Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management. Ann Surg 2008; 247 (02) 224-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ampt AJ, Ford JB. Ascertaining severe perineal trauma and associated risk factors by comparing birth data with multiple sources. Public Health Res Pract 2015; 25 (04) e2541544
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Badiou W, Bousquet P-J, Prat-Pradal D, Monroziès X, Mares P, de Tayrac R. Short vs long second stage of labour: is there a difference in terms of postpartum anal incontinence?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 152 (02) 168-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wilson AN, Homer CSE. Third- and fourth-degree tears: a review of the current evidence for prevention and management. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2020; 60 (02) 175-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Meister MRL, Cahill AG, Conner SN, Woolfolk CL, Lowder JL. Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injuries in a modern obstetric population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215 (03) 310.e1-310.e7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ramm O, Woo VG, Hung Y-Y, Chen H-C, Ritterman Weintraub ML. Risk factors for the development of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in modern obstetric practice. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131 (02) 290-296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 ACOG committee opinion no 647: limitations of perineal lacerations as an obstetric quality measure. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126 (05) e108-e111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Alligood-Percoco NR, Kjerulff KH, Repke JT. Risk factors for dyspareunia after first childbirth. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (03) 512-518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Signorello LB, Harlow BL, Chekos AK, Repke JT. Postpartum sexual functioning and its relationship to perineal trauma: a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184 (05) 881-888 , discussion 888–890
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gommesen D, Nøhr E, Qvist N, Rasch V. Obstetric perineal tears, sexual function and dyspareunia among primiparous women 12 months postpartum: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2019; 9 (12) e032368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Fitzpatrick M, O'Herlihy C. Short-term and long-term effects of obstetric anal sphincter injury and their management. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2005; 17 (06) 605-610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Macarthur AJ, Macarthur C. Incidence, severity, and determinants of perineal pain after vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191 (04) 1199-1204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Jones PW. Evaluation of postpartum perineal pain and dyspareunia–a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 137 (02) 152-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Handa VL, Blomquist JL, McDermott KC, Friedman S, Muñoz A. Pelvic floor disorders after vaginal birth: effect of episiotomy, perineal laceration, and operative birth. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119 (2, pt. 1): 233-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Cornelisse S, Arendsen LP, van Kuijk SMJ, Kluivers KB, van Dillen J, Weemhoff M. Obstetric anal sphincter injury: a follow-up questionnaire study on longer-term outcomes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2016; 27 (10) 1591-1596
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Dunn AB, Paul S, Ware LZ, Corwin EJ. Perineal injury during childbirth increases risk of postpartum depressive symptoms and inflammatory markers. J Midwifery Womens Health 2015; 60 (04) 428-436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Chang S-R, Chen K-H, Lee C-N, Shyu M-K, Lin M-I, Lin W-A. Relationships between perineal pain and postpartum depressive symptoms: A prospective cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud 2016; 59: 68-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lewicky-Gaupp C, Leader-Cramer A, Johnson LL, Kenton K, Gossett DR. Wound complications after obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125 (05) 1088-1093
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Priddis H, Dahlen HG, Schmied V. et al. Risk of recurrence, subsequent mode of birth and morbidity for women who experienced severe perineal trauma in a first birth in New South Wales between 2000-2008: a population based data linkage study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013; 13: 89
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kjerulff KH, Velott DL, Zhu J. et al. Mode of first delivery and women's intentions for subsequent childbearing: findings from the First Baby Study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2013; 27 (01) 62-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kjerulff KH, Paul IM, Weisman CS. et al. Association between mode of first delivery and subsequent fecundity and fertility. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (04) e203076
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bowling A. Just one question: If one question works, why ask several?. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005; 59 (05) 342-345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Burgio KL, Borello-France D, Richter HE. et al; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Risk factors for fecal and urinary incontinence after childbirth: the childbirth and pelvic symptoms study. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102 (09) 1998-2004
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry 1987; 150: 782-786
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Weissmann-Brenner A, Simchen MJ, Zilberberg E. et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of macrosomic pregnancies. Med Sci Monit 2012; 18 (09) PH77-PH81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Jelovsek JE, Piccorelli A, Barber MD, Tunitsky-Bitton E, Kattan MW. Prediction models for postpartum urinary and fecal incontinence in primiparous women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2013; 19 (02) 110-118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Borello-France D, Burgio KL, Richter HE. et al; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Fecal and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108 (04) 863-872
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Fenner DE, Genberg B, Brahma P, Marek L, DeLancey JOL. Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189 (06) 1543-1549 , discussion 1549–1550
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 LaCross A, Groff M, Smaldone A. Obstetric anal sphincter injury and anal incontinence following vaginal birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Midwifery Womens Health 2015; 60 (01) 37-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Richter HE, Nager CW, Burgio KL. et al; NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Incidence and predictors of anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2015; 21 (04) 182-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Elliot V, Yaskina M, Schulz J. Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries and the need for adequate care. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2019; 25 (02) 109-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hickman LC, Propst K. Accurate diagnosis and repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: why and how. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 222 (06) 580.e1-580.e5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Presidential Task Force of Redefining the Postpartum Visit, Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG committee opinion no. 736: optimizing postpartum care. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131 (05) e140-e150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Merriam AA, Ananth CV, Wright JD, Siddiq Z, D'Alton ME, Friedman AM. Trends in operative vaginal delivery, 2005-2013: a population-based study. BJOG 2017; 124 (09) 1365-1372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Blomquist JL, Muñoz A, Carroll M, Handa VL. Association of delivery mode with pelvic floor disorders after childbirth. JAMA 2018; 320 (23) 2438-2447
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW. Occult anal sphincter injuries–myth or reality?. BJOG 2006; 113 (02) 195-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Williams AB, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Spencer JA, Nicholls RJ, Kmiot WA. Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery using three-dimensional endosonography. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97 (5, pt. 1): 770-775
    PubMedGoogle Scholar