PDF herunterladen
Am J Perinatol 2023; 40(15): 1618-1628
DOI: 10.1055/a-1827-7607
Review Article

Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Phototherapy versus Non-LED Phototherapy Devices for Hyperbilirubinemia in Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Rommy H. Novoa 
1   High-Risk Pregnancy Unit, Obstetrics and Perinatology Department, Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal, Lima, Peru
,
Karen Huaman
2   Unidad de Análisis y Generación de Evidencias en Salud Pública (UNAGESP), Instituto Nacional de Salud, Ministerio de Salud Lima, Lima, Peru
,
Patricia Caballero
2   Unidad de Análisis y Generación de Evidencias en Salud Pública (UNAGESP), Instituto Nacional de Salud, Ministerio de Salud Lima, Lima, Peru
3   Academic Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Medicine “San Fernando,” Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru
› Institutsangaben Funding None.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

This review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of light-emitting diode (LED) phototherapy as compared with the conventional phototherapy in neonates with unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia and their adverse effects. We searched the following databases right from their inception till April, 2021: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and LILACS. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the LED phototherapy with other light sources, which enrolled newborns (term and preterm) with unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia were included. We included 21 articles in this review. The treatment with the LED light therapy had a lower failure rate as compared with the non-LED one (RR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.39–0.94). The mean duration of phototherapy was significantly shorter in the group with the LED light source as compared with the one with the non-LED light source (mean difference [hours]: −8.07, 95% CI: −8.45 to −7.68), regardless of the type of non-LED units. However, the rate of bilirubin showed a comparable decline (mean difference [mg/dL/h]: 0.01, 95% CI: −0.00, 0.03) in both the light sources, irrespective of irradiance or distance. No studies reported primary outcomes related to the neurotoxicity effects of hyperbilirubinemia in neonates. The LED light devices caused a significantly higher risk of hypothermia. Neonates were at a lower risk of developing hyperthermia and skin rash with the LED light therapy. Our findings provide support for the use of LED light source phototherapy due to its better clinical efficacy, which is evidenced by its shorter duration and lower rate of treatment failure, as compared with the non-LED light sources.

Key Points

  • The efficacy of phototherapy is dependent on specific characteristics of light sources of phototherapy devices.

  • LED phototherapy demonstrated better efficacy with shorter duration and lower rate of treatment failure.

  • Adverse effects of phototherapy devices such as hypothermia, hyperthermia, and skin rash should be monitored.

Keywords

phototherapy - hyperbilirubinemia - light-emitting diode - halogen spotlights - compact fluorescent tube - neonate

Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 07. November 2021

Angenommen: 13. April 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
18. April 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
07. Juni 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Olusanya BO, Kaplan M, Hansen TWR. Neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia: a global perspective. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2018; 2 (08) 610-620
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Bhutani VK, Stark AR, Lazzeroni LC. et al; Initial Clinical Testing Evaluation and Risk Assessment for Universal Screening for Hyperbilirubinemia Study Group. Predischarge screening for severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia identifies infants who need phototherapy. J Pediatr 2013; 162 (03) 477-482 .e1
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Maisels MJ, Kring EA, DeRidder J. Randomized controlled trial of light-emitting diode phototherapy. J Perinatol 2007; 27 (09) 565-567
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Kaplan M, Muraca M, Hammerman C. et al. Imbalance between production and conjugation of bilirubin: a fundamental concept in the mechanism of neonatal jaundice. Pediatrics 2002; 110 (04) e47
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Watchko JF, Tiribelli C. Bilirubin-induced neurologic damage—mechanisms and management approaches. N Engl J Med 2013; 369 (21) 2021-2030
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Woodgate P, Jardine LA. Neonatal jaundice. BMJ Clin Evid 2011; 2011: Pii.0319
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Ip S, Chung M, Kulig J. et al; American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia. An evidence-based review of important issues concerning neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatrics 2004; 114 (01) e130-e153
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Olusanya BO, Osibanjo FB, Slusher TM. Risk factors for severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10 (02) e0117229
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Lauer BJ, Spector ND. Hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn. Pediatr Rev 2011; 32 (08) 341-349
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia. Management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant 35 or more weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 2004; 114 (01) 297-316
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Ennever JF. Blue light, green light, white light, more light: treatment of neonatal jaundice. Clin Perinatol 1990; 17 (02) 467-481
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Mills JF, Tudehope D. Fibreoptic phototherapy for neonatal jaundice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; 1 (01) CD002060
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Tan KL. Efficacy of fluorescent daylight, blue, and green lamps in the management of nonhemolytic hyperbilirubinemia. J Pediatr 1989; 114 (01) 132-137
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Ebbesen F, Hansen TWR, Maisels MJ. Update on phototherapy in jaundiced neonates. Curr Pediatr Rev 2017; 13 (03) 176-180
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Seidman DS, Moise J, Ergaz Z. et al. A prospective randomized controlled study of phototherapy using blue and blue-green light-emitting devices, and conventional halogen-quartz phototherapy. J Perinatol 2003; 23 (02) 123-127
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Kumar P, Chawla D, Deorari A. Light-emitting diode phototherapy for unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 12 (12) CD007969
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6 (07) e1000097
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Johnson LHBA, Bhutani VK. BIND—a clinical score for bilirubin-induced neurologic dysfunction in newborns. Pediatrics 1999; 199: 746-747
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Shapiro SM. Definition of the clinical spectrum of kernicterus and bilirubin-induced neurologic dysfunction (BIND). J Perinatol 2005; 25 (01) 54-59
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 van Straaten HL. Automated auditory brainstem response in neonatal hearing screening. Acta Paediatr Suppl 1999; 88 (432) 76-79
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC. et al; Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d5928
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Schunemann HBrozek J.. Guyatt G, Oxman A. eds. GRADE Handbook for Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations. London, UK: Cochrane; 2015
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Seidman DS, Moise J, Ergaz Z. et al. A new blue light-emitting phototherapy device: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Pediatr 2000; 136 (06) 771-774
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Martins BM, de Carvalho M, Moreira ME, Lopes JM. Efficacy of new microprocessed phototherapy system with five high intensity light emitting diodes (Super LED). J Pediatr (Rio J) 2007; 83 (03) 253-258
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Bertini G, Perugi S, Elia S, Pratesi S, Dani C, Rubaltelli FF. Transepidermal water loss and cerebral hemodynamics in preterm infants: conventional versus LED phototherapy. Eur J Pediatr 2008; 167 (01) 37-42
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Kumar P, Murki S, Malik GK. et al. Light emitting diodes versus compact fluorescent tubes for phototherapy in neonatal jaundice: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr 2010; 47 (02) 131-137
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Demirel G, Uras N, Celik IH. et al. Comparison of total oxidant/antioxidant status in unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia of newborn before and after conventional and LED phototherapy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Invest Med 2010; 33 (05) E335-E341
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Meritano J, Solana C, Conti CS, Nieto R, Colares J. Comparación de la eficacia de la fototerapia convencional con tubos de luz azul vs. LEDs. Rev Hosp Matern Infant Ramon Sarda 2012; 31 (02) 57-62
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Ngerncham S, Jirapaet K, Suvonachai R, Chaweerat R, Wongsiridej P, Kolatat T. Effectiveness of conventional phototherapy versus Super light-emitting diodes phototherapy in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. J Med Assoc Thai 2012; 95 (07) 884-889
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Viau Colindres J, Rountree C, Destarac MA. et al. Prospective randomized controlled study comparing low-cost LED and conventional phototherapy for treatment of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. J Trop Pediatr 2012; 58 (03) 178-183
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Ek-isariyaphorn R, Maneenut R, Kardreunkaew J, Khobkhun W, Saenphrom S. The efficacy of the in-house light-emitting diode phototherapy equipment compare to conventional phototherapy equipment on the treatment of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. J Med Assoc Thai 2013; 96 (12) 1536-1541
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Brandão DCB, Draque CM, Sañudo A, de Gusmão Filho FAR, de Almeida MFB. LED versus daylight phototherapy at low irradiance in newborns ≥35 weeks of gestation: randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28 (14) 1725-1730
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Pratesi S, Di Fabio S, Bresci C, Di Natale C, Bar S, Dani C. Broad-spectrum light versus blue light for phototherapy in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Perinatol 2015; 32 (08) 779-784
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Sherbiny HS, Youssef DM, Sherbini AS, El-Behedy R, Sherief LM. High-intensity light-emitting diode vs fluorescent tubes for intensive phototherapy in neonates. Paediatr Int Child Health 2016; 36 (02) 127-133
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 El-Farrash RA, El-Shimy MS, Tawfik S. et al. Effect of phototherapy on oxidant/antioxidant status: a randomized controlled trial. Free Radic Res 2019; 53 (02) 179-186
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Gutta S, Shenoy J, Kamath SP. et al. Light emitting diode (LED) phototherapy versus conventional phototherapy in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: a single blinded randomized control trial from coastal India. BioMed Res Int 2019; 2019: 6274719
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Kato S, Iwata O, Yamada Y. et al. Standardization of phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia using multiple-wavelength irradiance integration. Pediatr Neonatol 2020; 61 (01) 100-105
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Mokhtar WA, Sherief LM, Elsayed H. et al. Conventional intensive versus LED intensive phototherapy oxidative stress burden in neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia of haemolytic origin. Paediatr Int Child Health 2020; 40 (01) 30-34
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Montealegre A, Charpak N, Parra A, Devia C, Coca I, Bertolotto AM. Effectiveness and safety of two phototherapy devices for the humanised management of neonatal jaundice. An Pediatr (Engl Ed) 2020; 92 (02) 79-87
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Tufail A, Ahmad I, Arshad R, Yousaf S, Butt MA. Comparison of light-emitting diodelights vs fluorescent light phototherpy for the treatment of unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia in preterm infants—randomised control trial. J Pak Med Assoc 2019; 69 (06) 767-771
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Joel HN, Mchaile DN, Philemon RN, Mbwasi RM, Msuya L. Effectiveness of FIBEROPTIC phototherapy compared to conventional phototherapy in treating HYPERBILIRUBINEMIA amongst term neonates: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pediatr 2021; 21 (01) 32
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Tridente A, De Luca D. Efficacy of light-emitting diode versus other light sources for treatment of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr 2012; 101 (05) 458-465
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Bhutani VK. Committee on Fetus and Newborn; American Academy of Pediatrics. Phototherapy to prevent severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant 35 or more weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 2011; 128 (04) e1046-e1052
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar