Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1860-1856
Reopenable-clip band-assisted underwater endoscopic mucosal resection to obtain a large specimen
Although en bloc resection of colorectal tumors larger than 20 mm is challenging for snare resection [1] [2], it should be pursued because piecemeal resection causes local recurrence afterward. Even when a large snare is used, the entire lesion is not captured when the snare tip slips forward and the snare does not open wide. Although some methods for fixing a snare tip at the proximal mucosa have been reported, they are not always effective [3] [4]. We devised a reopenable-clip band-assisted technique for underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (RB-UEMR) using a 35-mm snare to fix the snare tip to enable removal of a tumor as a large single specimen.
Our patient had a 40-mm sessile serrated lesion (SSL) in the ascending colon. We used RB-UEMR to fix the snare tip and resected the lesion. A reopenable-clip band (Sterile Elastic Traction Device; Micro-Tech Co. Ltd., Nan Jing, China), which is a reopenable clip holding a double-ring band and another reopenable clip ([Fig. 1], [Video 1]), is used for this method. The reopenable-clip band was placed at the normal mucosa beyond the tumor, while the other end of the band was connected to the mucosa next to the first clip to make a trap to hold the snare tip ([Fig. 2]). The tip of a rotatable snare (Rotasnare 35 mm; Medi-Globe GmbH, Achenmühle, Germany) was placed in the trap, and the snare was expanded to its widest. The entire lesion was then captured. However, since the snaring of this large mucosal area caused the lesion to bend, a small amount of the lesion was left behind. Additional snaring enabled complete resection of the residual lesion. The mucosal defect was completely closed using the reopenable-clip-over-the-line method [5]. The largest specimen of the lesion had a longest diameter of 46 mm and a shortest diameter of 36 mm, and the histopathological analysis revealed SSL.
Video 1 Schematic demonstration and an actual case of resection of a 40-mm sessile serrated lesion using reopenable-clip band-assisted underwater endoscopic mucosal resection.
Quality:
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AQ_2AD
Endoscopy E-Videos is an open access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online. Processing charges apply (currently EUR 375), discounts and wavers acc. to HINARI are available.
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos
#
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
-
References
- 1 Chandan S, Khan SR, Kumar A. et al. Efficacy and histologic accuracy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large (>20 mm) colorectal polyps: a comparative review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94: 471-482.e9
- 2 Binmoeller KF, Hamerski CM, Shah JN. et al. Attempted underwater en bloc resection for large (2–4 cm) colorectal laterally spreading tumors (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 713-718
- 3 Jacques J, Legros R, Chrissoux A. et al. Anchoring the snare tip by means of a small incision facilitates en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection and increases the specimen size. Endoscopy 2017; 49: E39-E41
- 4 Mori H, Kobara H, Rafiq K. et al. Preclipping fixation EMR to achieve sufficient surgical margin and negative resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 1025-1026
- 5 Nomura T, Sugimoto S, Kawabata M. et al. Large colorectal mucosal defect closure post-endoscopic submucosal dissection using the reopenable clip over line method and modified locking-clip technique. Endoscopy 2022; 54: E63-E64
Corresponding author
Publication History
Article published online:
01 July 2022
© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Chandan S, Khan SR, Kumar A. et al. Efficacy and histologic accuracy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large (>20 mm) colorectal polyps: a comparative review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94: 471-482.e9
- 2 Binmoeller KF, Hamerski CM, Shah JN. et al. Attempted underwater en bloc resection for large (2–4 cm) colorectal laterally spreading tumors (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 713-718
- 3 Jacques J, Legros R, Chrissoux A. et al. Anchoring the snare tip by means of a small incision facilitates en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection and increases the specimen size. Endoscopy 2017; 49: E39-E41
- 4 Mori H, Kobara H, Rafiq K. et al. Preclipping fixation EMR to achieve sufficient surgical margin and negative resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 1025-1026
- 5 Nomura T, Sugimoto S, Kawabata M. et al. Large colorectal mucosal defect closure post-endoscopic submucosal dissection using the reopenable clip over line method and modified locking-clip technique. Endoscopy 2022; 54: E63-E64