Duodenoscope contamination and decontamination: more questions than answers

References
1 Sender R, Fuchs S, Milo R. Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. PLoS Biol 2016; 14: e1002533
2 Struelens MJ, Rost F, Deplano A. et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia after biliary endoscopy: an outbreak investigation using DNA macrorestriction analysis. Am J Med 1993; 95: 489-498
3 Verfaillie CJ, Bruno MJ, Voor inʼt Holt AF. et al. Withdrawal of a novel-design duodenoscope ends outbreak of a VIM-2-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 493-502 Erratum in: Endoscopy 2015; 47: 502
4 Earnshaw JJ, Clark AW, Thom BT. Outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Hosp Infect 1985; 6: 95-97
5 Dirlam Langlay AM, Ofstead CL, Mueller NJ. et al. Reported gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing lapses: the tip of the iceberg. Am J Infect Control 2013; 41: 1188-1194
6 Muscarella LF. Risk of transmission of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and related “superbugs” during gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6: 457-474
7 Kwakman JA, Bexkens ML, Bruno MJ. et al. Persistent contamination of a duodenoscope working channel in a non-clinical simulated ERCP setting. Endoscopy 2022; 1085-1090
8 Reiter FP, Obermeier W, Jung J. et al. Prevalence, resistance rates, and risk factors of pathogens in routine bile cultures obtained during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Dig Dis 2021; 39: 42-51
9 Kastl Jr AJ , Terry NA, Wu GD. et al. The structure and function of the human small intestinal microbiota: current understanding and future directions. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 9: 33-45
10 Alfa MJ, DeGagne P, Olson N. et al. EVOTECH endoscope cleaner and reprocessor (ECR) simulated-use and clinical-use evaluation of cleaning efficacy. BMC Infect Dis 2010; 10: 200 Erratum in: BMC Infect Dis 2010; 10: 291