Key words
diabetes - gestational - thyroid - hypothyroxinemia - insulin - isolated
Introduction
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has been increasingly diagnosed both due to the
increasing frequency of the risk factors and more frequently applied screening
methods, and also in parallel to an increased rate of obesity worldwide [1]. Although most pregnant women with GDM may
be managed by medical nutrition therapy and physical exercise, insulin is required
in about 15–30% of those patients [1]
[2].
The results of studies investigating the role of overt or subclinical thyroid
dysfunction in the development of GDM are contradictory [3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]. In
some studies, isolated maternal hypothyroxinemia was shown to be associated with the
development of GDM [6]
[8]. Contrast findings also were reported [4]. In one study, levothyroxine treatment was
found to have no effect on the development of GDM in women with isolated maternal
hypothyroxinemia [9]. However, the association
of isolated maternal hypothyroxinemia with insulin requirement in GDM has not been
investigated yet.
We propose that investigation of the factors associated with insulin need in GDM is
so important that we could predict insulin need in pregnant women with GDM, and thus
prevent the progression of glycemic dysregulation in this population. We aimed to
analyze the association of free T4 level measured before the diagnosis of GDM in the
2nd trimester with the insulin requirement in GDM in pregnant women with normal
thyroid-stimulating hormone levels.
Patients and Methods
Study population
Adult pregnant women with GDM who were referred to our clinics between September
2018 and September 2019 were included in this study. This observational,
retrospective cohort study was approved by the Clinical Researches Ethics
Committee of Balıkesir University Faculty of Medicine with the approval
number 2019/120 and was performed in accordance with the ethical
standards specified in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later
amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Pregnant adult women diagnosed with GDM by oral glucose tolerance test between
the 24th and 28th gestational weeks were included in the study. The patients
whose thyroid function tests (free T4, free T3, and thyroid-stimulating hormone)
were measured in the 2nd trimester before the 20th week of pregnancy were also
included. Only women with singleton pregnancy were included. Those with a
history of overt or subclinical hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism, disorders of
glucose metabolism or any other chronic illnesses diagnosed before the
pregnancy, or a history of thyroid surgery, or radioactive iodine ablation were
excluded from the study. Those who use any medication that affects glucose or
thyroid metabolism and those whose data were missing were also excluded.
Data collection
Demographic (age), clinical (gravida, parity, previous history of GDM,
gestational hypertension, dietary modification, exercise, insulin requirement,
insulin dose, and the number of insulin injections), and laboratory (fasting
blood glucose, HbA1c, thyroid-stimulating hormone, free T4, free T3) findings
were recorded from the written and electronic files.
Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus
We diagnosed all the patients with GDM, and treated them accordingly, based on
the American Diabetes Association (ADA) guideline [10]. We measured 1st and 2nd hour venous
plasma glucose levels after an oral 75 gram glucose load. An oral glucose
tolerance test (OGTT) was performed between the 24th and 28th weeks of the
pregnancy. GDM was confirmed if at least one of the following criteria was met:
glucose level at
baseline≥92 mg/dl;≥180 mg/dl at
1st hour;≥153 mg/dl at 2nd hour. We measured fasting
blood glucose (FBG), and also HbA1c (mmol/mol) at the diagnosis of GDM.
We grouped the patients also according to HbA1c level (<47,5
vs.≥47,5 mmol/mol).
We assessed insulin requirement in the 3rd trimester until the end of the
pregnancy. We defined daily insulin dose as the maximum daily total insulin dose
in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy.
Thyroid function tests
We measured thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH, mIU/l), free T4 (fT4,
ng/dl), and free T3 (fT3, pg/ml) in all patients with the
chemiluminescence method using the DxI 800 model device (Beckman Coulter Inc.,
CA, USA). Thyroid function tests were measured in the 2nd trimester before the
20th week of the pregnancy. TSH levels of all the patients included in the study
were within the normal range, which was based on the 2nd trimester-specific
reference ranges for TSH defined in the previous American Thyroid Association
(ATA) guideline [11]. We defined isolated
maternal hypothyroxinemia as a maternal fT4 concentration lower than the
reference range with a normal maternal TSH concentration. These tests were
evaluated in the 2nd trimester using the method-specific reference range for TSH
(0,2–3,0 mIU/l) and fT4
(0,75–1,32 ng/dl). We did not monitor the thyroid test
levels throughout the pregnancy. Thyroid autoantibodies were not available in
all patients; therefore, we could not analyze the association of clinical and
laboratory factors with thyroid autoantibodies.
We grouped the patients mainly based on fT4 level as follows: Group A, isolated
maternal hypothyroxinemia vs. Group B, fT4 in a specific reference range. The
fT3/fT4 ratio was achieved by division of the fT3 level by the fT4
level. Also, we grouped the patients based on the insulin requirement: absent
versus present.
Türkiye is an endemic region for iodine deficiency, therefore all the
patients were given iodine supplementation, and LT4 was not prescribed to any
patients based on the guideline [11].
Statistical analysis
For all analyses, SPSS software (ver. 22,0; IBM Corporation, NY, USA) was used.
The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to assess the normality of the
data. When comparing two independent groups in terms of quantitative measures,
Mann–Whitney U-tests were used. Pearson’s Chi-square tests were
used to compare categorical variables. In order to determine the risk groups for
parameters affecting the need for insulin requirement, we used multivariate
logistic regression analysis with Backward Stepwise (Wald) Method. The Odds
Ratio (OR) was used with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to show that risk
groups had how higher risk than the other subjects. Quantitative variables are
reported as the median (minimum-maximum) in the tables. Categorical variables
are reported as numbers (n) and percentages (%), and
p-values<0,05 were taken to indicate statistical significance.
Results
A total of 223 pregnant women with the diagnosis of GDM were analyzed. Median age was
32 (21–43). Isolated maternal hypothyroxinemia (Group A) was detected in
4,93% (n=11) of the patients. Age, gravida, parity, daily insulin
dose, FBG, HbA1c, and TSH levels were similar both in Group A and B. fT4 level was
higher in Group B, fT3/fT4 ratio in Group A (p<0,001 and
p=0,009, respectively). Insulin requirement was present in 25,11%
(n=56) of the patients. The ratio of insulin requirement was 23,11%
in Group B and 63,63% in Group A (p=0,003). FBG and HbA1c levels
were higher in the patients whose insulin requirement was present (p=0,029
and p=0,005, respectively). The number of insulin injections per day
was>2 in 50% (n=28) of the patients whose insulin
requirement was present. Gestational hypertension (present), dietary modification
(absent), HbA1c (≥47,5 mmol/mol), and fT4 level (lower than
normal range) were associated with insulin requirement ([Table 1]). The number of patients with HbA1c
of<38,8 versus≥38,8 mmol/mol was similar in Groups A
and B, or in those for whom insulin was required or not (not shown in the
tables).
Table. 1 Comparison of the clinical and laboratory parameters
according to the presence of isolated maternal hypothyroxinemia or
insulin requirement.
|
fT4 Groups
|
Insulin requirement
|
Parameters
|
Group A Isolated maternal hypothyroxinemia (n=11)
|
Group B Normal fT4 level (n=212)
|
p– Value
|
Absent (n=167)
|
Present (n=56)
|
p-Value
|
Total (n=223)
|
|
Median (min–max)
|
|
Median (min–max)
|
|
Median (min–max)
|
Age (years)
|
28 (23–39)
|
32 (21–43)
|
0,539
|
32 (21–43)
|
33 (22–42)
|
0,732
|
32 (21–43)
|
Gravida
|
2 (1–4)
|
2 (1–6)
|
0,691
|
2 (1–6)
|
2 (1–6)
|
0,506
|
2 (1–6)
|
Parity
|
1 (0–3)
|
1 (0–4)
|
0,709
|
1 (0–4)
|
1 (0–3)
|
0,469
|
1 (0–4)
|
Daily insulin dose (U/day)
|
18 (4–33)
|
15 (4–62)
|
0,825
|
NA
|
15,5 (4–62)
|
NA
|
15,5 (4–62)
|
FBG (mg/dl)
|
79 (74–92)
|
83 (70–121)
|
0,259
|
82 (70–99)
|
86 (74–121)
|
0,029
|
83 (70–121)
|
HbA1c (mmol/mol)
|
33,3 (27,9–41,0)
|
34,4 (21,6–51,9)
|
0,810
|
34,4 (21,6–47,5)
|
35,5 (25,7–51,9)
|
0,005
|
34,4 (21,6–51,9)
|
TSH (mIU/l)
|
1,34 (0,77–3)
|
1,40 (0,20–3)
|
0,812
|
1,31 (0,20–3)
|
1,54 (0,41–3)
|
0,138
|
1,40 (0,20–3)
|
fT4 (ng/dl)
|
0,82 (0,54–0,92)
|
0,94 (0,67–1,32)
|
<0,001
|
0,94 (0,65–1,32)
|
0,92 (0,54–1,27)
|
0,658
|
0,92 (0,54–1,32)
|
fT3 (pg/ml)
|
2,74 (2–3,47)
|
2,63 (1,70–3,83)
|
0,640
|
2,61 (1,70–3,83)
|
2,70 (2–3,69)
|
0,100
|
2,65 (1,70–3,83)
|
fT3/fT4 ratio
|
3,11 (2,51–5,34)
|
2,71 (1,70–4,57)
|
0,009
|
2,70 (1,70–5,34)
|
2,84 (1,98–3,48)
|
0,095
|
2,75 (1,70–5,34)
|
|
n
|
|
n
|
|
n
|
Gestational hypertension (absent/present)
|
10/1
|
209/3
|
0,061
|
166/1
|
53/3
|
0,020
|
219/4
|
Previous GDM (absent/present)
|
11/0
|
191/21
|
0,273
|
153/14
|
49/7
|
0,361
|
202/21
|
Dietary modification (absent/present)
|
1/10
|
6/206
|
0,246
|
3/164
|
4/52
|
0,047
|
7/216
|
Exercise adherence (absent/present)
|
4/7
|
147/65
|
0,023
|
118/49
|
33/23
|
0,104
|
151/72
|
Insulin requirement (absent/present)
|
4/7
|
163/49
|
0,003
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
167/56
|
Number of insulin injections (≤2/>2 per
day)
|
3/4
|
25/24
|
0,686
|
NA
|
28/28
|
NA
|
NA
|
HbA1c (<47,5
vs.≥47,5 mmol/mol)
|
11/0
|
203/9
|
0,485
|
166/1
|
48/8
|
<0,001
|
214/9
|
fT4 (lower than normal range/in normal range)
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
4/163
|
7/49
|
0,003
|
11/212
|
min: Minimum; max: Maximum. NA: Not available.
In multivariate logistic regression analysis, HbA1c
(≥47,5 mmol/mol) and fT4 level (lower than normal range)
were positive predictors for insulin requirement [OR: 35,35 (4,28–291,63),
p=0,001; and OR: 6,05 (1,61–22,63), p=0,008; respectively]
([Table 2]).
Table 2 Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis
demonstrating clinical predictors for insulin requirement in gestational
diabetes mellitus.
Variables
|
Insulin requirement (present)
|
OR (95% CI)
|
p-Value
|
fT4 (lower than normal range)
|
6,05 (1,61–22,63)
|
0,008
|
HbA1c (≥47,5 mmol/mol)
|
35,35 (4,28–291,63)
|
0,001
|
Dietary modification (absent)
|
4,83 (0,99–23,25)
|
0,051
|
Gestational hypertension (present)
|
9,82 (0,93–103,85)
|
0,058
|
Discussion
We showed that isolated maternal hypothyroxinemia (IMH) was detected in a minority of
the patients, and insulin was required in about one-fourth of those. Higher HbA1c
and IMH predicted insulin requirement in GDM, but fT3/fT4 ratio was not
associated with it.
GDM can easily be diagnosed with universal screening by glucose load in the
24–28th weeks of pregnancy [10]. Also,
since thyroid function has been frequently screened in pregnant women, mild thyroid
dysfunctions, such as subclinical hypothyroidism and IMH, have been increasingly
encountered in those [11]. The IMH prevalence
has been shown to range between 1% and 18,8% in various studies
[8]
[12]. Hypothyroxinemia might be developed as a result of relative iodine
deficiency, which leads the thyroid gland to produce T3 rather than T4 to preserve
iodine, but also may be observed in the iodine sufficiency state [13]. IMH may be associated with preterm birth,
macrosomia, neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage, and poorer neuropsychological
development in the offspring [14]
[15]. IMH was found to be associated also with
an increased risk of GDM in some studies [8]
[16]
[17]. The association was shown in the patients
with IMH either in the 1st or the 2nd trimester of pregnancy. In other studies, no
associations were reported between IMH and GDM [8]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]. In one study analyzing IMH
both in the 1st and 2nd trimester of pregnancy, IMH was found not to be associated
with GDM [12]. In another large study, IMH in
early pregnancy (<20 weeks) was found to increase the risk of preeclampsia,
placenta abruption or previa, and preterm delivery but not GDM [19].
The effects of thyroid hormones on glucose metabolism have been shown to be
complicated [22]. Triiodothyronine (T3) was
known to stimulate pancreatic beta-cell proliferation in rats [23]. T3 was also shown to increase insulin
secretion and act as an anti-apoptotic factor for pancreatic beta cells [24]. Thyroid hormones increase intestinal
glucose absorption and hepatic glucose output via stimulating glycogenolysis and
gluconeogenesis and increase glucose intolerance [25]
[26]. Given these mechanisms,
thyrotoxicosis may obviously be expected to be related to glycemic dysregulation
[22]
[27]. However, hypothyroidism, subclinical hypothyroidism, and IMH were
shown to increase the risk of GDM [16]
[17]
[22]
[28]. Urinary iodine excretion
was shown to be negatively correlated with glucose levels in type 2 diabetes [29]. In one study, lower placental iodine was
found to increase the risk of GDM and be negatively associated with neonatal insulin
concentration in cord blood and HOMA-IR index [30]. Although the exact mechanism was not known, the association of IMH
with insulin requirement in GDM in our study might be due to higher insulin
resistance due to lower maternal iodine status. However, in another study, higher
maternal urinary iodine excretion was associated with GDM compared to lower urinary
iodine excretion [31].
Maternal age, previous history of GDM, family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus,
pre-conceptional body mass index, FBG, 1st-hour or 2nd-hour glucose level on OGTT,
and HbA1c were found as predictors for insulin use in GDM [32]
[33]
[34]. In the other studies, the
gestational week at the time of the diagnosis of GDM, abdominal subcutaneous fat
thickness, and HOMA-IR were associated with insulin treatment in GDM [34]
[35]
[36]. IMH was not analyzed as a
predictor for insulin use in GDM in any previous study. We showed that IMH or HbA1c
(≥47,5 mmol/mol), but not FBG, was a predictor for insulin
requirement in GDM. We could not analyze pre-conceptional BMI or serum insulin
levels during OGTT. We found that higher HbA1c levels at the diagnosis predicted
insulin requirement in GDM, similarly in the previous studies [33]
[36].
Actually, an increased HbA1c level may already be expected to be an important
determinant of insulin use in a pregnant woman with GDM. Of the patients,
10% with HbA1c≥47,5 mmol/mol did not require insulin
treatment since insulin treatment was based on both biochemical measurements and
follow-up by self-monitoring of blood glucose levels. Also, we found that the HbA1c
cut-off value of 38,8 mmol/mol was not associated with insulin
requirement. In a previous study, HOMA-IR was shown to be associated with insulin
requirement in GDM [36]. We did not measure
plasma insulin levels, and hence, could not calculate HOMA-IR scores.
Isolated AntiTPO positivity in early pregnancy was shown to be associated with an
increased risk of GDM [37]. The frequency of
AntiTPO positivity was found to be higher in the patients with GDM [21]. In one study, the effect of AntiTPO on GDM
was shown to be independent of thyroid function tests [21]. However, other studies showed no
relationship between GDM and thyroid autoimmunity [38]
[39]. In one study, low maternal
fT4 levels were found to be associated with increased levels of BMI, HbA1c, and
fasting plasma glucose, but it was also found that AntiTPO positivity did not affect
the adverse pregnancy outcomes [16]. In that
study, the frequency of AntiTPO positivity was similar in those with or without IMH.
As far as we know, the association of AntiTPO positivity with insulin requirement in
GDM has not been studied in previous studies. In a previous ATA guideline, AntiTPO
positivity was not defined as a prerequisite for IMH [11]. However, in some studies including the
patients with negative AntiTPO, IMH rates were found to be relatively lower, but
insulin requirement was not analyzed [12]
[19]. We could not analyze AntiTPO positivity in
our study.
fT3/fT4 ratio was also shown to be associated with adverse metabolic outcomes
such as obesity, GDM, insulin resistance and obesity in pregnant women [16]
[40].
fT3/fT4 ratio has not been studied before as regards to the insulin
requirement in GDM. We found that fT3/fT4 ratio was higher in the patients
with IMH than in those with normal fT4, but it was not associated with insulin
requirement.
In an interventional study on pregnant women with hypothyroxinemia, the effect of
levothyroxine treatment on adverse pregnancy outcomes and perinatal complications
was investigated [9]. Levothyroxine treatment
was shown to decrease the rate of miscarriage and neonatal intensive care unit
admission, but it did not affect the development of GDM. The impact of LT4 on
insulin requirement in GDM was not investigated in that study. In our study, we did
not treat the patients with IMH with LT4 but showed that IMH increased about 6 times
the risk of insulin requirement in patients with GDM. We prescribed iodine
supplementation in all the patients but did not make a routine follow-up for TSH or
fT4 measurement.
Strength and limitations
As far as we know, our study is one of the original studies investigating the
association of insulin requirement in GDM with fT4 level. Our study sample was
relatively small compared the previous studies reported in the literature. Since
only a minority of the patients did have available results for thyroid
autoantibodies, we could not analyze the association of thyroid autoantibodies
with insulin requirement or IMH. We did not include an interventional arm, which
may indicate the effect of LT4 treatment or iodine supplementation in IMH on the
clinical course of GDM.
Conclusion
We showed that IMH and increased HbA1c levels predicted the insulin requirement in
GDM. Our study is the first study showing the association of IMH with insulin
requirement in GDM. Pregnant women with GDM should be under close follow-up
especially if IMH is detected. Future interventional studies will reveal the effect
of LT4 treatment or iodine supplementation on the course of GDM in pregnant women
with IMH. Our findings, if supported by large studies, may bring up that IMH may be
questioned for LT4 treatment in pregnant women with GDM.