Key words
ACTN3
- α-actinin-3 - genotype - flexibility - ROM
Introduction
Flexibility parameters, including range of motion (ROM), are an important physical
fitness component in both the general population and in sports athletes [1]. Poor flexibility is a risk factor for
cardiovascular disease [2]; poor trunk flexibility is
associated with hypertension and arterial stiffness [3]
[4]. Additionally, elite sports athletes
with higher flexibility have a higher ROM than non-elite athletes [5]
[6]. The flexibility
parameters, such as ROM depend on the individual and are influenced by sex and age
[7]. Joint flexibility is known to decrease with
aging and be higher in females compared to males [7].
In addition, there are the genetic factors [8], since
38–61% of the traits associated with flexibility (based on
assessments of “sit-and- reach”) are heritable [8].
The ACTN3 R577X polymorphism in the gene encoding α-actinin-3
(ACTN3), an actinin-binding protein involved in muscle structure,
influences exercise performance [9]. In the
ACTN3 R577X polymorphism arginine (R) is converted to a stop codon (X) at
position 1747 (exon 16) in ACTN3 on chromosome 11. ACTN3 deficiency is
observed in the muscles of the XX carriers with ACTN3 R577X polymorphism.
ACTN3 R577X polymorphism influences muscle strength [9] and power/sprint athletic status [10]. Because deficiency of α-actinin-3 alters
muscle structure, the ACTN3 R577X polymorphism is associated with muscle
damage [11]
[12] and
muscle injury [13]
[14]
[15]. ACTN3 R577X polymorphism,
which regulates α-actinin-3 expression, influences not only muscle
contractile properties such as muscle strength and power but also flexibility.
ACTN3 R577X polymorphism influences flexibility parameters such as muscle
stiffness (using shear wave elastography), skinned fiber Young's modulus and
hysteresis, and ROM [16]
[17]
[18]. The X allele or XX genotype
carriers showed greater flexibility compared with those with the RR genotype or R
allele carriers. In addition, athletic status in artistic gymnasts and sport
climbers, who require flexibility, is related to the frequency of the ACTN3
R577X polymorphism [19]
[20]. In artistic gymnasts, the ACTN3 XX genotypes show higher
athletic performance than the RR and RX genotypes [20], and the XX genotype was underrepresented in male gymnasts compared to
controls [21]. A meta-analysis of three ethnic cohorts
(Japanese, Polish, and Russian) showed that the frequency of the XX+RX
genotypes in the ACTN3 R577X polymorphism was significantly higher in
climbers than that in the non-climbers [19].
Therefore, ACTN3 R577X polymorphism influences sports athlete status through
the influence of ACTN3 polymorphism on flexibility.
The association between ACTN3 R577X polymorphism and ROM is mostly studied in
the context of flexibility parameters. However, there is also a report that the
ACTN3 R577X polymorphism has no effect on ROM [22]. The aim of this meta-analysis and systemic review was to investigate
the association between the ACTN3 R577X polymorphism and ROM and to determine
the model (dominant, recessive and additive models) that is associated with ROM.
Materials and Methods
Data collection
All available studies published before April 14, 2022, were identified and
collected from PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) using
the following keywords and Boolean search operators :
(“flexibility” OR “Joint Range of Motion” OR
“Joint Flexibility” OR “Range of motion”) AND
(“ACTN3” OR “alpha-actinin 3”).
Inclusion criteria
Studies that met the following criteria were included: (1) published in English,
(2) human subject research, (3) ROM is measured, and (4) ACTN3 R577X
genotype has been analyzed. This review considered ROM measurement tests such as
sit-and-reach, straight leg test, and chair sit-and-reach.
The search aimed to obtain papers that reported an association between
ACTN3 R577X polymorphism and ROM. In the first round of evaluation,
the literature screen was based on the title and abstract. Papers that did not
meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. In the second round, the full text of
the selected papers was analyzed, and studies that lacked comparable
quantitative data and measurements of physical performance were excluded.
However, the reference lists of these excluded articles were inspected for
relevant papers that were missed.
Data extraction and risk of bias assessment
From each selected study, the following data were extracted: (1) lead author
names and year of publication, (2) subject characteristics, (3) ROM
measurements, and (4) mean and standard deviation (SD) of the ROM
measurements.
For risk of bias assessment, we used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool [23], which considers selection bias (random
sequence generation, allocation concealment), performance bias (blinding of
participants and personnel), detection bias (blinding of outcome assessment),
attrition bias (incomplete outcome data), reporting bias (selective reporting),
and other bias.
Statistics
All analyses were conducted using R (version 4.1.3) and its
“meta” package. The additive genetic model was assessed using a
meta-regression model. Dominant and recessive models were analyzed using a
random effects model [24]. Heterogeneity across
studies was evaluated using the mean of I2 statistics.
Egger’s test and funnel plots were used to evaluate publication bias
[25]. The relationship between flexibility,
sex, and age was assessed using meta-regression in the sub-analysis. In the
sub-analysis, we were unable to use the Juan Del Coso et al. 2019 data by sex
and age, so we divided age into 20 s, over 40 s, and
28−65 years, and sex into man, woman, and man-woman.
Results
Risk of bias
[Fig. 1] shows the risk of bias of the studies
included in the present study. Blinding participants and personnel (preference
bias) and blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) were not mentioned by
any study. In incomplete outcome data (attrition bias), only two studies
described the reasons for excluding subjects, and in both cases subject
selection was not arbitrary. All other sources of bias had low risk.
Fig. 1 Risk of bias summary (a) and risk of bias graph
(b).
Systematic review
We identified 26 articles after applying the search filters ([Fig. 2]). Seventeen articles were excluded in the
first round, and two articles were excluded in the second round of screening. We
believe that no papers were missed, based on the inspection of the reference
lists. A total of 2908 participants from seven reports were included in the
meta-analysis. The details of these reports are presented in [Table 1]. There were no studies that duplicates
cohort of subjects. Some papers included multiple ROM measurements from multiple
cohorts.
Fig. 2 Flowchart outlining the article-retrieval process and
articles meeting criteria for the systematic review and
meta-analysis.
Table 1 Studies on the association between the
ACTN3 R577X polymorphism and ROM that were included in
the meta-analysis.
No.
|
Author
|
Year
|
Sex
|
Cohort
|
Age
|
n
|
Phenotype
|
Reference
|
1
|
Jun Ho Kim et al.
|
2014
|
Women
|
Ballet dancers
|
20.9±2.4
|
97
|
Sit-and-reach
|
[46]
|
2
|
Jun Ho Kim et al.
|
|
Women
|
Ordinary population
|
25.3±4.4
|
151
|
Sit-and-reach
|
[46]
|
3
|
Jun Ho Kim et al.
|
|
Women
|
Ballet dancers
|
20.9±2.4
|
97
|
Straight leg raise
|
[46]
|
4
|
Kikuchi et al.
|
2017
|
Men
|
Cohort 1
|
51.1±13.6
|
208
|
Sit-and-reach
|
[18]
|
5
|
Kikuchi et al.
|
|
Women
|
Cohort 1
|
54.6±11.8
|
568
|
Sit-and-reach
|
[18]
|
6
|
Kikuchi et al.
|
|
Men
|
Cohort 2
|
48.9±15.7
|
529
|
Sit-and-reach
|
[18]
|
7
|
Kikuchi et al.
|
|
Women
|
Cohort 2
|
49.9±14.6
|
728
|
Sit-and-reach
|
[18]
|
8
|
Seok-Ki Min et al.
|
2016
|
Women
|
–
|
67.38±3.68
|
68
|
Chair sit-and-reach
|
[22]
|
9
|
Miyamoto et al.
|
2018
|
Men
|
–
|
21.2±2.8
|
76
|
Straight leg raise
|
[16]
|
10
|
Kikuchi et al.
|
2018
|
Men
|
–
|
20.8±3.8
|
52
|
Elbow joint angle
|
[47]
|
11
|
Juan Del Coso et al.
|
2019
|
Men and women
|
–
|
28–65
|
136
|
Ankle dorsiflexion
|
[48]
|
12
|
Juan Del Coso et al.
|
|
Men and women
|
–
|
28–65
|
136
|
Sit-and-reach angle
|
[48]
|
13
|
C. Romero-Blanco et al.
|
2021
|
Women
|
Cohort 1
|
69.7±3.2
|
164
|
Chair sit-and-reach
|
[49]
|
14
|
C. Romero-Blanco et al.
|
|
Women
|
Cohort 2
|
78.5±3
|
131
|
Chair sit-and-reach
|
[49]
|
Meta-analysis
The associations between ACTN3 R577X genotype and flexibility were not
affected by publication bias in both dominant (p=0.939) and recessive
(p=0.980) models. There was no significant association in the dominant
model (standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.01, 95% CI: –0.14,
0.15, p=0.941, [Fig. 3a]). The recessive
model showed a significant association between ACTN3 R577X polymorphism
and ROM, where the XX+RX genotypes had significantly higher ROM than the
RR genotype (SMD: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.006–0.23, p<0.001,
[Fig. 3b]). A sub-analysis of the recessive
model indicated that age and sex did not influence the relationship (age:
p=0.745, sex: p=0.997).
Fig. 3 Forest plot of the a: Dominant (RR+RX vs.
XX) model and B: Recessive (RR vs. XX+RX) model. ROM, range of
motion; SMD, standardized mean difference
In addition, an additive relationship was observed; the flexibility was in the
order XX, RX, and RR (p=0.029, [Fig.
4]).
Fig. 4 Bubble plot of the additive model.
Discussion
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between
ACTN3 R577X polymorphism and ROM in the dominant, recessive, and additive
models. The ROM in the XX+RX genotype was significantly higher than that in
the RR genotype (recessive model, p<0.001), and it additively increased in
the genotypes in the following order: XX>RX>RR (additive model,
p=0.029). However, no significant association was observed in the dominant
model. These relationships were not influenced by sex or age.
The ACTN3 R577X genotype is a knockout variant, and ACTN3 deficiency is
observed in the individuals with XX genotype [26]. The
ACTN3 R577X polymorphism alters muscle contractile properties [27]. In addition, there was a negative correlation
between ROM and passive muscle stiffness, as observed using share-wave elastography
[28]. Passive muscle stiffness was lower in the XX
genotype than that in the RR+RX genotype [16].
In contrast, higher passive muscle stiffness contributes to a rapid force, such as
the rate of torque development [29]. The RR genotype,
with a high passive muscle stiffness, showed rapid force, including squat and
countermovement jumps, compared to the XX genotype [30]. The ACTN3 R577X polymorphism influences rapid force
production and ROM through changes in the muscle properties.
There is an association between the ACTN3 R577X genotype and ROM. Broos et al.
examined Young’s modulus and hysteresis in human type IIa/IIx fibers
and suggested that these passive tensions significantly increased with each
additional R allele [17]. The results from the
meta-analysis are consistent with those of Broos et al. [17]. The concentration of theα-actinin-2 (ACTN2) protein in KO
mice was higher than that in wild-type mice, suggesting that in its absence, the
ACTN3 in the muscle is replaced with another protein from the same family
[31]. A higher expression of ACTN2 could lead to
lower passive tension because ACTN2 has a higher binding affinity with titin. Titin
is a major determinant of the passive stiffness of the sarcomere, especially in type
I fibers. Low concentrations of titin is correlated with a low Young’s
modulus (Tourse et al., 2002); ACTN2 changes the concentration and organization of
titin in the muscle.
In this meta-analysis and systematic review, a higher ROM was observed in the
XX+RX genotype than in the RR genotype (recessive model); the ROM increased
additively in the genotypes in the following order: XX>RX>XX
(additive model). Garton et al. reviewed the effect of ACTN3 R577X
polymorphism on human muscle performance [9]. In
healthy adults, strength/power performance was higher in the RR genotype
than that in the XX+RX genotypes (dominant model) and increased additively
in the following order: RR>RX>XX (additive model). Therefore, the
heterozygote RX could confer both muscle strength and power characteristics, and
flexibility. ACTN2 expression is additively increased in the order
RR>RX>XX in ACTN3 KO mice [32].
Therefore, the differential expression of ACTN2, regulated by the ACTN3 R577X
polymorphism, could play a key role in the additive association.
Age and sex influence flexibility [33]; however, in
this meta-analysis, age and sex did not have an impact in the sub-analysis.
Therefore, age and sex might not affect the association between the ACTN3
R577X polymorphism and flexibility.
The frequency of the ACTN3 X allele is lower than 10%, 45%,
and 50% in the African, European, and Asian populations, respectively, and
more than 70% in the American population [34]
[35]. The X allele of the ACTN3
R577X polymorphism is considered a polymorphic subject of positive selection during
human migration from the African to the Eurasian climate, which is colder and less
species-rich [36]. The XX genotype has a lower resting
systolic and diastolic blood pressure than the RR genotype [37]. The change in the ACTN3 expression levels in the arteries
could explain the difference in the resting systolic blood pressure. ACTN3
deficiency inhibits the progression of dystrophic pathology [38]. In addition, centenarian individuals show a higher frequency of the
X allele than professional road cyclists with an extreme muscle endurance phenotype
and with the highest frequency of X allele in non-athletic populations [39]. In this study, ACTN3 deficiency influences
flexibility. Flexibility traits including ROM, is an important physical fitness
characteristic [1], and is associated with risk
factors for cardiovascular diseases [2]. Therefore,
the effect of the ACTN3 R577X polymorphism on ROM may indirectly construe a
positive influence on health. In addition, ACTN3 deficiency could provide an
advantage to athletes who need flexibility.
Several studies have examined the association between other gene polymorphisms and
flexibility [40]
[41].
For instance, the COL1A1 (rs1107946) and COL5A1 (rs12722)
polymorphisms are associated with ROM [40]
[41]. Gene polymorphisms are associated with genu
recurvatum and general joint laxity (sports, exercise, and nutritional genomics).
However, no polymorphism is associated with ROM, apart from the ACTN3 R577X
polymorphism. Therefore, the ACTN3 R577X is a unique polymorphism that
influences flexibility.
Generally, low ROM is known to increase the risk of muscle injury [42]
[43]
[44]. However, the X allele of ACTN3 R577X
polymorphism has a higher ROM than the RR genotype and a higher risk of muscle
injury [13]
[14]
[15]. A previous study suggested that the X allele had
higher muscle damage such as creatine kinase activity and muscle soreness compared
to the RR genotype [45]. The relationship between the
high flexibility of X allele and muscle injury is unclear and should be examined in
future study.
This study has a few limitations. The number of reports included appears fewer
because we could not find more papers that met the inclusion criteria. Flexibility
parameters are not limited to ROM. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the
exhaustive effect of the ACTN3 R577X polymorphism on flexibility in future
studies. Several factors affect ROM apart from muscle properties. The results of the
sit-and-reach test are influenced not only by muscle stiffness but also by tendon
and ligament stiffness. Therefore, the effects of the ACTN3 R577X
polymorphism on flexibility should be investigated using multiple methods and by
considering interaction effects, including other genetic factors.
In conclusion, the ROM in XX+RX genotypes was significantly higher than that
in the RR genotype. ROM was additively higher in the genotypes in the following
order, XX>RX>RR.