Gehäuftes Auftreten von Staphylococcus-aureus-Mastitiden in einer Milchviehherde: Ein Fallbericht

Zusammenfassung

Der vorliegende Bericht beschreibt einen Fall gehäuften Auftretens von Staphylococcus-aureus-Mastitiden in einer Milchviehherde. Daten der Milchleistungsprüfung, bakteriologische Milchprobenergebnisse, Aufzeichnungen über das Auftreten klinischer Mastitiden einschließlich deren Verlauf und Einfluss auf den Verbleib in der der Herde betroffener Tiere sowie die Beurteilung der Melkroutine wurden zur Abklärung herangezogen. Die Melkroutine sowie das Behandlungsprotokoll für Tiere mit einer Staphylococcus-aureus-Infektion wurden als mögliche Risikofaktoren identifiziert. Umgesetzte Maßnahmen beinhalteten Veränderungen in der Melkroutine und dem Behandlungsprotokoll für infizierte Tiere sowie Keulung oder Abtrennung bereits infizierter Tiere.

Abstract

The report describes an outbreak of Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in a dairy herd. The risk assessment included the analysis of data from milk recordings, bacteriological milk cultures, clinical mastitis records and influence of infected status on the culling risk of affected animals, as well as an evaluation of the milking routine. The milking routine and the treatment protocol of animals with Staphylococcus aureus infection were identified as possible risk factors. The implemented measures included changes to the milking routine, a different treatment protocol for infected animals, and culling and segregation of infected animals to reduce overall prevalence.

Schlüsselwörter

Mastitis - Melkroutine - Rind - Zitzendesinfektion

Key words

Mastitis - milking routine - cattle - teat disinfection

Publication History

Received: 24 October 2022

Accepted: 20 February 2023

Article published online:
25 May 2023

• Literatur

• 1 Ruegg PL. A 100-Year Review: Mastitis detection, management, and prevention. J Dairy Sci 2017; 100: 10381-10397 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13023.
• 2 Seegers H, Fourichon C, Beaudeau F. Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. Vet Res 2003; 34: 475-491 DOI: 10.1051/vetres:2003027.
• 3 Bar D, Tauer LW, Bennett G. et al. The Cost of Generic Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Cows as Estimated by Using Dynamic Programming. J Dairy Sci 2008; 91: 2205-2214 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2007-0573.
• 4 Rollin E, Dhuyvetter KC, Overton MW. The cost of clinical mastitis in the first 30 days of lactation: An economic modeling tool. Prev Vet Med 2015; 122: 257-264 DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.11.006.
• 5 Gröhn YT, Wilson DJ, González RN. et al. Effect of Pathogen-Specific Clinical Mastitis on Milk Yield in Dairy Cows. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87: 3358-3374 DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73472-4.
• 6 Cha E, Hertl JA, Schukken YH. et al. The effect of repeated episodes of bacteria-specific clinical mastitis on mortality and culling in Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96: 4993-5007 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6232.
• 7 Schukken YH, Hertl J, Bar D. et al. Effects of repeated gram-positive and gram-negative clinical mastitis episodes on milk yield loss in Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92: 3091-3105 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1557.
• 8 Beaudeau F, Ducrocq V, Fourichon C. et al. Effect of Disease on Length of Productive Life of French Holstein Dairy Cows Assessed by Survival Analysis. J Dairy Sci 1995; 78: 103-117 DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76621-8.
• 9 Gröhn YT, Eicker SW, Ducrocq V. et al. Effect of Diseases on the Culling of Holstein Dairy Cows in New York State. J Dairy Sci 1998; 81: 966-978 DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75657-7.
• 10 Chebel RC, Santos JEP, Reynolds JP. et al. Factors affecting conception rate after artificial insemination and pregnancy loss in lactating dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2004; 84: 239-255 DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.12.012.
• 11 Santos JEP, Cerri RLA, Ballou MA. et al. Effect of timing of first clinical mastitis occurrence on lactational and reproductive performance of Holstein dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2004; 80: 31-45 DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00133-7.
• 12 Ahmadzadeh A, Frago F, Shafii B. et al. Effect of clinical mastitis and other diseases on reproductive performance of Holstein cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2009; 112: 273-282 DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.04.024.
• 13 Pol M, Ruegg PL. Relationship Between Antimicrobial Drug Usage and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Gram-Positive Mastitis Pathogens. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 262-273 DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)72627-9.
• 14 O’Shea J. Machine milking and mastitis. Section 2: Machine milking factors affecting mastitis. A literature review. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation 1987; 215: 5-32
• 15 Barkema HW, Schukken YH, Zadoks RN. Invited Review: The role of cow, pathogen, and treatment regimen in the therapeutic success of bovine Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89: 1877-1895 DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72256-1.
• 16 Wilson DJ, Das HH, Gonzalez RN. et al. Association between management practices, dairy herd characteristics, and somatic cell count of bulk tank milk. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997; 210: 1499-1502
• 17 Zadoks RN, Allore HG, Hagenaars TJ. et al. A mathematical model of Staphylococcus aureus control in dairy herds. Epidemiol Infect 2002; 129: 397-416 DOI: 10.1017/s0950268802007483.
• 18 Jayarao BM, Pillai SR, Sawant AA. et al. Guidelines for monitoring bulk tank milk somatic cell and bacterial counts. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87: 3561-3573 DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73493-1.
• 19 Barkema HW, Schukken YH, Lam TJ. et al. Incidence of clinical mastitis in dairy herds grouped in three categories by bulk milk somatic cell counts. J Dairy Sci 1998; 81: 411-419 DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75591-2.
• 20 Sargeant JM, Schukken YH, Leslie KE. Ontario bulk milk somatic cell count reduction program: progress and outlook. J Dairy Sci 1998; 81: 1545-1554 DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75720-0.
• 21 van Schaik G, Lotem M, Schukken YH. Trends in somatic cell counts, bacterial counts, and antibiotic residue violations in New York State during 1999-2000. J Dairy Sci 2002; 85: 782-789 DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74136-2.
• 22 Jørgensen HJ, Mathisen T, Løvseth A. et al. An outbreak of staphylococcal food poisoning caused by enterotoxin H in mashed potato made with raw milk. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2005; 252: 267-272 DOI: 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.09.005.
• 23 Goodger WJ, Ferguson G. Benefits and costs of a control program for an epizootic of Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1987; 190: 1284-1287
• 24 NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle: Seventh Revised Edition, 2001. In. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2001: 408 DOI: 10.17226/9825
• 25 Cornell University. Automated Pathogen-Based Mastitis Therapy. Access: 21. 10. 2022. https://www.vet.cornell.edu/animal-health-diagnostic-center/programs/quality-milk-production/services/automated-mastitis-therapy
• 26 Sears PM, Smith BS, English PB. et al. Shedding pattern of Staphylococcus aureus from bovine intramammary infections. J Dairy Sci 1990; 73: 2785-2789 DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78964-3.
• 27 NMC. Procedures for Evaluating Vacuum Levels and Air Flow in Milking Systems. Verona, WI: National Mastitis Council. 2012
• 28 Mein GA, Neijenhuis F, Morgan WF. et al. Evaluation of bovine teat condition in commercial dairy herds: 1. Non-infectious factors. In: 2nd International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality. Vancouver, BC, Canada: National Mastitis Council Inc 2001; 347-351
• 29 Wilson DJ, Gonzalez RN, Sears PM. Segregation or Use of Separate Milking Units for Cows Infected with Staphylococcus aureus: Effects on Prevalence of Infection and Bulk Tank Somatic Cell Count. J Dairy Sci 1995; 78: 2083-2085 DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76834-5.
• 30 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service FaDA. Grade “A” Pasteurized Milk Ordinance. In. 2019. https://www.fda.gov/media/140394/download
• 31 NMC. 2013. Recommended milking procedures. Access: 21. 10. 2022. http://www.nmconline.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/ Recommended-Milking-Procedures.pdf
• 32 Gleeson D, Flynn J, Brien BO. Effect of pre-milking teat disinfection on new mastitis infection rates of dairy cows. Ir Vet J 2018; 71: 11 DOI: 10.1186/s13620-018-0122-4.
• 33 Lam TJ, van Vliet JH, Schukken YH. [Udder disinfection and mastitis in cattle: a literature review]. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 1995; 120: 392-399
• 34 Oliver SP, Lewis MJ, Ingle TL. et al. Prevention of bovine mastitis by a premilking teat disinfectant containing chlorous acid and chlorine dioxide. Journal of dairy science 1993; 76: 287-292 DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77348-8.
• 35 Falkenberg U, Tenhagen BA, Baumgärtner B. et al. [Prevention of intramammary infections in dairy cows by the use of a premilking teat dip method with a foaming iodophor dip agent]. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2002; 109: 423-427
• 36 Neave FK, Dodd FH, Kingwill RG. et al. Control of mastitis in the dairy herd by hygiene and management. J Dairy Sci 1969; 52: 696-707 DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(69)86632-4.
• 37 Barkema HW, Schukken YH, Lam TJ. et al. Management practices associated with low, medium, and high somatic cell counts in bulk milk. J Dairy Sci 1998; 81: 1917-1927 DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75764-9.
• 38 Skarbye AP, Krogh MA, Sørensen JT. The effect of individual quarter dry-off in management of subclinical mastitis on udder condition and milk production in organic dairy herds: A randomized field trial. J Dairy Sci 2018; 101: 11186-11198 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-14794.
• 39 Ruegg PL. Investigation of mastitis problems on farms. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2003; 19: 47-73