Histopathologic uncertainties after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection with visible retraction of proper muscle layer

Endoscopy 2023; 55(09): 884
DOI: 10.1055/a-2066-8332

Letter to the editor

Andrej Wagner

¹Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria

,

Daniel Neureiter

²Institute of Pathology, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria

,

Frieder Berr

¹Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria

References
1 Lafeuille P, Yzet C, Benech N. et al. Histological R0 classification after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a gold standard with feet of clay. Endoscopy 2022; 54: E798-E799
2 Sumimoto K, Tanaka S, Shigita K. et al. Diagnostic performance of Japan NBI Expert Team classification for differentiation among non-invasive, superficially invasive and deeply invasive colorectal neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86: 700-709
3 Hashiguchi Y, Muro K, Saito Y. et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2020; 25: 1-42
4 Saito Y. Pathologic sm2 carries a moderate risk of metastases even without other unfavorable factors, but positive horizontal margins have a low recurrence risk after en bloc resection. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 252-254
5 Yahagi N. Is artificial intelligence ready to replace the expert endoscopists?. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 478-479
6 Daoud DC, Suter N, Durand M. et al. Comparing outcomes for endoscopic submucosal dissection between Eastern and Western countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24: 2518-2536