Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2158-8752
Intramolecular Asymmetric Cyclopropanation Using Air-Stable Alkylboronic Esters
We thank the Swiss National Science Foundation for its financial support of the project 200020_201092.
Abstract
The preparation of polysubstituted bicyclo[3.1.0]hexanes starting from air-stable substituted pent-4-en-1-ylboronic acid esters has been investigated. The method involves a Matteson homologation with LiCHCl2, leading to 1-chlorohex-5-en-1-ylboronic acid ester intermediates. The subsequent intramolecular cyclopropanation step was performed in a one-pot process. With pinacol boronic esters, the cyclopropanation step was either performed thermally at 140 °C or at 70 °C after in situ transesterification to form a catechol boronic ester. This last approach is suitable for the preparation of enantioenriched bicyclo[3.1.0]hexanes using either chiral-auxiliary control or by taking advantage of the sparteine-controlled enantioselective boroalkylation of alcohols.
Key words
cyclopropanation - boronic esters - Matteson homologation - chloroalkylboronates - bicyclo[3.1.0]hexanes - fused cyclopropanesSupporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2158-8752.
- Supporting Information
Publication History
Received: 27 July 2023
Accepted after revision: 22 August 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
22 August 2023
Article published online:
28 September 2023
© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References and Notes
- 1 Rynbrandt RH, Dutton FE, Schmidt FL. J. Med. Chem. 1972; 15: 424
- 2 Parks J, Gyeltshen T, Prachyawarakorn V, Mahidol C, Ruchirawat S, Kittakoop P. J. Nat. Prod. 2010; 73: 992
- 3 Boatman PD, Lauring B, Schrader TO, Kasem M, Johnson BR, Skinner P, Jung J.-K, Xu J, Cherrier MC, Webb PJ, Semple G, Sage CR, Knudsen J, Chen R, Luo W.-L, Caro L, Cote J, Lai E, Wagner J, Taggart AK, Carballo-Jane E, Hammond M, Colletti SL, Tata JR, Connolly DT, Waters MG, Richman JG. J. Med. Chem. 2012; 55: 3644
- 4 Liu M.-L, Duan Y.-H, Hou Y.-L, Li C, Gao H, Dai Y, Yao X.-S. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 1000
- 5 Reissig H.-U, Zimmer R. Chem. Rev. 2003; 103: 1151
- 6 Sarpong R, Su JT, Stoltz BM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 13624
- 7 Bajtos B, Yu M, Zhao H, Pagenkopf BL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 9631
- 8 Sawada T, Nakada M. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 1004
- 9 Donaldson WA. Tetrahedron 2001; 57: 8589
- 10 Lebel H, Marcoux J.-F, Molinaro C, Charette AB. Chem. Rev. 2003; 103: 977
- 11 Pellissier H. Tetrahedron 2008; 64: 7041
- 12 Barberis M, Pérez-Prieto J, Stiriba S.-E, Lahuerta P. Org. Lett. 2001; 3: 3317
- 13 Barberis M, Pérez-Prieto J, Herbst K, Lahuerta P. Organometallics 2002; 21: 1667
- 14 Saha B, Uchida T, Katsuki T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003; 14: 823
- 15 Hodgson DM, Chung YK, Paris J.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 8664
- 16 Hodgson DM, Chung YK, Nuzzo I, Freixas G, Kulikiewicz KK, Cleator E, Paris J.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 4456
- 17 Hodgson DM, Humphreys PG, Ward JG. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 995
- 18 Bull JA, Charette AB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 1895
- 19 Corey EJ, Chaykovsky M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965; 87: 1353
- 20 Jiang X, Lim Z, Yeung Y.-Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013; 54: 1798
- 21 Takai K, Toshikawa S, Inoue A, Kokumai R, Hirano M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007; 692: 520
- 22 Benoit G, Charette AB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 1364
- 23 Sayes M, Benoit G, Charette AB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 13514
- 24 Murai M, Mizuta C, Taniguchi R, Takai K. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 6104
- 25 den Hartog T, Toro JM. S, Chen P. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 1100
- 26 Tappin ND. C, Michalska W, Rohrbach S, Renaud P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 14240
- 27 Xu G, Renaud P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 3657
- 28 Roesner S, Brown CA, Mohiti M, Pulis AP, Rasappan R, Blair DJ, Essafi S, Leonori D, Aggarwal VK. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 4053
- 29 Matteson DS, Majumdar D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980; 102: 7588
- 30 Matteson DS, Majumdar D. Organometallics 1983; 2: 1529
- 31 CCDC 2264981, 2264984, and 2264985 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for compounds 7, (+)-6, and (+)-14, respectively. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures
- 32 (±)-(1SR,5SR)-2,2-Dibenzyl-6,6-dimethylbicyclo[3.1.0]hexane [(±)-6]: Thermal Procedure A 2.5 M solution of BuLi in hexane (0.87 mL, 2.2 mmol) was slowly added to a solution of anhyd CH2Cl2 (0.35 mL, 5.4 mmol) in THF (10 mL) at such a rate that the internal temperature did not exceed –100 °C. The resulting mixture was stirred at below –100 °C for 30 min, then a solution of dioxaborolane 4 (730 mg, 1.81 mmol) in anhyd THF (4 mL) was added. The resulting mixture was allowed to reach rt and stirred for 5 h. The solvents were removed under reduced pressure and toluene (20 mL) was then added, resulting in the precipitation of LiCl. The supernatant was transferred through a cannula to a flask containing BzOK (265 mg, 1.8 mmol), and the resulting mixture was heated at 140 °C overnight in a closed vessel and then cooled. The solid residue was filtered off and the remaining solution was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash chromatography [silica gel, heptane–EtOAc (100:1 to 30:1)] to give a clear liquid that solidified on refrigeration; yield: 368 mg( 1.27 mmol, 70%); mp 46.8–47.7 °C. IR (neat): 3021, 2999, 2943, 2913, 2859, 1602, 1494, 1452, 1373, 1186, 1126, 1076, 1031, 778, 754, 738, 702, 639 cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.35–7.13 (m, 10 H), 2.85 (d, J = 13.1 Hz, 1 H), 2.71 (d, J = 13.1 Hz, 1 H), 2.62 (d, J = 12.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.45 (d, J = 12.9 Hz, 1 H), 1.80–1.69 (m, 1 H), 1.44–1.24 (m, 2 H), 1.21 (s, 3 H), 1.01 (s, 3 H), 0.91–0.73 (m, 3 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 140.7 (CqAr), 140.0 (CqAr), 130.8 (2 × CHAr), 130.5 (2 × CHAr), 128.0 (2 × CHAr), 127.7 (2 × CHAr), 126.0 (CHAr), 125.8 (CHAr), 49.7, 48.0, 45.7, 39.7, 36.9, 31.5, 29.5, 25.1, 20.5, 17.3. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C22H27: 291.2107; found: 291.2108.
- 33 André-Joyaux E, Kuzovlev A, Tappin ND. C, Renaud P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 13859
- 34 Hoffmann RW, Ditrich K, Köster G, Stürmer R. Chem. Ber. 1989; 122: 1783
- 35 Matteson DS, Man H.-W. J. Org. Chem. 1993; 58: 6545
- 36 Matteson DS, Man H.-W, Ho OC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996; 118: 4560
- 37 Matteson DS, Sadhu KM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983; 105: 2077
- 38 Matteson DS. Tetrahedron 1998; 54: 10555
- 39 (+)-(1S,5S)-2,2-Dibenzyl-6,6-dimethylbicyclo[3.1.0]hexane [(+)-6]: Transesterification Procedure A 2.5 M solution of BuLi in hexane (0.79 mL, 2.00 mmol) was slowly added to a solution of CH2Cl2 (0.17 mL, 2.70 mmol) in dry THF (15 mL) at –100 °C at such a rate that the internal temperature never exceeded –100 °C. The resulting mixture was then stirred at below –100 °C for 30 min, and then a solution of 10 (940 mg, 1.80 mmol) in dry THF (5 mL) was added. The mixture was stirred at below –100 °C for 15 min before anhyd ZnCl2 (417 mg, 3.00 mmol, 1.70 equiv) was added in one portion, and the resulting mixture was stirred for 14 h at rt. Pentane (5 mL) was added, and the mixture was carefully treated with sat. aq NH4Cl (5 mL) and H2O (5 mL). The phases were separated, and the aqueous phase was extracted with pentane (2 × 10 mL). The combined organic phases were dried (Na2SO4) and filtered. Toluene (5 mL) was added to remove residual THF, and the mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting residue was dissolved in pentane (10 mL), which resulted in a slightly turbid solution. This solution was filtered through a syringe filter and concentrated to give the α-chloroboronic ester intermediate (S)-11. The resulting residue was dissolved in dry TFT (20 mL), and O(Bcat)2 (914 mg, 3.60 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred at 70 °C for 24 h, then cooled to rt and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography (silica gel, pentane) to give (+)-6 as a clear oil, contaminated with olefinic impurities. Product (+)-6 contaminated with olefinic impurities was dissolved 1:5 MeOH–CH2Cl2 (6 mL) and the solution was cooled to –78 °C. Ozone was bubbled through the solution until its color turned light blue. N2 was then bubbled through for 15 min to remove excess ozone. NaBH4 (76 mg, 2.0 mmol) was carefully added at –78 °C, and the mixture was allowed to reach rt and stirred at rt for 3 h. The mixture was then treated with H2O (2 mL) and sat. aq NaHCO3 (2 mL). The phases were separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 × 5 mL). The combined organic phases were washed with sat. aq NH4Cl (5 mL), dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash chromatography [silica gel, pentane] to give a clear oil that crystallized on refrigeration; yield: 209 mg (40%, 77:23 er); mp 41.0–42.1 °C. [α]D 20 +36.76 (c = 1, CH2Cl2). Other physical data were in accordance with those of the racemic compound (±)-6.
- 40 Sadhu KM, Matteson DS, Hurst GD, Kurosky JM. Organometallics 1984; 3: 804
- 41 Imao D, Glasspoole BW, Laberge VS, Crudden CM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 5024
- 42 Larouche-Gauthier R, Elford TG, Aggarwal VK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 16794
- 43 Hawthorne MF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960; 82: 1886
- 44 Brown HC, Rhodes SP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969; 91: 2149
- 45 Brown HC, Rhodes SP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969; 91: 4306
- 46 Goering HL, Trenbeath SL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976; 98: 5016
- 47 Gurskii ME, Potapova TV, Cherkasova KL, Bubnov YN. Russ. Chem. Bull. 1988; 37: 334
- 48 Larouche-Gauthier R, Fletcher CJ, Couto I, Aggarwal VK. Chem. Commun. 2011; 47: 12592
- 49 Hoffmann RW. Chem. Rev. 1989; 89: 1841