Advancements in Graft Placement Techniques

Abstract

For decades, the placement of follicular units (FUs) into incisions in the recipient area was exclusively carried out using forceps. In 1992, Dr. Choi introduced an instrument known as the “implanter,” which had the advantage of simultaneously creating incisions and placing FUs without damaging sensitive parts. Its initial popularity was greater in the East, primarily due to the characteristics of Asian hair. Asian hair is typically straight and thick, with FUs mostly consisting of just one or two hair.

With the description of the follicular unit excision (FUE) technique in 2002 and its widespread adoption nearly a decade later, the advantages of using the implanter also gained popularity in the West. The uniformity in the size of FUs provided by the FUE technique and the possibility of delegating the placement were key attractions in the use of this placement tool. In addition to the traditional Korean implanter with a sharp needle, other implanters and inserters have been described.

The choice of implantation technique depends on individual adaptation and the advantages and disadvantages offered by each instrument. Although forceps allow for safe placement in the hands of well-trained teams, the increased fragility of FUs obtained with the FUE technique has led to the growing acceptance of techniques that employ implanters and inserters.

Keywords

placement - premade sites - implanter - inserter - FUE technique - dull-needled implanters - DNI - sharp-needled implanters

Publication History

Accepted Manuscript online:
25 October 2023

Article published online:
11 December 2023

• References

• 1 Choi YC, Kim JC. Single hair transplantation using the Choi hair transplanter. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1992; 18 (11) 945-948
• 2 Rassman WR, Bernstein RM, McClellan R, Jones R, Worton E, Uyttendaele H. Follicular unit extraction: minimally invasive surgery for hair transplantation. Dermatol Surg 2002; 28 (08) 720-728
• 3 Speranzini M. FUE graft placement with dull needle implanters into premade sites. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2016; 26 (02) 49-56
• 4 Speranzini M. Graft placement using the dull needle implanter (DNI) technique. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2017; 27 (02) 45-56
• 5 Speranzini M, Souza EGS. The spin maneuver. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2021; 31 (06) 218-220
• 6 Erdogan K, Alp B. The “KEEP”: an FUE placing instrument that protects graft integrity and increases hair survival. In: Unger W, Shapiro R. eds. Hair Transplantation. 6th ed. New York: Thieme; 2022. 47B. 306-308
• 7 Devroye JM. A new multi-graft implanter system. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2018; 28 (03) 100-101
• 8 Mohebi P. A novel device to insert FU grafts into premade sites. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2018; 28 (04) 146-148
• 9 Garg S. No-touch to root technique. In: True, Robert H. , et al. eds. Practical Guide to Hair Transplantation. New Delhi, India: Thieme; 2001: 270-272
• 10 Speranzini M. The use of methylene blue to enhance site visualization and definition of areas by number of hairs per graft. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2008; 18 (02) 59
• 11 Rashid MN. Recipient site staining: a powerful tool in follicular unit hair transplantation. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2005; 15 (06) 196
• 12 Cole JP, Wolf BR. Cyberspace chat: to dye or not to dye. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2014; 24 (01) 34-35
• 13 Park JH, Ho YH, Manonukul K. A practical guide to hair graft placement using the sharp implanter method. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2023; 16: 1777-1785
• 14 Knudsen R. Controversies: forceps vs. implanters. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2014; 24: 57
• 15 Lorenzo J, Vila X. Introduction to the use of implanters. Part I. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2011; 4: 121-122
• 16 Lorenzo J, Vila X. Introduction to the use of implanters. Part II. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2011; 5: 170-171
• 17 Bansal A, Sethi P, Kumar A, Sahoo AK, Das P. Use of implanters in premade recipient sites for hair transplantation. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2019; 12 (04) 250-254