Biomechanical Comparison of Uniplanar versus Biplanar Lateral Opening-wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy Techniques in Terms of Risk for Medial Hinge Fracture

Cem Yıldırım; Mehmet Demirel; Mehmet Ekinci; Simge Öztürk; Süreyya Ergün Bozdağ

doi:10.1055/a-2232-4971

The Journal of Knee Surgery, Table of Contents

J Knee Surg 2024; 37(09): 623-630
DOI: 10.1055/a-2232-4971

Original Article

Biomechanical Comparison of Uniplanar versus Biplanar Lateral Opening-wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy Techniques in Terms of Risk for Medial Hinge Fracture

Cem Yıldırım

¹Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

,

Mehmet Demirel

²Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, İstanbul University, Istanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

,

Mehmet Ekinci

³Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

,

Simge Öztürk

⁴Mechanical Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

,

Süreyya Ergün Bozdağ

⁴Mechanical Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

The effect of osteotomy type on the initial stiffness of the bone-implant construct in lateral opening-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO) using a uniplanar compared with a biplanar technique has been investigated. However, no study has explored the biomechanical risk factors for medial hinge fracture. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical strength of uniplanar versus biplanar LOWDFO regarding the risk for medial hinge fracture during gap opening. Twelve composite femora were divided into two groups (six in each group) based on the distal femoral osteotomy technique: uniplanar versus biplanar LOWDFO. All LOWDFO models were subjected to incremental static loading. The gap distance was expanded by 1 mm, and displacement values were recorded as anterior and posterior gap distances (mm). The average force values of all samples at certain gap distances were recorded, and the head distance was measured. The uniplanar group had higher load values than the biplanar group at all anterior gap distances. These differences were only significant at 2- and 3-mm gap distances (p = 0.025 and 0.037). At all posterior gap distances, the uniplanar group had higher load values than the biplanar group, but these differences only reached statistical significance at 2 mm (p = 0.037). Both groups had similar anterior, posterior, and average gap distances (p = 0.75, 0.522, 0.873). The uniplanar group had a higher head insertion distance (15.3 ± 5.7) than the biplanar group (14.7 ± 2.9), but it was not significant (p = 0.87). The uniplanar group had a lower average load before medial hinge fracture (46.41 ± 13.91 N) than the biplanar group (54.92 ± 31.94, p = 0.81). The biplanar group had an average maximum load value of 64.18 ± 25.6 N, while the uniplanar group had 57.90 ± 12.21 N (p = 0.81). This study revealed that the biplanar osteotomy technique allows a wider opening wedge gap with less risk of a medial hinge fracture than uniplanar LOWDFO.

Level of evidence was level 3, case–control series.

Keywords

lateral opening-wedge osteotomy - uniplanar osteotomy - biplanar osteotomy - medial hinge fracture

Full Text

References

References
1 Rosso F, Margheritini F. Distal femoral osteotomy. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2014; 7 (04) 302-311
2 Pilone C, Rosso F, Cottino U, Rossi R, Bonasia DE. Lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy for lateral compartment arthrosis/overload. Clin Sports Med 2019; 38 (03) 351-359
3 Bonasia DE, Dettoni F, Sito G. et al. Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment overload/arthritis in the varus knee: prognostic factors. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (03) 690-698
4 Wylie JD, Jones DL, Hartley MK. et al. Distal femoral osteotomy for the valgus knee: medial closing wedge versus lateral opening wedge: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (10) 2141-2147
5 Pietsch M, Hochegger M, Winkler M, Sandriesser S, Freude T, Augat P. Opening-wedge osteotomies of the distal femur: minor advantages for a biplanar compared to a uniplanar technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (07) 2375-2384
6 Cameron JI, McCauley JC, Kermanshahi AY, Bugbee WD. Lateral opening-wedge distal femoral osteotomy: pain relief, functional improvement, and survivorship at 5 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (06) 2009-2015
7 van Heerwaarden R, Najfeld M, Brinkman M, Seil R, Madry H, Pape D. Wedge volume and osteotomy surface depend on surgical technique for distal femoral osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (01) 206-212
8 Türkmen F, Kaçıra BK, Özkaya M. et al. Comparison of monoplanar versus biplanar medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy techniques for preventing lateral cortex fracture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (09) 2914-2920
9 Rho J-Y, Tsui TY, Pharr GM. Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation. Biomaterials 1997; 18 (20) 1325-1330
10 Agneskirchner JD, Freiling D, Hurschler C, Lobenhoffer P. Primary stability of four different implants for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (03) 291-300
11 Liska F, Voss A, Imhoff FB, Willinger L, Imhoff AB. Nonunion and delayed union in lateral open wedge distal femoral osteotomies-a legitimate concern?. Int Orthop 2018; 42 (01) 9-15
12 Winkler PW, Rupp MC, Lutz PM. et al. A hinge position distal to the adductor tubercle minimizes the risk of hinge fractures in lateral open wedge distal femoral osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29 (10) 3382-3391
13 Jacobi M, Wahl P, Bouaicha S, Jakob RP, Gautier E. Distal femoral varus osteotomy: problems associated with the lateral open-wedge technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131 (06) 725-728
14 Saithna A, Kundra R, Getgood A, Spalding T. Opening wedge distal femoral varus osteotomy for lateral compartment osteoarthritis in the valgus knee. Knee 2014; 21 (01) 172-175
15 Ekeland A, Nerhus TK, Dimmen S, Heir S. Good functional results of distal femoral opening-wedge osteotomy of knees with lateral osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (05) 1702-1709
16 Rupp MC, Winkler PW, Lutz PM. et al. Dislocated hinge fractures are associated with malunion after lateral closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30 (03) 982-992
17 Edgerton BC, Mariani EM, Morrey BF. Distal femoral varus osteotomy for painful genu valgum. A five-to-11-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (288) 263-269
18 Duerr RA, Harangody S, Magnussen RA, Kaeding CC, Flanigan DC. Technique for Biplanar lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy in the valgus knee. Arthrosc Tech 2020; 9 (09) e1323-e1333
19 Mitchell JJ, Dean CS, Chahla J, Moatshe G, Cram TR, LaPrade RF. Varus-producing lateral distal femoral opening-wedge osteotomy. Arthrosc Tech 2016; 5 (04) e799-e807
20 O'Malley MP, Pareek A, Reardon PJ, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ. Distal femoral osteotomy: lateral opening wedge technique. Arthrosc Tech 2016; 5 (04) e725-e730
21 Takeuchi R, Ishikawa H, Kumagai K. et al. Fractures around the lateral cortical hinge after a medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a new classification of lateral hinge fracture. Arthroscopy 2012; 28 (01) 85-94