Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2235-5381
Establishing Safe Surgical Parameters for Placement of C2 Pedicle Screws: A Retrospective Study
Funding None.
Abstract
Background The study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transpedicular instrumentation for the C2 vertebra and to establish the precise anatomical parameters and boundaries within which this procedure can be safely and effectively performed.
Methods This retrospective study analyzed 66 patients who underwent C2 transpedicular screw fixation. Preoperative and postoperative axial, sagittal, and coronal computed tomography (CT) scans were examined. Anatomical measurements were taken to determine the horizontal and vertical distances from the C2 pedicle projection to the vertebral foramen using CT images. Based on the anatomical location of the vertebral artery within the C2 vertebral foramen, the patients were divided into four subgroups using the horizontal pedicle width (HPW) and vertical pedicle width (VPW) of the C2 spine.
Results The average age of the patients included in the study was 46.48 years. The patient population comprised 32 (48.5%) males and 34 (51.5%) females. Based on the anatomical measurements, the distribution of C2 vertebra types was as follows: type 1 accounted for 68.9%, type 2 for 3.8%, type 3 for 16.7%, and type 4 for 10.6%. Significantly narrower pedicle widths were observed in types 2 and 4 compared to other vertebra types. Type 2 had the largest medial angle (MA), while type 4 had the narrowest MA. In terms of the sagittal plane, type 4 exhibited the widest MA and type 3 had the narrowest MA, but these differences were not statistically significant. Among the cases, 12 (18.1%) involved the vertebral foramen, with 1 case (8.3%) showing screw-related vertebral artery injury (0.75% of all screws). No vertebral artery injuries were observed with the other transpedicular screws.
Conclusion Preoperative anatomical measurements for patients undergoing transpedicular instrumentation on the C2 vertebra should include planning CT images on three planes: axial, sagittal, and coronal.
Publication History
Received: 09 June 2023
Accepted: 20 December 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
27 December 2023
Article published online:
29 March 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AMR. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Google Kitaplar. Accessed March 5, 2023 at: https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=9CvvDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=moore+clinically+oriented+anatomy&ots=96naoFjhGI&sig=T9e2PFzvKjzU0oFnWig8ndE86BI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=moore%20clinically%20oriented%20anatomy&f=false
- 2 Oxland TR. Fundamental biomechanics of the spine: what we have learned in the past 25 years and future directions. J Biomech 2016; 49 (06) 817-832
- 3 Wang J, Xia H, Ying Q. et al. An anatomic consideration of C2 vertebrae artery groove variation for individual screw implantation in axis. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 (07) 1547-1552
- 4 Wajanavisit W, Lertudomphonwanit T, Fuangfa P, Chanplakorn P, Kraiwattanapong C, Jaovisidha S. Prevalence of high-riding vertebral artery and morphometry of C2 pedicles using a novel computed tomography reconstruction technique. Asian Spine J 2016; 10 (06) 1141-1148
- 5 Lee SH, Park DH, Kim SD, Huh DS, Kim KT. Analysis of 3-dimensional course of the intra-axial vertebral artery for C2 pedicle screw trajectory: a computed tomographic study. Spine 2014; 39 (17) E1010-E1014
- 6 Lunardini DJ, Eskander MS, Even JL. et al. Vertebral artery injuries in cervical spine surgery. Spine J 2014; 14 (08) 1520-1525
- 7 Eskander MS, Drew JM, Aubin ME. et al. Vertebral artery anatomy: a review of two hundred fifty magnetic resonance imaging scans. Spine 2010; 35 (23) 2035-2040
- 8 Kazan S, Yildirim F, Sindel M, Tuncer R. Anatomical evaluation of the groove for the vertebral artery in the axis vertebrae for atlanto-axial transarticular screw fixation technique. Clin Anat 2000; 13 (04) 237-243
- 9 Sim HB, Lee JW, Park JT, Mindea SA, Lim J, Park J. Biomechanical evaluations of various c1-c2 posterior fixation techniques. Spine 2011; 36 (06) E401-E407
- 10 Igarashi T, Kikuchi S, Sato K, Kayama S, Otani K. Anatomic study of the axis for surgical planning of transarticular screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (408) 162-166