PDF herunterladen
J Am Acad Audiol 2024; 35(07/08): 165-171
DOI: 10.1055/a-2250-3096
Research Article

Electrode Montage for Bilateral Cervical Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing

Jessie N. Patterson
1   Department of Audiology, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska
,
Nour El Hidek
2   Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska
3   Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
,
Kristen L. Janky
1   Department of Audiology, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska
› Institutsangaben Funding This work was funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. 1K23DC019950.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) are predominantly ipsilateral, myogenic responses originating from saccular activation. Some individuals have contralateral-crossed cVEMP responses with monaural air-conducted stimulation (ACS) which can contaminate cVEMP responses with bilateral stimulation. While the origin of the contralateral-crossed response is under debate, its presence has implications for cVEMP testing with midline bone conduction vibration (BCV).

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the origin of the contralateral-crossed cVEMP response. It was hypothesized that the crossed response is due to electrode contamination and would disappear with a modified electrode montage.

Research Design This is a cross-sectional research study.

Study Sample Fifteen healthy participants (30 ears; mean age: 27.4 19–39; 10 females).

Data Collection and Analysis Participants completed cVEMP testing using three stimulation methods (monoaural ACS, binaural ACS, and midline BCV) and two electrode montages (sternum reference and Fp reference).

Results In the monoaural ACS with sternum reference condition, 53.3% ears had contralateral-crossed cVEMP responses that were in-phase with the ipsilateral response for all but three ears. Whereas in the monoaural ACS with Fp reference condition, 3% had a contralateral-crossed cVEMP response. ACS and BCV cVEMP corrected amplitudes were significantly larger in the sternum reference conditions, which is attributed to artificial enhancement from the in-phase contralateral-crossed responses.

Conclusions The significant reduction of contralateral-crossed responses in the Fp reference condition suggests that the contralateral-crossed cVEMP response is due to reference electrode contamination and may be a more appropriate reference placement when completing cVEMPs with midline BCV.

Keywords

cVEMP - bone conduction - binaural - electrode montage


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 01. August 2023

Angenommen: 16. Januar 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
19. Januar 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
19. Dezember 2024

© 2024. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Colebatch JG, Halmagyi GM. Vestibular evoked potentials in human neck muscles before and after unilateral vestibular deafferentation. Neurology 1992; 42 (08) 1635-1636
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Colebatch JG, Halmagyi GM, Skuse NF. Myogenic potentials generated by a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57 (02) 190-197
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Bath AP, Harris N, McEwan J, Yardley MP. Effect of conductive hearing loss on the vestibulo-collic reflex. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1999; 24 (03) 181-183
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Halmagyi GM, Colebatch JG, Curthoys IS. New tests of vestibular function. Baillieres Clin Neurol 1994; 3 (03) 485-500
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Merchant GR, Schulz KM, Patterson JN, Fitzpatrick D, Janky KL. Effect of cochlear implantation on vestibular evoked myogenic potentials and wideband acoustic immittance. Ear Hear 2020; 41 (05) 1111-1124
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Martens S, Dhooge I, Dhondt C. et al. Pediatric vestibular assessment: clinical framework. Ear Hear 2023; 44 (02) 423-436
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Fröhlich L, Wilke M, Plontke SK, Rahne T. Bone conducted vibration is an effective stimulus for otolith testing in cochlear implant patients. J Vestib Res 2022; 32 (04) 355-365
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Banakis Hartl RM, Mattingly JK, Greene NT, Jenkins HA, Cass SP, Tollin DJ. A Preliminary investigation of the air-bone gap: changes in intracochlear sound pressure with air- and bone-conducted stimuli after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37 (09) 1291-1299
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Chole RA, Hullar TE, Potts LG. Conductive component after cochlear implantation in patients with residual hearing conservation. Am J Audiol 2014; 23 (04) 359-364
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Greene NT, Mattingly JK, Jenkins HA, Tollin DJ, Easter JR, Cass SP. Cochlear implant electrode effect on sound energy transfer within the cochlea during acoustic stimulation. Otol Neurotol 2015; 36 (09) 1554-1561
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Mattingly JK, Uhler KM, Cass SP. Air-bone gaps contribute to functional hearing preservation in cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37 (09) 1255-1262
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Choi CH, Oghalai JS. Predicting the effect of post-implant cochlear fibrosis on residual hearing. Hear Res 2005; 205 (1-2): 193-200
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Fayad JN, Makarem AO, Linthicum Jr FH. Histopathologic assessment of fibrosis and new bone formation in implanted human temporal bones using 3D reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 141 (02) 247-252
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Li PMMC, Somdas MA, Eddington DK, Nadol Jr JB. Analysis of intracochlear new bone and fibrous tissue formation in human subjects with cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2007; 116 (10) 731-738
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Tien HC, Linthicum Jr FH. Histopathologic changes in the vestibule after cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 127 (04) 260-264
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Portnuff CDF, Kleindienst S, Bogle JM. Safe use of acoustic vestibular-evoked myogenic potential stimuli: protocol and patient-specific considerations. J Am Acad Audiol 2017; 28 (08) 708-717
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Rodriguez AI, Thomas MLA, Fitzpatrick D, Janky KL. Effects of high sound exposure during air-conducted vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing in children and young adults. Ear Hear 2018; 39 (02) 269-277
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Thomas MLA, Fitzpatrick D, McCreery R, Janky KL. Big stimulus, little ears: safety in administering vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in children. J Am Acad Audiol 2017; 28 (05) 395-403
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Rosengren SM, Colebatch JG, Young AS, Govender S, Welgampola MS. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in practice: methods, pitfalls and clinical applications. Clin Neurophysiol Pract 2019; 4: 47-68
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Taylor RL, Winton RW, Rosengren SM, Argaet EC, Welgampola MS. Evidence of a vestibular origin for crossed-sternocleidomastoid muscle responses to air-conducted sound. Ear Hear 2020; 41 (04) 896-906
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Brantberg K, Tribukait A, Fransson PA. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in response to skull taps for patients with vestibular neuritis. J Vestib Res 2003; 13 (2–3): 121-130
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Wang SJ, Young YH. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials using simultaneous binaural acoustic stimulation. Hear Res 2003; 185 (1–2): 43-48
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Li MW, Houlden D, Tomlinson RD. Click evoked EMG responses in sternocleidomastoid muscles: characteristics in normal subjects. J Vestib Res 1999; 9 (05) 327-334
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Rosengren SM, Colebatch JG, Borire A, Straumann D, Weber KP. cVEMP morphology changes with recording electrode position, but single motor unit activity remains constant. J Appl Physiol 2016; 120 (08) 833-842
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Oh SY, Shin HJ, Boegle R. et al. Simultaneous recording of cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials. Neurology 2018; 90 (03) e230-e238
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Greenwalt NL, Patterson JN, Rodriguez AI, Fitzpatrick D, Gordon KR, Janky KL. Bone conduction vibration vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) testing: reliability in children, adolescents, and young adults. Ear Hear 2021; 42 (02) 355-363
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Iwasaki S, Smulders YE, Burgess AM. et al. Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials to bone conducted vibration of the midline forehead at Fz in healthy subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119 (09) 2135-2147
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Chou CH, Hsu WC, Young YH. Ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials via bone-conducted vibration in children. Clin Neurophysiol 2012; 123 (09) 1880-1885
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Govender S, Cheng PY, Dennis DL, Colebatch JG. Electrode montage and gaze effects on ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs). Clin Neurophysiol 2016; 127 (08) 2846-2854
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Nguyen KD, Welgampola MS, Carey JP. Test-retest reliability and age-related characteristics of the ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential tests. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31 (05) 793-802
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Papathanasiou ES, Murofushi T, Akin FW, Colebatch JG. International guidelines for the clinical application of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: an expert consensus report. Clin Neurophysiol 2014; 125 (04) 658-666
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Kushiro K, Zakir M, Ogawa Y, Sato H, Uchino Y. Saccular and utricular inputs to sternocleidomastoid motoneurons of decerebrate cats. Exp Brain Res 1999; 126 (03) 410-416
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 British Society of Audiology. Recommended procedure for tympanometry. Br J Audiol 1992; 26 (04) 255-257
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 ASHA Panel on Audiologic Assessment. Guidelines for Audiologic Screening. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 1997:GL1997–00199
    Crossref
  • 35 Shahnaz N, David EA. Normal values for cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials using EMG scaling: effect of body position and electrode montage. Acta Otolaryngol 2021; 141 (05) 440-448
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 McCaslin DL, Fowler A, Jacobson GP. Amplitude normalization reduces cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) amplitude asymmetries in normal subjects: proof of concept. J Am Acad Audiol 2014; 25 (03) 268-277
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Fuemmeler E, Rodriguez AI, Thomas M, Creutz T, Fitzpatrick D, Janky KL. Vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) test-retest reliability in children. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41 (08) e1052-e1059
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Ertl M, Kirsch V, Gerb J, Boegle R, Krafczyk S, Dieterich M. Appraisal of the signal-to-noise-ratio of uni- and bipolar recordings of ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. J Vestib Res 2015; 25 (01) 9-14
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Smith KJ, McCaslin DL, Jacobson GP, Burkard R. The effect of recording montage and tone burst duration on cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential latency and amplitude. Am J Audiol 2019; 28 (02) 300-307
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Ward BK, van de Berg R, van Rompaey V. et al. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome: Diagnostic criteria consensus document of the committee for the classification of vestibular disorders of the Bárány Society. J Vestib Res 2021; 31 (03) 131-141
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar