Keywords carbohydrate - metabolism - endurance training - heat acclimation - lipid - endurance
athlete
Introduction
Relative to exercise completed in temperate conditions (18–21°C), environmental heat
stress (>30°C) increases core temperature [1 ],
heart rate [1 ]
[2 ],
circulating catecholamines [3 ], peripheral blood
flow, sweat rate, and dehydration [4 ]. Concomitant to
cardiovascular and thermoregulatory alterations, substrate metabolism shifts toward
increased carbohydrate utilization and decreased lipid oxidation [5 ]. This increased physiological strain induced by
heat stress during endurance exercise impairs exercise capacity and performance
[6 ], warranting strategies to offset the impact
of heat stress, including; heat acclimation/acclimatization protocols and specific
nutritional considerations to ensure substrate availability, hydration and
performance [7 ].
Increasingly, international sporting events (e. g. Tokyo Olympic Games and Doha World
Athletics Championships) are hosted in cities with ambient temperatures sufficiently
high to impair endurance performance (>12–13°C for Marathon Running) [8 ]. To counteract the effects of elevated ambient
temperatures, athletes undergo “heat stress camps” to induce a heat-acclimated
phenotype, leading to improved exercise capacity in hot conditions [9 ]. Heat acclimation aside, endurance training in
elevated ambient temperatures may augment physiological stress and optimize
metabolic adaptations [10 ]. This hypothesis is, in
part, based on the notion that post-exercise adaptations are induced via metabolic
demand, substrate depletion and potentially direct heat stress during endurance
training, all amplified by environmental heat stress. This review will provide a
brief overview of the metabolic impact of heat stress during endurance exercise and,
against this backdrop, discuss the impact of heat-induced metabolic alterations on
post-exercise molecular adaptation.
Effects of acute heat stress on substrate metabolism
Effects of acute heat stress on substrate metabolism
Extensive research exists regarding the effect of heat stress on substrate metabolism
during prolonged exercise ([Table 1), and it ] has
been reviewed elsewhere [5 ]. During submaximal
exercise performed in elevated ambient temperature, the respiratory exchange ratio
(RER) typically increases compared to thermoneutral conditions [3 ]
[11 ]
[12 ]
[13 ]
[14 ]
[15 ], indicating a
shift toward increased carbohydrate oxidation and decreased lipid oxidation.
Reported increases in carbohydrate utilization during heat stress and exercise
implemented fixed external workloads within a narrow range of relative exercise
intensities between environmental conditions, typically 50–75% of maximal aerobic
capacity (VO2max ) [11 ]
[16 ]
[17 ]
[18 ]
[19 ]
[20 ]
[21 ]
[22 ], power (Wmax ) [23 ]
[24 ]
[25 ]
and speed (Vmax ) [26 ]. Furthermore, when
exercise intensity or ambient temperature is too low, several studies failed to
alter substrate utilization in response to heat stress [21 ]
[27 ]
[28 ]
[29 ].
Table 1 Overview of the methodological details and outcomes of
studies investigating the effect of heat stress on prolonged exercise
substrate metabolism.
Reference
Participants
Protocol
Metabolic effect (compared to temperate condition)
Thermoregulatory effects (compared to temperate)
Bennett et al.
[41 ]
24 endurance trained males (˙VO2max ,
62.3±6.6 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ), 2 hr post
absorptive following controlled pre-trial meal.
30-min capacity test consisting of 6×4 min 50 s steady state
interspersed with 10 s sprints.
↑ Blood Glucose↑ Blood Lactate↑ Blood Alanine
↑ T
rec
(~ 0.5°C)
Charoensap et al.
[34 ]
10 endurance trained males (˙VO2max ,
58.1±6.8 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 , first
ventilatory threshold [VT1 ], 204±46 W), overnight
fast
90-min cycling at 95% of HR associated with VT1 in
18°C and 33°C
↔︎ Mean HR↓ Energy Expenditure↓ CHO Oxidation ↔ Fat Oxidation↔︎
Adrenaline↔︎ Noradrenaline↔︎ HSP70
↔︎ T
rec
↑ Estimated
T
mus
(~0.7°C)
Dolny and Lemon, [16 ]
8 healthy males, (˙VO2max ,
55±8 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ), 4 hr post
absorptive
90-min cycle at 65% ˙VO2max in 5, 20, 30°C
↑ RER ↑ CHO oxidation (~ 6.4%)↑ Blood Lactate↑ Serum adrenaline:
noradrenaline↔︎ NEFA
↑ T
rec
(~ 0.25°C)
Febbraio et al.
[14 ]
7 endurance trained males, (˙VO2max ,
65±13 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ), overnight fast
40-min cycle at 70% ˙VO2max in 20 & 40°C
↑ RER ↓ ˙VO2 ↑ CHO oxidation (~16.3%) ↑ net muscle
glycogenolysis↑ Blood and Muscle Lactate↑ Blood Glucose↑ Plasma
adrenaline
↑ T
rec
(~ 1°C)↑
T
mus
(~ 1.3°C)
Febbraio et al.
[11 ]
12 endurance trained males, (˙VO2max ,
65±7 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ), overnight
fast
40-min cycle at 70% ˙VO2max in 20 & 40°C
↑ RER ↔︎ ˙VO2 ↑ Net muscle glycogenolysis ↑ Net muscle
CrP degradation ↑ Net muscle Cr accumulation ↑ Blood and Muscle
Lactate↑ Blood Glucose ↔︎ Muscular ATP, ADP, AMP, IMP↑ Muscular
NH3
↑ T
rec
(~ 1°C)↑
T
mus
(~ 1.7°C)
Fernandez-Elias et al.
[18 ]
7 endurance trained males, (˙VO2max ,
55±3 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ), controlled
pre-trial diet
Dehydrating exercise in heat, 4-hr rehydration, 40-min cycle at
75% ˙VO2max in 25, 36°C
↑ CHO oxidation ↑ Net muscle glycogenolysis ↑ Blood Lactate
↑ T
rec
(~ 0.7°C)
Fink, Costill & Van Handel[39 ]
6 physically active men
3×15-min cycling at 70 to 85% VO2max interspersed by
10 min (biopsies were collected) at 9 vs 41°C
↑ Net muscle glycogenolysis ↓ IMTG Utilization ↑ Blood Lactate↑
Blood Glucose↓ Blood Triglycerides
↑ T
rec
(~ 2°C)
Galloway and Maughan [19 ]
8 active males, (˙VO2max ,
~56±7 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ), overnight
fast
Cycle TTE at 75% ˙VO2max in 4, 11, 21, 31°C
↔︎ CHO Oxidation↔︎ Blood Lactate↔︎ Blood Glucose↔︎ Glycerol↔︎
NEFA
↑ T
rec
(~ 0.3–0.5°C)
Hargreaves et al.
[18 ]
6 endurance trained males, (˙˙VO2max ,
~64 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ), overnight fast
40-min cycle at 65% ˙VO2max in 20 & 40°C
↑ RER ↑ CHO Oxidation (~19.8%)↔︎ ˙VO2 ↑ Muscle
glycogenolysis oxidation (~16.8%)↑ Hepatic Glucose Production ↑
Plasma Glucose & Lactate↑ Plasma Adrenaline: noradrenaline ↑
Plasma Cortisol↑ Plasma Glucagon↑ Plasma GH
↑ T
rec
(~ 0.9°C)
Hettinga et al.
[23 ]
6 well-trained males, (˙VO2max ,
~66 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ), 2 hr fast
20-min cycle at 60% MAP in 15.5 & 35.5°C
↔︎ RER↑ ˙VO2 ↓ Gross Efficiency↑ Blood Lactate
↑ T
rec
(~ 0.3°C)
Jentjens et al.
[38 ]
9 endurance trained males, (˙VO2max ,
65±3 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ), overnight
fast
90-min cycle at 55% Wmax in 16 & 35°C with
~1.5 g·min-1 CHO ingestion
(Data from between 60–90 min of exercise)↔︎ RER↔︎
˙VO2 ↔︎ Total CHO Oxidation↑ Exogenous CHO Oxidation↔︎
Fat Oxidation↑ Muscle Glycogenolysis↑ Plasma Lactate↔︎ Plasma
Glucose↔︎ Insulin↔︎ NEFA
↑ T
rec
(~ 0.8°C)
Marino et al.
[26 ]
9 endurance trained males, (˙VO2max ,
66±4 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ), nutritional
status unknown
30-min run at 70% PTRS in 15 & 35°C
↑ RER ↔︎ ˙VO2 ↑ CHO Oxidation ↔︎ Plasma Lactate
↑ T
rec
(~0.6°C)
Maunder et al.
[35 ]
Part A: 9 endurance trained males (˙VO2max ,
57±5 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ), overnight fast
Part B: 11 Endurance Trained Males (˙VO2max ,
57±5 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ), 4 hr fast
Part A: 60-min cycling at absolute power output at VT1
in 18 & 35°C. Part B: 20-min cycling at absolute power
output at VT1 in 18, 28, 34 & 40°C
Part A:↑ CHO Oxidation at high intensity only↓ Fat Oxidation at
high intensity only↑ Plasma Lactate↔︎ Plasma GlucosePart B:↑
Plasma Adrenaline↑ CHO Oxidation at high and moderate intensity↓
Fat Oxidation at high intensity
Part A:↑ T
rec
(data not reported)↑
T
mus
(data not reported)Part B:↑
T
rec
(~ 0.2 and 0.3°C at moderate
and high intensity respectively)↑
T
mus
Nielsen et al.
[29 ]
7 healthy males, (˙VO2max ,
~54 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ), overnight fast
30-min incline walk in 18°C followed immediately by 60-min
incline walk in 40°C
↑ ˙VO2 ↔︎ Arterial & Venous Lactate↔︎ Plasma
Glucose↔︎ Plasma FFA↔︎ Muscle Glycogenolysis
↑ T
es
(~1.1°C)↑
T
sk
(~4.8°C)
Parkin et al.
[13 ]
8 endurance trained males, (˙VO2max ,
55±8 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ), overnight
fast
Cycle TTE at 70% ˙VO2max in 3, 20, 40°C
↔︎ RER ↔︎ ˙VO2 ↑ Net Muscle Glycogenolysis↑ Plasma
Adrenaline↔︎ Noradrenaline
↑ T
rec
(~0.5°C)
Yaspelkis et al.
[22 ]
9 endurances trained, heat acclimatized males,
(˙VO2max ,
69±1 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ), overnight
fast
60-min cycle at ~74% ˙VO2max in 24 & 34°C
↔︎ RER ↔︎ ˙VO2 ↔︎ CHO Oxidation↔︎ Net muscle
glycogenolysis↑ Plasma Glucose &Lactate↔︎ Glycerol↔︎
NEFA
↑ T
rec
(~0.4°C)
Young et al.
[15 ]
13 untrained males, (˙VO2max ,
45±5 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ), 4 hr post liquid
meal
30-min cycle at 70% ˙VO2max in 21 & 49°C
↑ RER↓ ˙VO2 ↑ CHO Oxidation (~3.8%)↔︎ Net muscle
glycogenolysis↑ Plasma and Muscle Lactate
↑ T
rec
(~0.7°C)
Esophageal temperature (Tes ), Muscle temperature
(Tmus ), Rectal temperature (Trec ), Skin temperature
(Tsk ).
While there is a foundational understanding of the role of heat stress on exercise
metabolism, matched external workload designs lack ecological validity and
translational applicability as endurance athletes typically reduce their absolute
workload when training in hot conditions [30 ]
[31 ]
[32 ]
[33 ]
[34 ]. Furthermore,
these approaches do not permit the identification of exercise intensity or
temperature (either core or ambient) thresholds likely to impact metabolism.
Recently, Maunder et al. [35 ] investigated the
relationship between exercise intensity, environmental heat stress, and carbohydrate
oxidation during endurance cycling exercise. At lower exercise intensities (~68%
VO2max ), higher ambient temperatures (40°C: 2.64±0.77 g·min-1) were
required to stimulate carbohydrate oxidation rates compared to temperate conditions
(18°C: 2.25±0.65 g·min-1 ). Conversely, exercise at a higher relative
intensity (~81% VO2max ) led to increases (+10.7%) in carbohydrate
oxidation at lower environmental temperature (34°C: 3.74±0.74 g·min-1 )
compared to temperate conditions (18°C: 3.38±0.40 g·min-1 ). These
findings underscore the limited insight into the impact of heat stress on substrate
utilization during exercise using matched workload designs. Additionally, this
highlights the need to adjust carbohydrate intake during endurance events in hot
conditions, with particular attention to events or stages of a grand tour
characterized by high-intensity periods (time trial and mountain stages of a grand
tour) relative to cooler days or flatter stages of the race [36 ].
When exercise intensity was heart rate-matched (95% of HR associated with
VT1 ) between environmental conditions (18 vs. 33°C), Charoensap et
al. [34 ] reported reduced power output (−17%) in hot
conditions and a subsequent reduction in total energy expenditure during exercise
compared to temperate conditions (-14%). Notably, fat oxidation rates were similar
between environmental conditions, with a reduction in carbohydrate oxidation
accounting for reduced energy expenditure in hot conditions. Moreover, a reduction
in absolute power output attenuated any rise in core temperature, a critical factor
in stimulating carbohydrate oxidation during heat-stressed exercise. Critically,
following heat acclimation, athletes increase power output for a given heart rate
under heat stress [37 ]
[38 ], which requires greater rates of ATP synthesis, and by extension,
carbohydrate oxidation, meaning the differences observed within the present study
may not be consistent following a period of acclimation. While data from Maunder et
al. [35 ] and Charoensap et al. [37 ] appear to represent a paradigm shift in
understanding how substrate utilization is changed during exercise under heat
stress, it is important to consider that while external workloads can be reduced
during training or self-paced races (e. g. time trials), this is unlikely during
race situations where intensity is dictated by other competitors.
The impact of heat stress during exercise on amino acid metabolism and protein
turnover is yet to be directly investigated. However, indirect measures of protein
breakdown, including urinary ammonia (NH3 ) are elevated following
heat-stressed exercise in both trained [11 ] and
untrained individuals [39 ] supporting the notion that
protein breakdown is increased during exercise in elevated ambient temperatures.
Mechanistically, NH3 is produced during deamination of adenosine
5′-monophosphate (AMP) to form NH3 and inosine 5′-monophosphate (IMP) or
from the oxidation of branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) within skeletal muscle [40 ]. Increased NH3 accumulation without
increased IMP indicates protein breakdown during exercise under heat stress [11 ], and while the relative contribution of liberated
amino acids to energy production pathways during exercise is likely negligible, the
impact on post-exercise recovery and skeletal muscle proteostasis is yet to be
resolved. Recent work from our group characterized the metabolomic impact of maximal
exercise under environmental heat stress using an ecologically valid self-paced
exercise model [41 ]. Despite power output being
significantly reduced during exercise in the heat, core temperature increased by
~1.5°C, resulting in significantly altered post-exercise serum metabolomes,
including increased glycolytic metabolites (glucose, lactate and glucarate) and
amino acids (alanine, glutamate and isoleucine). Increased circulating
concentrations of alanine coupled with glucose and lactate are representative of the
multi-tissue alanine cycle, whereby liberated alanine (from skeletal muscle) is
transported via the bloodstream to the liver for gluconeogenesis [42 ]. Additionally, decreased glutamate and isoleucine
may indicate the use of amino acids as tricarboxylic acid cycle precursors to
sustain energy metabolism during high rates of glycolytic flux. It has been proposed
that pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) flux is increased during exercise and heat stress
[5 ] to support increased rates of carbohydrate
oxidation. While this remains to be investigated, the alterations in glucogenic
amino acids reported in our previous work highlight the often-overlooked role of
amino acid metabolism in substrate provision and may indicate increased amino acid
metabolism during exercise and heat stress ([Fig.
1 ]). The implementation of ecologically valid study designs, characterization
of whole-body metabolism, and harnessing of -omics approaches, permitting a greater
understanding of the molecular response to exercise and heat stress, are required
to
facilitate a step-change in sports nutrition guidelines. For instance, if amino acid
metabolism or protein breakdown is increased during exercise in hot conditions, it
may be appropriate to increase protein intake immediately following heat-stressed
exercise. For further reading on the application and utility of omics in exercise
physiology research, see [43 ]
[44 ]
[45 ].
Fig. 1 Overview of the alanine cycle encompassing liver and muscle
metabolism. Alanine is liberated from proteins during proteolysis within
skeletal muscle, which enters the bloodstream and is transported to the
liver. Once in the liver, glutamate-pyruvate aminotransferase (ALT) converts
alanine to pyruvate, which is then converted to glucose through
gluconeogenesis, a process augmented under heat stress. Increased
circulating alanine and urea may be hallmarks of protein breakdown during
exercise and heat stress. Created with Biorender.com [rerif].
Regulation of substrate utilization during exercise under heat stress
Multiple proposed mechanisms exist to explain the shift in substrate utilization,
characterized by an increase in carbohydrate oxidation in response to heat
stress during exercise. These include increased circulating adrenaline [21 ]
[35 ]
[46 ], the direct effect of temperature on
enzyme-controlled reactions (Q10 Effect) [47 ], altered skeletal muscle fiber recruitment [27 ]
[48 ], altered
blood flow and reduced oxygen supply to muscles [49 ]. While each is a plausible mechanism and likely impacts substrate
utilization, their relative contribution is difficult to quantify
experimentally; nevertheless, each will be discussed here.
Hormonal regulation of substrate utilization – adrenaline
Circulating adrenaline is elevated during exercise [50 ] and is further augmented under heat stress [3 ]
[12 ]
[13 ]
[20 ]
[29 ]
[51 ]
[52 ]
[53 ]
[54 ]. Mechanistically, glycogen phosphorylase
activity is increased by β-adrenergic receptor stimulation [55 ], leading to increased muscle glycogenolysis
[3 ]
[12 ]
[51 ]
[56 ]. One study
reported no difference in muscle glycogenolysis, which is explained by
experimental design [29 ]. Participants completed
30 minutes of exercise in cool conditions (18–20°C) before 60 minutes of
exercise in hot conditions (40°C); as such, this study lacked sufficient
counterbalancing between environmental conditions, rendering the resultant data
difficult to interpret. Supporting the mechanistic role of adrenaline augmenting
muscle glycogenolysis, trained men infused with adrenaline during exercise at
70% ˙VO2max increased muscle glycogen utilization and lactate
accumulation [57 ] despite no change in muscle
nucleotide concentrations between environmental conditions (20 vs. 40°C) [11 ]. Moreover, increased RER during exercise in
hot conditions is ubiquitous compared to thermoneutral conditions [3 ]
[11 ]
[16 ]
[20 ]
[27 ], consistent with metabolic responses observed
during exercise with adrenaline infusion [57 ]
[58 ].
While investigating the relationship between exercise intensity, heat stress, and
substrate utilization, Maunder et al. [34 ]
[35 ] provided supporting evidence of the role of
adrenaline in inducing carbohydrate oxidation during heat-stressed exercise.
Changes in carbohydrate oxidation tended to correlate with circulating
adrenaline at moderate (r= 0.35, P =0.07) and high (r= 0.60,
P= 0.001) exercise intensities underpinned by changes in core and
muscle temperatures [35 ]. Additionally, when
rises in core temperature were blunted by reductions in absolute exercise
intensity, a reduction in carbohydrate oxidation occurred, likely due to no
changes in circulating adrenaline [34 ], as
reported during work-matched studies [51 ].
Skeletal muscle aside, hyperglycemia is often observed during exercise in hot
conditions [11 ]
[14 ]
[21 ]
[41 ]
[59 ], potentially due to
adrenaline-induced hepatic glucose production (HGP). While limited evidence
exists in humans, Howlett et al. reported increased circulating glucose and HGP
when adrenaline is infused in physiological concentrations in endurance-trained
[60 ] and bi-laterally adrenalectomized humans
[61 ]. Despite requiring further
investigation, this evidence highlights the potential regulatory role of
adrenaline in blood glucose homeostasis and HGP during exercise and heat
stress.
Counterintuitively, given the potent lipolytic regulation by adrenaline [62 ]
[63 ]
[64 ] during heat-stressed exercise, whole-body fat
oxidation [34 ] and circulating plasma fatty acid
concentrations were unchanged [21 ]
[29 ]
[52 ]
[59 ] despite overall reductions in FFA uptake in
working skeletal muscle [52 ] indicating reduced
FFA release from adipocytes. This phenomenon may be explained by reduced adipose
tissue blood flow when exercising in the heat, reducing available albumin for
fatty acid transport, and promoting fatty acid re-esterification within
adipocytes. However, similar plasma glycerol levels reported by Yaskpelkis et
al. [21 ] during exercise and heat stress, may
indicate that fatty acid esterification is unlikely to account for comparable
FFA levels and is more likely due to reduced fatty acid lipolysis when
exercising in the heat. Although not experimentally confirmed, the direct
inhibitory effect of heat on hormone-sensitive lipase and other enzymes
responsible for fatty acid liberation and metabolism should be considered.
Altered muscle fiber type recruitment
It has been reported that during exercise in hot conditions (49°C), individuals
with a higher proportion of type II muscle fibers exhibited greater muscle
lactate accumulation compared to those with greater type I density [27 ], spurring the hypothesis that type II fibers
have greater sensitivity to heat stress, thus altering the metabolic impact of
heat stress during exercise [27 ]
[48 ]. To test this, Febbraio and colleagues
utilized immunohistochemical analyses to characterize muscle glycogen use
between fiber types following exercise and in hot conditions (40°C) [3 ]. Compared to exercise completed in temperate
conditions (20°C), muscle lactate was greater following exercise in hot
conditions. When considering fiber type-specific differences, muscle glycogen
was significantly reduced in Type I muscle fibers after exercise in the heat,
with no difference in Type II fibers. The fiber type-specific response observed
was consistent with muscle glycogen utilization during prolonged exercise in
temperate conditions [65 ]
.
The direct effect of heat stress on skeletal muscle temperature
(Tmus )
Exercise increases T
mus
in a workload-dependent manner
[66 ]
[67 ] and
is amplified with heat stress [3 ]
[11 ]
[20 ].
Theoretically, any rise in T
mus
would directly alter
enzyme activity and thus substrate metabolism [22 ]
[47 ]. The temperature coefficient
(Q10 ) is the factor by which the rate of enzymatic reactions
changes in response to increased/decreased temperature, meaning for every 10°C
increase, a 2 to 3-fold increase in enzyme reaction rate is expected [68 ]. While a 10°C increase in
T
mus
is supra-physiological, a modest 2°C
increase in T
mus
may result in a 30 to 40% increase in
enzyme activity.
Direct investigations of increased T
mus
on intramuscular
metabolism are scarce; however, Edwards et al. [69 ] demonstrated increased glycogen utilization and lactate
accumulation following exhaustive isometric contractions following limb
immersion in a water bath (44°C). While this study only intended to increase
skeletal muscle temperature, it is noteworthy that core temperature was
increased relative to temperate conditions. Given the stimulatory role of heat
stress on circulating adrenaline concentrations the resultant increases in
carbohydrate oxidation, may not be due to direct muscle temperature per
se . To isolate the impact of muscle heating, Febbraio et al. used
external heating pads (on the thigh) to elevate muscle temperature by 2°C
immediately before supra-maximal exercise (2 min cycling at 115%
˙VO2max ) in active (but untrained) males [14 ]. Pre-exercise circulating adrenaline was not
increased by muscle heating, but muscle glycogenolysis and lactate accumulation
were increased post-exercise compared to exercise without pre-heating.
Additionally, pre-heating increased the magnitude of ATP breakdown, with
increased IMP and ammonia accumulation compared to non-heated muscle. Given
these changes occurred in heated muscle only, the authors concluded that
temperature per se increased carbohydrate utilization via anaerobic
pathways. Mechanistically, heat-induced changes in total adenine nucleotide
(TAN) pool (ATP, ADP, AMP) and IMP accumulation may result in altered
carbohydrate metabolism via allosteric activation of phosphofructokinase (PFK)
[70 ] and phosphorylase [71 ], two critical enzymes in glycogenolysis and
glycolysis that increase glycolytic flux. In a follow-up study, the same
research group completed a study where one leg was heated and the other cooled
before and during exercise at 70% ˙VO2max using water-perfused cuffs
[72 ]. The initial difference in
T
mus
in the heated vs. cooled leg was reduced
during exercise; however, it remained significantly elevated at the termination
of exercise. While there was an increase in the glycogenolytic rate in the
heated limb, no differences in high-energy phosphagen metabolism were noted
between legs, providing evidence that T
mus
per
se has a role in regulating carbohydrate metabolism during exercise and
heat stress.
Altered skeletal muscle blood flow
To facilitate thermoregulation during exercise and heat stress, blood flow is
prioritized to working muscles, the skin and essential organs while splanchnic
[49 ], hepatic [73 ], renal [74 ], and inactive muscle
blood flow is reduced. Competing demands for blood supply mean that
cardiovascular demand exceeds the maximal cardiac output capacity in the heat,
leading to potentially altered substrate metabolism and ultimately impaired
performance through reduced oxygen supply to the working muscle [22 ]
[29 ]
[47 ]
[59 ]. It is
contentious whether blood supply to working muscle is altered during exercise
and heat stress [29 ]
[75 ], and there is little understanding of how this alters local
oxygen extraction. Direct measures of active limb blood flow via thermodilution
plethysmography [29 ]
[76 ]
[77 ]
[78 ] and doppler flowmetry [79 ] during
exercise in the heat revealed unaltered skeletal blood flow. When implementing
graded heat stress at rest and during exercise, Pearson et al. [80 ] reported gradual increases in leg blood flow
(LBF), cardiac output, and leg vascular conductance (LVC), which correlated to
muscle temperature at rest and during exercise
(r
2
=0.86–0.99; P <0.05). Muscle and skin
perfusion were also increased, as evidenced by reductions in leg arteriovenous
oxygen (a-vO2 ) difference and increases in deep femoral venous
O2 content. Crucially, the authors used multiple approaches to
validate whether heat stress increased subcutaneous and muscle vascular
vasodilation.
More recently, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has revealed reduced muscle
oxygenation during exercise under heat stress (40°C), with a simultaneous
increase in skin blood flow providing strong evidence of a vascular shunt away
from working muscles toward the skin for thermoregulation [81 ]. The authors also reported decreased muscle
oxygen saturation and increased deoxygenated hemoglobin in heat stress
conditions, indicating a widened arteriovenous VO2 difference and a
rise in oxygen extraction. A significant increase in deoxygenated hemoglobin may
be interpreted as a limitation in oxygen delivery rather than an inability to
utilize the available oxygen [82 ]. However,
adjustments in deoxygenated hemoglobin indicate muscle oxygenation changes only
when total hemoglobin volume is relatively stable, meaning caution should be
used when interpreting the muscle oxygenation solely based on altered
deoxygenated hemoglobin during the exercise. Discrepancies between the findings
of these studies may be explained by the exercise protocols, whereby the latter
was exhaustive cycling exercise compared to sub-maximal knee extensor exercise
in the former.
When coupled with dehydration, muscle blood flow was attenuated during exercise
[31 ]; however, the adverse effects of
dehydration on cardiovascular function must be considered here, as function is
severely impaired when compared to hyperthermia alone or exercise in temperate
conditions [56 ]. When environmental heat stress
(~35°C) was combined with dehydration during exercise, contracting limb blood
flow decreased by ~1.0 L·min-1 , compared with comparable euhydrated
exercise in the heat, with no difference in leg VO2
[52 ]. Despite this, metabolic analysis highlighted
an increase in muscle glycogen utilization and lactate accumulation with
exercise and dehydration [52 ]. The data generated
by this research group suggests that even if muscle blood flow is reduced during
exercise and heat stress, arteriovenous oxygen difference is adjusted
accordingly to ensure that oxygen supply is not compromised. While this evidence
shows that oxygen supply is unlikely to play a significant role in altered
muscle metabolism during exercise in the heat, it does not rule out the
influence of decreased blood flow on underlying metabolic processes. The
functional vascular shunt in skeletal muscle has already been shown to alter
substrate metabolism due to an altered supply rate of nutrients and removal of
metabolic by-products [83 ]. However, the
importance of nutrient and non-nutrient supply and removal under heat stress has
not been investigated directly.
Implications of Heat stress on the post-exercise Adaptive Response
During exercise, heat stress, a significant stressor transiently activates or
inhibits signaling pathways that regulate cellular energy storage, metabolism,
contraction, ion handling, and vascularization [10 ]. Several recent reviews have provided an overview of the benefits
of heat therapy, including angiogenesis, muscle mass regulation, mitochondrial
biogenesis, glucose metabolism and insulin signaling [84 ] and its potential usefulness to augment endurance training
adaptations [85 ]. These reviews primarily focus
on passive heating strategies before or after exercise. In contrast, the present
review focuses on the combined effect of heat stress during exercise to optimize
endurance training adaption.
Heat shock protein (HSP) response
Heat shock factors are activated in response to exercise, heat, inflammation and
oxidative stress, promoting mRNA expression of their respective HSPs, a unique
family of proteins responsible for ensuring multiple chaperone roles, ensuring
correct protein folding and repairing damaged proteins [86 ]. Functionally, HSPs represent an evolutionary quality control
mechanism allowing cells to ensure protein quality, and they are especially
important during periods of cellular stress such as exercise or heat stress. In
this context, the induction of HSP expression and subsequent increased capacity
to offset the deleterious effects of heat stress on protein structure and
function is referred to as thermotolerance. Notably, thermotolerance is
increasingly viewed as a critical adaptive component of heat acclimation [87 ]
[88 ] that is
essential for allowing repeated heat exposures over a short timeframe.
After initial stimulus, HSP mRNA is transiently elevated, translating to robust
increases in HSP protein expression following several weeks [89 ]
[90 ]. Heat shock
proteoforms with roles in exercise adaptation and cellular tolerance are HSP27,
60, 72, and 90. HSP72 has numerous chaperone roles, including transporting and
folding newly synthesized polypeptides, which are folded structures within the
process of protein synthesis and maintenance. Thus, HSP72 facilitates
mitochondrial biogenesis and molecular exercise adaptation in response to heat
stress and protein repair during recovery. Indeed, when exposed to 15 bouts of
endurance training and passive heat stress, protein expression of HSP60
increased by 2.5 and 1.75-fold in mouse plantaris and soleus muscles,
respectively, while 65- and 4-fold increases in HSP72 protein expression were
reported in response to heat stress alone. When heat stress was preceded by
exercise (30 min running at 25 m·min-1 ), an additive effect of heat
stress post-exercise was found [91 ]. Combining
exercise and heat stress can induce greater HSP70 expression relative to either
treatment alone [92 ], potentially improving
thermotolerance in subsequent bouts of heat stress during exercise.
In humans, exercise-induced HSP responses appear to be intensity- and
duration-dependent [93 ]
[94 ] with no increase in HSP expression following 1 hour of exercise
[34 ] and diminished magnitude and time-course
of HSP response in individuals with higher basal HSP content [95 ]
[96 ]. Following
a period of heat acclimation, basal HSP72 protein expression increased by ~18%
[97 ], with mRNA transiently increasing
(+195%) following each bout of heat acclimation before returning to baseline
within 24 hours [98 ]
[99 ]. Increases in basal HSP expression may confer improved cellular
thermotolerance, a hypothesis supported by impaired thermotolerance in murine
HSP KO models [100 ].
Endurance-like adaptation and oxidative capacity
In C2C12 myotubes, heat stress increases AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)
phosphorylation and mRNA expression of Sirtuin-1 (SIRT1) and PGC-1α [101 ]
[102 ], a key
regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis. Consequently, transcription of downstream
transcription factors, such as nuclear respiratory factor (NRF) 1, NRF2, and
mitochondrial transcription factor (Tfam), are upregulated, increasing
mitochondrial components (Cycs, COXII, COXIV) and glucose transporter-4 (GLUT4)
protein content. Repeated heat exposures (2 h at 40°C on 5 consecutive days)
increased PGC-1α and mitochondrial subunit protein abundance compared to control
cells (maintained at 37°C), and when exposed to a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)
challenge, heat-acclimated cells maintained peak oxidation rates and exhibited
greater oxidative capacity [102 ].
The application of heat stress in conjunction with endurance training has seldom
been researched in humans and even less in highly trained subjects.
Nevertheless, a single bout of aerobic cycling exercise (50% Wmax ) at
33°C in untrained individuals reduced PGC1-α mRNA expression compared to
exercise at 20°C [103 ]. Additionally, three weeks
of exercise (matched at a rating of perceived exertion of 15) in the heat did
not increase PGC1-α mRNA expression compared to similar exercise in temperate
conditions [104 ]. Crucially, in these studies,
the impact of exercise intensity cannot be overlooked. In the former [104 ], power output was significantly reduced
during exercise in hot conditions. In the case of the latter implementing
walking exercise [105 ], the exercise intensity
may have been insufficient to induce increases in PGC-1α or markers of
mitochondrial biogenesis [106 ]. Interestingly,
˙VO2peak increased in the group that trained at 20°C only, with
no difference in peak power output between groups. The authors concluded that
heat stress might limit the effectiveness of aerobic exercise to increase
aerobic power and may blunt regular exercise-induced PGC1-α expression. The same
group replicated its study in untrained women and reported improved aerobic
power and PGC1-α expression following the heat acclimation protocol [107 ]. Given the blunted evaporative heat loss
responses and augmented rise in core temperature in response to heat stress at a
given absolute exercise intensity in women [108 ]
[109 ], it may be appropriate to
speculate that alterations in substrate metabolism and the intra-muscular
adaptive response observed in males are exacerbated in females.
Ten days of active heat acclimation (i. e. walking at 30–40% ˙VO2max
twice for 45 min at 42°C, interspersed with 10 min rest) in recreationally
active males (56.4±4.4 ml·kg·min-1 ) and females
(42.3±3.4 ml·kg·min-1 ) increased HSP72 expression but did not
enhance markers of mitochondrial biogenesis (CaMK, TFAM & PGC-1α protein
expression) nor oxidative protein expression (COX I – IV) [105 ]. More recently, Maunder et al. [33 ] investigated the effects of 3 weeks of active
heat acclimation (5 sessions per week ranging from moderate to severe exercise
domains) on temperate exercise performance and metabolic adaptation in endurance
trained males (53.4±7 ml·kg·min-1 ). Compared to participants that
exercised at 18°C, citrate synthase activity (a marker of mitochondrial
biogenesis) increased by 1.25-fold following endurance training in the heat and
was significantly correlated with training-induced change in time trial
performance (r= 0.51). Critically, training intensity was matched between
environmental conditions based on relative cardiovascular demand at the first
and second ventilatory thresholds, meaning physiological strain was maintained
despite reductions in absolute workload in the heat.
Pro-angiogenic response to heat stress
The formation of new blood vessels from existing ones, called angiogenesis, is
closely regulated by exercise [110 ] and is
essential to optimize endurance performance [111 ]. Increasing the number of capillaries in skeletal muscle improves
oxygen and nutrient exchange and enhances metabolic by-product removal leading
to improved aerobic and anaerobic exercise capacity [112 ], ventilatory threshold, and critical power [113 ]. During exercise, elevated skeletal muscle
blood flow increases shear stress within the muscle vasculature [114 ], triggering the release of pro-angiogenic
growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast
growth factor-2 (FGF-2) and platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) [115 ]
[116 ].
Additionally, blood flow kinetics are altered when exercising in hot conditions.
Heat increases local arteriolar vasodilation, increasing antegrade sheer stress
and dilation of conduit arteries [117 ], which
increases skeletal muscle VEGF release. Moreover, biochemical mechanisms induced
by exercise and heat stress may also increase VEGF and other pro-angiogenic
factors via increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production [118 ] and increased production of lactate [119 ]
[120 ].
It is widely accepted that heat stress increases endothelial nitric oxide
synthase (eNOS) expression, which plays a crucial role in regulating vasomotor
function and vascular remodeling in vitro
[121 ]
[122 ]
[123 ]
[124 ] and in rodents [125 ]
[126 ]
[127 ]
[128 ]
[129 ]. In humans, a single bout of heat stress
increases endothelial mRNA expression of pro-angiogenic factors [116 ], while repeated exposures (6–8 weeks) to heat
stress increase skeletal muscle eNOS content and induces angiogenesis [130 ]
[131 ].
Interestingly, Hesketh et al. [131 ] reported that
6 weeks of passive heat stress (via heat chamber at 40°C) induced comparable
angiogenesis to time-matched exercise alone (moderate intensity exercise, ~65%
VO2peak ), albeit in untrained sedentary individuals.
Additionally, recent work by Kaluhiokalani et al.
[132 ] investigated the impact of 6 weeks of passive
heat therapy (via short-wave diathermy) or exercise (knee extension exercise for
2 h, 3 days per week) on vascular function in previously untrained individuals.
Blood flow during a passive leg movement increased to the same extent both in
the exercise condition (~10.5%) and heat therapy condition (~8.5%). Peak
vascular conductance was also increased in similar proportions (~25%) in both
conditions. Meanwhile, exercise induced additional vascular adaptation with
increased peak flow rate (~19%), capillary-to-fiber ratio, capillary density,
and capillary-to-fiber perimeter exchange index compared to no change in heat
therapy conditions.
When administered in isolation, passive heat therapy appears to provide some of
the benefits of exercise spanning both mitochondrial and vascular adaptations.
Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether combining heat stress and exercise
would augment vascular adaptations further, and future studies should aim to
understand the combined effects of exercise and heat stress on vascular
adaptations.
Hematological adaptation to repeated heat stress
A well-documented adaptation to repeated heat stress, plasma volume expansion, is
rapidly induced and occurs following relatively few exposures to heat stress
(between 3 to 4 days) [133 ]. Ultimately, any
increase in plasma volume has two physiological advantages; (1) increased
vascular filling to support cardiovascular stability, and (2) increased specific
heat of blood to lower skin blood flow responsiveness [134 ]. This increase in plasma volume precedes changes in hemoglobin
concentration, thus leading to an initial relative decrease in hemoglobin and
hematocrit [135 ]. Consequently, heat-induced
erythropoiesis requires a more extended intervention period (>4 weeks) before
red blood cell volume (RBCV) and hemoglobin mass (Hbmass ) are
increased [136 ]. Increased RBCV and
Hbmass represent critical endurance training adaptations,
improving oxygen transport, and contributing to improved VO2max , a
key determinant of endurance performance. Interestingly, when implementing
prolonged heat-acclimation protocols (5 weeks) using either environmental
chambers [137 ]
[138 ] or ‘heat suits’ [139 ] in
highly-trained participants (VO2max ~ 75 ml·kg·min-1 ),
Hbmass was increased compared to unheated controls. Crucially,
this increase in Hbmass improved peak power during incremental and
time-trial cycling tests. While recent evidence supports the application of heat
stress during exercise to promote hematological adaptation, several studies have
failed to report increases in Hbmass , albeit the heat acclimation
protocols in these studies were considerably shorter [140 ]
[141 ]
[142 ], leaving limited time for erythropoiesis to compensate for
hemodilution following plasma volume expansion. Crucially, longer heat exposures
(weeks vs. days) are required for a marked increase in RBCV and
Hbmass . A summary of biomolecular adaptation in response to
endurance exercise combined with heat exposure is proposed in [Fig. 2 ].
Fig. 2 Overview of heat-inducible molecular pathways associated
with endurance training adaptation. In response to multiple cellular
stressors, Heat shock factors (HSF) are activated and promote the
transcription of heat shock proteins (HSP), which have numerous roles in
promoting protein stability and functioning and as a quality control
mechanism in cells. A key adaptive outcome of endurance training,
mitochondrial biogenesis occurs in response to cellular and metabolic
stress following substrate depletion and subsequent activation of AMPK,
and the ‘master regulator’ of mitochondrial biogenesis PGC-1α.
Augmented mitochondrial biogenesis has been reported in vitro and
in vivo, albeit limited human evidence highlights the
supplementary benefit of heat stress during exercise. Alterations in
skeletal muscle blood flow associated with exercise and heat stress
increase the expression of pro-angiogenic transcription factors. Whether
heat stress promotes skeletal muscle microvascular adaptation in
conjunction with exercise in trained individuals requires further
investigation. Abbreviations: AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase;
eNOS: endothelial nitric oxide synthase; E3: Ubiquitin (Ub) Ligases;
FOXO: Forkhead box O; HIF-1α : Hypoxia inducible
factor-1α ; HSF: Heat Shock Factor; HSP: Heat Shock Protein;
PGC-1α : Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma
coactivator-1α ; pO
2
: partial
pressure of oxygen; p53: tumor protein p53; ROS: reactive oxygen
species; ULK1: Unc-51-like kinase 1; VEGF: vascular endothelial
growth factor. Created with Biorender.com [rerif].
Future directions
It is well-documented that women are underrepresented in sports and exercise
science research [143 ]. A meta-analysis of the
physiological and performance adaptations to heat acclimation included 96
studies with 1,056 total participants, of which only 76 (7%) were female [144 ]. By comparison, a recent meta-analysis
including studies only implementing heat acclimation in female included 22
articles with 235 participants [145 ]. Currently,
the magnitude of whole-body adaptation to heat stress appears to be similar in
both men and women, albeit the time course of specific adaptations and optimal
strategies for exposure to heat stress remains unknown (for both sexes). The
potential for gender-specific molecular adaptative responses also requires
further investigation. For instance, in response to continuous and interval
training, skeletal muscle HSP expression appears to be gender-specific, with 38
and 23% increases observed for men, respectively, and only 3 and 4% for women
[146 ]. Notably, the diminished cryoprotective
response observed in females may be attributable to the heat-protective effect
of high estrogen levels [147 ], providing a
mechanistic rationale for gender differences in HSP expression [148 ]. Only two studies have investigated the
gender differences in HSP expression response to heat stress. Firstly, Gillum et
al. reported increased HSP in males following a single bout of heat-stressed
exercise compared to females during both the follicular and luteal phases [149 ]. When implementing a controlled hyperthermia
acclimation protocol, there was no difference in HSP72 mRNA expression between
males and females [150 ]. The contrasting findings
can be attributed to different biological measures (mRNA vs. protein),
hyperthermia induction (external vs. controlled hyperthermia), and exercise
duration (acute vs. chronic).
Evidence of increased carbohydrate oxidation during combined heat stress and
exercise has been studied in males only; further work is required to elucidate
the impact of ambient temperature on substrate utilization in women.
Additionally, given the blunted evaporative heat loss responses and augmented
rise in core temperature in response to heat stress at a given absolute exercise
intensity in women compared to men [108 ]
[109 ], it may be appropriate to speculate that
alterations in substrate metabolism observed in males are exacerbated in
females. That said, all the studies in the present review have been conducted
solely with males, and thus the impact of heat stress on exercise metabolism in
females remains to be resolved.
Methodological developments, including applying mass spectrometry and nuclear
magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy in exercise metabolism, provide an
exciting opportunity for biochemical interrogation of the impact of heat stress
during exercise beyond a targeted analysis of specific proteins or metabolites.
Profiling biofluids (urine, sweat, serum and saliva) and tissue samples (muscle
biopsies) provide high-resolution systemic and local insight into the impact of
exercise and heat stress. For example, recent work has sought to characterize
the serum exercise metabolome in response to exercise under environmental heat
stress in trained participants [41 ]. Alterations
to glycolytic metabolites were observed, but crucially, novel alterations to
circulating amino acids (alanine and leucine) were identified between
environmental conditions, highlighting potentially divergent protein
requirements following exercise during heat stress.
Multiple mechanisms have been proposed for altered substrate utilization under
heat stress, with both local (direct impact of heat stress on enzymatic
reactions, fiber-type recruitment, and altered blood flow) and systemic
(circulating adrenaline) factors considered responsible. Based on the current
evidence, circulating adrenaline is critical in regulating substrate utilization
during exercise under heat stress. Carbohydrate oxidation is increased when
adrenaline is elevated during exercise [3 ]
[12 ]
[51 ]
[56 ], and no alterations in substrate utilization
are observed when rises in core temperature and, by extension, increased
circulating adrenaline are blunted [34 ]. Further
mechanistic insight is required to elucidate the relative contribution of these
factors to substrate utilization. No in vitro evidence supports the
hypothesis that adrenaline is a critical regulatory factor in skeletal muscle
metabolism in response to heat stress. Future research should combine exercise
mimetics such as electrical pulse stimulation [151 ]
[152 ]
[153 ]
[154 ], heat stress, and adrenaline
treatment in vitro to better understand each factor's relative
contribution to altered substrate metabolism ([Fig.
3 ]).
Fig. 3 Overview of current opportunities and shortcomings within
the current evidence base that, if addressed, would significantly
advance the field of thermal exercise physiology and nutrition.
Opportunities are shown in order of translational applicability from
left to right. Research on women represents the highest priority
regarding translational potential and need. Further to the right, future
in vitro studies will provide critical insight into the
mechanisms associated with heat stress and exercise, albeit with the
least capacity for translation to practice. Created with Biorender.com
[rerif].
Conclusion
Despite the increased prevalence of sporting competitions held in locations with high
ambient temperatures, questions remain regarding the regulation of metabolism during
exercise under heat stress and the subsequent impact on substrate metabolism.
Alongside key modifiable training variables such as time, duration, frequency and
modality, heat stress is a readily modifiable factor that alters substrate
utilization and potentially benefits endurance training outcomes. The optimal
strategy for inducing high muscle and core temperatures remains to be elucidated,
and this lack of consensus makes providing practical advice regarding promoting
endurance training adaptation difficult. Despite promising in vitro and
pre-clinical data supporting the role of heat stress on endurance training
adaptation, caution should always be used when extrapolating findings to humans.
Resolving the role of heat stress on intra-muscular signaling responses and
subsequent endurance training adaptation remains an emerging and exciting area of
research and will continue to be topical as long as sporting events are held in hot
environments and global temperatures continue to rise.