Effects of Resistance Training Overload Progression Protocols on
                    Strength and Muscle Mass

Talisson Santos Chaves; Maíra Camargo Scarpelli; João Guilherme Almeida Bergamasco; Deivid Gomes da Silva; Ricardo Alessandro Medalha Junior; Nathalia Fernanda Dias; Diego Bittencourt; Paulo Cesar Carello Filho; Vitor Angleri; Sanmy Rocha Nóbrega; Michael D. Roberts; Carlos Ugrinowitsch; Cleiton Augusto Libardi

doi:10.1055/a-2256-5857

International Journal of Sports Medicine, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Int J Sports Med 2024; 45(07): 504-510
DOI: 10.1055/a-2256-5857

Training & Testing

Effects of Resistance Training Overload Progression Protocols on Strength and Muscle Mass

Talisson Santos Chaves

¹MUSCULAB – Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos – UFSCar, São Carlos, Brazil

,

Maíra Camargo Scarpelli

¹MUSCULAB – Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos – UFSCar, São Carlos, Brazil

,

João Guilherme Almeida Bergamasco

¹MUSCULAB – Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos – UFSCar, São Carlos, Brazil

,

Deivid Gomes da Silva

¹MUSCULAB – Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos – UFSCar, São Carlos, Brazil

,

Ricardo Alessandro Medalha Junior

¹MUSCULAB – Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos – UFSCar, São Carlos, Brazil

,

Nathalia Fernanda Dias

¹MUSCULAB – Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos – UFSCar, São Carlos, Brazil

,

Diego Bittencourt

¹MUSCULAB – Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos – UFSCar, São Carlos, Brazil

,

Paulo Cesar Carello Filho

¹MUSCULAB – Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos – UFSCar, São Carlos, Brazil

,

Vitor Angleri

¹MUSCULAB – Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos – UFSCar, São Carlos, Brazil

,

Sanmy Rocha Nóbrega

¹MUSCULAB – Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos – UFSCar, São Carlos, Brazil

,

Michael D. Roberts

²School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA

,

Carlos Ugrinowitsch

³School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

⁴Department of Health Sciences and Human Performance, The University of Tampa, FL, USA

,

Cleiton Augusto Libardi

¹MUSCULAB – Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos – UFSCar, São Carlos, Brazil

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of progressive overload in resistance training on muscle strength and cross-sectional area (CSA) by specifically comparing the impact of increasing load (LOADprog) versus an increase in repetitions (REPSprog). We used a within-subject experimental design in which 39 previously untrained young persons (20 men and 19 women) had their legs randomized to LOADprog and REPSprog. Outcomes were assessed before and after 10 weeks of training. Muscle strength was assessed using the one repetition maximum (1RM) test on the leg extension exercise, and the CSA of the vastus lateralis was assessed by ultrasonography. Both protocols increased 1RM values from pre (LOADprog: 52.90±16.32 kg; REPSprog: 51.67±15.84 kg) to post (LOADprog: 69.05±18.55 kg, REPSprog: 66.82±17.95 kg), with no difference between them (P+>+0.05). Similarly, both protocols also increased in CSA values from pre (LOADprog: 21.34±4.71 cm²; REPSprog: 21.08±4.62 cm²) to post (LOADprog: 23.53±5.41 cm², REPSprog: 23.39±5.19 cm²), with no difference between them (P+>+0.05). In conclusion, our findings indicate that the progression of overload through load or repetitions can be used to promote gains in strength and muscle hypertrophy in young men and women in the early stages of training.

Keywords

muscle cross-sectional area - 1-RM - concentric muscle failure - strength training

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 ACSM. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 687-708
2 Kraemer WJ. Strength training basics: Designing workouts to meet patients’ goals. Phys Sportsmed 2003; 31: 39-45
3 Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA, French DN. Resistance training for health and performance. Curr Sports Med Rep 2002; 1: 165-171
4 Mitchell CJ, Churchward-Venne TA, West DW. et al. Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2012; 113: 71-77
5 Lasevicius T, Ugrinowitsch C, Schoenfeld BJ. et al. Effects of different intensities of resistance training with equated volume load on muscle strength and hypertrophy. Eur J Sport Sci 2018; 18: 772-780
6 Nobrega SR, Ugrinowitsch C, Pintanel L. et al. Effect of Resistance Training to Muscle Failure vs. Volitional Interruption at High- and Low-Intensities on Muscle Mass and Strength. J Strength Cond Res 2018; 32: 162-169
7 Nóbrega SR, Scarpelli MC, Barcelos C. et al. Muscle Hypertrophy Is Affected by Volume Load Progression Models. J Strength Cond Res 2023; 37: 62-67
8 Lakens D, Caldwell AR. Simulation-Based Power Analysis for Factorial Analysis of Variance Designs 2021; 4: 1-14
9 Angleri V, Ugrinowitsch C, Libardi CA. Crescent pyramid and drop-set systems do not promote greater strength gains, muscle hypertrophy, and changes on muscle architecture compared with traditional resistance training in well-trained men. Eur J Appl Physiol 2017; 117: 359-369
10 Damas F, Angleri V, Phillips SM. et al. Myofibrillar protein synthesis and muscle hypertrophy individualized responses to systematically changing resistance training variables in trained young men. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2019; 127: 806-815
11 Chaves TS, Biazon TMPC, Santos LME. et al. Effects of resistance training with controlled versus self-selected repetition duration on muscle mass and strength in untrained men. Peerj 2020; 8: e8697
12 Santanielo N, Nobrega SR, Scarpelli MC. et al. Effect of resistance training to muscle failure vs non-failure on strength, hypertrophy and muscle architecture in trained individuals. Biol Sport 2020; 37: 333-341
13 Angleri V, Damas F, Phillips SM. et al. Resistance training variable manipulations are less relevant than intrinsic biology in affecting muscle fiber hypertrophy. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2022; 32: 821-832
14 Association WM. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Jama 2013; 310: 2191-2194
15 Chung B, Pandis N, Scherer RW. et al. CONSORT Extension for Within-Person Randomized Clinical Trials. J Dent Res 2020; 99: 121-124
16 MacInnis MJ, McGlory C, Gibala MJ. et al. Investigating human skeletal muscle physiology with unilateral exercise models: When one limb is more powerful than two. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2017; 42: 563-570
17 Broglio K. Randomization in Clinical Trials: Permuted Blocks and Stratification. JAMA 2018; 319: 2223-2224
18 Dallal J. Randomization.com (2007) In Internet: www.jerrydallal.com/random/randomize.htm (Accessed July 10, 2022)
19 Schoenfeld BJ, James F, Jozo G. et al. Resistance Training Recommendations to Maximize Muscle Hypertrophy in an Athletic Population: Position Stand of the IUSCA. Int J Strength Cond 2021; 1: 1-30
20 Lixandrao ME, Ugrinowitsch C, Bottaro M. et al. Vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area ultrasonography validity for image fitting in humans. J Strength Cond Res 2014; 28: 3293-3297
21 Damas F, Phillips SM, Lixandrao ME. et al. Early resistance training-induced increases in muscle cross-sectional area are concomitant with edema-induced muscle swelling. Eur J Appl Physiol 2016; 116: 49-56
22 Newton MJ, Morgan GT, Sacco P. et al. Comparison of responses to strenuous eccentric exercise of the elbow flexors between resistance-trained and untrained men. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 597-607
23 Reeves ND, Maganaris CN, Narici MV. Ultrasonographic assessment of human skeletal muscle size. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004; 91: 116-118
24 Brown LE, Weir JP, Brown L. et al. ASEP Procedures Recommendation I: Accurate Assessment of Muscular Strength and Power. J Exerc Physiol 2001; 4: 1-21
25 Kelley K, Preacher KJ. On effect size. Psychological Methods 2012; 17: 137-152
26 Abe T, DeHoyos DV, Pollock ML. et al. Time course for strength and muscle thickness changes following upper and lower body resistance training in men and women. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000; 81: 174-180
27 Ahtiainen JP, Walker S, Peltonen H. et al. Heterogeneity in resistance training-induced muscle strength and mass responses in men and women of different ages. Age (Dordr) 2016; 38: 1-10
28 Colliander EB, Tesch PA. Responses to eccentric and concentric resistance training in females and males. Acta Physiol Scand 1991; 141: 149-156
29 Cureton KJ, Collins MA, Hill DW. et al. Muscle hypertrophy in men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1988; 20: 338-344
30 Ivey FM, Tracy BL, Lemmer JT. et al. Effects of strength training and detraining on muscle quality: age and gender comparisons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000; 55: B152-B157
31 Carvalho L, Junior RM, Barreira J. et al. Muscle hypertrophy and strength gains after resistance training with different volume-matched loads: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2022; 47: 357-368
32 Lopez P, Radaelli R, Taaffe DR. et al. Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2021; 53: 1206-1216
33 Lacio M, Vieira JG, Trybulski R. et al. Effects of Resistance Training Performed with Different Loads in Untrained and Trained Male Adult Individuals on Maximal Strength and Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 1-19
34 Refalo MC, Hamilton DL, Paval DR. et al. Influence of resistance training load on measures of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and improvements in maximal strength and neuromuscular task performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci 2021; 39: 1723-1745
35 Schoenfeld BJ, Grgic J, Ogborn D. et al. Strength and Hypertrophy Adaptations Between Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 2017; 31: 3508-3523
36 Plotkin D, Coleman M, Van Every D. et al. Progressive overload without progressing load? The effects of load or repetition progression on muscular adaptations. PeerJ 2022; 10: e14142
37 Barcelos C, Damas F, Nobrega SR. et al. High-frequency resistance training does not promote greater muscular adaptations compared to low frequencies in young untrained men. Eur J Sport Sci 2018; 18: 1077-1082
38 Schoenfeld BJ, Grgic J, Ogborn D. et al. Strength and Hypertrophy Adaptations between Low- Vs. High-Load Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Strength Cond Res 2017; 31: 3508-3523
39 Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn D, Contreras B. et al. A Comparison of Increases in Volume Load Over 8 Weeks of Low-Versus High-Load Resistance Training. Asian J Sports Med 2016; 7: e29247
40 Altman N, Krzywinski M. Association, correlation and causation. Nat Methods 2015; 12: 899-900