Download PDF
Notfallmedizin up2date 2024; 19(04): 385-395
DOI: 10.1055/a-2263-3467
Schritt für Schritt

Notfallsonografie – RUSH-Protokoll – Schritt für Schritt

Michael Bentele
,
Armin Seibel
,
Beatrice Fundel
,
Sven Lederle
,
Stefanie Bentele
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Patienten im undifferenzierten Schock profitieren von einer schnellen und zielgerichteten Diagnostik und Therapie. Dabei ist die Notfallsonografie ein effektives Tool, um die Schockursachen einzugrenzen. Notfallmediziner nutzen dafür bereits seit vielen Jahren unterschiedliche standardisierte Untersuchungsabläufe [1] [2] [3]. Das Protokoll "Rapid Ultrasound in Shock and Hypotension" (RUSH) ist ein weltweit etabliertes notfallsonografisches Protokoll zur systematischen und schnellen Untersuchung hämodynamisch instabiler Patienten [4] [5] [6].

Schlüsselwörter

Notfallmedizin - Notfallsonografie - Ultraschall - HIMAP - Rapid Ultrasound in Schock and Hypotension - RUSH-Protokoll

Zusatzmaterial



Publication History

Article published online:
05 December 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Rose JS, Bair AE, Mandavia D. et al. The UHP ultrasound protocol: a novel ultrasound approach to the empiric evaluation of the undifferentiated hypotensive patient. Am J Emerg Med 2001; 19: 299-302
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Jones AE, Tayal VS, Sullivan DM. et al. Randomized, controlled trial of immediate versus delayed goal-directed ultrasound to identify the cause of nontraumatic hypotension in emergency department patients. Crit Care Med 2004; 32: 1703-1708
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Atkinson PRT, McAuley DJ, Kendall RJ. et al. Abdominal and cardiac evaluation with sonography in shock (ACES): an approach by emergency physicians for the use of ultrasound in patients with undifferentiated hypotension. Emerg Med J 2009; 26: 87-91
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Weingart S, Duque D, Nelson B. Rapid ultrasound for shock and hypotension (RUSH-HI-MAP). 2009 Accessed September 09, 2024 at: https://emcrit.org
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Bentele S, Biermann H, Seibel A. et al. Notfallsonographiekonzepte im nichttraumatologischen Schockraum–eFAST, FEEL, RUSH und andere. Notf Rett Med 2023; 26: 517-526
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Perera P, Mailhot T, Riley D. et al. The RUSH exam: Rapid Ultrasound in SHock in the evaluation of the critically lll. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2010; 28: 29-56
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Singh S, Wann L, Schuchard G. et al. Right ventricular and right atrial collapse in patients with cardiac tamponade–a combined echocardiographic and hemodynamic study. Circulation 1984; 70: 966-971
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Moore CL, Rose GA, Tayal VS. et al. Determination of left ventricular function by emergency physician echocardiography of hypotensive patients. Acad Emerg Med 2002; 9: 186-193
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Jardin F, Dubourg O, Bourdarias J-P. Echocardiographic pattern of acute cor pulmonale. Chest 1997; 111: 209-217
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 McConnell MV, Solomon SD, Rayan ME. et al. Regional right ventricular dysfunction detected by echocardiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 469-473
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Wallace DJ, Allison M, Stone MB. Inferior vena cava percentage collapse during respiration is affected by the sampling location: an ultrasound study in healthy volunteers. Acad Emerg Med 2010; 17: 96-99
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Seif D, Mailhot T, Perera P. et al. Caval sonography in shock: a noninvasive method for evaluating intravascular volume in critically ill patients. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 1885-1890
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Airapetian N, Maizel J, Alyamani O. et al. Does inferior vena cava respiratory variability predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients?. Crit Care 2015; 19: 400
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Barbier C, Loubières Y, Schmit C. et al. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Int Care Med 2004; 30: 1740-1746
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Orso D, Paoli I, Piani T. et al. Accuracy of ultrasonographic measurements of inferior vena cava to determine fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Care Med 2020; 35: 354-363
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Rozycki GS, Ochsner MG, Jaffin JH. et al. Prospective evaluation of surgeons’ use of ultrasound in the evaluation of trauma patients. J Trauma 1993; 34: 516-526
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Desforges JF, Ernst CB. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 1167-1172
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Tayal VS, Graf CD, Gibbs MA. Prospective study of accuracy and outcome of emergency ultrasound for abdominal aortic aneurysm over two years. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10: 867-871
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Lichtenstein DA, Mezière GA. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol. Chest 2008; 134: 117-125
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar