Facial Plast Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2296-3105
Original Research

Tunneled Paranasal Augmentation Using Diced Autologous Costal Cartilage in Asian Rhinoplasty: A Comparative Study

Guangxian Lin
1   Nasal Reconstruction Centre, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Plastic Surgery Hospital and Institute, Shijingshan District, China
,
Xu Yihao
1   Nasal Reconstruction Centre, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Plastic Surgery Hospital and Institute, Shijingshan District, China
,
Xulong Zhang
1   Nasal Reconstruction Centre, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Plastic Surgery Hospital and Institute, Shijingshan District, China
,
Jianjun You
1   Nasal Reconstruction Centre, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Plastic Surgery Hospital and Institute, Shijingshan District, China
,
Huan Wang
1   Nasal Reconstruction Centre, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Plastic Surgery Hospital and Institute, Shijingshan District, China
,
Ruobing Zheng
1   Nasal Reconstruction Centre, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Plastic Surgery Hospital and Institute, Shijingshan District, China
,
Le Tian
1   Nasal Reconstruction Centre, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Plastic Surgery Hospital and Institute, Shijingshan District, China
,
Junsheng Guo
1   Nasal Reconstruction Centre, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Plastic Surgery Hospital and Institute, Shijingshan District, China
,
Zhen Song
1   Nasal Reconstruction Centre, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Plastic Surgery Hospital and Institute, Shijingshan District, China
,
Fei Fan
1   Nasal Reconstruction Centre, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Plastic Surgery Hospital and Institute, Shijingshan District, China
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Due to the prevalence of anterior maxilla dysplasia in Asian population, paranasal concavity is a common accompaniment to low nose, but its impact on facial harmonization is often underestimated. A retrospective comparative study was conducted on patients diagnosed as low nose with paranasal concavity between June 2017 and June 2021, with a total of 56 patients followed up successfully. The control and observation groups were established according to whether the paranasal augmentation was performed. Demographic data were collected. Cosmetic enhancement was quantitatively evaluated by sagittal planimetry, establishing related anatomical landmarks and measuring columella base prominence (CBP) and alar base prominence (ABP). Subjective evaluation concluded the patient-reported satisfaction (FACE-Q-Rhinoplasty Module and Facial Appearance Module) and the third-party physician assessment (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, GAIS).

Significant improvements in CBP and ABP were reported both in the control and the observation group (p < 0.01). In postoperative intergroup comparisons, the observation group was superior to the control group regarding ABP values (2.5 ± 0.75 degrees, p < 0.01), FACE-Q-Facial scores (7.49 ± 3.70, p < 0.05), and GAIS scores (p < 0.05). However, no statistical difference was found in CBP values and FACE-Q-Rhinoplasty scores. Paranasal augmentation-related complications included asymmetry of alar bases (6.9%) and facial or intraoral foreign body sensation (34.5%). This study affirmed that paranasal augmentation using diced costal cartilage in rhinoplasty is a safe procedure effective in remedying paranasal concavity and improving facial satisfaction.

Level of Evidence: IV



Publication History

Accepted Manuscript online:
28 March 2024

Article published online:
22 April 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Zhang L, Tang M-Y, Jin R. et al. Classification of nasolabial folds in Asians and the corresponding surgical approaches: by Shanghai 9th People's Hospital. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (07) 914-919
  • 2 Forte AJ, Steinbacher DM, Persing JA, Brooks ED, Andrew TW, Alonso N. Orbital dysmorphology in untreated children with Crouzon and Apert syndromes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (05) 1054-1062
  • 3 Tripathi NV, Hakimi AA, Parsa KM, Bartholomew IY, Reilly MJ, Chu E. Complications, treatment, and outcomes of self-injecting substances into the face: a systematic review. Dermatol Surg 2024; 50 (01) 59-61
  • 4 Limongi RM, Tao J, Borba A. et al. Complications and management of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) injections to the midface. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (02) 132-135
  • 5 Gruber RP, Freeman MB, Hsu C, Elyassnia D, Reddy V. Nasal base reduction: a treatment algorithm including alar release with medialization. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (02) 716-725
  • 6 Zhao R, Pan B, Li D, An Y. Application of paranasal augmentation rhinoplasty in Asians with midfacial concavity. Ann Plast Surg 2023; 90 (5S, Suppl 2) S147-S152
  • 7 Bahşi I, Orhan M, Kervancioğlu P, Karatepe Ş, Sayin S. External nose anthropometry of healthy Turkish young adults. J Craniofac Surg 2021; 32 (06) 2226-2229
  • 8 Ottenhof MJ, Veldhuizen IJ, Hensbergen LJV. et al. The use of the FACE-Q aesthetic: a narrative review. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022; 46 (06) 2769-2780
  • 9 AlOtaibi NM, Liu C-H, Benington PCM, Ayoub AF. Improvement in facial aesthetics of orthognathic patients after surgery-first approach. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023; 61 (10) 666-671
  • 10 Park J-H, Kim J-W, Kim S-J. Midfacial soft-tissue changes after paranasal augmentation with porous polyethylene. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (02) 232-237
  • 11 Lee T-Y, Chung H-Y, Dhong E-S, Jeong SH, Han SK. Paranasal augmentation using multi-folded expanded polytetrafluorethylene (ePTFE) in the East Asian nose. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (12) 1319-1328
  • 12 Rohrich RJ, Hoxworth RE, Thornton JF, Pessa JE. The pyriform ligament. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (01) 277-281
  • 13 Gruber RP, Freeman MB, Hsu C, Elyassnia D, Reddy V. Nasal base reduction by alar release: a laboratory evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (02) 709-715
  • 14 Ponsky D, Guyuron B. Alar base disharmonies. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37 (02) 245-251
  • 15 Peleg O, Mahmoud R, Shuster A. et al. Orthognathic surgery complications: the 10-year experience of a single center. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2021; 49 (10) 891-897
  • 16 Ulkur F, Uyar VO, Ozdemir F, Guzel MZ. Interdisciplinary orthognathic treatment of high angle class III malocclusion. Niger J Clin Pract 2015; 18 (01) 144-148
  • 17 Wang G, Wei M, Zhen Y. et al. Three-dimensional morphological study on the effectiveness of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis in the paranasal augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2023
  • 18 Zhai Z, Zhao J, Qi Z. Paranasal augmentation: a viable and simplified modality with diced expanded polytetrafluoroethylene. J Craniofac Surg 2022; 33 (06) e613-e616
  • 19 Kim JH, Jung MS, Lee BH, Jeong HS, Suh IS, Ahn DK. Silicone implant-based paranasal augmentation for mild midface concavity. Arch Craniofac Surg 2016; 17 (01) 20-24
  • 20 Schwaiger M, Echlin K, Atherton D, Haers P. The use of Medpor implants for midface contouring in cleft patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019; 48 (09) 1177-1184
  • 21 Lee TS, Park S. Use of pedicled buccal fat pad for midface augmentation. J Craniofac Surg 2017; 28 (08) 2133-2134
  • 22 Choung PH, Kim SG. The coronoid process for paranasal augmentation in the correction of midfacial concavity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 91 (01) 28-33
  • 23 Jeon Y-T, Han S-J. Comparative study of the effect of paranasal augmentation with autologous bone in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 77 (10) 2116-2124
  • 24 Sabuncuoglu F, Varol A, Sençimen M, Olmez H. Onlay iliac bone grafting as an ancillary augmentation procedure for paranasal rejuvenation during bimaxillary surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109 (02) e13-e19
  • 25 Park H, Chun K-W, Kye M-S, Dhong ES, Yoon ES. Midface augmentation using bony segments obtained from sagittal splitting angle ostectomy in Asians. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (02) 578-586
  • 26 Remache D, Caliez M, Gratton M, Dos Santos S. The effects of cyclic tensile and stress-relaxation tests on porcine skin. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018; 77: 242-249
  • 27 Mendelson B, Wong C-H. Changes in the facial skeleton with aging: implications and clinical applications in facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44 (04) 1151-1158
  • 28 Lin SI, Hsiao Y-C, Chang C-S, Chen PK, Chen JP, Ueng SH. Histology and long-term stability of diced cartilage graft for revision rhinoplasty in a cleft patient. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (06) e763
  • 29 An Y, Zhen Y, Ye W. et al. Diced costal cartilage graft combined with muscle repositioning improves cleft-side alar asymmetry in Asian secondary unilateral cleft rhinoplasty: a three-dimensional evaluation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (09) 2265-2271
  • 30 Yu MS, Kim B-H, Kang S-H, Lim DJ. Combined use of crushed cartilage and fibrin sealant for radix augmentation in Asian rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (02) 293e-300e
  • 31 Dong W, Xu Y, Han R. et al. Paranasal augmentation using diced costal cartilage for midface concavity: a retrospective study of 68 patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021