Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2312-9176
Original Article

The Evolution of My Extended SMAS-Biplanar Deep Plane Facelift to a Composite Tissue Deep Plane Face and Neck Lift: Similarities and Differences

Stephen Perkins
1   Department of Facial Plastic Surgery, Meridian Plastic Surgery Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
,
Alexander Caniglia 
1   Department of Facial Plastic Surgery, Meridian Plastic Surgery Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

In this article, Dr. Stephen Perkins, a seasoned facial plastic surgeon, presents his refined techniques in facelift surgery developed over four decades of practice. His evolution from traditional methods to the current composite tissue deep plane facelift is elucidated. His composite tissue deep plane facelift involves meticulous dissection and repositioning of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) and platysma in the deep plane, as well as incorporating his innovative “Perkins' Kelly clamp anterior platysmaplasty.” This technique, refined through years of experience, aims for natural, enduring results, crucially addressing patient concerns such as jowling and neck laxity. Long-term analysis reveals the advantages of Dr. Perkins' technique, particularly in achieving sustained cervicomental angle improvement for over a decade postoperatively. This article underscores the importance of understanding deep plane facelift techniques, distinguishing between different approaches, and tailoring surgical interventions to individual patient characteristics. Dr. Perkins' comprehensive approach, incorporating advancements in surgical technique and meticulous patient care protocols, exemplifies the goal of achieving natural, long-lasting facial rejuvenation.

Keywords

facelift - deep plane - rhytidectomy - SMAS - neck lift


Publication History

Accepted Manuscript online:
24 April 2024

Article published online:
03 June 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Albucker SJ, Lipner SR. “Weekend facelifts” gone wrong: retrospective analysis of the MAUDE database on thread-lifting complications from 2003-2023. J Cutan Med Surg 2023; 27 (06) 647-648
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Van Pham T, Truong KHTN. Short or minimum incision deep plane/extended deep plane facelift/rhytidectomy. Facial Plast Surg 2020; 36 (04) 376-385
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 McCollough EG, Perkins SW, Langsdon PR. SASMAS suspension rhytidectomy. Rationale and long-term experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115 (02) 228-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hu S, Perkins SW. The extended superficial musculoaponeurotic system deep plane facelift. Facial Plast Surg 2022; 38 (06) 575-583
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Baker SR. Deep plane rhytidectomy and variations. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2009; 17 (04) 557-573 , vi
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 58 (01) 80-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Skoog TG. Plastic surgery: the aging face. In: Skoog TG. ed. Plastic Surgery: New Methods and Refinements. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 1974: 300-330
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Kamer FM, Mingrone MD. Deep plane rhytidectomy: a personal evolution. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2005; 13 (01) 115-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Adamson PA, Litner JA. Evolution of rhytidectomy techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2005; 13 (03) 383-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Jacono AA. A novel volumizing extended deep-plane facelift: using composite flap shifts to volumize the midface and jawline. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2020; 28 (03) 331-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Feldman JJ. Neck lift my way: an update. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (06) 1173-1183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Marten T, Elyassnia D. High SMAS facelift: combined single flap lifting of the midface, cheek, and jawline. Facial Plast Surg 2022; 38 (06) 593-612
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Marten TJ. High SMAS facelift: combined single flap lifting of the jawline, cheek, and midface. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (04) 569-603 , vi–vii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Perkins SW. Book review: “The Art and Science of Extended Deep Plane Facelifting.” by Andrew Jacono MD. Fac Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2021 (e-pub ahead of print). https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2021.0187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Tonnard P, Verpaele A. The MACS-lift short scar rhytidectomy. Aesthet Surg J 2007; 27 (02) 188-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Jacono AA, Bryant LM, Alemi AS. Optimal facelift vector and its relation to zygomaticus major orientation. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (04) 351-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Jacono AA, Alemi AS, Harmon JJ, Ahmedli N. The effect of a novel platysma hammock flap during extended deep plane facelift on the signs of aging in the neck. Aesthet Surg J 2022; 42 (08) 845-857
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Brobst R, Sufyan A, Perkins S. Kelly clamp technique for submental platysmaplasty: evaluation of long-term outcomes. Paper presented at: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Fall Meeting,. September 5–8, 2013; Washington, DC
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Caniglia RJ, Pollei TR. Evaluation of fibrin sealant and postoperative hematoma/seroma rates in rhytidectomy. Paper presented at: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Fall Meeting, October 19–21, 2013 ; New Orleans, LA
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kamer FM, Markarian A. Deep-plane technique. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006; 8 (03) 193-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar