Download PDF
Hebamme 2024; 37(04): 26-31
DOI: 10.1055/a-2332-8886
CNE Schwerpunkt
Schwangerenvorsorge

Einführung der Gruppenschwangerschaftsbetreuung in Deutschland

Jalana Lazar
,
Octavia Wiseman
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

In Deutschland laufen Pilotprojekte sehr erfolgreich an – international ist die Schwangerenvorsorge in Gruppen bereits weit verbreitet. Die Autorinnen beleuchten die Vorteile der Gruppenbetreuung, blicken auf vorliegende Evidenz und aktuelle Forschungsvorhaben und fassen die Perspektiven des Modells für die Zukunft zusammen. Hebammen sind eingeladen, sich zu diesem Thema global zu vernetzen.



Publication History

Article published online:
26 August 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 World Health Organization. Recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Downe S, Finlayson K, Tunçalp Ö, Gülmezoglu AM. Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2019 Jun 12 [cited 2020 Oct 19]. Im Internet:
    CrossrefPubMed
  • 3 Rising SS, Quimby CH. The CenteringPregnancy model: the power of group health care. 1st ed. New York: Springer; 2017
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Baldwin K, Phillips G. Voices Along the Journey: Midwives’ Perceptions of Implementing the CenteringPregnancy Model of Prenatal Care. J Perinat Educ 2011; 20: 210-217
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Andersson E, Christensson K, Hildingsson I. Parents’ experiences and perceptions of group-based antenatal care in four clinics in Sweden. Midwifery 2012; 28: 502-508
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Ahrne M, Schytt E, Andersson E. et al. Antenatal care for Somali-born women in Sweden: Perspectives from mothers, fathers and midwives. Midwifery 2019; 74: 107-115
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Byrskog U, Ahrne M, Small R. et al. Rationale, development and feasibility of group antenatal care for immigrant women in Sweden: A study protocol for the Hooyo Project. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e030314
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Gaudion A, Menka Y, Demilew J. et al. Findings from a UK feasibility study of the CenteringPregnancy® model. Br J Midwifery 2011; 19: 796-802
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 McNeill JA, Reiger KM. Rethinking Prenatal Care Within a Social Model of Health: An Exploratory Study in Northern Ireland. Health Care Women Int 2015; 36: 5-25
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Barnes J, Stuart J. The feasibility of delivering group Family Nurse Partnership. J Child Serv 2016; 11: 170-186
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Sawtell M, Wiggins M, Wiseman O. et al. Group antenatal care: findings from a pilot randomised controlled trial of REACH Pregnancy Circles. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9: 42
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Wiggins M, Sawtell M, Wiseman O. et al. Testing the effectiveness of REACH Pregnancy Circles group antenatal care: protocol for a randomised controlled pilot trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2018; 4: 169
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Craswell A, Kearney L, Reed R. ‘Expecting and Connecting’ Group Pregnancy Care: Evaluation of a collaborative clinic. Women Birth 2016; 29: 416-422
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Riggs E, Yelland J, Szwarc J, Muyeen S, Dawson W, Brown S. Improving access, equty and health literacy: Group pregnancy care and information for refugee background women. In Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. Conference: 21st Annual Congress of the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand, PSANZ. Australia: Blackwell Publishing; 2017. 53. 116 Im Internet: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28110517/
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Brookfield J. Group antenatal care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women: An acceptability study. Women Birth 2019; 32: 437-448
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Patil CL, Klima CS, Leshabari SC. et al. Randomized controlled pilot of a group antenatal care model and the sociodemographic factors associated with pregnancy-related empowerment in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17: 33-42
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Adaji SE, Jimoh A, Bawa U. et al. Women’s experience with group prenatal care in a rural community in northern Nigeria. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2019; 145: 164-169
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Grenier L, Suhowatsky S, Kabue MM. et al. Impact of group antenatal care (G-ANC) versus individual antenatal care (ANC) on quality of care, ANC attendance and facility-based delivery: A pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial in Kenya and Nigeria. PLoS ONE 2019; 14: e0222177
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Ibañez-Cuevas M, Heredia-Pi IB, Fuentes-Rivera E. et al. Atención Prenatal en Grupo en México: perspectivas y experiencias del personal de salud. Rev Saúde Pública 2020; 54: 140
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Sultana M, Mahumud RA, Ali N. et al. Cost of introducing group prenatal care (GPC) in Bangladesh: a supply-side perspective. Saf Health [Internet]. 2017 3. Im Internet: https://safetyinhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40886-017-0059-4
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Musabyimana A, Lundeen T, Butrick E. et al. Before and after implementation of group antenatal care in Rwanda: a qualitative study of women’s experiences. Reprod Health 2019; 16: 90-90
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Harsha Bangura A, Nirola I, Thapa P. et al. Measuring fidelity, feasibility, costs: an implementation evaluation of a cluster-controlled trial of group antenatal care in rural Nepal. Reprod Health 2020; 17: 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Catling CJ, Medley N, Foureur M. et al. Group versus conventional antenatal care for women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015: 007622
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Byerley BM, Haas DM. A systematic overview of the literature regarding group prenatal care for high-risk pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17: 329-329
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Lazar J, Boned-Rico L, Olander EK. et al. A systematic review of providers’ experiences of facilitating group antenatal care. Reprod Health 2021; 18: 180
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Sadiku F, Bucinca H, Talrich F. et al. Maternal satisfaction with group care: a systematic review. AJOG Glob Rep 2024; 4: 100301
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Wagijo MA, Crone M, Bruinsma-van Zwicht B. et al. The Effect of CenteringPregnancy Group Antenatal Care on Maternal, Birth, and Neonatal Outcomes Among Low-Risk Women in the Netherlands: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial. J Midwifery Womens Health 2024; 69: 191-201
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Ickovics JR, Kershaw TS, Westdahl C. et al. Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 330
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Jafari F. PP-310. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of group prenatal care: A new experience in Iran. Early Hum Dev 2010; 86: 140
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Kennedy HP, Farrell T, Paden R. et al. A randomized clinical trial of group prenatal care in two military settings. Mil Med 2011; 176: 1169-1177
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Andersson E, Christensson K, Hildingsson I. Mothers’ satisfaction with group antenatal care versus individual antenatal care – a clinical trial. Sex Reprod Healthc 2013; 4: 113-120
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Ickovics JR, Earnshaw V, Lewis JB. et al. Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Prenatal Care: Perinatal Outcomes Among Adolescents in New York City Health Centers. Am J Public Health 2016; 106: 359-365
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Novick G, Reid AE, Lewis J. et al. Group prenatal care: model fidelity and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 112. e1-112.e6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Talrich F, Van Damme A, Bastiaens HLA. et al. How to Support the Referral Towards Group Antenatal Care in Belgian Primary Healthcare Organizations: A Qualitative Study. Int J Womens Health 2023; 15: 33-49
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S. et al. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. COCHRANE DATABASE Syst Rev 2016; 2015: CD004667
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 36 Fikre R, Gubbels J, Teklesilasie W. et al. Effectiveness of midwifery-led care on pregnancy outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23: 386
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Wiseman O, Emmett L, Hickford G. et al. The challenges and opportunities for implementing group antenatal care (‘Pregnancy Circles’) as part of standard NHS maternity care: A co-designed qualitative study. Midwifery [Internet] 2022; 109 Im Internet: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85127929641&doi=10.1016%2fj.midw.2022.103333&partnerID=40&md5=37f4fd349755bdf9958472972f3b9320
    Search in Google Scholar