Energy Flow during Baseball Machine Hitting

Abstract

The primary aims of the study were to perform a descriptive analysis of hitting energetics off a pitching machine and to compare between the rear- and lead-side lower and upper extremities. Eighty-five high school to minor league baseball athletes participated. Five full-effort swings off a pitching machine with the fastest exit velocity were used for analysis. Energy flow was quantified using a segment power analysis. Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed significant differences between rear- and lead-side energetics during both swing phases. During the stride, the rear knee and shoulder generated more energy than the lead side. Throughout the swing phase the lead knee, hip, and elbow generated more energy than the rear side, but at the shoulder the rear side generated significantly more energy than the lead. Most intriguing, differing energy transfer directions between the rear and lead knee and shoulder joints were reported. Furthermore, descriptive results revealed energy is predominantly transferred across the knee, shoulder, and elbow joints, while the hips primarily display energy generation. The descriptive nature of the study provides a foundation for future research and can be used as a resource for training personnel to design effective training protocols aimed at maximizing performance.

Keywords

descriptive - energetics - performance - swing

Publication History

Received: 05 March 2024

Accepted: 11 June 2024

Article published online:
24 July 2024

• References

• 1 Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, DeRenne C. et al. A comparison of age level on baseball hitting kinematics. J Appl Biomech 2009; 25: 210-218
• 2 Bordelon N, Wasserberger KW, Downs Talmage JL. et al. Segment power analysis of collegiate softball hitting. Sports Biomech 2021; Dec 28: 1-14 DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2021.2011391.
• 3 Welch CM, Banks SA, Cook FF. et al. Hitting a baseball: A biomechanical description. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1995; 22: 193-201
• 4 Dowling B, Fleisig G. Kinematic comparison of baseball batting off a tee among various competition levels. Sports Biomech 2016; 15: 255-269
• 5 Horiuchi G, Nakashima H. Relationship between ground reaching force in horizontal plane and mechanical energy flow in torso during baseball tee batting. Sports Biomech 2023; Jan 3: 1-12 DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2022.2162433.
• 6 Horiuchi G, Nakashima H, Sakurai S. Mechanical energy flow in torso during baseball toss batting. Sports Biomech 2021; May 19: 1-11
• 7 Horiuchi F, Nakajima D, Sakurai S. The flow of mechanical energy of the lower limbs and cores in baseball batting. Phys Educ Res 2017; DOI: 10.5432/jjpehss.16095.
• 8 Washington JK, Oliver GD. Kinematic differences between hitting off a tee versus front toss in collegiate softball players. Int Biomech 2018; 5: 30-35
• 9 Ae K, Koike S, Fujii N. et al. Kinetic analysis of the lower limbs in baseball tee batting. Sports Biomech 2017; 16: 283-296
• 10 Oliver GD, Wasserberger KW, de Swart A. et al. Effects of hip range of motion and isometric strength on energy flow during windmill softball pitching. J Athl Train 2021; Jan 22 DOI: 10.4085/145-20.
• 11 Marsh JA, Wagshol MI, Boddy KJ. et al. Effects of a six-week weighted-implement throwing program on baseball pitching velocity, kinematics, arm stress, and arm range of motion. PeerJ 2018; 6: e6003 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6003.
• 12 O’Connell ME, Lindley KE, Scheffey JO. et al. Weighted baseball training affects arm speed without increasing elbow and shoulder joint kinetics. J Appl Biomech 2022; 38: 281-285
• 13 Gordon D, Robertson E, Winter DA. Mechanical energy generation, absorption and transfer amongst segments during walking. J Biomech 1980; 13: 845-854
• 14 de Swart A, van Trigt B, Wasserberger KW. et al. Energy flow through the lower extremities in baseball pitching. Sports Biomech 2022; Oct 13: 1-15 DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2022.2129430.
• 15 Wasserberger KW, Giordano KA. et al. Energy generation, absorption, and transfer at the shoulder and elbow in youth baseball pitchers. Sports Biomech 2021; June 8 1-16 DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2021.1933158.
• 16 Oliver GD, Wasserberger KW, de Swart A. et al. Hip range of motion and strength and energy flow during windmill softball pitching. J Athl Train 2021; 56: 280-285
• 17 Hashimoto J, LaSalle T, Takata A. et al. Energy flow and ground reaction force predictors of bat swing speed during pitched ball batting in professional baseball players. International Society of Biomechanics in Sport; 2023, Milwaukee, WI. ISBS Proceedings Archive, Article 45. Available from: https://commons.nmu.edu/isbs/vol41/iss1/45
• 18 Robb AJ, Fleisig G, Wilk K. et al. Passive ranges of motion of the hips and their relationship with pitching biomechanics and ball velocity in professional baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38: 2487-2493 DOI: 10.1177/0363546510375535.
• 19 Laudner K, Wong R, Onuki T. et al. The relationship between clinically measured hip rotational motion and shoulder biomechanics during the pitching motion. J Sci Med Sport 2015; 18: 581-584
• 20 Plummer H, Bordelon N, Wasserberger KW. et al. Association between passive hip range of motion and pitching kinematics in high school baseball pitchers. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2021; 16: 1323-1329
• 21 Kimura A, Yoshioka S, Omura L. et al. Mechanical properties of upper torso rotation from the viewpoint of energetics during baseball pitching. Euro J Sport Sci 2020; 20: 606-613