Keywords PBMAH - adrenal - cushing’s syndrome - food-dependent - GIP-dependent - GIP - GIPR - KDM1A
Introduction
Food-dependent cortisol secretion is a rare feature that can be observed in
unilateral or bilateral benign adrenal causes of Cushing’s syndrome, namely
adrenocortical adenomas and primary bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia
(PBMAH) [1 ]. Its first description in
1987 [2 ] was followed by numerous reports
and attempts to understand its origins until the recent discovery of its molecular
cause [3 ]
[4 ]. In this review, we propose both a
historical perspective and practical keys for the clinical management of
food-dependent (also referred to as “glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide
(GIP)-dependent”) Cushing’s syndrome (FDCS). This review article was commissioned
after a lecture on this topic at the 2023 IMPROCUSH meeting.
Isolation of glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and its receptor
Isolation of glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and its receptor
GIP is a 42 amino acid-long protein secreted by the duodenal K cells in response to
carbohydrates and fat intake, as well as protein intake, but to a lesser extent. The
history of the discovery of GIP is a series of failures and successes and has been
brilliantly related by Vincent Marks in a 2020 special issue of peptides dedicated
to GIP [5 ]. In the late 1960s, John C.
Brown in Canada first isolated a gastrointestinal polypeptide with the
characteristics of an enterogastrone—a hormone secreted by the lower
gastrointestinal tract in response to fat intake that inhibits gastric acid
secretion and emptying [6 ]—and then named
it gastric inhibitory polypeptide. During the same time, Desmond S. Turner in
England was assessing the incretin activity of a supposed polypeptide isolated from
a gastrointestinal extract, named insulin releasing peptide (IRP) [7 ]. A few years earlier, Turner was one of
the re-discoverers of the concept of incretin [8 ]
[9 ] – a gastrointestinal
hormone secreted by the small intestine in response to oral carbohydrate intake,
stimulating the insulin secretion by the pancreatic beta cells – which had been
first described more than 30 years earlier by Laughton and Macallum [10 ]. The incretin activity of Turner’s IRP
was poor compared to that of GIP which he obtained from Brown [11 ]
[12 ]. IRP was then abandoned, and GIP was renamed glucose-dependent
insulinotropic polypeptide, as its enterogastrone properties were actually weakly
relevant compared to other gastrointestinal peptides. It was demonstrated many years
later that Turner’s IRP contained both GIP and somatostatin, accounting for its
moderate insulinotropic effect [5 ]. The
effects of GIP are actually much wider than only on stomach and beta cells: it also
promotes bone formation, fat accumulation, both insulin and glucagon secretion, and
beta cell proliferation, among other pleiotropic functions [13 ]. This explains the current development
of drugs targeting the GIP receptor (GIPR) for the treatment of obesity and
diabetes.
GIPR was isolated and cloned simultaneously by three independent teams in 1995
[14 ]
[15 ]
[16 ]. The human GIPR gene is 13.8 kb long and consists of 14 exons,
encoding a 466 amino acids protein, with a homology with rat Gipr >80%.
GIPR is a seven-domain transmembrane G -protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) broadly
expressed in numerous human tissues. In pancreatic beta cells, where the GIP action
is the most documented, GIP is secreted after food intake and binds to its receptor,
leading to the recruitment of Gαs protein and the activation of the cAMP/PKA
pathway, finally stimulating insulin secretion [17 ].
Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, glucose-dependent insulinotropic
peptide receptor, and Cushing’s syndrome
Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, glucose-dependent insulinotropic
peptide receptor, and Cushing’s syndrome
The first case of a food-dependent Cushing’s syndrome was reported by Pavel Hamet in
1987, describing a 41-year-old man with clinical and biological adrenocorticotropin
(ACTH)-independent hypercortisolism secondary to a unilateral adrenocortical
adenoma. The special feature of this patient was his low fasting cortisol,
increasing after food intake, suggesting that “a humoral factor induced by eating
was responsible for the periodic hormonogenesis, directly stimulating the adrenal
secretion of cortisol” [2 ]. That humoral
factor was identified as GIP 5 years later in back-to-back publications by André
Lacroix and Yves Reznik [18 ]
[19 ], enlightened by an editorial from Prof
Xavier Bertagna [20 ] in the New England
Journal of Medicine. They both described the cases of two women in their 40 s
presenting PBMAH and severe ACTH-independent Cushing’s syndrome characterized by a
low fasting plasma cortisol, increasing in correlation with serum GIP variations
following meals. In these two cases, cortisol secretion was stimulated by oral
glucose load, lipid-rich or protein-rich meals, but not by intravenous glucose
infusion. The involvement of GIP was corroborated by the stimulation of cortisol
secretion upon intravenous GIP infusion and suppressed by somatostatin analog
treatment. The measured GIP was not higher in the two patients than in normal
controls, not arguing for an excessive secretion of GIP but rather for an abnormal
sensitivity of adrenocortical cells to the physiological postprandial increase of
GIP. Based on previous descriptions of various hormone receptors in rat [21 ]
[22 ] and human adrenocortical cancer [23 ], paving the way for the new concept of illegitimate receptor
expression, both publications from Lacroix and Reznik assumed the role of the GIPR
in food-dependent Cushing’s syndrome [18 ]
[19 ]. However, they were
not able to demonstrate this since GIPR had not yet been cloned. Evidence for the
abnormal expression of GIPR in food-dependent adenoma [24 ] and PBMAH [25 ]
[26 ] was provided a few years later.
To summarize, in FDCS, the aberrantly expressed GIPR in adrenocortical cells is
triggered when bound to GIP, which is physiologically secreted by duodenal K cells
following food intake. This leads to the activation of the cAMP/PKA pathway,
resulting in the stimulation of glucocorticoid synthesis ([Fig. 1 ]), similar to ACTH stimulation.
Chronic hypercortisolism consecutive to the intermittent but sustained GIP
stimulation suppresses ACTH secretion, accounting for the low ACTH and cortisol
levels during fast.
Fig. 1 Schematic representation of food-dependent Cushing’s syndrome
pathophysiology. GIP is secreted by duodenal K cells in response to food
intake. GIP binds to its receptor (GIPR) aberrantly expressed in
adrenocortical cells and activates the cAMP/PKA pathway, resulting in a
stimulation of cortisol secretion following meals. The cortisol excess
suppresses CRH and ACTH secretion, accounting for the low plasma levels
during fast. GIP, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide; GIPR, GIP
receptor; CRH, corticotropin-releasing hormone; ACTH, adrenocorticotropic
hormone. Created with BioRender.com. [rerif]
Whether or not GIPR ectopic expression in adrenocortical cells is sufficient to
promote tumorigenesis is still a matter of question. An element of response was
brought by Mazzuco and colleagues in 2007: a rat Gipr vector was transfected
in bovine adrenocortical cells, and these cells were transplanted in
adrenalectomized immunodeficient mice, resulting in the development of a
hyperplastic adrenocortical tissue with a high GIP-responsive cortisol output, but
non-responsive to ACTH. These observations account for the tumorigenic potential of
aberrant expression of GIPR in adrenocortical cells [27 ].
FDCS was the first in vivo demonstration of the regulation of adrenocortical
steroidogenesis by illegitimate GPCR, responding to physiological stimuli. Since
then, many other GPCRs have been described in PBMAH, including vasopressin receptors
AVPR1A and AVPR2 (cortisol response to upright posture and vasopressin agonists)
[28 ]
[29 ]
[30 ], beta1 and beta2-adrenergic receptors (cortisol response to upright
posture, sport, stress, etc.) [31 ],
serotonin receptors 5HT4 (cortisol response to 5HT4 serotonin receptor agonists)
[32 ]
[33 ]
[34 ]
[35 ]
[36 ], luteinizing hormone (LH) and human
chorionic gonadotropin (LH/hCG) receptor (cortisol response to high LH in menopause,
and probably to high hCG in pregnancy) [32 ]
[37 ]; there are also some
reports on aberrant response of PBMAH to thyroid stimulating hormone, glucagon, or
follicle-stimulating hormone [38 ]
[39 ]
[40 ].
Diagnosis of food-dependent Cushing’s syndrome
Diagnosis of food-dependent Cushing’s syndrome
FDCS can be observed in unilateral adrenal Cushing’s syndrome secondary to
adrenocortical adenoma, or, more frequently, in PBMAH.
Some teams have reported the systematic screening of aberrant cortisol response to
various stimuli in PBMAH, showing a high prevalence>80% of at least one
illegitimate receptor, the most frequent being vasopressin receptors (33–75%),
beta-adrenergic receptors (33–48%), serotonin receptors (16–47%), GIP receptor
(8–33%), and LH/hCG receptor (around 15%) [38 ]
[39 ]
[40 ]
[41 ]. However, concerning GIPR, this could be overestimated by a
recruitment bias, and in retrospect, its prevalence is probably much lower and
remains currently unknown. To the best of our knowledge, only 39 patients with PBMAH
and FDCS have been reported in the literature and have been summarized by André
Lacroix in 2023 [42 ]. Among them, 36
(92.3%) were women, which is much higher imbalance than in other forms of PBMAH
(65–70% of women in sporadic PBMAH and around 50% in PBMAH secondary to ARMC5
germline mutation) [43 ]
[44 ]
[45 ].
The food-dependent nature of an adrenal Cushing’s syndrome can be suspected in front
of clinical signs of hypercortisolism with a surprisingly low morning fasting
cortisolemia, associated with a suppressed circulating ACTH, which can mimic a
corticotroph deficiency and an increasing cortisolemia during the diurnal cycle of
measurements. It can be further corroborated by the stimulation of the cortisol
secretion, indicated by an increase of 50% or more of plasma and/or salivary
cortisol after a mixed meal or oral glucose load following an overnight fasting
([Fig. 2 ]). As somatostatin
counteracts GIP action, the use of a somatostatin analog such as subcutaneous
octreotide 100 µg before meals can show a decrease in cortisol stimulation after
food intake [19 ] ([Fig. 2 ]). Through intravenous GIP
infusion, it is feasible to demonstrate the GIP-dependence of cortisol secretion
[18 ]
[19 ], but it is probably unnecessary for
the diagnosis since GIPR is the only incretin receptor known to be aberrantly
expressed in PBMAH. Notably, there is no report on the aberrant expression of the
GLP1R in adrenal Cushing’s syndrome [42 ].
Fig. 2 Cortisol secretion in a patient with PBMAH and food-dependent
Cushing’s syndrome. This patient with food-dependent Cushing’s syndrome has
a low fasting cortisolemia<300 nmol/L, which dramatically increases
quickly after food intake (dark line). The cortisol response following meals
is suppressed by the subcutaneous injection of 100 µg octreotide before
meals (pale line). PBMAH, primary bilateral macronodular adrenal
hyperplasia.
Most patients with FDCS have been reported with a low fasting cortisol [3 ]
[4 ]. However, one must consider the potential association of several
illegitimate receptors in one patient, i. e., GIPR and LHCGR, which could lead to
non-suppressed fasting cortisol due to the concomitant stimulation of cortisol
secretion by several ligands [46 ].
The other biological assays meet the classical diagnostic methodology of any
ACTH-independent Cushing’s syndrome, including 24-h urinary free cortisol (24 h UFC)
and 1 mg overnight or low dose dexamethasone suppression test (DST) [47 ]. Theoretically, DST could be faulted
in FDCS due to the expected low morning fasting plasma cortisol in this situation
[46 ]. However, in our experience,
even if morning plasma cortisol is lower than in other forms of PBMAH, it is not
fully suppressed, and since ACTH is usually already suppressed, the DST is not
supposed to lower cortisol.
Several teams in the past have proposed, described, and performed systematic in
vivo screening of illegitimate receptors in PBMAH patients [1 ]
[38 ]
[39 ]
[40 ]
[41 ]
[48 ]. However, considering
the complexity of these time-consuming protocols, they are infrequently performed
nowadays. Indeed, given that efficient specific treatments are available only for a
limited number of receptors (mainly LHCGR and beta-adrenergic receptors) and that an
individual patient often presents an aberrant response to a combination of
illegitimate receptors, the added value of the results of these explorations in
clinical practice at present is not demonstrated [46 ].
Treatment of food-dependent Cushing’s syndrome
Treatment of food-dependent Cushing’s syndrome
The treatment of the rare adrenocortical adenomas with FDCS is unilateral
adrenalectomy [42 ], with a consecutive
corticotroph deficiency necessitating glucocorticoid replacement until the recovery
of corticotroph function. Bilateral adrenalectomy is the classical treatment of
food-dependent PBMAH [42 ], with a
following adrenal insufficiency needing lifelong glucocorticoid and
mineralocorticoid replacement therapy. For a few decades, unilateral adrenalectomy
has been considered in PBMAH to avoid lifelong medical treatment and to prevent the
risk of adrenal crisis [49 ]
[50 ]. Its use has been summarized in a
recent review [46 ]: of the 286 reported
patients with PBMAH treated with unilateral adrenalectomy, 220 (77%) experienced an
initial remission of Cushing’s syndrome, with a secondary relapse of
hypercortisolism in 64 (29%), while 66 (23%) had a persistent hypercortisolism after
surgery. In total, 89 patients (31%) further needed a contralateral adrenalectomy.
Considering the rarity of FDCS, unilateral adrenalectomy has not been specifically
studied in this condition yet [42 ].
However, we can speculate that in the persistent presence of the stimulus of
cortisol secretion, namely GIP, removing one adrenal gland may not lead to the
remission of Cushing’s syndrome, as observed in ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome.
Still, unilateral adrenalectomy may be considered in very asymmetrical
food-dependent PBMAH with one morphologically dominant adrenal gland. To illustrate
this, André Lacroix recently reported that a patient with severe FDCS and very
asymmetrical adrenals (two supra-centimetric nodules in the right adrenal and one
infra-centimetric nodule in the left adrenal, with an exclusive iodocholesterol
uptake by the right adrenal) [51 ] was
still in remission 23 years after a right adrenalectomy [42 ]. This patient was further genotyped
and harbored a germline KDM1A pathogenic variant associated with a 1p loss of
heterozygosity in her right adrenal nodules [4 ].
Medical therapy by inhibitors of cortisol synthesis, such as metyrapone,
ketoconazole, mitotane or the more recent osilodrostat, can be an alternative to the
surgical treatment for patients for whom surgery is contra-indicated or refused
[46 ]. These drugs may also be
transiently used to prepare for surgery in case of severe hypercortisolism.
Considering the neutralization of GIP action by somatostatin, specific medical
treatment of FDCS by somatostatin analogs has been reported [19 ]
[24 ]
[52 ]
[53 ]
[54 ]
[55 ], but usually with a
transient control of cortisol secretion because GIP inhibition escapes after a few
weeks or months or the rapid occurrence of side effects, limiting its use in
clinical practice. Future prospects on the potential use of specific GIPR
antagonists in FDCS would be valuable [42 ].
Clinical practitioners may advise FDCS patients against fasting, given that cortisol
secretion is dependent on GIP and limited to GIP due to the suppressed CRH and ACTH
in FDCS. Indeed, in the absence of GIP, the actual situation of a patient with FDCS
is corticotroph deficiency, which could lead to an adrenal crisis in case of
prolonged fasting. One also should consider a transient glucocorticoid replacement
in case of medically justified fasting (i. e., before surgery).
Molecular causes of food-dependent Cushing’s syndrome
Molecular causes of food-dependent Cushing’s syndrome
Following the identification of germline ARMC5 pathogenic variants in 2013
[56 ], its systematic sequencing has
been performed in many different series of patients with PBMAH, with a mutation rate
around 20 to 25% in apparently sporadic index cases [43 ]
[44 ]
[45 ]
[57 ]. Aberrant expression of illegitimate
receptors in ARMC5 mutated patients—mostly vasopressin, beta-adrenergic, and
serotonin receptors—has been previously reported in the same proportion as in
wild-type patients [44 ]
[56 ]
[58 ]. But none of the explored patients with FDCS, including those with a
familial history of PBMAH, harbored an ARMC5 pathogenic variant, suggesting a
different genetic mechanism [3 ]
[59 ]
[60 ]. No pathogenic variant affecting the coding sequence of the
GIPR gene or its promoter was identified in patients with FDCS [26 ]
[61 ].
In 2017, Lecoq et al. reported the first large molecular study of both food-dependent
adenomas and PBMAH. They found somatic microduplications and chromosomal
rearrangements of the 19q13 region where the GIPR locus is mapped in 2/5
adrenocortical adenomas from patients with FDCS, and a complete 19q duplication in
the nodular tissue from 1/10 patients with a food-dependent PBMAH. Those chromosomal
alterations were absent in germline DNA [62 ].
In 2021, the genetic cause of food-dependent PBMAH was identified simultaneously by
two independent teams, solving a 35-year enigma. Our group used a multi-omics
approach to classify 52 tumor samples from 36 adrenalectomized index cases of PBMAH
with various phenotypes [3 ]. The
integrative analysis revealed three different molecular groups: G1, comprising the
tumor samples from the 16 patients with ARMC5 mutation; G2, comprising the
tumor samples from the six patients with FDCS; G3, from 14 more heterogeneous
patients. ARMC5 patients were characterized by a strong transcriptomic
clustering and their recurrent copy-neutral 16p loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH),
previously described as the second hit causing biallelic inactivation of the gene
[56 ]
[63 ]. All patients from the G2 group had a
somatic loss of 1p arm, a high GIPR expression, and the most underexpressed
gene compared to G1 and G3 was KDM1A , interestingly mapped at 1p. We then
performed a germline exome sequencing and found a heterozygous pathogenic variant of
KDM1A in 5/6 G2 patients. Combined with the loss of the wild-type allele
through the 1p LOH, this led to the complete loss of KDM1A in the adrenal nodules,
both at mRNA and protein levels. In addition, we found germline pathogenic variants
of KDM1A in four supplementary index cases of food-dependent PBMAH, including
one in a familial presentation. KDM1A mutated PBMAH were also distinguished
by an unusually high proportion of eosinophilic cells; this aspect has been further
explored and described recently in the first histopathological classification of
PBMAH [64 ]. We did not find any recurrent
germline or somatic alteration in the G3 group.
On their side, after the joint groups of Peter Kamenicky and Isabelle Bourdeau found
KDM1A germline variants in two independent patients from their respective
teams, they reported the same observations of KDM1A germline variants
associated with somatic 1p LOH on 17 index cases of FDCS, and also in 2 familial
situations [4 ]. In addition, they showed
that both the combined use of a KDM1A siRNA with a pharmacological inhibitor
of KDM1A (GSK-LSD1) and KDM1A knockout by CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing resulted
in an increase of GIPR expression in the adrenocortical cell line H295R. They also
described foci of myelolipoma in four patients and myeloid metaplasia in three
others, which has not been observed in our series. In both studies, no KDM1A
germline variant was reported in non-FDCS PBMAH control patients [3 ]
[4 ].
KDM1A encodes a histone demethylase, demethylating histone 3 on lysine 4, and
thus is considered a transcriptional repressor [65 ]
[66 ]. We can speculate that
a functional KDM1A normally represses GIPR transcription in adrenocortical
cells and that this inhibition is lost in the case of KDM1A inactivation,
leading to the aberrant expression of GIPR. However, KDM1A can also demethylate
histone 3 on lysine 9, making it a transcriptional activator [67 ]
[68 ]. Thus, the mechanisms through which KDM1A inactivation results
in the GIPR overexpression in the adrenal cortex could be more complex.
Besides GIPR , we have demonstrated that LHCGR , encoding the LH and hCG
receptor, was the second most overexpressed illegitimate receptor in tumor samples
from KDM1A mutated patients, compared to G1 et G3 samples [3 ], this overexpression was also observed
in H295R cells after KDM1A silencing [4 ]. A cortisol aberrant response mediated by GIPR and LHCGR
concomitantly, had been previously reported in two unrelated PBMAH female patients
[69 ], and one of our patients had a
clear response to both mixed meal and GnRH, but none of the studied patients were
known to have clinical signs of Cushing’s syndrome during pregnancy or after
menopause. Larose et al., in 2019, also reported a patient with aberrant regulation
of cortisol secretion by both GIP and LH [55 ].
Before the identification of KDM1A in FDCS, KDM1A germline variants had
been reported in patients with multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of
uncertain significance (MGUS, a premalignant condition predisposing to multiple
myeloma) [70 ]. One of our KDM1A
patients had a MGUS, and one other had a familial history of multiple myeloma in
numerous relatives [3 ]
[4 ]. Besides germline alterations in
multiple myeloma, the overexpression of KDM1A has been demonstrated in
different types of cancers [71 ].
Chasseloup et al. described some other malignancies in KDM1A patients (one
rectal cancer, one bronchial neuroendocrine tumor, and one breast cancer) [4 ], but at this point, no functional data
supports the involvement of KDM1A in the occurrence of these cancers.
Based on these data, the germline KDM1A sequencing should be proposed to every
patient with PBMAH with arguments for an FDCS, such as low fasting cortisol or
cortisol response to oral glucose load or mixed meal, as well as to every
first-degree relative of KDM1A pathogenic variant carrier [42 ]
[46 ]. Considering its association with multiple myeloma, KDM1A
patients should also be monitored regularly for this disease, notably by serum
protein electrophoresis. Subject to further investigations, KDM1A
inactivation may be seen as the cause of a new syndromic disease rather than a
predisposition to isolated food-dependent PBMAH.
The aberrant expression of GIPR has also been reported in around 30% of somatotroph
pituitary adenomas, resulting in a paradoxical increase of GH after oral glucose
load [72 ]
[73 ]
[74 ]
[75 ]. Chasseloup et al.
recently sequenced KDM1A and other members of the large histone demethylases
family in somatic DNA from 146 somatotropinomas. They did not identify any
pathogenic variant. However, they observed recurrent 1p LOH and monoallelic
KDM1A expression in the somatic DNA from 27.9% of adenomas, with a more
frequent increase in GIPR expression in these adenomas, but this was neither
constant nor exclusive, including with regard to the paradoxical response to oral
glucose load. They concluded that KDM1A is not the molecular cause of GIPR
expression in somatotropinomas [76 ].
Perspectives
In 2021, the identification of germline KDM1A mutations marked a turning point
in the 35-year history of food-dependent Cushing’s syndrome [3 ]
[4 ], reinforcing the idea that PBMAH is a genetic disease [77 ], and leading to significant changes in
clinical practice [42 ]
[46 ]. Routine germline KDM1A testing
can now be proposed to PBMAH patients with evidence for FDCS and to all first-degree
relatives of KDM1A pathogenic variant carriers. Clinicians should also be
aware of the risk of associated MGUS or multiple myeloma and screen their patients
accordingly. It also proves that in vivo screening of aberrant GIPR
expression, which could have been regarded as outdated in recent years, is actually
essential to screen for FDCS and KDM1A alterations in patients with
PBMAH.
These original findings broadened our knowledge on PBMAH and adrenal physiology in
general, but they also have raised a number of unsolved questions: how to explain
the large female predominance of FDCS? Do male variant carriers have an attenuated
adrenal phenotype or no phenotype at all, and for what reasons? Considering the
critical role of KDM1A in human embryonic stem cells and its ubiquitous
expression [78 ]
[79 ], why does its constitutive
inactivation seem to only affect adrenals and plasma cells? Hence, KDM1A
identification not only has clinical consequences, but also several exhilarating
scientific implications with numerous interrogations to address.