Time-Varying Association of the Second Internal Thoracic Artery with Long-Term Survival after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Ibrahim Gadelkarim; Mateo Marin-Cuartas; Sergey Leontyev; Manuela De La Cuesta; Salil V. Deo; Martin Misfeld; Piroze Davierwala; Michael Borger; Alexander Verevkin

doi:10.1055/a-2524-9264

The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, Table of Contents

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2524-9264

Original Cardiovascular

Time-Varying Association of the Second Internal Thoracic Artery with Long-Term Survival after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Ibrahim Gadelkarim^*

¹University Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Leipzig, Sachsen, Leipzig, Germany

,

Mateo Marin-Cuartas ^*

¹University Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Leipzig, Sachsen, Leipzig, Germany

,

Sergey Leontyev

¹University Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Leipzig, Sachsen, Leipzig, Germany

,

Manuela De La Cuesta

¹University Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Leipzig, Sachsen, Leipzig, Germany

,

Salil V. Deo

²Department of Cardiac surgery, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States

,

Martin Misfeld

³The Discipline of Medicine, The Central Clinical School, The Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

,

Piroze Davierwala

⁴Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac surgery, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

,

Michael Borger

¹University Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Leipzig, Sachsen, Leipzig, Germany

,

Alexander Verevkin

¹University Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Leipzig, Sachsen, Leipzig, Germany

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

All articles of this category

Abstract

Background

The survival advantages of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafts in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery remain unclear. Therefore, this study aims to systematically evaluate the time-dependent influence of BITA on long-term survival in elective CABG patients presenting with stable multivessel coronary artery disease.

Methods

Data from 3,693 patients undergoing isolated CABG with single internal thoracic artery (SITA) or BITA, with or without additional vein grafts, between 2002 and 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The entire cohort was divided into BITA and SITA groups (830 vs. 2,863 patients). A 1:3 propensity score matching was performed. Subsequent analysis of a subgroup meeting Randomized comparison of the clinical Outcome of single versus Multiple Arterial grafts (ROMA) trial criteria (n = 1,339) followed a 1:1 matching. Differences in restricted mean survival time (RMST) estimates were used to assess the time-varying association of BITA with long-term survival.

Results

In-hospital mortality (SITA 1.8% vs. BITA 1.1%, p = 0.2) and major postoperative complications were similar between the matched groups. However, long-term survival was significantly higher in BITA patients for the matched whole cohort (15-year survival: 64 vs. 51%, respectively; p < 0.001) and the ROMA-like population (76 vs. 60%, respectively; p < 0.001). RMST demonstrated an incremental survival advantage of BITA over SITA grafting over time for both the whole and ROMA-like populations (0.1, 0.5, and 1.1 years, and 0.1, 0.4, and 1.0 years at 5-, 10-, and 15-year follow-up, respectively)

Conclusion

BITA grafting is safe and associated with superior long-term survival compared with SITA and vein grafts, with benefits extending beyond 5 years for the entire cohort and beyond 10 years for ROMA criteria patients.

Keywords

bilateral internal thoracic arteries - coronary artery bypass surgery - survival

Full Text

References

References
1 Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM. et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986; 314 (01) 1-6
2 Benedetto U, Amrani M, Gaer J. et al; Harefield Cardiac Outcomes Research Group. The influence of bilateral internal mammary arteries on short- and long-term outcomes: a propensity score matching in accordance with current recommendations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148 (06) 2699-2705
3 Grau JB, Johnson CK, Kuschner CE. et al. Impact of pump status and conduit choice in coronary artery bypass: a 15-year follow-up study in 1412 propensity-matched patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 149 (04) 1027-33.e2
4 Kurlansky PA, Traad EA, Dorman MJ, Galbut DL, Zucker M, Ebra G. Thirty-year follow-up defines survival benefit for second internal mammary artery in propensity-matched groups. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 90 (01) 101-108
5 Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Sabik JF, Houghtaling P, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting on survival during 20 postoperative years. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78 (06) 2005-2012 , discussion 2012–2014
6 Weiss AJ, Zhao S, Tian DH, Taggart DP, Yan TD. A meta-analysis comparing bilateral internal mammary artery with left internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 2 (04) 390-400
7 Buttar SN, Yan TD, Taggart DP, Tian DH. Long-term and short-term outcomes of using bilateral internal mammary artery grafting versus left internal mammary artery grafting: a meta-analysis. Heart 2017; 103 (18) 1419-1426
8 Taggart DP, D'Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet 2001; 358 (9285): 870-875
9 Taggart DP, Benedetto U, Gerry S. et al; Arterial Revascularization Trial Investigators. Bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafts at 10 years. N Engl J Med 2019; 380 (05) 437-446
10 Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM. et al; ART Investigators. Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). Eur Heart J 2010; 31 (20) 2470-2481
11 Gaudino M, Alexander JH, Bakaeen FG. et al. Randomized comparison of the clinical outcome of single versus multiple arterial grafts: the ROMA trial-rationale and study protocol. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 52 (06) 1031-1040
12 Pevni D, Mohr R, Kramer A, Paz Y, Nesher N, Ben-Gal Y. Are two internal thoracic grafts better than one? An analysis of 5301 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 56 (05) 935-941
13 Carrier M, Cossette M, Pellerin M. et al. Statin treatment equalizes long-term survival between patients with single and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88 (03) 789-795 , discussion 795
14 Iqbal J, Zhang Y-J, Holmes DR. et al. Optimal medical therapy improves clinical outcomes in patients undergoing revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting: insights from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial at the 5-year follow-up. Circulation 2015; 131 (14) 1269-1277
15 Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, May S. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data. 2nd. ed.. Hoboken, New Jersey, United States: Wiley-Interscience; 2008
16 Royston P, Parmar MKB. Restricted mean survival time: an alternative to the hazard ratio for the design and analysis of randomized trials with a time-to-event outcome. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13: 152-167
17 Sareh S, Hadaya J, Sanaiha Y. et al. Predictors and in-hospital outcomes among patients using a single versus bilateral mammary arteries in coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 2020; 134: 41-47
18 Benedetto U, Altman DG, Gerry S. et al; Arterial Revascularization Trial investigators. Pedicled and skeletonized single and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts and the incidence of sternal wound complications: insights from the Arterial Revascularization Trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 152 (01) 270-276
19 Gaudino M, Bakaeen F, Benedetto U. et al. Use rate and outcome in bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2018; 7 (11) e009361
20 Yi G, Shine B, Rehman SM, Altman DG, Taggart DP. Effect of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts on long-term survival: a meta-analysis approach. Circulation 2014; 130 (07) 539-545
21 Puskas JD, Sadiq A, Vassiliades TA, Kilgo PD, Lattouf OM. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting is associated with significantly improved long-term survival, even among diabetic patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 94 (03) 710-715 , discussion 715–716
22 Hirotani T, Nakamichi T, Munakata M, Takeuchi S. Risks and benefits of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in diabetic patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76 (06) 2017-2022
23 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: General Information and National Estimates on Diabetes in the United States, 2005. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2005. . Accessed May 29, 2008 at: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs_2005.pdf
24 Deshpande AD, Harris-Hayes M, Schootman M. Epidemiology of diabetes and diabetes-related complications. Phys Ther 2008; 88 (11) 1254-1264
25 Kurlansky PA, Traad EA, Dorman MJ, Galbut DL, Zucker M, Ebra G. Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting reverses the negative influence of gender on outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 44 (01) 54-63
26 Kurlansky PA, Traad EA, Galbut DL, Zucker M, Ebra G. Efficacy of single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafting in women: a long-term study. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71 (06) 1949-1957 , discussion 1957–1958
27 Pevni D, Kramer A, Farkash A, Ben-Gal Y. Is gender a risk factor for bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting? A twenty-year follow-up. J Card Surg 2021; 36 (02) 551-557
28 Swaminathan RV, Feldman DN, Pashun RA. et al. Gender differences in in-hospital outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 2016; 118 (03) 362-368
29 Alam M, Lee VV, Elayda MA. et al. Association of gender with morbidity and mortality after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. A propensity score matched analysis. Int J Cardiol 2013; 167 (01) 180-184
30 Fiore AC, Naunheim KS, Dean P. et al. Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: single versus double grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 49 (02) 202-208 , discussion 208–209
31 Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S. et al; RADIAL Investigators. Association of radial artery graft vs saphenous vein graft with long-term cardiovascular outcomes among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2020; 324 (02) 179-187
32 Ura M, Sakata R, Nakayama Y, Arai Y, Oshima S, Noda K. Analysis by early angiography of right internal thoracic artery grafting via the transverse sinus : predictors of graft failure. Circulation 2000; 101 (06) 640-646
33 Bonacchi M, Prifti E, Battaglia F, Frati G, Sani G, Popoff G. In situ retrocaval skeletonized right internal thoracic artery anastomosed to the circumflex system via transverse sinus: technical aspects and postoperative outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126 (05) 1302-1313
34 Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA. The right internal thoracic artery: the forgotten conduit–5,766 patients and 991 angiograms. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92 (01) 9-15 , discussion 15–17
35 Buxton BF, Ruengsakulrach P, Fuller J, Rosalion A, Reid CM, Tatoulis J. The right internal thoracic artery graft–benefits of grafting the left coronary system and native vessels with a high grade stenosis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000; 18 (03) 255-261
36 Sabik JF, Stockins A, Nowicki ER. et al. Does location of the second internal thoracic artery graft influence outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting?. Circulation 2008; 118 (Suppl): 210-215
37 Kurlansky PA, Traad EA, Dorman MJ, Galbut DL, Zucker M, Ebra G. Location of the second internal mammary artery graft does not influence outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91 (05) 1378-1383 , discussion 1383–1384

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material